Download PDF
J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 2016; 77(06): 515-522
DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1583940
Original Article
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Complex Spine Pathology Simulator: An Innovative Tool for Advanced Spine Surgery Training

Cristian Gragnaniello
1   Department of Neurosurgery, George Washington University, Washington, District of Columbia, United States
,
Amal Abou-Hamden
2   Department of Neurosurgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
,
Pietro Mortini
3   Department of Neurosurgery, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy
,
Elena V. Colombo
3   Department of Neurosurgery, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy
,
Michele Bailo
3   Department of Neurosurgery, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy
,
Kevin A. Seex
4   Department of Neurosurgery, Australian School of Advanced Medicine, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
,
Zachary Litvack
1   Department of Neurosurgery, George Washington University, Washington, District of Columbia, United States
,
Anthony J. Caputy
1   Department of Neurosurgery, George Washington University, Washington, District of Columbia, United States
,
Filippo Gagliardi
3   Department of Neurosurgery, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

04 September 2015

17 March 2016

Publication Date:
01 July 2016 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background Technical advancements in spine surgery have made possible the treatment of increasingly complex pathologies with less morbidity. Time constraints in surgeons' training have made it necessary to develop new training models for spine pathology.

Objective To describe the application of a novel compound, Stratathane resin ST-504 derived polymer (SRSDP), that can be injected at different spinal target locations to mimic spinal epidural, subdural extra-axial, and intra-axial pathologies for the use in advanced surgical training.

Material and Methods Fresh-frozen thoracolumbar and cervical spine segments of human and sheep cadavers were used to study the model. SRSDP is initially liquid after mixing, allowing it to be injected into target areas where it expands and solidifies, mimicking the entire spectrum of spinal pathologies.

Results Different polymer concentrations have been codified to vary adhesiveness, texture, spread capability, deformability, and radiologic visibility. Polymer injection was performed under fluoroscopic guidance through pathology-specific injection sites that avoided compromising the surgical approach for subsequent excision of the artificial lesion. Inflation of a balloon catheter of the desired size was used to displace stiff cadaveric neurovascular structures to mimic pathology-related mass effect.

Conclusion The traditional cadaveric training models principally only allow surgeons to practice the surgical approach. The complex spine pathology simulator is a novel educational tool that in a user-friendly, low-cost fashion allows trainees to practice advanced technical skills in the removal of complex spine pathology, potentially shortening some of the aspects of the learning curve of operative skills that may otherwise take many years to acquire.

Keywords

spine pathology - training model - simulation - spine surgery
 

  • References

  • 1 Cohen-Gadol AA, Piepgras DG, Krishnamurthy S, Fessler RD. Resident duty hours reform: results of a national survey of the program directors and residents in neurosurgery training programs. Neurosurgery 2005; 56 (2) 398-403 ; discussion 398–403
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Fargen KM, Chakraborty A, Friedman WA. Results of a national neurosurgery resident survey on duty hour regulations. Neurosurgery 2011; 69 (6) 1162-1170
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Jagannathan J, Vates GE, Pouratian N , et al. Impact of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education work-hour regulations on neurosurgical resident education and productivity. J Neurosurg 2009; 110 (5) 820-827
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Philibert I, Friedmann P, Williams WT ; ACGME Work Group on Resident Duty Hours. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. New requirements for resident duty hours. JAMA 2002; 288 (9) 1112-1114
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Batjer HH, Aoun SG, Rahme RJ, Bendok BR. Honoring our public responsibility: creating milestone and matrix-based training in an era of duty hour restrictions. Clin Neurosurg 2012; 59: 70-74
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Ganju A, Aoun SG, Daou MR , et al. The role of simulation in neurosurgical education: a survey of 99 United States neurosurgery program directors. World Neurosurg 2013; 80 (5) e1-e8
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Popp AJ. Navigating the Strait of Magellan: mapping a new paradigm for neurosurgical residency training. Presidential address to the Society of Neurological Surgeons, May 7, 2007. J Neurosurg 2008; 109 (4) 576-582
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Aboud E, Al-Mefty O, Yaşargil MG. New laboratory model for neurosurgical training that simulates live surgery. J Neurosurg 2002; 97 (6) 1367-1372
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Buis DR, Buis CR, Feller RE, Mandl ES, Peerdeman SM. A basic model for practice of intracranial microsurgery. Surg Neurol 2009; 71 (2) 254-256
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Hicdonmez T, Hamamcioglu MK, Parsak T, Cukur Z, Cobanoglu S. A laboratory training model for interhemispheric-transcallosal approach to the lateral ventricle. Neurosurg Rev 2006; 29 (2) 159-162
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Krisht AF, Yoo K, Arnautovic KI, Al-Mefty O. Cavernous sinus tumor model in the canine: a simulation model for cavernous sinus tumor surgery. Neurosurgery 2005; 56 (6) 1361-1365 ; discussion 1365–1366
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Lannon DA, Atkins JA, Butler PE. Non-vital, prosthetic, and virtual reality models of microsurgical training. Microsurgery 2001; 21 (8) 389-393
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Takeuchi M, Hayashi N, Hamada H, Matsumura N, Nishijo H, Endo S. A new training method to improve deep microsurgical skills using a mannequin head. Microsurgery 2008; 28 (3) 168-170
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Gasco J, Holbrook TJ, Patel A , et al. Neurosurgery simulation in residency training: feasibility, cost, and educational benefit. Neurosurgery 2013; 73 (Suppl. 01) 39-45
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Selden NR, Barbaro N, Origitano TC, Burchiel KJ. Fundamental skills for entering neurosurgery residents: report of a Pacific region “boot camp” pilot course, 2009. Neurosurgery 2011; 68 (3) 759-764 ; discussion 764
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Selden NR, Origitano TC, Burchiel KJ , et al. A national fundamentals curriculum for neurosurgery PGY1 residents: the 2010 Society of Neurological Surgeons boot camp courses. Neurosurgery 2012; 70 (4) 971-981 ; discussion 981
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Selden NR, Origitano TC, Hadjipanayis C, Byrne R. Model-based simulation for early neurosurgical learners. Neurosurgery 2013; 73 (Suppl. 01) 15-24
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Alaraj A, Charbel FT, Birk D , et al. Role of cranial and spinal virtual and augmented reality simulation using immersive touch modules in neurosurgical training. Neurosurgery 2013; 72 (Suppl. 01) 115-123
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Alaraj A, Lemole MG, Finkle JH , et al. Virtual reality training in neurosurgery: Review of current status and future applications. Surg Neurol Int 2011; 2: 52
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Chan S, Conti F, Salisbury K, Blevins NH. Virtual reality simulation in neurosurgery: technologies and evolution. Neurosurgery 2013; 72 (Suppl. 01) 154-164
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Chitale R, Ghobrial GM, Lobel D, Harrop J. Simulated lumbar minimally invasive surgery educational model with didactic and technical components. Neurosurgery 2013; 73 (Suppl. 01) 107-110
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Choudhury N, Gélinas-Phaneuf N, Delorme S, Del Maestro R. Fundamentals of neurosurgery: virtual reality tasks for training and evaluation of technical skills. World Neurosurg 2013; 80 (5) e9-e19
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Delorme S, Laroche D, DiRaddo R, Del Maestro RF. NeuroTouch: a physics-based virtual simulator for cranial microneurosurgery training. Neurosurgery 2012; 71 (1, Suppl Operative ): 32-42
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 El Ahmadieh TY, Aoun SG, El Tecle NE , et al. A didactic and hands-on module enhances resident microsurgical knowledge and technical skill. Neurosurgery 2013; 73 (Suppl. 01) 51-56
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Fargen KM, Arthur AS, Bendok BR , et al. Experience with a simulator-based angiography course for neurosurgical residents: beyond a pilot program. Neurosurgery 2013; 73 (Suppl. 01) 46-50
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Fargen KM, Siddiqui AH, Veznedaroglu E, Turner RD, Ringer AJ, Mocco J. Simulator based angiography education in neurosurgery: results of a pilot educational program. J Neurointerv Surg 2012; 4 (6) 438-441
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Gélinas-Phaneuf N, Choudhury N, Al-Habib AR , et al. Assessing performance in brain tumor resection using a novel virtual reality simulator. Int J CARS 2014; 9 (1) 1-9
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Ghobrial GM, Anderson PA, Chitale R, Campbell PG, Lobel DA, Harrop J. Simulated spinal cerebrospinal fluid leak repair: an educational model with didactic and technical components. Neurosurgery 2013; 73 (Suppl. 01) 111-115
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Lemole Jr GM, Banerjee PP, Luciano C, Neckrysh S, Charbel FT. Virtual reality in neurosurgical education: part-task ventriculostomy simulation with dynamic visual and haptic feedback. Neurosurgery 2007; 61 (1) 142-148 ; discussion 148–149
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Lobel DA, Elder JB, Schirmer CM, Bowyer MW, Rezai AR. A novel craniotomy simulator provides a validated method to enhance education in the management of traumatic brain injury. Neurosurgery 2013; 73 (Suppl. 01) 57-65
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Luciano CJ, Banerjee PP, Bellotte B , et al. Learning retention of thoracic pedicle screw placement using a high-resolution augmented reality simulator with haptic feedback. Neurosurgery 2011; 69 (1, Suppl Operative ): ons14 –ons19; discussion ons19
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Luciano CJ, Banerjee PP, Sorenson JM , et al. Percutaneous spinal fixation simulation with virtual reality and haptics. Neurosurgery 2013; 72 (Suppl. 01) 89-96
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Malone HR, Syed ON, Downes MS, D'Ambrosio AL, Quest DO, Kaiser MG. Simulation in neurosurgery: a review of computer-based simulation environments and their surgical applications. Neurosurgery 2010; 67 (4) 1105-1116
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Ray WZ, Ganju A, Harrop JS, Hoh DJ. Developing an anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion simulator for neurosurgical resident training. Neurosurgery 2013; 73 (Suppl. 01) 100-106
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Roitberg B, Banerjee P, Luciano C , et al. Sensory and motor skill testing in neurosurgery applicants: a pilot study using a virtual reality haptic neurosurgical simulator. Neurosurgery 2013; 73 (Suppl. 01) 116-121
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Schirmer CM, Mocco J, Elder JB. Evolving virtual reality simulation in neurosurgery. Neurosurgery 2013; 73 (Suppl. 01) 127-137
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Schirmer CM, Elder JB, Roitberg B, Lobel DA. Virtual reality-based simulation training for ventriculostomy: an evidence-based approach. Neurosurgery 2013; 73 (Suppl. 01) 66-73
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Spiotta AM, Rasmussen PA, Masaryk TJ, Benzel EC, Schlenk R. Simulated diagnostic cerebral angiography in neurosurgical training: a pilot program. J Neurointerv Surg 2013; 5 (4) 376-381
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Duckworth EA, Silva FE, Chandler JP, Batjer HH, Zhao JC. Temporal bone dissection for neurosurgery residents: identifying the essential concepts and fundamental techniques for success. Surg Neurol 2008; 69 (1) 93-98 ; discussion 98
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Ebner FH, Dimostheni A, Tatagiba MS, Roser F. Step-by-step education of the retrosigmoid approach leads to low approach-related morbidity through young residents. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2010; 152 (6) 985-988 ; discussion 988
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Frati P, Frati A, Salvati M , et al. Neuroanatomy and cadaver dissection in Italy: History, medicolegal issues, and neurosurgical perspectives. J Neurosurg 2006; 105 (5) 789-796
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Hayashi N, Kurimoto M, Hamada H, Kurosaki K, Endo S, Cohen AR. Preparation of a simple and efficient laboratory model for training in neuroendoscopic procedures. Childs Nerv Syst 2008; 24 (6) 749-751
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Moon K, Filis AK, Cohen AR. The birth and evolution of neuroscience through cadaveric dissection. Neurosurgery 2010; 67 (3) 799-809 ; discussion 809–810
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Olabe J, Olabe J, Roda JM, Sancho V. Human cadaver brain infusion skull model for neurosurgical training. Surg Neurol Int 2011; 2: 54
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Olabe J, Olabe J, Sancho V. Human cadaver brain infusion model for neurosurgical training. Surg Neurol 2009; 72 (6) 700-702
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Tubbs RS, Loukas M, Shoja MM, Wellons JC, Cohen-Gadol AA. Feasibility of ventricular expansion postmortem: a novel laboratory model for neurosurgical training that simulates intraventricular endoscopic surgery. J Neurosurg 2009; 111 (6) 1165-1167
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Yaşargil MG. From the microsurgical laboratory to the operating theatre. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2005; 147 (5) 465-468
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Kshettry VR, Mullin JP, Schlenk R, Recinos PF, Benzel EC. The role of laboratory dissection training in neurosurgical residency: results of a national survey. World Neurosurg 2014; 82 (5) 554-559
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Gragnaniello C, Nader R, van Doormaal T , et al. Skull base tumor model. J Neurosurg 2010; 113 (5) 1106-1111
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Gragnaniello C, Gagliardi F, Chau AM , et al. Intracranial injectable tumor model: technical advancements. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2014; 75 (5) 301-308
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Suslu H. A practical laboratory study simulating the percutaneous lumbar transforaminal epidural injection: training model in fresh cadaveric sheep spine. Turk Neurosurg 2012; 22 (6) 701-705
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Suslu HT, Tatarli N, Karaaslan A, Demirel N. A practical laboratory study simulating the lumbar microdiscectomy: training model in fresh cadaveric sheep spine. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 2014; 75 (3) 167-169
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Daniels AH, Ames CP, Garfin SR , et al. Spine surgery training: is it time to consider categorical spine surgery residency?. Spine J 2015; 15 (7) 1513-1518
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Waran V, Narayanan V, Karuppiah R, Owen SL, Aziz T. Utility of multimaterial 3D printers in creating models with pathological entities to enhance the training experience of neurosurgeons. J Neurosurg 2014; 120 (2) 489-492
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Harrop J, Rezai AR, Hoh DJ, Ghobrial GM, Sharan A. Neurosurgical training with a novel cervical spine simulator: posterior foraminotomy and laminectomy. Neurosurgery 2013; 73 (Suppl. 01) 94-99
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar