Am J Perinatol 2016; 33(09): 918-924
DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1581056
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Characteristics of Recurrent Large-for-Gestational-Age Infants in Obese Women

Arun P. Jain
1   Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
,
Jeffrey A. Gavard
1   Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
,
Dorothea J. Mostello
1   Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
,
Jim J. Rice
1   Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
,
Rosemary B. Catanzaro
1   Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
,
Sarah A. Hopkins
1   Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

09 November 2015

10 February 2016

Publication Date:
21 April 2016 (online)

Abstract

Objective The objective of this study was to identify characteristics associated with recurrent large-for-gestational-age (LGA) infants in obese women and to explore the relationship between interpregnancy weight change and gestational weight gain (GWG) on risk of recurrence.

Study Design We conducted a population-based historical cohort study of 1,190 obese women in Missouri who delivered LGA infants in their first pregnancy with two consecutive pregnancies resulting in singleton live births during 1998 to 2005. Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) for recurrent LGA infants were calculated with multiple logistic regression. Population-attributable risk assessed the relative importance of specific characteristics.

Results A second LGA infant was delivered by 501 women (42%). Recurrence of LGA infants was associated with GWG (aOR, 1.03 [per pound]; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02–1.04), maternal age (aOR, 1.05 [per year]; 95% CI, 1.02–1.08), birth weight of the first LGA infant (aOR, 1.001 [per gram]; 95% CI, 1.000–1.001), being married (aOR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.02–2.49), diabetes (aOR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.24–2.59), and pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI) (aOR, 1.04 [per unit BMI]; 95% CI, 1.02–1.06). Excessive GWG contributed the most to LGA infant recurrence (13%). Interpregnancy weight change was not significantly associated with LGA infant recurrence.

Conclusion Lower pre-pregnancy BMI and reduced GWG may mitigate the risk of recurrent LGA infants in obese women.

 
  • References

  • 1 Donahue SM, Kleinman KP, Gillman MW, Oken E. Trends in birth weight and gestational length among singleton term births in the United States: 1990-2005. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 115 (2 Pt 1): 357-364
  • 2 Boulet SL, Alexander GR, Salihu HM, Pass M. Macrosomic births in the united states: determinants, outcomes, and proposed grades of risk. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 188 (5) 1372-1378
  • 3 Davis R, Woelk G, Mueller BA, Daling J. The role of previous birthweight on risk for macrosomia in a subsequent birth. Epidemiology 1995; 6 (6) 607-611
  • 4 Mahony R, Foley M, McAuliffe F, O'Herlihy C. Maternal weight characteristics influence recurrence of fetal macrosomia in women with normal glucose tolerance. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2007; 47 (5) 399-401
  • 5 Walsh CA, Mahony RT, Foley ME, Daly L, O'Herlihy C. Recurrence of fetal macrosomia in non-diabetic pregnancies. J Obstet Gynaecol 2007; 27 (4) 374-378
  • 6 Ju H, Chadha Y, Donovan T, O'Rourke P. Fetal macrosomia and pregnancy outcomes. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2009; 49 (5) 504-509
  • 7 Groenendaal F, Elferink-Stinkens PM ; Netherlands Perinatal Registry. Hypoglycaemia and seizures in large-for-gestational-age (LGA) full-term neonates. Acta Paediatr 2006; 95 (7) 874-876
  • 8 Ahlsson FS, Diderholm B, Ewald U, Gustafsson J. Lipolysis and insulin sensitivity at birth in infants who are large for gestational age. Pediatrics 2007; 120 (5) 958-965
  • 9 Darendeliler F, Poyrazoglu S, Sancakli O , et al. Adiponectin is an indicator of insulin resistance in non-obese prepubertal children born large for gestational age (LGA) and is affected by birth weight. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2009; 70 (5) 710-716
  • 10 Chiavaroli V, Giannini C, D'Adamo E, de Giorgis T, Chiarelli F, Mohn A. Insulin resistance and oxidative stress in children born small and large for gestational age. Pediatrics 2009; 124 (2) 695-702
  • 11 Sørensen HT, Sabroe S, Rothman KJ, Gillman M, Fischer P, Sørensen TI. Relation between weight and length at birth and body mass index in young adulthood: cohort study. BMJ 1997; 315 (7116) 1137
  • 12 Ahlsson F, Gustafsson J, Tuvemo T, Lundgren M. Females born large for gestational age have a doubled risk of giving birth to large for gestational age infants. Acta Paediatr 2007; 96 (3) 358-362
  • 13 Cnattingius S, Villamor E, Lagerros YT, Wikström AK, Granath F. High birth weight and obesity—a vicious circle across generations. Int J Obes 2012; 36 (10) 1320-1324
  • 14 Ehrenberg HM, Mercer BM, Catalano PM. The influence of obesity and diabetes on the prevalence of macrosomia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 191 (3) 964-968
  • 15 Ray JG, Vermeulen MJ, Shapiro JL, Kenshole AB ; Diabetes Endocrine Pregnancy Outcome Study in Toronto. Maternal and neonatal outcomes in pregestational and gestational diabetes mellitus, and the influence of maternal obesity and weight gain: the DEPOSIT study. QJM 2001; 94 (7) 347-356
  • 16 Okun N, Verma A, Mitchell BF, Flowerdew G. Relative importance of maternal constitutional factors and glucose intolerance of pregnancy in the development of newborn macrosomia. J Matern Fetal Med 1997; 6 (5) 285-290
  • 17 Jain AP, Gavard JA, Rice JJ, Catanzaro RB, Artal R, Hopkins SA. The impact of interpregnancy weight change on birthweight in obese women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013; 208 (3) 205.e1-205.e7
  • 18 Reinhold C, Dalenius K, Brindley P, Smith B, Grummer-Strawn L. Pregnancy Nutrition Surveillance 2009 Report. Atlanta: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Center for Disease Control and Prevention; 2011
  • 19 Herman AA, McCarthy BJ, Bakewell JM , et al. Data linkage methods used in maternally-linked birth and infant death surveillance data sets from the United States (Georgia, Missouri, Utah and Washington State), Israel, Norway, Scotland and Western Australia. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 1997; 11 (Suppl. 01) 5-22
  • 20 Martin J, Curtin S, Saulnier M , et al. Development of the matched multiple birth file: 1995–1998 (Matched Multiple Birth File CD-ROM series 21, no. 13a). Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 2003
  • 21 Oken E, Kleinman KP, Rich-Edwards J, Gillman MW. A nearly continuous measure of birth weight for gestational age using a United States national reference. BMC Pediatr 2003; 3: 6
  • 22 Callaghan WM, Dietz PM. Differences in birth weight for gestational age distributions according to the measures used to assign gestational age. Am J Epidemiol 2010; 171 (7) 826-836
  • 23 Ahlsson F, Diderholm B, Jonsson B , et al. Insulin resistance, a link between maternal overweight and fetal macrosomia in nondiabetic pregnancies. Horm Res Paediatr 2010; 74 (4) 267-274
  • 24 Buescher PA, Taylor KP, Davis MH, Bowling JM. The quality of the new birth certificate data: a validation study in North Carolina. Am J Public Health 1993; 83 (8) 1163-1165
  • 25 Fattah C, Farah N, O'Toole F, Barry S, Stuart B, Turner MJ. Body Mass Index (BMI) in women booking for antenatal care: comparison between self-reported and digital measurements. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2009; 144 (1) 32-34
  • 26 Schieve LA, Perry GS, Cogswell ME , et al; NMIHS Collaborative Working Group. Validity of self-reported pregnancy delivery weight: an analysis of the 1988 National Maternal and Infant Health Survey. Am J Epidemiol 1999; 150 (9) 947-956
  • 27 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Committee opinion no. 548: weight gain during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2013; 121 (1) 210-212