Download PDF
Semin Speech Lang 2015; 36(01): 05-16
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1396442
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Balanced Intervention for Adolescents and Adults with Language Impairment: A Clinical Framework

Karen A. Fallon
1   Department of Audiology, Speech-Language Pathology, and Deaf Studies, Towson University, Towson, Maryland
,
Lauren A. Katz
2   Literacy, Language, and Learning Institute, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, Ohio
,
Rachel Carlberg
1   Department of Audiology, Speech-Language Pathology, and Deaf Studies, Towson University, Towson, Maryland
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
29 January 2015 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Providing effective intervention services for adolescents and adults who struggle with spoken and written language presents a variety of unique challenges. This article discusses the 5S Framework (skills, strategies, school, student buy-in, and stakeholders) for designing and implementing balanced spoken and written language interventions for adolescents and adults. An in-depth case illustration highlights the usefulness of the framework for targeting the language and literacy skills of adolescents and young adults. By describing and illustrating the five key components of the intervention framework, the article provides a useful clinical tool to help guide clinicians and educators who serve the needs of adolescents and adults who struggle with spoken and written language.

Keywords

Spoken and written language - speech-language pathologist - language intervention
 

  • References

  • 1 Catts HW, Fey ME, Tomblin JB, Zhang X. A longitudinal investigation of reading outcomes in children with language impairments. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2002; 45 (6) 1142-1157
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Rath KA, Royer JM. The nature and effectiveness of learning disability services for college students. Educ Psychol Rev 2002; 14: 353-381
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Young AR, Beitchman JH, Johnson C , et al. Young adult academic outcomes in a longitudinal sample of early identified language impaired and control children. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2002; 43 (5) 635-645
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 National Joint Committee on Learning Disabilities. Learning disabilities: implications for policy regarding research and practice. Available at: www.ldonline.org/pdfs/njcld/OverviewofLDValidityReport.pdf . Accessed December 2, 2014
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Snow C, Moje E. Why is everyone talking about adolescent literacy?. Phi Delta Kappan 2010; 9 (6) 66-69
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Swanson HL, Hoskyn M. Instructing adolescents with learning disabilities: a component and composite analysis. Learn Disabil Res Pract 2001; 16: 109-120
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Common Core State Standards Initiative. English language arts standards. Available at: www.corestandards.org/ELA-Literacy/ . Accessed December 2, 2014
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Hurst D, Smerdon B. Postsecondary students with disabilities: enrollment, services, and persistence. Education Statistics Quarterly 2000; 2 (3) 55-58
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Murray C, Goldstein DE, Nourse S, Edgar E. The postsecondary school attendance and completion rates of high school graduates with learning disabilities. Learn Disabil Res Pract 2000; 15: 119-127
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 United States Department of Education . Available at: www.ed.gov . Accessed August 26, 2014
    PubMed
  • 11 Faggella-Luby M, Sampson Graner P. Literacy supports for adolescent struggling readers: taking action through comprehension instruction. Adv Learn Behav Disabil 2010; 2 (23) 61-94
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Clegg J, Hollis C, Mawhood L, Rutter M. Developmental language disorders—a follow-up in later adult life. Cognitive, language and psychosocial outcomes. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2005; 46 (2) 128-149
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Johnson CJ, Beitchman JH, Brownlie EB. Twenty-year follow-up of children with and without speech-language impairments: family, educational, occupational, and quality of life outcomes. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 2010; 19 (1) 51-65
    Google Scholar
  • 14 Stanovich KE. Matthew effects in reading: some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Read Res Q 1986; 21: 360-407
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Brophy J. Motivating Students to Learn. 2nd Ed. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum; 2004
    Google Scholar
  • 16 Guthrie JT, Wigfield A. Engagement and motivation in reading. In: Kamil ML, Mosenthal PB, Pearson PD, , eds. Handbook of Reading Research, Vol. III. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum; 2000: 403-422
    Google Scholar
  • 17 Morgan PL, Fuchs D. Is there a bidirectional relationship between children's reading skills and reading motivation?. Except Child 2007; 73: 165-183
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Katz LA, Fallon KA. The final frontier: high school and college students with reading disabilities. In: Udrainetz TA, , ed. School-Age Language Intervention: Principles and Procedures for Oral and Written Success. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed; ; in press
    Google Scholar
  • 19 Biancarosa G, Snow C. Reading next: a vision for action and research in middle and high school literacy—a report to Carnegie Corporation of New York. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education; 2004
    Google Scholar
  • 20 Kamil ML. Adolescents and Literacy: Reading for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education; 2003
    Google Scholar
  • 21 Kamil ML, Borman GD, Dole J, Kral CC, Salinger T, Torgesen J. Improving adolescent literacy: effective classroom and intervention practices: a practice guide (NCEE # 2008–4027). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute Educational Science, U.S. Department of Education; 2008
    Google Scholar
  • 22 Ukrainetz TA. Assessment and intervention within a contextualized skill framework. In: Ukrainetz TA, , ed. Contextualized Language Intervention: Scaffolding PreK–12 Literacy Achievement. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed; 2006: 7-58
    Google Scholar
  • 23 Roberts G, Torgesen JK, Boardman A, Scammacca N. Evidenced-based strategies for reading instruction of older students with learning disabilities. Learn Disabil Res Pract 2008; 23: 63-69
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Edmonds MS, Vaughn S, Wexler J , et al. A synthesis of reading interventions and effects on reading comprehension outcomes for older struggling readers. Rev Educ Res 2009; 79 (1) 262-300
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Mokhtari K, Reichard C. Assessing students' metacognitive awareness of reading strategies. J Educ Psychol 2002; 94: 249-259
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Apel K, Swank LK. Second chances: improving decoding skills in the older student. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch 1999; 30: 231-242
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Dickson SV, Collins VL, Simmons DC, Kameenui EJ. Metacognitive strategies: research bases. In: Simmons DC, Kameenui EJ, , eds. What Reading Research Tells Us about Children with Diverse Learning Needs. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum; 1998: 295-360
    Google Scholar
  • 28 Guthrie JT, Davis MH. Motivating struggling readers in middle school through an engagement model of classroom practice. Read Writ Q 2003; 19: 59-85
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Ivey G. A multicase study in the middle school: complexities among young adolescent readers. Read Res Q 1999; 34: 172-193
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar