Journal of Pediatric Neurology 2004; 02(02): 057-064
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1557194
Review Article
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart – New York

Reconstructing cerebral palsy

Bernard Dan
1   Department of Neurology, Hôpital Universitaire des Enfants Reine Fabiola, Free University of Brussels (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
2   Laboratory of Movement Biomechanics, ISEPK, Free University of Brussels (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
,
Guy Cheron
2   Laboratory of Movement Biomechanics, ISEPK, Free University of Brussels (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
3   Laboratory of Electrophysiology, Université de Mons-Hainaut, Mons, Belgium
› Author Affiliations

Subject Editor:
Further Information

Publication History

10 December 2003

29 January 2004

Publication Date:
29 July 2015 (online)

Abstract

Forty years ago, a consensual definition of the cerebral palsy concept was suggested, delineating it as a disorder of movement and posture secondary to non-progressive pathological processes that affect the immature brain. Because this concept is pragmatic and based on function, it has survived unaltered many changes in pathophysiolgical knowledge, diagnostic technology and general nosology. However, its basis has appeared to be flawed. Its main justification remains management, for which the need to meticulously select patients, define adapted objectives, design appropriate management programs and evaluate results has been increasingly recognized. Fine movement analysis using recent technologies can provide a wealth of information about neurological functioning in cerebral palsy that can serve these purposes. Specific patterns of motor organization reveal different modes of motor control in individuals with developmental motor problems. The different motor patterns reflect individual adaptation to the impairment of the central nervous system. Taken phenomenologically these patterns can contribute to the clinical approach to cerebral palsy and redefine patients groups within this framework. (J Pediatr Neurol 2004; 2(2): 57–64).