Changing Authorship Patterns and Publishing Habits in the European Journal of Pediatric Surgery: A 10-Year Analysis

Abstract

Aim The aim of this study is an analysis of the changing authorship patterns and publishing habits encountered in papers published in the European Journal of Pediatric Surgery (EJPS) over the past 10 years. Furthermore, it seeks to anticipate the trends in the years ahead.

Materials and Methods We conducted a retrospective review of articles published in the EJPS during a 10-year period (January 1, 2003–December 31, 2012). Each article was classified as an Original Report/Original Article (OR/OA) or as a Case Report/Case Gallery (CR/CG), and they were analyzed separately. For investigation of the percentage distribution of publications according to the number of authors per articles, papers were combined and into three groups (1–2, 3–5, and 6 ≤ authors). The analysis focused on whether the work was done by members of one institution, or in collaboration with other units of the same institution, or in collaboration with other national or multinational institutes.

Results In the past 10 years, the EJPS published 996 articles (616 ORs/OAs, 380 CRs/CGs). The one and two authored publications (125) have not decreased, the three to five authored articles (552) changed minimally, whereas the number of 6 ≤ authored publications (319) has increased. Of 996 publications, 348 were from single institutes and 648 were written in collaboration with two or more other institutes. In addition, in this 10-year period, the number of multinational articles has increased significantly from 24 to 59.

Conclusion Increase in cooperation within and between institutions is a positive trend, aiming with the goal of improving quality of publications.

Keywords

European Journal of Pediatric Surgery - publish or perish - publish together or perish - national collaboration - international collaboration

• References

• 1 McGrail MR, Rickard CM, Jones R. Publish or perish: a systematic review of interventions to increase academic publication rates. High Educ Res Dev 2006; 25: 19-35
• 2 Hirthler MA, Glick PL, Hassett Jr JM , et al. Comparative analysis of successful and unsuccessful candidates for the pediatric surgical matching program. J Pediatr Surg 1992; 27 (2) 142-145 , discussion 145–148
• 3 Pintér A. Changing trends in authorship patterns in the JPS: publish or perish. J Pediatr Surg 2013; 48 (2) 412-417
• 4 Rennie D, Yank V, Emanuel L. When authorship fails. A proposal to make contributors accountable. JAMA 1997; 278 (7) 579-585
• 5 Rennie D. Who did what? Authorship and contribution in 2001. Muscle Nerve 2011; 24: 1274-1277
• 6 Camp M, Escott BG. Authorship proliferation in the orthopaedic literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2013; 95 (7) e44 . doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.00519
• 7 Colquhoun D. Publish-or-perish: peer review and the corruption of science. Available at: http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2011/sep/05
• 8 Poltronieri E, Bravo E, Camerini T , et al. Where on earth to publish? A sample survey comparing traditional and open access publishing in the oncological field. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 2013; 32: 4
• 9 Borry P, Schotsmans P, Dierickx K. Author, contributor or just a signer? A quantitative analysis of authorship trends in the field of bioethics. Bioethics 2006; 20 (4) 213-220
• 10 ICMJE Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. Available at http://www.icmje.org . Accessed May 30, 2011
• 11 Wager E. Do medical journals provide clear and consistent guidelines on authorship?. MedGenMed 2007; 9 (3) 16
• 12 Pignatelli B, Maisonneuve H, Chapuis F. Authorship ignorance: views of researchers in French clinical settings. J Med Ethics 2005; 31 (10) 578-581
• 13 Baerlocher MO, Gautam T, Newton M, Tomlinson G. Changing author counts in five major general medicine journals: effect of author contribution forms. J Clin Epidemiol 2009; 62 (8) 875-877
• 14 Masic I. Ethical aspects and dilemmas of preparing, writing and publishing of the scientific papers in the biomedical journals. Acta Inform Med 2012; 20 (3) 141-148
• 15 Low WY, Ng KH. International collaboration in journal publishing: enhancing quality and visibility. Asia Pac J Public Health 2011; 23 (5) 649-650
• 16 Matarese V. Emerging concepts in high-impact publishing: insights from the First Brazilian Colloquium on High Impact Research and Publishing. Ann 1st Super Sanita 2010; 46: 451-455
• 17 Baethge C. Publish together or perish. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2008; 105 (20) 380-383
• 18 Holschneider A, Hutson J, Peña A , et al. Preliminary report on the international conference for the development of standards for the treatment of anorectal malformations. J Pediatr Surg 2005; 40 (10) 1521-1526
• 19 Suita S, Kinoshita Y, Tajiri T , et al. Clinical characteristics and outcome of Wilms tumors with a favourable histology in Japan: a report from the study group for pediatric solid malignant tumors in the Kyushu Area, Japan. J Pediatr Surg 2006; 41 (9) 1501-1505
• 20 McDonald RJ, Neff KL, Rethlefsen ML, Kallmes DF. Effects of author contribution disclosures and numeric limitations on authorship trends. Mayo Clin Proc 2010; 85 (10) 920-927