Semin Respir Crit Care Med 2015; 36(06): 870-877
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1566157
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Protocol-Based Care versus Individualized Management of Patients in the Intensive Care Unit

Jonathan M. Siner
1   Section of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
,
Geoffrey R. Connors
1   Section of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
23 November 2015 (online)

Abstract

The delivery of evidence-based care in the high-acuity environment of the intensive care unit can be challenging. In an effort to help turn guidelines and standards of care into consistent and uniform practice, physicians and hospitals turn toward protocol-based medical care. A protocol can help guide a practitioner to make correct interventions, at the right time, and in the proper order when managing a given disease. But to be considered a success, a protocol must meet several standards. A protocol must facilitate consistent practice, guiding the practitioner to deliver care more consistently than without the protocol. A good protocol must also be in alignment with the provider's general practice and beliefs to assure wide adoption and complete penetrance. Finally, the protocol must deliver the most medically correct care—neither simplifying nor overcomplicating health care delivery. In addition to the care the protocol delivers, it must overcome other barriers to gain acceptance. These include concerns about protocol usage among medical trainees, physician concern regarding loss of autonomy, and the ceiling effect protocol-driven care places on expert practitioners, among other concerns. The aim of this article is to critically appraise what it means for a protocol to be considered successful with an aim toward improving protocol design and implementation in the future.

 
  • References

  • 1 Freemantle N, Cleland J, Young P, Mason J, Harrison J. beta Blockade after myocardial infarction: systematic review and meta regression analysis. BMJ 1999; 318 (7200) 1730-1737
  • 2 Houck PM, Bratzler DW, Nsa W, Ma A, Bartlett JG. Timing of antibiotic administration and outcomes for Medicare patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia. Arch Intern Med 2004; 164 (6) 637-644
  • 3 Fox KA, Goodman SG, Klein W , et al. Management of acute coronary syndromes. Variations in practice and outcome; findings from the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE). Eur Heart J 2002; 23 (15) 1177-1189
  • 4 Cabana MD, Rand CS, Powe NR , et al. Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. JAMA 1999; 282 (15) 1458-1465
  • 5 Timmermans S, Berg M. Standardization in action: achieving local universality through medical protocols. Soc Stud Sci 1997; 27: 273-305
  • 6 Morris AH. Developing and implementing computerized protocols for standardization of clinical decisions. Ann Intern Med 2000; 132 (5) 373-383
  • 7 Tversky A, Kahneman D. Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science 1974; 185 (4157) 1124-1131
  • 8 Schmidt HG, Norman GR, Boshuizen HP. A cognitive perspective on medical expertise: theory and implication. [published erratum appears in Acad Med 1992 Apr;67(4):287] Acad Med 1990; 65 (10) 611-621
  • 9 Tierney WM, Overhage JM, McDonald CJ. Computerizing guidelines: factors for success. Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp 1996; 459-462
  • 10 e Silva ME, Resende VL, Abreu MH, Dayrell AV, Valle DdeA, de Castilho LS. Oral hygiene protocols in intensive care units in a large Brazilian city. Am J Infect Control 2015; 43 (3) 303-304
  • 11 Knowles S, Lam LT, McInnes E, Elliott D, Hardy J, Middleton S. Knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviour intentions for three bowel management practices in intensive care: effects of a targeted protocol implementation for nursing and medical staff. BMC Nurs 2015; 14: 6
  • 12 Wang Y, Li Z, Xian Y , et al; GOLDEN BRIDGE–AIS investigators. Rationale and design of a cluster-randomized multifaceted intervention trial to improve stroke care quality in China: The GOLDEN BRIDGE-Acute Ischemic Stroke. Am Heart J 2015; 169 (6) 767-774.e2
  • 13 Thuzar M, Malabu UH, Tisdell B, Sangla KS. Use of a standardised diabetic ketoacidosis management protocol improved clinical outcomes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2014; 104 (1) e8-e11
  • 14 Ventura AM, Waitzberg DL. Enteral nutrition protocols for critically ill patients: are they necessary?. Nutr Clin Pract 2015; 30 (3) 351-362
  • 15 Karsies TJ, Sargel CL, Marquardt DJ, Khan N, Hall MW. An empiric antibiotic protocol using risk stratification improves antibiotic selection and timing in critically ill children. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2014; 11 (10) 1569-1575
  • 16 Lancaster JW, Lawrence KR, Fong JJ , et al. Impact of an institution-specific hospital-acquired pneumonia protocol on the appropriateness of antibiotic therapy and patient outcomes. Pharmacotherapy 2008; 28 (7) 852-862
  • 17 Tierney WM, Overhage JM, Takesue BY , et al. Computerizing guidelines to improve care and patient outcomes: the example of heart failure. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1995; 2 (5) 316-322
  • 18 The Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network. Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 2000; 342 (18) 1301-1308
  • 19 Moon KJ, Lee SM. The effects of a tailored intensive care unit delirium prevention protocol: A randomized controlled trial. Int J Nurs Stud 2015; 52 (9) 1423-1432
  • 20 Duby JJ, Berry AJ, Ghayyem P, Wilson MD, Cocanour CS. Alcohol withdrawal syndrome in critically ill patients: protocolized versus nonprotocolized management. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2014; 77 (6) 938-943
  • 21 DeCarolis DD, Rice KL, Ho L, Willenbring ML, Cassaro S. Symptom-driven lorazepam protocol for treatment of severe alcohol withdrawal delirium in the intensive care unit. Pharmacotherapy 2007; 27 (4) 510-518
  • 22 Grissom CK, Hirshberg EL, Dickerson JB , et al; National Heart Lung and Blood Institute Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Clinical Trials Network. Fluid management with a simplified conservative protocol for the acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care Med 2015; 43 (2) 288-295
  • 23 Wiedemann HP, Wheeler AP, Bernard GR , et al; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) Clinical Trials Network. Comparison of two fluid-management strategies in acute lung injury. N Engl J Med 2006; 354 (24) 2564-2575
  • 24 Burry L, Rose L, McCullagh IJ, Fergusson DA, Ferguson ND, Mehta S. Daily sedation interruption versus no daily sedation interruption for critically ill adult patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; 7: CD009176
  • 25 Rose L, Fitzgerald E, Cook D , et al; SLEAP Investigators; Canadian Critical Care Trials Group. Clinician perspectives on protocols designed to minimize sedation. J Crit Care 2015; 30 (2) 348-352
  • 26 Khan BA, Fadel WF, Tricker JL , et al. Effectiveness of implementing a wake up and breathe program on sedation and delirium in the ICU. Crit Care Med 2014; 42 (12) e791-e795
  • 27 Aitken LM, Bucknall T, Kent B, Mitchell M, Burmeister E, Keogh SJ. Protocol-directed sedation versus non-protocol-directed sedation to reduce duration of mechanical ventilation in mechanically ventilated intensive care patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; 1: CD009771
  • 28 Blackwood B, Burns KE, Cardwell CR, O'Halloran P. Protocolized versus non-protocolized weaning for reducing the duration of mechanical ventilation in critically ill adult patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; 11: CD006904
  • 29 Berwanger O, Guimarães HP, Laranjeira LN , et al; Bridge-Acs Investigators. Effect of a multifaceted intervention on use of evidence-based therapies in patients with acute coronary syndromes in Brazil: the BRIDGE-ACS randomized trial. JAMA 2012; 307 (19) 2041-2049
  • 30 Ely EW, Baker AM, Dunagan DP , et al. Effect on the duration of mechanical ventilation of identifying patients capable of breathing spontaneously. N Engl J Med 1996; 335 (25) 1864-1869
  • 31 Esteban A, Frutos F, Tobin MJ , et al; Spanish Lung Failure Collaborative Group. A comparison of four methods of weaning patients from mechanical ventilation. N Engl J Med 1995; 332 (6) 345-350
  • 32 Tobin M. Answer to E. W. Ely: “Remembrance of weaning past”. Intensive Care Med 2008; 34 (2) 385
  • 33 Ely W. Comment on “Remembrance of weaning past: the seminal papers,” by Dr. Martin Tobin. Intensive Care Med 2007; 33 (4) 746
  • 34 Kollef MH, Shapiro SD, Silver P , et al. A randomized, controlled trial of protocol-directed versus physician-directed weaning from mechanical ventilation. Crit Care Med 1997; 25 (4) 567-574
  • 35 Figueroa-Casas JB, Broukhim A, Vargas A, Milam L, Montoya R. Inter-observer agreement of spontaneous breathing trial outcome. Respir Care 2014; 59 (9) 1324-1328
  • 36 Girault C, Bubenheim M, Abroug F , et al; VENISE Trial Group. Noninvasive ventilation and weaning in patients with chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure: a randomized multicenter trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2011; 184 (6) 672-679
  • 37 Yang KL, Tobin MJ. A prospective study of indexes predicting the outcome of trials of weaning from mechanical ventilation. N Engl J Med 1991; 324 (21) 1445-1450
  • 38 Rose L, Blackwood B, Burns SM, Frazier SK, Egerod I. International perspectives on the influence of structure and process of weaning from mechanical ventilation. Am J Crit Care 2011; 20 (1) e10-e18
  • 39 American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine Consensus Conference: definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. Crit Care Med 1992; 20 (6) 864-874
  • 40 Centers for Disease Contorl and Prevention Web site Available at http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr . Accessed on October 6, 2015
  • 41 Martin GS, Mannino DM, Eaton S, Moss M. The epidemiology of sepsis in the United States from 1979 through 2000. N Engl J Med 2003; 348 (16) 1546-1554
  • 42 Melamed A, Sorvillo FJ. The burden of sepsis-associated mortality in the United States from 1999 to 2005: an analysis of multiple-cause-of-death data. Crit Care 2009; 13 (1) R28
  • 43 Angus DC, Linde-Zwirble WT, Lidicker J, Clermont G, Carcillo J, Pinsky MR. Epidemiology of severe sepsis in the United States: analysis of incidence, outcome, and associated costs of care. Crit Care Med 2001; 29 (7) 1303-1310
  • 44 Rivers E, Nguyen B, Havstad S , et al; Early Goal-Directed Therapy Collaborative Group. Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med 2001; 345 (19) 1368-1377
  • 45 Wilson RF, Thal AP, Kindling PH, Grifka T, Ackerman E. Hemodynamic measurements in septic shock. Arch Surg 1965; 91 (1) 121-129
  • 46 Edwards JD, Brown GC, Nightingale P, Slater RM, Faragher EB. Use of survivors' cardiorespiratory values as therapeutic goals in septic shock. Crit Care Med 1989; 17 (11) 1098-1103
  • 47 Shoemaker WC, Appel PL, Kram HB. Hemodynamic and oxygen transport responses in survivors and nonsurvivors of high-risk surgery. Crit Care Med 1993; 21 (7) 977-990
  • 48 Hayes MA, Timmins AC, Yau EH, Palazzo M, Hinds CJ, Watson D. Elevation of systemic oxygen delivery in the treatment of critically ill patients. N Engl J Med 1994; 330 (24) 1717-1722
  • 49 Shoemaker WC, Bland RD, Appel PL. Therapy of critically ill postoperative patients based on outcome prediction and prospective clinical trials. Surg Clin North Am 1985; 65 (4) 811-833
  • 50 Shoemaker WC, Kram HB, Appel PL. Therapy of shock based on pathophysiology, monitoring, and outcome prediction. Crit Care Med 1990; 18 (1 Pt 2) S19-S25
  • 51 Dellinger RP, Carlet JM, Masur H , et al; Surviving Sepsis Campaign Management Guidelines Committee. Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock. Crit Care Med 2004; 32 (3) 858-873
  • 52 Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Carlet JM , et al; International Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines Committee; American Association of Critical-Care Nurses; American College of Chest Physicians; American College of Emergency Physicians; Canadian Critical Care Society; European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases; European Society of Intensive Care Medicine; European Respiratory Society; International Sepsis Forum; Japanese Association for Acute Medicine; Japanese Society of Intensive Care Medicine; Society of Critical Care Medicine; Society of Hospital Medicine; Surgical Infection Society; World Federation of Societies of Intensive and Critical Care Medicine. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2008. Crit Care Med 2008; 36 (1) 296-327
  • 53 Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Rhodes A , et al; Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines Committee including the Pediatric Subgroup. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2012. Crit Care Med 2013; 41 (2) 580-637
  • 54 Yealy DM, Kellum JA, Huang DT , et al; ProCESS Investigators. A randomized trial of protocol-based care for early septic shock. N Engl J Med 2014; 370 (18) 1683-1693
  • 55 Mouncey PR, Osborn TM, Power GS , et al; ProMISe Trial Investigators. Trial of early, goal-directed resuscitation for septic shock. N Engl J Med 2015; 372 (14) 1301-1311
  • 56 Peake SL, Delaney A, Bailey M , et al; ARISE Investigators; ANZICS Clinical Trials Group. Goal-directed resuscitation for patients with early septic shock. N Engl J Med 2014; 371 (16) 1496-1506
  • 57 Schmidt GA. Counterpoint: adherence to early goal-directed therapy: does it really matter? No. Both risks and benefits require further study. Chest 2010; 138 (3) 480-483 , discussion 483–484
  • 58 Gu WJ, Wang F, Bakker J, Tang L, Liu JC. The effect of goal-directed therapy on mortality in patients with sepsis - earlier is better: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Crit Care 2014; 18 (5) 570
  • 59 Rusconi AM, Bossi I, Lampard JG, Szava-Kovats M, Bellone A, Lang E. Early goal-directed therapy vs usual care in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intern Emerg Med 2015; 10 (6) 731-743
  • 60 Zhang L, Zhu G, Han L, Fu P. Early goal-directed therapy in the management of severe sepsis or septic shock in adults: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Med 2015; 13: 71
  • 61 Trzeciak S, Dellinger RP, Abate NL , et al. Translating research to clinical practice: a 1-year experience with implementing early goal-directed therapy for septic shock in the emergency department. Chest 2006; 129 (2) 225-232
  • 62 Kumar A, Roberts D, Wood KE , et al. Duration of hypotension before initiation of effective antimicrobial therapy is the critical determinant of survival in human septic shock. Crit Care Med 2006; 34 (6) 1589-1596
  • 63 Kumar A, Ellis P, Arabi Y , et al; Cooperative Antimicrobial Therapy of Septic Shock Database Research Group. Initiation of inappropriate antimicrobial therapy results in a fivefold reduction of survival in human septic shock. Chest 2009; 136 (5) 1237-1248
  • 64 Kelm DJ, Perrin JT, Cartin-Ceba R, Gajic O, Schenck L, Kennedy CC. Fluid overload in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock treated with early goal-directed therapy is associated with increased acute need for fluid-related medical interventions and hospital death. Shock 2015; 43 (1) 68-73
  • 65 Meybohm P, Shander A, Zacharowski K. Should we restrict erythrocyte transfusion in early goal directed protocols?. BMC Anesthesiol 2015; 15: 75
  • 66 Hébert PC, Wells G, Blajchman MA , et al. A multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial of transfusion requirements in critical care. Transfusion Requirements in Critical Care Investigators, Canadian Critical Care Trials Group. N Engl J Med 1999; 340 (6) 409-417
  • 67 Levy MM. Early goal-directed therapy: what do we do now?. Crit Care 2014; 18 (6) 705