Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015; 63(07): 604-608
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1381742
Original Thoracic
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Should We Routinely Investigate Incidental Head and Neck Findings on 18-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography in Patients Being Staged for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer? A Retrospective Analysis

Akshay Patel
1   Division of Thoracic Surgery, St George's Hospital, London, England, United Kingdom
,
Troy Perry
2   Department of Thoracic Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
,
Ian Hunt
1   Division of Thoracic Surgery, St George's Hospital, London, England, United Kingdom
,
Jonathan Abele
3   Department of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
,
Connor Maquire
3   Department of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
,
Michael Allegretto
4   Division of Otolaryngology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
,
Eric Bedard
2   Department of Thoracic Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

15 December 2013

16 April 2014

Publication Date:
24 June 2014 (online)

Abstract

Background Positron emission tomography (PET) with 18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) is routinely performed for investigating suspected lung cancers. Despite the known potential for false-positive FDG uptake in the head and neck, most suspicious lesions on FDG-PET are investigated.

Methods Between October 2002 and January 2010, FDG-PET/PET-computed tomography (CT) reports showing significant incidental uptake were retrospectively analyzed using controls to compare time to treatment for lung cancer and the rate of secondary malignancy in those with and without incidental head and neck FDG uptake.

Results In this study, 48/1,846 PET/PET-CT scan reports reviewed, and demonstrated nonthyroidal head and neck abnormalities. A total of 30 patients had proven non-small cell lung cancer (1.6%); 3/30 (10%) went on to have biopsy proven malignancy. Furthermore, there was a significant increase in time to treatment in those patients with incidental head and neck findings (p = 0.002).

Conclusion These unexpected findings are mostly of no clinical significance and the patient should continue treatment without delay; however, aggressive work-up should be pursued if concerns for head and neck pathology are raised following clinical assessment.

 
  • References

  • 1 Almeida FA, Uzbeck M, Ost D. Initial evaluation of the nonsmall cell lung cancer patient: diagnosis and staging. Curr Opin Pulm Med 2010; 16 (4) 307-314
  • 2 Beatty JS, Williams HT, Aldridge BA , et al. Incidental PET/CT findings in the cancer patient: how should they be managed?. Surgery 2009; 146 (2) 274-281
  • 3 Ishimori T, Patel PV, Wahl RL. Detection of unexpected additional primary malignancies with PET/CT. J Nucl Med 2005; 46 (5) 752-757
  • 4 Even-Sapir E, Lerman H, Gutman M , et al. The presentation of malignant tumours and pre-malignant lesions incidentally found on PET-CT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2006; 33 (5) 541-552
  • 5 Agress Jr H, Cooper BZ. Detection of clinically unexpected malignant and premalignant tumors with whole-body FDG PET: histopathologic comparison. Radiology 2004; 230 (2) 417-422
  • 6 Ozkol V, Alper E, Aydin N, Ozkol HF, Topal NB, Akpinar AT. The clinical value of incidental 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-avid foci detected on positron emission tomography/computed tomography. Nucl Med Commun 2010; 31 (2) 128-136
  • 7 Marom EM, Bruzzi JF, Truong MT. Extrathoracic PET/CT findings in thoracic malignancies. J Thorac Imaging 2006; 21 (2) 154-166
  • 8 Porceddu SV, Burmeister BH, Hicks RJ. Role of functional imaging in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and beyond. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 2008; 22 (6) 1221-1238 , ix–x.
  • 9 Soelberg KK, Bonnema SJ, Brix TH, Hegedüs L. Risk of malignancy in thyroid incidentalomas detected by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography: a systematic review. Thyroid 2012; 22 (9) 918-925