Klinische Neurophysiologie 2015; 46(02): 65-68
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1548891
Originalia
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Mikroembolien und zerebrale Hämodynamik nach Implantation eines linksventrikulären Assist-Devices

Cerebral Microembolisation and Haemodynamics in Patients with Left Ventricular Assist Devices
M. Siebler
1   Neurologie, MediClin Rhein – Ruhr, Universität Düsseldorf, Essen
,
R. Marx
2   Kardiologie, MediClin Fachklinik Rhein – Ruhr, Universität Witten-Herdecke, Essen
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
30 June 2015 (online)

Zusammenfassung

Der Behandlung mit mechanischen Herzunterstützungssystemen („Kunstherz“) wird eine beachtliche Zukunftsoption für viele herzinsuffiziente Patienten vorhergesagt, zumal die Herztransplantationszahlen den Bedarf bei weitem nicht decken können. Erfolgreich sind linksventrikuläre Assist-Systeme, welche inzwischen komplett intrathorakal implantierbar sind und Patienten eine hohe Selbständigkeit ermöglichen und eine geringere Komplikationsrate als extrathorakale Systeme aufweisen. Was als Bridging-Therapie angedacht war wird zunehmend eine Endversorgung (Destination-Therapie). Die Behandlung erfordert eine intensive Nachbetreuung zur Vermeidung von Komplikationen wie Thrombosen, Blutungen oder Infektionen. Gefürchtet sind Schlaganfälle, welche den Neurologen in die akute Behandlungskette als auch in die Rehabilitation einbringen. Da MRT Untersuchungen nicht möglich sind, sind Ultraschalluntersuchungen hoch relevant. Diese erfordern Kenntnisse bezüglich des Auftretens von Mikroembolien und der veränderten zerebralen Hämodynamik. In dem Artikel werden die bisherigen Befunde vorgestellt und diskutiert.

Abstract

Treatment options with mechanical circulatory support devices of the heart have a high potential for a majority of cardiac patients with heart insufficiency. This is important in respect to the decreasing availability of donor organs for heart transplantations. Left ventricular assisted devices can be successfully implanted intracorporeally, allow the patients a high mobility and have less complications. Although the treatment was developed to bridge the critical phases before heart transplantation, nowadays LVADs are used as destination therapy. The treatment requires attention to avoid complications, such as thrombosis, bleeding or infections of the drive line. Stroke is a challenge and neurologists are involved for the acute management on stroke units and rehabilitation centres. Since MRI is a contraindication ultrasound investigations could be relevant. The ultrasound examination requires special knowledge about the detection of cerebral microemboli and the cerebral haemodynamics. We present aspects about the ultrasound results in these patients.

 
  • Literatur

  • 1 Milano CA, Simeone AA. Mechanical circulatory support: devices, outcomes and complications. Heart Fail Rev 2013; 18: 35-53
  • 2 Vitali E, Lanfranconi M, Bruschi G et al. Left ventricular assist devices as bridge to heart transplantation: The Niguarda Experience. J Card Surg 2003; 18: 107-113
  • 3 Arabia FA, Smith RG, Rose DS et al. DS et al. Success rates of long-term circulatory assist devices used currently for bridge to heart transplantation. ASAIO J 1996; 42: M542-M546
  • 4 Takatani S. Cardiac prosthesis as an advanced surgical therapy for end-stage cardiac patients: current status and future perspectives. J Med Dent Sci 2000; 47: 151-165
  • 5 Xie A, Phan K, Yan TD. Durability of continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices: a systematic review.
  • 6 Birati EY, Rame JE. Diagnosis and Management of LVAD Thrombosis. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med 2015; 17: 361
  • 7 Amer S, Shah P, Hassan S. Gastrointestinal bleeding with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices. Clin J Gastroenterol 2015; 24 [Epub ahead of print]
  • 8 Baghai M, Heilmann C, Beyersdorf F et al Platelet dysfunction and acquired von Willebrand syndrome in patients with left ventricular assist devices†. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2014; 27 pii: ezu510. [Epub ahead of print]
  • 9 Ahmad T, Wang T, O’Brien EC et al. Effects of left ventricular assist device support on biomarkers of cardiovascular stress, fibrosis, fluid homeostasis, inflammation, and renal injury. JACC Heart Fail 2015; 3: 30-39
  • 10 Morgan JA, Brewer RJ, Nemeh HW et al. Stroke while on long-term left ventricular assist device support: incidence, outcome, and predictors. ASAIO J 2014; 60: 284-289
  • 11 Nassif ME, Tibrewala A, Raymer DS et al. Systolic blood pressure on discharge after left ventricular assist device insertion is associated with subsequent stroke. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2014; 23 pii: S1053-2498(14)01414-4 DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2014.09.042.
  • 12 Slaughter MS, Pagani FD, Rogers JG et al. Clinical management of continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices in advanced heart failure. J Heart Lung Transplant 2010; 29: S1-S39
  • 13 Russell D, Brucher R. Embolus detection and differentiation using multifrequency transcranial Doppler. Stroke 2006; 37: 340-341
  • 14 Junghans U, Siebler M. Cerebral microembolism is blocked by tirofiban, a selective nonpeptide platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonist. Circulation 2003; 107: 2717-2721
  • 15 Thoennissen NH, Allroggen A, Ritter M et al. Influence of inflammation and pump dynamic on cerebral microembolization in patients with Continuous-Flow DeBakey LVAD. ASAIO J 2006; 52: 243-347
  • 16 Ringelstein EB, Droste DW, Babikian VL et al. Consensus on microembolus detection by TCD. International Consensus Group on Microembolus Detection. Stroke 1998; 29: 725-729
  • 17 Kaps M, Hansen J, Weiher M et al. Clinically silent microemboli in patients with artificial prosthetic aortic valves are predominantly gaseous and not solid. Stroke 1997; 28: 322-325
  • 18 Coutsoumpos A, Patel S, Teruya TH et al. Carotid duplex ultrasound changes associated with left ventricular assist devices. Ann Vasc Surg 2014; 28: 1030.e7-1030.e11
  • 19 Arning C, Widder B, Von Reutern GM et al. Revision of DEGUM ultrasound criteria for grading internal carotid artery stenoses and transfer to NASCET measurement. Ultraschall Med 2010; 31: 251-257
  • 20 Urban M, Pirk J, Szarszoi O et al. Post-heart transplantation outcome of HeartMate II-bridged recipients requiring unplanned concomitant temporary right ventricular mechanical support. Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2015; 20: 372-378