Semin Speech Lang 2015; 36(01): 31-41
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1396444
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Morphological Awareness Assessment and Intervention to Improve Language and Literacy

Julie A. Wolter
1   Department of Communicative Disorders and Deaf Education, Utah State University, Logan, Utah
,
Frances E. Gibson
1   Department of Communicative Disorders and Deaf Education, Utah State University, Logan, Utah
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
29 January 2015 (online)

Abstract

Morphological awareness positively influences language and literacy development and may be an ideal intervention focus for improving vocabulary, sight word reading, reading decoding, and reading comprehension in students with and without language and literacy deficits. This article will provide supporting theory, research, and strategies for implementing morphological awareness intervention with students with language and literacy deficits. Additionally, functional connections are explored through the incorporation and application of morphological awareness intervention in academic literacy contexts linked to Common Core State Standards.

 
  • References

  • 1 Carlisle JF. Morphology matters in learning to read: a commentary. Read Psychol 2003; 24 (3–4) 291-322
  • 2 Apel K, Diehm E. Morphological awareness intervention with kindergartners and first and second grade students from low SES homes: a small efficacy study. J Learn Disabil 2014; 47 (1) 65-75
  • 3 Tong X, Deacon SH, Cain K. Morphological and syntactic awareness in poor comprehenders: another piece of the puzzle. J Learn Disabil 2014; 47 (1) 22-33
  • 4 Carlisle JF. Effects of instruction in morphological awareness on literacy achievement: an integrative review. Read Res Q 2010; 45 (4) 464-487
  • 5 Wolter JA, Wood A, D'zatko KW. The influence of morphological awareness on the literacy development of first-grade children. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch 2009; 40 (3) 286-298
  • 6 Kuo L, Anderson RC. Morphological awareness and learning to read: a cross-language perspective. Educ Psychol 2006; 41: 161-180
  • 7 Stolz JA, Feldman LB. The role of orthographic and semantic transparency of the base morpheme in morphological processing. In: Feldman LB, , ed. Morphological Aspects of Language Processing. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1995: 109-129
  • 8 Carlisle JF, Stone CA, Katz LA. The effects of phonological transparency on reading derived words. Ann Dyslexia 2001; 51 (1) 249-274
  • 9 Deacon SH, Bryant P. The strength of children's knowledge of the role of root morphemes in the spelling of derived words. J Child Lang 2005; 32 (2) 375-389
  • 10 Windsor J. The role of phonological opacity in reading achievement. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2000; 43 (1) 50-61
  • 11 Anglin JM, Miller GA, Wakefield PC. Vocabulary development: a morphological analysis. . Monogr Soc Res Child Dev 1993; 58: 1-166
  • 12 Bowers PN, Kirby JR, Deacon SH. The effects of morphological instruction on literacy skills a systematic review of the literature. Rev Educ Res 2010; 80 (2) 144-179
  • 13 Deacon HS. Sounds, letters and meanings: the independent influences of phonological, morphological and orthographic skills on early word reading accuracy. J Res Read 2012; 35 (4) 456-475
  • 14 Catts HW, Fey ME, Tomblin JB, Zhang X. A longitudinal investigation of reading outcomes in children with language impairments. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2002; 45 (6) 1142-1157
  • 15 Carlisle JF. Awareness of the structure and meaning of morphologically complex words: impact on reading. Read Writ 2000; 12 (3) 169-190
  • 16 Binder K, Borecki C. The use of phonological, orthographic, and contextual information during reading: a comparison of adults who are learning to read and skilled adult readers. Read Writ 2008; 21 (8) 843-858
  • 17 Green L. Morphology and literacy: getting our heads in the game. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch 2009; 40 (3) 283-285
  • 18 Jarmulowicz L, Hay SE, Taran VL, Ethington CA. Fitting derivational morphophonology into a developmental model of reading. Read Writ 2008; 21 (3) 275-297
  • 19 Kirby JR, Desrochers A, Roth L, Lai SS. Longitudinal predictors of word reading development. Can Psychol 2008; 49 (2) 103-110
  • 20 McCutchen D, Green L, Abbott RD. Children's morphological knowledge: links to literacy. Read Psychol 2008; 29 (4) 289-314
  • 21 Nagy W, Berninger VW, Abbott RD. Contributions of morphology beyond phonology to literacy outcomes of upper elementary and middle-school students. J Educ Psychol 2006; 98 (1) 134-147
  • 22 Schwiebert C, Green L, McCutchen D. The Contribution of Morphology to Reading and Spelling Achievement (ED465986). ERIC. 2002
  • 23 Carlisle JF. Morphological Awareness and Early Reading Achievement. Morphological Aspects of Language Processing. Laurie Beth Feldman: New Jersey; 1995: 189-209
  • 24 Carlisle JF, Nomanbhoy DM. Phonological and morphological awareness in first graders. Appl Psycholinguist 1993; 14 (2) 177-195
  • 25 Deacon SH, Kirby JR, Casselman-Bell M. How robust is the contribution of morphological awareness to general spelling outcomes?. Read Psychol 2009; 30 (4) 301-318
  • 26 Tong X, Deacon SH, Kirby JR, Cain K, Parrila R. Morphological awareness: a key to understanding poor reading comprehension in English. J Educ Psychol 2011; 103 (3) 523-534
  • 27 Goodwin AP, Ahn S. A meta-analysis of morphological interventions: effects on literacy achievement of children with literacy difficulties. Ann Dyslexia 2010; 60 (2) 183-208
  • 28 Reed DK. A synthesis of morphology interventions and effects on reading outcomes for students in grades K–12. Learn Disabil Res Pract 2008; 23 (1) 36-49
  • 29 Nagy WE, Carlisle JF, Goodwin AP. Morphological knowledge and literacy acquisition. J Learn Disabil 2014; 47 (1) 3-12
  • 30 Curtiss S, Katz W, Tallal P. Delay versus deviance in the language acquisition of language-impaired children. J Speech Hear Res 1992; 35 (2) 373-383
  • 31 Moran MR, Byrne MC. Mastery of verb tense markers by normal and learning-disabled children. J Speech Hear Res 1977; 20 (3) 529-542
  • 32 Rubin H, Patterson PA, Kantor M. Morphological development and writing ability in children and adults. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch 1991; 22 (4) 228-235
  • 33 Wiig EH, Semel EM, Crouse MA. The use of English morphology by high-risk and learning disabled children. J Learn Disabil 1973; 6: 457-465
  • 34 Kirby JR, Deacon SH, Bowers PN, Izenberg L, Wade-Woolley L, Parrila R. Children's morphological awareness and reading ability. Read Writ 2012; 25: 389-410
  • 35 Wolter JA, Dilworth V. The effects of a multilinguistic morphological awareness approach for improving language and literacy. J Learn Disabil 2014; 47 (1) 76-85
  • 36 Kieffer MJ. Morphological awareness and reading difficulties in adolescent Spanish-speaking language minority learners and their classmates. J Learn Disabil 2014; 47 (1) 44-53
  • 37 Wolter JA, Green L. Morphological awareness intervention in school-age children with language and literacy deficits: a case study. Top Lang Disord 2013; 33 (1) 27-41
  • 38 Ramirez G, Walton P, Roberts W. Morphological awareness and vocabulary development among kindergartners with different ability levels. J Learn Disabil 2014; 47 (1) 54-64
  • 39 Nagy WE, Anderson RC. How many words are there in printed school English?. Read Res Q 1984; 19: 304-330
  • 40 Larsen JA, Nippold MA. Morphological analysis in school-age children: dynamic assessment of a word learning strategy. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch 2007; 38 (3) 201-212
  • 41 Ram G, Marinellie SA, Benigno J, McCarthy J. Morphological analysis in context versus isolation: use of a dynamic assessment task with school-age children. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch 2013; 44 (1) 32-47
  • 42 Wolter JA, Carlisle J, Goodwin A, Wagner RK. Dynamic assessment of morphological awareness in third-grade children. Paper presented at: Probing the Relationship between Morphology and Literacy: New Paths towards a Nuanced Model of Reading. Society for Scientific Studies of Reading Annual Convention; July 2012; Montreal, CA
  • 43 Wolter JA. Spelling and word study: a speech-language pathologists' guide for language-based assessment and intervention. In: Ukrainetz T, , ed. Contextualized Language Assessment and Intervention. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed; (in press)
  • 44 Deacon SH, Kirby JR. Morphological awareness: just “more phonological”? The roles of morphological and phonological awareness in reading development. Appl Psycholinguist 2004; 25 (2) 223-238
  • 45 Nunes T, Bryant P, Barros R. The development of word recognition and its significance for comprehension and fluency. J Educ Psychol 2012; 104 (4) 959-973
  • 46 Nunes T, Bryant P, Olsson J. Learning morphological and phonological spelling rules: an intervention study. Sci Stud Read 2003; 7 (3) 289-307
  • 47 Apel K, Lawrence J. Contributions of morphological awareness skills to word-level reading and spelling in first-grade children with and without speech sound disorder. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2011; 54 (5) 1312-1327
  • 48 Morris RD, Lovett MW, Wolf M , et al. Multiple-component remediation for developmental reading disabilities: IQ, socioeconomic status, and race as factors in remedial outcome. J Learn Disabil 2010; 45 (2) 99-127
  • 49 Masterson J, Apel K. Monitoring progress in spelling improvement. Perspectives on Language Learning and Education 2013; 20 (4) 140-152
  • 50 Wolter JA, Squires K. Spelling: instructional and intervention frameworks. In: Stone CA, Silliman ER, Ehren BJ, Wallach G, , eds. Handbook of Language Literacy: Development and Disorders. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 2013: 602-615
  • 51 Newcomer PL, Hammill DD. Test of Language Development: Primary. 4th ed. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed; 2008
  • 52 Apel K, Diehm E, Apel L. Using multiple measures of morphological awareness to measure its relation to reading. Top Lang Disord 2013; 33: 42-56
  • 53 Derwing BL. Morpheme recognition and learning of rules for derivational morphology. Canadian Journal of Linguistics-Revue Canadienne De Linguistique 1976; 21 (1) 38-66
  • 54 Windsor J, Hwang M. Testing the generalized slowing hypothesis in specific language impairment. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1999; 42 (5) 1205-1218
  • 55 Berko J. The child's learning of English morphology. Word 1958; 14: 150-177
  • 56 Bear DR, Invernizzi M, Templeton S, Johnson F. Words Their Way: Word Study Learning and Teaching Phonics, Vocabulary, and Spelling. 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill; 2004
  • 57 Goodwin A, Lipsky M, Ahn S. Word detectives: using units of meaning to support literacy. Read Teach 2012; 65 (7) 461-470
  • 58 Common Core State Standards Initiative. Available at: http://www.corestandards.org/ . Accessed June 17, 2014
  • 59 Gabig C, Zaretsky E. Promoting morphological awareness in children with language needs: do the Common Core State Standards pave the way?. Top Lang Disord 2013; 33 (1) 7-26
  • 60 Wasowicz J, Apel K, Masterson JJ, Whitney A. SPELL-Links to Reading and Writing. Evanston, IL: Learning by Design, Inc.; 2004