Download PDF
J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2016; 77(03): 193-198
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1564054
Original Article
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Clinical and Radiographic Factors Predicting Hearing Preservation Rates in Large Vestibular Schwannomas

Daniel Mendelsohn
1   Division of Neurosurgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
,
Brian D. Westerberg
2   Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
,
Charles Dong
1   Division of Neurosurgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
,
Ryojo Akagami
1   Division of Neurosurgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

09 February 2015

22 July 2015

Publication Date:
14 September 2015 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objectives Postoperative hearing preservation rates for patients with large vestibular schwannomas range from 0 to 43%. The clinical and radiographic factors predicting hearing preservation in smaller vestibular schwannomas are well described; however, their importance in larger tumors is unclear. We investigated factors predicting hearing preservation in large vestibular schwannomas.

Design Retrospective review.

Setting Quaternary care academic center.

Participants A total of 85 patients with unilateral vestibular schwannomas > 3 cm underwent retrosigmoid resections.

Main Outcomes Measures Preoperative and postoperative serviceable hearing rates.

Methods Clinical and radiographic data including preoperative and postoperative audiograms, preoperative symptoms, magnetic resonance imaging features, and postoperative facial weakness were analyzed.

Results Hearing was preserved in 41% of patients (17 of 42) with preoperative serviceable hearing. Hypertension and diabetes increased the likelihood of preoperative hearing loss. Preoperative tinnitus predicted a lower likelihood of hearing preservation. No radiographic factors predicted hearing preservation; however, larger tumor size, smaller fourth ventricular width, and the presence of a cerebrospinal fluid cleft surrounding the tumor predicted postoperative facial weakness.

Conclusion Systemic comorbidities may influence hearing loss preoperatively in patients with large vestibular schwannomas. The absence of tinnitus may reflect hearing reserve and propensity for hearing preservation. Preoperative radiographic features did not predict hearing preservation despite some associations with postoperative facial weakness.

Keywords

hearing preservation - microsurgery - vestibular schwannoma
 

  • References

  • 1 Koerbel A, Gharabaghi A, Safavi-Abbasi S, Tatagiba M, Samii M. Evolution of vestibular schwannoma surgery: the long journey to current success. Neurosurg Focus 2005; 18 (4) e10
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Cohen NL, Lewis WS, Ransohoff J. Hearing preservation in cerebellopontine angle tumor surgery: the NYU experience 1974–1991. Am J Otol 1993; 14 (5) 423-433
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Fischer G, Fischer C, Rémond J. Hearing preservation in acoustic neurinoma surgery. J Neurosurg 1992; 76 (6) 910-917
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Kemink JL, LaRouere MJ, Kileny PR, Telian SA, Hoff JT. Hearing preservation following suboccipital removal of acoustic neuromas. Laryngoscope 1990; 100 (6) 597-602
    Google Scholar
  • 5 Mohr G, Sade B, Dufour JJ, Rappaport JM. Preservation of hearing in patients undergoing microsurgery for vestibular schwannoma: degree of meatal filling. J Neurosurg 2005; 102 (1) 1-5
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Gormley WB, Sekhar LN, Wright DC, Kamerer D, Schessel D. Acoustic neuromas: results of current surgical management. Neurosurgery 1997; 41 (1) 50-58 ; discussion 58–60
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Sugita K, Kobayashi S. Technical and instrumental improvements in the surgical treatment of acoustic neurinomas. J Neurosurg 1982; 57 (6) 747-752
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Post KD, Eisenberg MB, Catalano PJ. Hearing preservation in vestibular schwannoma surgery: what factors influence outcome?. J Neurosurg 1995; 83 (2) 191-196
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Di Maio S, Malebranche AD, Westerberg B, Akagami R. Hearing preservation after microsurgical resection of large vestibular schwannomas. Neurosurgery 2011; 68 (3) 632-640 ; discussion 640
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Yokoh A, Kobayashi S, Tanaka Y, Gibo H, Sugita K. Preservation of cochlear nerve function in acoustic neurinoma surgery. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1993; 123 (1–2) 8-13
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Umezu H, Aiba T. Preservation of hearing after surgery for acoustic schwannomas: correlation between cochlear nerve function and operative findings. J Neurosurg 1994; 80 (5) 844-848
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Iwai Y, Yamanaka K, Ishiguro T. Surgery combined with radiosurgery of large acoustic neuromas. Surg Neurol 2003; 59 (4) 283-289 ; discussion 289–291
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Samii M, Matthies C. Management of 1000 vestibular schwannomas (acoustic neuromas): hearing function in 1000 tumor resections. Neurosurgery 1997; 40 (2) 248-260 ; discussion 260–262
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Yu YL, Lee MS, Juan CJ, Hueng DY. Calculating the tumor volume of acoustic neuromas: comparison of ABC/2 formula with planimetry method. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2013; 115 (8) 1371-1374
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Khrais T, Sanna M. Hearing preservation surgery in vestibular schwannoma. J Laryngol Otol 2006; 120 (5) 366-370
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Kari E, Friedman RA. Hearing preservation: microsurgery. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2012; 20 (5) 358-366
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Somers T, Casselman J, de Ceulaer G, Govaerts P, Offeciers E. Prognostic value of magnetic resonance imaging findings in hearing preservation surgery for vestibular schwannoma. Otol Neurotol 2001; 22 (1) 87-94
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Tesfaye S, Chaturvedi N, Eaton SE , et al; EURODIAB Prospective Complications Study Group. Vascular risk factors and diabetic neuropathy. N Engl J Med 2005; 352 (4) 341-350
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Friedman RA, Goddard JC, Wilkinson EP , et al. Hearing preservation with the middle cranial fossa approach for neurofibromatosis type 2. Otol Neurotol 2011; 32 (9) 1530-1537
    Google Scholar
  • 20 Sanna M, Zini C, Mazzoni A , et al. Hearing preservation in acoustic neuroma surgery. Middle fossa versus suboccipital approach. Am J Otol 1987; 8 (6) 500-506
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Tringali S, Ferber-Viart C, Fuchsmann C, Buiret G, Zaouche S, Dubreuil C. Hearing preservation in retrosigmoid approach of small vestibular schwannomas: prognostic value of the degree of internal auditory canal filling. Otol Neurotol 2010; 31 (9) 1469-1472
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Goddard JC, Schwartz MS, Friedman RA. Fundal fluid as a predictor of hearing preservation in the middle cranial fossa approach for vestibular schwannoma. Otol Neurotol 2010; 31 (7) 1128-1134
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Yong RL, Westerberg BD, Dong C, Akagami R. Length of tumor-cochlear nerve contact and hearing outcome after surgery for vestibular schwannoma. J Neurosurg 2008; 108 (1) 105-110
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Ansari SF, Terry C, Cohen-Gadol AA. Surgery for vestibular schwannomas: a systematic review of complications by approach. Neurosurg Focus 2012; 33 (3) E14
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Nadol Jr JB, Chiong CM, Ojemann RG , et al. Preservation of hearing and facial nerve function in resection of acoustic neuroma. Laryngoscope 1992; 102 (10) 1153-1158
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Moriyama T, Fukushima T, Asaoka K, Roche PH, Barrs DM, McElveen Jr JT. Hearing preservation in acoustic neuroma surgery: importance of adhesion between the cochlear nerve and the tumor. J Neurosurg 2002; 97 (2) 337-340
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Nonaka Y, Fukushima T, Watanabe K , et al. Contemporary surgical management of vestibular schwannomas: analysis of complications and lessons learned over the past decade. Neurosurgery 2013; 72 (2, Suppl Operative): ons103-ons115 ; discussion ons115
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Brackmann DE, Owens RM, Friedman RA , et al. Prognostic factors for hearing preservation in vestibular schwannoma surgery. Am J Otol 2000; 21 (3) 417-424
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Rachinger J, Rampp S, Prell J, Scheller C, Alfieri A, Strauss C. Tumor origin and hearing preservation in vestibular schwannoma surgery. J Neurosurg 2011; 115 (5) 900-905
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Baguley DM, Humphriss RL, Axon PR, Moffat DA. The clinical characteristics of tinnitus in patients with vestibular schwannoma. Skull Base 2006; 16 (2) 49-58
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Knipper M, Van Dijk P, Nunes I, Rüttiger L, Zimmermann U. Advances in the neurobiology of hearing disorders: recent developments regarding the basis of tinnitus and hyperacusis. Prog Neurobiol 2013; 111: 17-33
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Lalwani AK, Butt FY, Jackler RK, Pitts LH, Yingling CD. Facial nerve outcome after acoustic neuroma surgery: a study from the era of cranial nerve monitoring. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1994; 111 (5) 561-570
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Sampath P, Holliday MJ, Brem H, Niparko JK, Long DM. Facial nerve injury in acoustic neuroma (vestibular schwannoma) surgery: etiology and prevention. J Neurosurg 1997; 87 (1) 60-66
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar