Download PDF
Semin Speech Lang 2016; 37(01): 023-033
DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1571356
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Verb Production in Aphasia: Testing the Division of Labor between Syntax and Semantics

Julia Thorne
1   Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland
,
Yasmeen Faroqi-Shah
1   Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
16 February 2016 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Some individuals with aphasia preferably use semantically general light verbs, whereas others prefer semantically specific heavy verbs. This study aimed to test Gordon and Dell's “division of labor” hypothesis that light versus heavy verb usage depends on syntactic and semantic processes, respectively. In a retrospective analysis of data from the AphasiaBank corpus, narrative language of neurologically healthy individuals and individuals with aphasia was analyzed for the proportion of light verbs used, and its relationship with narrative measures of syntactic and semantic sophistication and verb naming scores was examined. In individuals with aphasia, light verb usage was positively correlated with a syntactic measure (developmental sentence score) and negatively associated with two semantic measures (idea density and verb naming). For healthy individuals, the number of verbs per utterance, which is a measure of syntactic complexity, predicted light verb use. These findings suggest that light verb usage in aphasia observes an inverse relationship with syntactic and semantic abilities, supporting the division of labor hypothesis.

Keywords

Aphasia - light verbs - narratives - verb complexity
 

  • References

  • 1 Daniele A, Giustolisi L, Silveri MC, Colosimo C, Gainotti G. Evidence for a possible neuroanatomical basis for lexical processing of nouns and verbs. Neuropsychologia 1994; 32 (11) 1325-134
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Bak TH, O'Donovan DG, Xuereb JH, Boniface S, Hodges JR. Selective impairment of verb processing associated with pathological changes in Brodmann areas 44 and 45 in the motor neurone disease-dementia-aphasia syndrome. Brain 2001; 124 (Pt 1): 103-120
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Zingeser LB, Berndt RS. Retrieval of nouns and verbs in agrammatism and anomia. Brain Lang 1990; 39 (1) 14-32
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Mätzig S, Druks J, Masterson J, Vigliocco G. Noun and verb differences in picture naming: past studies and new evidence. Cortex 2009; 45 (6) 738-758
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Caramazza A, Hillis AE. Lexical organization of nouns and verbs in the brain. Nature 1991; 349 (6312) 788-790
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Damasio AR, Tranel D. Nouns and verbs are retrieved with differently distributed neural systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1993; 90 (11) 4957-4960
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 McCarthy RA, Warrington EK. Evidence for modality-specific meaning systems in the brain. Nature 1988; 334 (6181) 428-430
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Berndt RS, Mitchum CC, Wayland S. Patterns of sentence comprehension in aphasia: a consideration of three hypotheses. Brain Lang 1997; 60 (2) 197-221
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Aggujaro S, Crepaldi D, Pistarini C, Taricco M, Luzzatti C. Neuro-anatomical correlates of impaired retrieval of verbs and nouns: interaction of grammatical class, imageability and actionality. J Neurolinguist 2006; 19 (3) 175-194
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Fillenbaum S, Jones L, Wepman J. Some linguistic features of speech from aphasic patients. Lang Speech 1961; 4: 91-108
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Myerson R, Goodglass H. Transformational grammars of three agrammatic patients. Lang Speech 1972; 15 (1) 40-50
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Saffran EM, Berndt RS, Schwartz MF. The quantitative analysis of agrammatic production: procedure and data. Brain Lang 1989; 37 (3) 440-479
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Goodglass H. Agrammatism in aphasiology. Clin Neurosci 1997; 4 (2) 51-56
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Edwards S, Bastiaanse R. Diversity in the lexical and syntactic abilities of fluent aphasic speakers. Aphasiology 1998; 12 (2) 99-117
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Bastiaanse R, Jonkers R. Verb retrieval in action naming and spontaneous speech in agrammatic and anomic aphasia. Aphasiology 1998; 12 (11) 951-969
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Bird H, Howard D, Franklin S. Why is a verb like an inanimate object? Grammatical category and semantic category deficits. Brain Lang 2000; 72 (3) 246-309
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Jonkers R, Bastiaanse R. The influence of instrumentality and name-relation to a noun on verb comprehension in Dutch aphasic speakers. Aphasiology 2006; 20 (1) 3-16
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Kim M, Thompson CK. Verb retrieval in agrammatism. Brain Lang 2000; 74: 1-25
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Kim M, Thompson CK. Verb deficits in Alzheimer's disease and agrammatism: implications for lexical organization. Brain Lang 2004; 88 (1) 1-20
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Stavrakaki S, Alexiadou A, Kambanaros M, Bostantjopoulou S, Katsarou Z. The production and comprehension of verbs with alternating transitivity by patients with non-fluent aphasia. Aphasiology 2011; 25 (5) 642-668
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Grimshaw J. Argument Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1990
    Google Scholar
  • 22 Bastiaanse R, Hugen J, Kos M, van Zonneveld R. Lexical, morphological, and syntactic aspects of verb production in agrammatic aphasics. Brain Lang 2002; 80 (2) 142-159
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Thompson CK, Tait ME, Ballard KJ, Fix SC. Agrammatic aphasic subjects' comprehension of subject and object extracted Wh questions. Brain Lang 1999; 67 (3) 169-187
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Macwhinney B, Fromm D, Forbes M, Holland A. AphasiaBank: methods for studying discourse. Aphasiology 2011; 25 (11) 1286-1307
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 den Ouden D, Malyutina S, Richardson JD. Verb Argument Structure in Narrative Speech: Mining the AphasiaBank. Tuscon, AZ: Academy of Aphasia; 2015
    Google Scholar
  • 26 Pinker S. Learnability and Cognition: The Acquisition of Argument Structure. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press; 1989
    Google Scholar
  • 27 Clark EV. Discovering what words can do. In: Farkas D, Jacobsen WM, Todrys KW, eds. Paper presented at: Paracession on the Lexicon, Chicago Linguistics Society; April 14–15, 1978; Chicago, IL
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Ninio A. Model learning in syntactic development: intransitive verbs. Int J Biling 1999; 3: 111-131
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Hollebrandse B, van Hout A. Aspectual bootstrapping via light verbs. In: Weissenborn J, Dittmar N, Penner Z, eds. Issues in the Theory of Language Acquisition: Essays in Honor of Jürgen Weissenborn:. Bern, Switzerland: P. Lang; 1998
    Google Scholar
  • 30 Maouene J, Laakso A, Smith LB. Object associations of early-learned light and heavy English verbs. First Lang 2011; 31 (1) 109-132
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Gordon JK, Dell GS. Learning to divide the labor: an account of deficits in light and heavy verb production. Cogn Sci 2003; 27 (1) 1-40
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Breedin SD, Saffran EM, Schwartz MF. Semantic factors in verb retrieval: an effect of complexity. Brain Lang 1998; 63 (1) 1-31
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Barde LHF, Schwartz MF, Boronat CB. Semantic weight and verb retrieval in aphasia. Brain and Language 2006; 97 (3) 266-278
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Hoffman P, Rogers TT, Ralph MA. Semantic diversity accounts for the “missing” word frequency effect in stroke aphasia: insights using a novel method to quantify contextual variability in meaning. J Cogn Neurosci 2011; 23 (9) 2432-2446
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Mirman D, Britt AE. What we talk about when we talk about access deficits. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2013; 369 (1634) 20120388
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Templin MC. Certain Language Skills in Children: Their Development and Interrelationships. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press; 1957
    Google Scholar
  • 37 Lee L. Developmental Sentence Analysis: A Grammatical Assessment Procedure for Speech and Language Clinicians. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press; 1974
    Google Scholar
  • 38 Malvern D, Richards BJ. A new measure of lexical diversity. In: Ryan, Wray A, eds. Evolving Models of Language. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters; 1997: 58-71
    Google Scholar
  • 39 Turner A, Greene E . (1977). The Construction and Use of a Propositional Text Base. Boulder, CO: Institute for the Study of Intellectual Behavior, University of Colorado; 1977
    Google Scholar
  • 40 MacWhinney B, Fromm D, Holland A, Forbes M, Wright H. Automated analysis of the Cinderella story. Aphasiology 2010; 24 (6–8) 856-868
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 McCarthy PM, Jarvis S. Voc-D: a theoretical and empirical evaluation. Lang Test 2007; 24 (4) 459-488
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Berndt RS, Haendiges AN, Mitchum CC, Sandson J. Verb retrieval in aphasia. 2. Relationship to sentence processing. Brain Lang 1997; 56 (1) 107-137
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Kemper S, Greiner LH, Marquis JG, Prenovost K, Mitzner TL. Language decline across the life span: findings from the Nun Study. Psychol Aging 2001; 16 (2) 227-239
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Snowdon DA, Greiner LH, Markesbery WR. Linguistic ability in early life and the neuropathology of Alzheimer's disease and cerebrovascular disease. Findings from the Nun Study. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2000; 903: 34-38
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Kertesz A. Western Aphasia Battery-Revised. San Antonio, TX: Pearson; 2006
    Google Scholar
  • 46 Goodglass H, Kaplan E, Barresi B. Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination, 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2001
    Google Scholar
  • 47 Cho-Reyes S, Thompson CK. Verb and sentence production and comprehension in aphasia: Northwestern Assessment of Verbs and Sentences (NAVS). Aphasiology 2012; 26 (10) 1250-1277
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Fergadiotis G, Wright HH. Lexical diversity for adults with and without aphasia across discourse elicitation tasks. Aphasiology 2011; 25 (11) 1414-1430
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 MacWhinney B. The CHILDES Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk, Vol. 1: Transcription Format and Programs. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum; 2000
    Google Scholar
  • 50 Wilson MD. The MRC psycholinguistic database: machine readable dictionary, version 2. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 1988; 20 (1) 6-11
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Davis M. The Corpus of Contemporary American English: 450 million words, 1990 present. Retrieved in 2008 from http://corpus.byu.edu/coca/
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Grodzinsky Y. Language deficits and the theory of syntax. Brain Lang 1986; 27 (1) 135-159
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Goodglass H, Christiansen JA, Gallagher R. Comparison of morphology and syntax in free narrative and structured tests: fluent vs. nonfluent aphasics. Cortex 1993; 29 (3) 377-407
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Brown C, Snodgrass T, Kemper SJ, Herman R, Covington MA. Automatic measurement of propositional idea density from part-of-speech tagging. Behav Res Methods 2008; 40 (2) 540-545
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Bird H, Lambon Ralph MA, Patterson K, Hodges JR. The rise and fall of frequency and imageability: noun and verb production in semantic dementia. Brain Lang 2000; 73 (1) 17-49
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Arévalo A, Perani D, Cappa SF, Butler A, Bates E, Dronkers N. Action and object processing in aphasia: from nouns and verbs to the effect of manipulability. Brain Lang 2007; 100 (1) 79-94
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 Vinson DP, Vigliocco G. A semantic analysis of grammatical class impairments: semantic representations of object nouns, action nouns and action verbs. J Neurolinguist 2002; 15 (3–5) 317-351
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 58 Williams SE, Canter GJ. The influence of situational context on naming performance in aphasic syndromes. Brain Lang 1982; 17 (1) 92-106
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 59 Pashek GV, Tompkins CA. Context and word class influences on lexical retrieval in aphasia. Aphasiology 2002; 16 (3) 261-286
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 60 Mayer J, Murray L. Functional measures of naming in aphasia: word retrieval in confrontation naming versus connected speech. Aphasiology 2003; 17 (5) 481-497
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 61 Scarborough HS. Index of productive syntax. Appl Psycholinguist 1990; 11: 1-20
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 62 Edmonds LA, Babb M. Effect of verb network strengthening treatment in moderate-to-severe aphasia. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 2011; 20 (2) 131-145
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar