J Knee Surg 2016; 29(05): 387-390
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1559580
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Arthroscopic Partial Meniscectomy for Meniscal Tears: A Review and Commentary on a Study by NEJM

Anthony J. Scillia
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seton Hall University School of Health and Medical Sciences, South Orange, New Jersey
,
James D. McDermott
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seton Hall University School of Health and Medical Sciences, South Orange, New Jersey
,
Kimona Issa
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seton Hall University School of Health and Medical Sciences, South Orange, New Jersey
,
Peter Goljan
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seton Hall University School of Health and Medical Sciences, South Orange, New Jersey
,
Steven F. Harwin
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seton Hall University School of Health and Medical Sciences, South Orange, New Jersey
,
Anthony Festa
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seton Hall University School of Health and Medical Sciences, South Orange, New Jersey
,
Vincent K. McInerney
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seton Hall University School of Health and Medical Sciences, South Orange, New Jersey
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

27 April 2015

14 June 2015

Publication Date:
17 September 2015 (online)

Abstract

Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (APM) has been demonstrated to be effective when performed in the appropriately indicated patient. However, a recent study published in the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) questioned whether or not the procedure actually had any clinical benefit whatsoever. Despite being a prospective, Level 1, randomized study, there are several aspects of the study that must be taken into consideration when interpreting the findings, including but not limited to the patient selection criteria, limited sample size, and lack of information regarding meniscal tear patterns. This study will critically review the recently published NEJM article, as well as analyze and assess the current body of APM literature.

 
  • References

  • 1 Cullen KA, Hall MJ, Golosinskiy A. Ambulatory surgery in the United States, 2006. Natl Health Stat Rep 2009; 11 (11) 1-25
  • 2 Lubowitz JH, Appleby D. Cost-effectiveness analysis of the most common orthopaedic surgery procedures: knee arthroscopy and knee anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 2011; 27 (10) 1317-1322
  • 3 Sihvonen R, Paavola M, Malmivaara A , et al; Finnish Degenerative Meniscal Lesion Study (FIDELITY) Group. Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy versus sham surgery for a degenerative meniscal tear. N Engl J Med 2013; 369 (26) 2515-2524
  • 4 Chatain F, Robinson AH, Adeleine P, Chambat P, Neyret P. The natural history of the knee following arthroscopic medial meniscectomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2001; 9 (1) 15-18
  • 5 Papalia R, Del Buono A, Osti L, Denaro V, Maffulli N. Meniscectomy as a risk factor for knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review. Br Med Bull 2011; 99: 89-106
  • 6 Gauffin H, Tagesson S, Meunier A, Magnusson H, Kvist J. Knee arthroscopic surgery is beneficial to middle-aged patients with meniscal symptoms: a prospective, randomised, single-blinded study. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2014; 22 (11) 1808-1816
  • 7 El Ghazaly SA, Rahman AA, Yusry AH, Fathalla MM. Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy is superior to physical rehabilitation in the management of symptomatic unstable meniscal tears. Int Orthop 2015; 39 (4) 769-775
  • 8 Kirkley A, Birmingham TB, Litchfield RB , et al. A randomized trial of arthroscopic surgery for osteoarthritis of the knee. N Engl J Med 2008; 359 (11) 1097-1107
  • 9 Moseley JB, O'Malley K, Petersen NJ , et al. A controlled trial of arthroscopic surgery for osteoarthritis of the knee. N Engl J Med 2002; 347 (2) 81-88
  • 10 Katz JN, Brophy RH, Chaisson CE , et al. Surgery versus physical therapy for a meniscal tear and osteoarthritis. N Engl J Med 2013; 368 (18) 1675-1684
  • 11 Herrlin S, Hållander M, Wange P, Weidenhielm L, Werner S. Arthroscopic or conservative treatment of degenerative medial meniscal tears: a prospective randomised trial. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2007; 15 (4) 393-401
  • 12 Herrlin SV, Wange PO, Lapidus G, Hållander M, Werner S, Weidenhielm L. Is arthroscopic surgery beneficial in treating non-traumatic, degenerative medial meniscal tears? A five year follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2013; 21 (2) 358-364
  • 13 Katz JN, Losina E. Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy for degenerative tears: where do we stand?. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2014; 22 (11) 1749-1751
  • 14 Roos EM, Lohmander LS. The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS): from joint injury to osteoarthritis. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2003; 1: 64
  • 15 Yim JH, Seon JK, Song EK , et al. A comparative study of meniscectomy and nonoperative treatment for degenerative horizontal tears of the medial meniscus. Am J Sports Med 2013; 41 (7) 1565-1570
  • 16 Fabricant PD, Jokl P. Surgical outcomes after arthroscopic partial meniscectomy. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2007; 15 (11) 647-653
  • 17 Richmond J, Hunter D, Irrgang J , et al; American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee (nonarthroplasty). J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2009; 17 (9) 591-600
  • 18 Tállay A, Lim MH, Bartlett J. Anatomical study of the human anterior cruciate ligament stump's tibial insertion footprint. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2008; 16 (8) 741-746
  • 19 Anderson AF, Irrgang JJ, Dunn W , et al. Interobserver reliability of the International Society of Arthroscopy, Knee Surgery and Orthopaedic Sports Medicine (ISAKOS) classification of meniscal tears. Am J Sports Med 2011; 39 (5) 926-932
  • 20 Sadoghi P, Gomoll AH. New England Journal of Medicine article evaluating the usefulness of meniscectomy is flawed. Arthroscopy 2014; 30 (6) 659-660
  • 21 Rossi MJ, D'Agostino Jr RB, Provencher MT, Lubowitz JH. Could the new England journal of medicine be biased against arthroscopic knee surgery?. Arthroscopy 2014; 30 (5) 536-537
  • 22 Lubowitz JH, Provencher MT, Rossi MJ. Could the New England Journal of Medicine be biased against arthroscopic knee surgery? Part 2. Arthroscopy 2014; 30 (6) 654-655
  • 23 Elattrache N, Lattermann C, Hannon M, Cole B. New England journal of medicine article evaluating the usefulness of meniscectomy is flawed. Arthroscopy 2014; 30 (5) 542-543
  • 24 Krych AJ, Carey JL, Marx RG , et al. Does arthroscopic knee surgery work?. Arthroscopy 2014; 30 (5) 544-545
  • 25 Brophy R. Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy was not better than sham surgery for medial meniscal tear. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2014; 96 (16) 1396
  • 26 Belluck P. Common knee surgery does very little for some, study suggests. New York Times. December 25, 2013:A16
  • 27 Gold M, Franks P, Erickson P. Assessing the health of the nation. The predictive validity of a preference-based measure and self-rated health. Med Care 1996; 34 (2) 163-177
  • 28 Siebert WJ, Groessl EJ, David KM, Ganiats TG, Kaplan RM. Quality of Well Being Self-Administered (QWB-SA) scale. San Diego: Health Services Research Center, University of California, 2008. Available at: http://hoap.ucsd.edu/qwb info/QWB-Manual.pdf . Accessed January 18, 2015
  • 29 Laupacis A, Feeny D, Detsky AS, Tugwell PX. How attractive does a new technology have to be to warrant adoption and utilization? Tentative guidelines for using clinical and economic evaluations. CMAJ 1992; 146 (4) 473-481
  • 30 Torrance GW. Measurement of health state utilities for economic appraisal. J Health Econ 1986; 5 (1) 1-30
  • 31 Jaslow R. Common arthroscopic knee surgery no better than “sham” version, researchers say. CBS News. Available at: http://www.cbsnews.com/news/common-arthroscopic-knee-surgery-not-effective-no-better-than-sham-researchers-say/ . Accessed December 26, 2013