Aktuelle Ernährungsmedizin 2015; 40(02): 93-97
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1387601
Übersicht
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Ernährungskonzepte bei akuter Pankreatitis

Nutrition Concepts in Acute Pancreatitis
J. Leibold
1   Medizinische Universitätsklinik Tübingen, Abteilung für Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie und Infektionskrankheiten, Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen
,
R. Riessen
2   Medizinische Universitätsklinik Tübingen, Internistische Intensivstation, Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen
,
M. Haap
2   Medizinische Universitätsklinik Tübingen, Internistische Intensivstation, Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
01 April 2015 (online)

Zusammenfassung

In den letzten Jahrzehnten fand bezüglich der Ernährungstherapie im Rahmen der akuten Pankreatitis ein grundsätzlicher Paradigmenwechsel statt: Wurden früher eher eine parenterale Ernährung und eine orale Nahrungskarenz favorisiert, so wird nach aktuellen Leitlinien eine frühe enterale Ernährung empfohlen. Bei der häufigen milden akuten Pankreatitis, die durch einen selbstlimitierenden Verlauf ohne zusätzliches Organversagen gekennzeichnet ist, können die Patienten nach Abklingen der Beschwerden frühzeitig mit einer leichten oralen Vollkost beginnen. Bei der selteneren schweren Pankreatitis sollte nach den aktuellen Leitlinien innerhalb der ersten 24 – 48 h eine enterale Ernährungstherapie, vorzugsweise über eine nasogastrale Sonde, initiiert werden. Hierdurch konnte in randomisierten Studien sowohl die Häufigkeit von Infektionen als auch Mortalität der Patienten signifikant gesenkt werden, wobei der Erhalt der gastrointestinalen Integrität als zugrunde liegender Mechanismus vermutet wurde.

Abstract

In recent decades, a fundamental paradigm shift took place with respect to nutritional therapy in acute pancreatitis: While formerly parenteral nutrition and oral fasting was favored, recent guidelines recommend early enteral nutrition in most circumstances. In mild and moderately severe acute pancreatitis, which is in most cases a self-limited disease without persistent organ failure, nutrition can be started as an oral diet after a few days depending on their gastrointestinal symptoms. In severe acute pancreatitis with persistent organ failure, however, enteral nutrition should be initiated preferably through a nasogastric tube within the first 24 – 48 hours. In randomized studies early enteral nutrition significantly reduced infection rates and mortality rates, possibly by maintaining gastrointestinal integrity.

 
  • Literatur

  • 1 Fagenholz PJ et al. Increasing United States hospital admissions for acute pancreatitis, 1988 – 2003. Ann Epidemiol 2007; 17: 491-497
  • 2 Yadav D, Lowenfels AB. Trends in the epidemiology of the first attack of acute pancreatitis: a systematic review. Pancreas 2006; 33: 323-330
  • 3 Peery AF et al. Burden of gastrointestinal disease in the United States: 2012 update. Gastroenterology 2012; 143: 1179-1187, e1 – 3
  • 4 Gullo L et al. Acute pancreatitis in five European countries: etiology and mortality. Pancreas 2002; 24: 223-227
  • 5 Lankisch PG et al. Acute pancreatitis: does gender matter?. Dig Dis Sci 2001; 46: 2470-2474
  • 6 Lowenfels AB, Maisonneuve P, Sullivan T. The changing character of acute pancreatitis: epidemiology, etiology, and prognosis. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 2009; 11: 97-103
  • 7 Banks PA et al. Classification of acute pancreatitis – 2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus. Gut 2013; 62: 102-111
  • 8 Bradley 3rd EL. A clinically based classification system for acute pancreatitis. Summary of the International Symposium on Acute Pancreatitis, Atlanta, Ga, September 11 through 13, 1992. Arch Surg 1993; 128: 586-590
  • 9 Tenner S et al. American College of Gastroenterology guideline: management of acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 2013; 108: 1400-1415; 1416
  • 10 Ockenga J et al. S3-Leitlinie der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Ernährungsmedizin (DGEM) in Zusammenarbeit mit der GESKES, der AKE und der DGVS Klinische Ernährung in der Gastroenterologie (Teil 2) – Pankreas. Aktuel Ernahrungsmed 2014; 39: e43-e56
  • 11 Sah RP, Dawra RK, Saluja AK. New insights into the pathogenesis of pancreatitis. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 2013; 29: 523-530
  • 12 Busquets J et al. Factors influencing mortality in patients undergoing surgery for acute pancreatitis: importance of peripancreatic tissue and fluid infection. Pancreas 2013; 42: 285-292
  • 13 Gunjaca I et al. Circulating cytokine levels in acute pancreatitis-model of SIRS/CARS can help in the clinical assessment of disease severity. Inflammation 2012; 35: 758-763
  • 14 Duan L et al. The regulatory role of immunosuppressants on immune abnormalities in acute pancreatitis. Biomed Rep 2014; 2: 193-198
  • 15 Phillip V, Steiner JM, Algul H. Early phase of acute pancreatitis: Assessment and management. World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol 2014; 5: 158-168
  • 16 Osuchowski MF et al. Sepsis chronically in MARS: systemic cytokine responses are always mixed regardless of the outcome, magnitude, or phase of sepsis. J Immunol 2012; 189: 4648-4656
  • 17 O’Keefe SJ et al. Trypsin secretion and turnover in patients with acute pancreatitis. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2005; 289: G181-187
  • 18 Boreham B, Ammori BJ. A prospective evaluation of pancreatic exocrine function in patients with acute pancreatitis: correlation with extent of necrosis and pancreatic endocrine insufficiency. Pancreatology 2003; 3: 303-308
  • 19 Petrov MS, Windsor JA. Nutritional management of acute pancreatitis: the concept of 'gut rousing'. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 2013; 16: 557-563
  • 20 Eckerwall GE et al. Immediate oral feeding in patients with mild acute pancreatitis is safe and may accelerate recovery – a randomized clinical study. Clin Nutr 2007; 26: 758-763
  • 21 Shah SK et al. Resuscitation-induced intestinal edema and related dysfunction: state of the science. J Surg Res 2011; 166: 120-130
  • 22 Chowdhury AH, Lobo DN. Fluids and gastrointestinal function. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 2011; 14: 469-476
  • 23 Brock C et al. Opioid-induced bowel dysfunction: pathophysiology and management. Drugs 2012; 72: 1847-1865
  • 24 Holzer P. Treatment of opioid-induced gut dysfunction. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 2007; 16: 181-194
  • 25 Anastasilakis CD et al. Artificial nutrition and intestinal mucosal barrier functionality. Digestion 2013; 88: 193-208
  • 26 Genton L, Cani PD, Schrenzel J. Alterations of gut barrier and gut microbiota in food restriction, food deprivation and protein-energy wasting. Clin Nutr 2014; Oct 12. pii: S0261-5614(14)00255-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2014.10.003. [Epub ahead of print]
  • 27 Fukatsu K. Impact of the feeding route on gut mucosal immunity. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 2014; 17: 164-170
  • 28 Wu BU et al. Lactated Ringer's solution reduces systemic inflammation compared with saline in patients with acute pancreatitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2011; 9: 710-717, e1
  • 29 Myburgh JA, Mythen MG. Resuscitation fluids. N Engl J Med 2013; 369: 2462-2463
  • 30 Deutsche Gesellschaft für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin. S3-Leitlinie. Intravasale Volumentherapie beim Erwachsenen. AWMF-Register Nr. 001/020. 2014. http://www.awmf.org
  • 31 van Brunschot S et al. Abdominal compartment syndrome in acute pancreatitis: a systematic review. Pancreas 2014; 43: 665-674
  • 32 Teich N et al. Optimal timing of oral refeeding in mild acute pancreatitis: results of an open randomized multicenter trial. Pancreas 2010; 39: 1088-1092
  • 33 Moraes JM et al. A full solid diet as the initial meal in mild acute pancreatitis is safe and result in a shorter length of hospitalization: results from a prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind clinical trial. J Clin Gastroenterol 2010; 44: 517-522
  • 34 Sathiaraj E et al. Clinical trial: oral feeding with a soft diet compared with clear liquid diet as initial meal in mild acute pancreatitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2008; 28: 777-781
  • 35 Jacobson BC et al. A prospective, randomized trial of clear liquids versus low-fat solid diet as the initial meal in mild acute pancreatitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007; 5: 946-951; quiz 886
  • 36 Meng WB et al. Three initial diets for management of mild acute pancreatitis: a meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 2011; 17: 4235-4241
  • 37 Yi F et al. Meta-analysis: total parenteral nutrition versus total enteral nutrition in predicted severe acute pancreatitis. Intern Med 2012; 51: 523-530
  • 38 Al-Omran M et al. Enteral versus parenteral nutrition for acute pancreatitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010; CD002837
  • 39 Gupta R et al. A randomised clinical trial to assess the effect of total enteral and total parenteral nutritional support on metabolic, inflammatory and oxidative markers in patients with predicted severe acute pancreatitis (APACHE II > or = 6). Pancreatology 2003; 3: 406-413
  • 40 Marik PE, Zaloga GP. Meta-analysis of parenteral nutrition versus enteral nutrition in patients with acute pancreatitis. BMJ 2004; 328: 1407
  • 41 Li JY et al. Enteral nutrition within 48 hours of admission improves clinical outcomes of acute pancreatitis by reducing complications: a meta-analysis. PLoS One 2013; 8: e64926
  • 42 Bakker OJ et al. Early versus on-demand nasoenteric tube feeding in acute pancreatitis. N Engl J Med 2014; 371: 1983-1993
  • 43 Petrov MS et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of enteral nutrition formulations in acute pancreatitis. Br J Surg 2009; 96: 1243-1252
  • 44 Petrov MS, Kukosh MV, Emelyanov NV. A randomized controlled trial of enteral versus parenteral feeding in patients with predicted severe acute pancreatitis shows a significant reduction in mortality and in infected pancreatic complications with total enteral nutrition. Dig Surg 2006; 23: 336-344; discussion 344 – 345
  • 45 Petrov MS, Correia MI, Windsor JA. Nasogastric tube feeding in predicted severe acute pancreatitis. A systematic review of the literature to determine safety and tolerance. JOP 2008; 9: 440-448
  • 46 Jiang K et al. Early nasogastric enteral nutrition for severe acute pancreatitis: a systematic review. World J Gastroenterol 2007; 13: 5253-5260
  • 47 Singh N et al. Evaluation of early enteral feeding through nasogastric and nasojejunal tube in severe acute pancreatitis: a noninferiority randomized controlled trial. Pancreas 2012; 41: 153-159
  • 48 Meier R et al. ESPEN guidelines on nutrition in acute pancreatitis. European Society of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. Clin Nutr 2002; 21: 173-183
  • 49 Schroder S et al. [Postpyloric feeding tubes for surgical intensive care patients. Pilot series to evaluate two methods for bedside placement]. Anaesthesist 2011; 60: 214-220
  • 50 Boyer N, McCarthy MS, Mount CA. Analysis of an electromagnetic tube placement device versus a self-advancing nasal jejunal device for postpyloric feeding tube placement. J Hosp Med 2014; 9: 23-28
  • 51 Gianotti L et al. ESPEN Guidelines on Parenteral Nutrition: pancreas. Clin Nutr 2009; 28: 428-435
  • 52 Heidegger CP et al. Optimisation of energy provision with supplemental parenteral nutrition in critically ill patients: a randomised controlled clinical trial. Lancet 2013; 381: 385-393
  • 53 Petrov MS, Atduev VA, Zagainov VE. Advanced enteral therapy in acute pancreatitis: is there a room for immunonutrition? A meta-analysis. Int J Surg 2008; 6: 119-124