Autologous Breast Reconstruction: Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Angiography for Perforator Flap Vessel Mapping

Abstract

Background Selection of a vascular pedicle for autologous breast reconstruction is time consuming and depends on visual evaluation during the surgery. Preoperative imaging of donor site for mapping the perforator artery anatomy greatly improves the efficiency of perforator selection and significantly reduces the operative time. In this article, we present our experience with magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) for perforator vessel mapping including MRA technique and interpretation.

Methods We have performed over 400 MRA examinations from August 2008 to August 2013 at our institution for preoperative imaging of donor site for mapping the perforator vessel anatomy. Using our optimized imaging protocol with blood pool magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents, multiple donor sites can be imaged in a single MRA examination. Following imaging using the postprocessing and reporting tool, we estimated incidence of commonly used perforators for autologous breast reconstruction.

Results In our practice, anterior abdominal wall tissue is the most commonly used donor site for perforator flap breast reconstruction and deep inferior epigastric artery perforators are the most commonly used vascular pedicle. A thigh flap, based on the profunda femoral artery perforator has become the second most used flap at our institution. In addition, MRA imaging also showed evidence of metastatic disease in 4% of our patient subset.

Conclusion Our MRA technique allows the surgeons to confidently assess multiple donor sites for the best perforator and flap design. In conclusion, a well-performed MRA with specific postprocessing provides an accurate method for mapping perforator vessel, at the same time avoiding ionizing radiation.

Keywords

MRA - blood pool contrast agent - perforator flap artery imaging

• References

• 1 International Agency for Research on Cancer. GLOBOCAN 2008: Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide. Available at: http://www.iarc.fr/en/media-centre/iarcnews/2010/globocan2008.php . Accessed September 22, 2013
• 2 Bostwick III J. Breast reconstruction following mastectomy. CA Cancer J Clin 1995; 45 (5) 289-304
• 3 Rawson AE, McClellan WT. Current concepts in breast reconstruction. W V Med J 2009; 105 (Spec No): 16-22 , quiz 23
• 4 Fodor L, Bota IO, Filip CI , et al. New trends in breast reconstruction. Chirurgia (Bucur) 2011; 106 (4) 485-489
• 5 Mathes DW, Neligan PC. Current techniques in preoperative imaging for abdomen-based perforator flap microsurgical breast reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg 2010; 26 (1) 3-10
• 6 Mathes DW, Neligan PC. Preoperative imaging techniques for perforator selection in abdomen-based microsurgical breast reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg 2010; 37 (4) 581-591 , xi
• 7 Greenspun D, Vasile J, Levine JL , et al. Anatomic imaging of abdominal perforator flaps without ionizing radiation: seeing is believing with magnetic resonance imaging angiography. J Reconstr Microsurg 2010; 26 (1) 37-44
• 8 Moon HK, Taylor GI. The vascular anatomy of rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flaps based on the deep superior epigastric system. Plast Reconstr Surg 1988; 82 (5) 815-832
• 9 Phillips TJ, Stella DL, Rozen WM, Ashton M, Taylor GI. Abdominal wall CT angiography: a detailed account of a newly established preoperative imaging technique. Radiology 2008; 249 (1) 32-44
• 10 Granzow JW, Levine JL, Chiu ES, Allen RJ. Breast reconstruction with the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap: history and an update on current technique. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2006; 59 (6) 571-579
• 11 Fukaya E, Kuwatsuru R, Iimura H, Ihara K, Sakurai H. Imaging of the superficial inferior epigastric vascular anatomy and preoperative planning for the SIEA flap using MDCTA. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2011; 64 (1) 63-68
• 12 Strauch B, Yu H-L. Atlas of Microvascular Surgery: Anatomy and Operative Techniques. New York, NY: Thieme; 2006
• 13 Karunanithy N, Rose V, Lim AKP, Mitchell A. CT angiography of inferior epigastric and gluteal perforating arteries before free flap breast reconstruction. Radiographics 2011; 31 (5) 1307-1319
• 14 Tseng CY, Lipa JE. Perforator flaps in breast reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg 2010; 37 (4) 641-654 , vi–ii
• 15 Rozen WM, Pan W-R, Le Roux CM, Taylor GI, Ashton MW. The venous anatomy of the anterior abdominal wall: an anatomical and clinical study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 124 (3) 848-853
• 16 Schaverien MV, Ludman CN, Neil-Dwyer J , et al. Relationship between venous congestion and intraflap venous anatomy in DIEP flaps using contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 126 (2) 385-392
• 17 Ahmadzadeh R, Bergeron L, Tang M, Morris SF. The superior and inferior gluteal artery perforator flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 120 (6) 1551-1556
• 18 Rozen WM, Ting JWC, Grinsell D, Ashton MW. Superior and inferior gluteal artery perforators: In-vivo anatomical study and planning for breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2011; 64 (2) 217-225
• 19 Fansa H, Schirmer S, Warnecke IC, Cervelli A, Frerichs O. The transverse myocutaneous gracilis muscle flap: a fast and reliable method for breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 122 (5) 1326-1333
• 20 Kappler UA, Constantinescu MA, Büchler U, Vögelin E. Anatomy of the proximal cutaneous perforator vessels of the gracilis muscle. Br J Plast Surg 2005; 58 (4) 445-448
• 21 Allen RJ, Haddock NT, Ahn CY, Sadeghi A. Breast reconstruction with the profunda artery perforator flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 129 (1) 16e-23e
• 22 Lauffer RB, Parmelee DJ, Dunham SU , et al. MS-325: albumin-targeted contrast agent for MR angiography. Radiology 1998; 207 (2) 529-538
• 23 Ersoy H, Jacobs P, Kent CK, Prince MR. Blood pool MR angiography of aortic stent-graft endoleak. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004; 182 (5) 1181-1186
• 24 Thimmappa ND, Dutruel SP, Pei M , et al. Pre-operative perforator flap MRA for autologous breast reconstruction. In: Proceedings of the 21st Annual Meeting and Exhibition of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine; April 20–26, 2013; Salt Lake City, UT
• 25 Zou Z, Kate Lee H, Levine JL , et al. Gadofosveset trisodium-enhanced abdominal perforator MRA. J Magn Reson Imaging 2012; 35 (3) 711-716
• 26 Vasile JV, Newman T, Rusch DG , et al. Anatomic imaging of gluteal perforator flaps without ionizing radiation: seeing is believing with magnetic resonance angiography. J Reconstr Microsurg 2010; 26 (1) 45-57
• 27 Newman TM, Vasile J, Levine JL , et al. Perforator flap magnetic resonance angiography for reconstructive breast surgery: a review of 25 deep inferior epigastric and gluteal perforator artery flap patients. J Magn Reson Imaging 2010; 31 (5) 1176-1184
• 28 Chernyak V, Rozenblit AM, Greenspun DT , et al. Breast reconstruction with deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap: 3.0-T gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging for preoperative localization of abdominal wall perforators. Radiology 2009; 250 (2) 417-424
• 29 Masia J, Kosutic D, Cervelli D, Clavero JA, Monill JM, Pons G. In search of the ideal method in perforator mapping: noncontrast magnetic resonance imaging. J Reconstr Microsurg 2010; 26 (1) 29-35
• 30 CodeMap 2013 Medicare physician fee schedule reimbursement. Available at: https://www.codemap.com/ge/index.cfm?cat=5&subcat=27 . Accessed December 22, 2013