J Knee Surg 2016; 29(06): 482-486
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1567872
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Are Locked Plates Needed for Split Depression Tibial Plateau Fractures?

Michelle Abghari
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York
2   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Jamaica Hospital Medical Center, Queens, New York
,
Alejandro Marcano
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York
2   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Jamaica Hospital Medical Center, Queens, New York
,
Roy Davidovitch
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York
2   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Jamaica Hospital Medical Center, Queens, New York
,
Sanjit R. Konda
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York
2   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Jamaica Hospital Medical Center, Queens, New York
,
Kenneth A. Egol
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York
2   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Jamaica Hospital Medical Center, Queens, New York
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

24 November 2014

20 September 2015

Publication Date:
16 November 2015 (online)

Abstract

Displaced tibial plateau fractures often require surgical treatment and plate and screw constructs are the most common method of fixation. There has been increased usage of locking plate technology for both complex and simple fracture patterns without any evidence demonstrating their advantage. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical use of locked versus nonlocked plating for repair of displaced Schatzker type-II (OTA Type 41B) tibial plateau fractures. Seventy-seven consecutive patients treated operatively with one of two types of plate and screw constructs in a nonrandomized fashion for Schatzker type II tibial plateau fractures and they were prospectively followed over a 5-year period. A total of 35 (45.5%) patients were treated using a locked plate and screw construct and 42 (54.5%) patients were treated with a nonlocked plate and screw construct. All patients received the same pre- and postoperative care and there was no difference in plate morphology and length between cohorts. Clinical outcomes were assessed using Short Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment (SMFA) scores, Visual Analogue Score for pain, and knee ranges of motion. Radiographic outcome was assessed with plain radiographs at all follow-up points. Implant costs for both types of constructs were calculated from hospital purchasing records. Patients were assessed at a mean period of 18.5 months (range: 12–72 months). There was no difference in demographic factors, physical examination parameters, radiographic outcomes, and SMFA scores between cohorts. In terms of cost, the cost of locked construct was $905 more than the nonlocked construct. Based on clinical outcomes and cost per implant, we found no evidence to support the routine use of locked plating for simple split depression fractures of the lateral tibial plateau. The use of standard nonlocked, precontoured implants provides adequate fixation for these fracture patterns.

IRB approval has been obtained for the data collected in this study.


 
  • References

  • 1 Markhardt BK, Gross JM, Monu JU. Schatzker classification of tibial plateau fractures: use of CT and MR imaging improves assessment. Radiographics 2009; 29 (2) 585-597
  • 2 Schatzker J, McBroom R, Bruce D. The tibial plateau fracture. The Toronto experience 1968–1975. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1979; (138) 94-104
  • 3 Savoie FH, Vander Griend RA, Ward EF, Hughes JL. Tibial plateau fractures. A review of operative treatment using AO technique. Orthopedics 1987; 10 (5) 745-750
  • 4 Touliatos AS, Xenakis T, Soucacos PK, Soucacos PN. Surgical management of tibial plateau fractures. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 1997; 275: 92-96
  • 5 Marsh JL, Slongo TF, Agel J , et al. Fracture and dislocation classification compendium - 2007: Orthopaedic Trauma Association classification, database and outcomes committee. J Orthop Trauma 2007; 21 (10, Suppl): S1-S133
  • 6 Swiontkowski MF, Engelberg R, Martin DP, Agel J. Short musculoskeletal function assessment questionnaire: validity, reliability, and responsiveness. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1999; 81 (9) 1245-1260
  • 7 Perren SM. Physical and biological aspects of fracture healing with special reference to internal fixation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1979; (138) 175-196
  • 8 Gösling T, Schandelmaier P, Marti A, Hufner T, Partenheimer A, Krettek C. Less invasive stabilization of complex tibial plateau fractures: a biomechanical evaluation of a unilateral locked screw plate and double plating. J Orthop Trauma 2004; 18 (8) 546-551
  • 9 Krettek C, Gerich T, Miclau T. A minimally invasive medial approach for proximal tibial fractures. Injury 2001; 32 (Suppl. 01) SA4-SA13
  • 10 Musahl V, Tarkin I, Kobbe P, Tzioupis C, Siska PA, Pape HC. New trends and techniques in open reduction and internal fixation of fractures of the tibial plateau. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2009; 91 (4) 426-433
  • 11 Biggi F, Di Fabio S, D'Antimo C, Trevisani S. Tibial plateau fractures: internal fixation with locking plates and the MIPO technique. Injury 2010; 41 (11) 1178-1182
  • 12 Russell N, Tamblyn P, Jaarsma R. Tibial plateau fractures treated with plate fixation: to lock or not to lock. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2009; 19 (2) 75-82
  • 13 Jiang R, Luo CF, Wang MC, Yang TY, Zeng BF. A comparative study of Less Invasive Stabilization System (LISS) fixation and two-incision double plating for the treatment of bicondylar tibial plateau fractures. Knee 2008; 15 (2) 139-143
  • 14 Canadian Orthopaedic Trauma Society. Open reduction and internal fixation compared with circular fixator application for bicondylar tibial plateau fractures. Results of a multicenter, prospective, randomized clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006; 88 (12) 2613-2623
  • 15 Ebraheim NA, Sabry FF, Haman SP. Open reduction and internal fixation of 117 tibial plateau fractures. Orthopedics 2004; 27 (12) 1281-1287
  • 16 Gosling T, Schandelmaier P, Muller M, Hankemeier S, Wagner M, Krettek C. Single lateral locked screw plating of bicondylar tibial plateau fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005; 439 (439) 207-214
  • 17 Hsu CJ, Chang WN, Wong CY. Surgical treatment of tibial plateau fracture in elderly patients. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2001; 121 (1–2) 67-70
  • 18 Mahadeva D, Costa ML, Gaffey A. Open reduction and internal fixation versus hybrid fixation for bicondylar/severe tibial plateau fractures: a systematic review of the literature. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2008; 128 (10) 1169-1175
  • 19 Partenheimer A, Gösling T, Müller M , et al. Management of bicondylar fractures of the tibial plateau with unilateral fixed-angle plate fixation. Unfallchirurg 2007; 110 (8) 675-683
  • 20 Rademakers MV, Kerkhoffs GM, Sierevelt IN, Raaymakers EL, Marti RK. Operative treatment of 109 tibial plateau fractures: five- to 27-year follow-up results. J Orthop Trauma 2007; 21 (1) 5-10
  • 21 Sirkin MS, Bono CM, Reilly MC, Behrens FF. Percutaneous methods of tibial plateau fixation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2000; (375) 60-68
  • 22 Ehlinger M, Rahme M, Moor BK , et al. Reliability of locked plating in tibial plateau fractures with a medial component. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2012; 98 (2) 173-179
  • 23 Haidukewych GJ, Ricci W. Locked plating in orthopaedic trauma: a clinical update. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2008; 16 (6) 347-355