Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2013; 17(05): 429-436
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1361587
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Anatomy and Biomechanics of the Elbow Joint

Silvia Martin
1   Department of Radiology, Son Llatzer Hospital, Palma de Mallorca, Spain
,
Eugenia Sanchez
2   Department of Radiology, Clínica Cemtro, Madrid, Spain
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
10 December 2013 (online)

Abstract

Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging provides clinically useful information in assessing the elbow joint. Superior depiction of muscles, ligaments and tendons as well as the ability to directly visualize nerves, bone marrow and hyaline cartilage, are advantages of MR imaging relative to conventional imaging techniques. As the elbow is located superficially, clinical examination is easier for the orthopedic surgeon and only a few cases need a diagnosis for the radiologist, for this reason the elbow joint is little known for the radiologist. To better understand the injuries that occur in the elbow during the sport activities, we need a better understanding of the biomechanics of the joint. And for understanding the biomechanics, it is necessary to know the exact anatomy of the elbow joint and to be able to identify each anatomic structure in the different imaging planes and pulse sequences. This is especially important in MR as the imaging tool that shows a highest soft tissue resolution among other imaging techniques.

 
  • References

  • 1 Sonin AH, Tutton SM, Fitzgerald SW, Peduto AJ. MR imaging of the adult elbow. Radiographics 1996; 16 (6) 1323-1336
  • 2 Chew ML, Giuffrè BM. Disorders of the distal biceps brachii tendon. Radiographics 2005; 25 (5) 1227-1237
  • 3 Martinoli C, Bianchi S, Zamorani MP, Zunzunegui JL, Derchi LE. Ultrasound of the elbow. Eur J Ultrasound 2001; 14 (1) 21-27
  • 4 Daniels DL, Mallisee TA, Erickson SJ, Boynton MD, Carrera GF. The elbow joint: osseous and ligamentous structures. Radiographics 1998; 18 (1) 229-236
  • 5 Goswami GK. The fat pad sign. Radiology 2002; 222 (2) 419-420
  • 6 Cotten A, Jacobson J, Brossmann J , et al. Collateral ligaments of the elbow: conventional MR imaging and MR arthrography with coronal oblique plane and elbow flexion. Radiology 1997; 204 (3) 806-812
  • 7 Murphy BJ. MR imaging of the elbow. Radiology 1992; 184 (2) 525-529
  • 8 Bunnell DH, Fisher DA, Bassett LW, Gold RH, Ellman H. Elbow joint: normal anatomy on MR images. Radiology 1987; 165 (2) 527-531
  • 9 Rosenberg ZS, Bencardino J, Beltran J. MR features of nerve disorders at the elbow. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 1997; 5 (3) 545-565
  • 10 Loftice J, Fleisig GS, Zheng N, Andrews JR. Biomechanics of the elbow in sports. Clin Sports Med 2004; 23 (4) 519-530 , vii–viii
  • 11 Hutchinson MR, Wynn S. Biomechanics and development of the elbow in the young throwing athlete. Clin Sports Med 2004; 23 (4) 531-544 , viii
  • 12 Alcid JG, Ahmad CS, Lee TQ. Elbow anatomy and structural biomechanics. Clin Sports Med 2004; 23 (4) 503-517 , vii
  • 13 Pope Jr TL, Bloem HL, Beltran J, Morrison WB, Wilson DJ. Normal elbow. In: Imaging of the Musculoskeletal System, Vol 1. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders; 2008: 221
  • 14 An KN, Morrey BF, Chao EY. The effect of parcial renoval of proximal ulna on elbow constraint. Clin Orthop 1986; 209: 270-279
  • 15 Soller DW. The elbow. In: Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine. 3rd ed., Vol 2. Baltimore, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007: 1463
  • 16 Morrey BF, An KN. Articular and ligamentous contributions to the stability of the elbow joint. Am JS Sports Med 1983; 11: 315-319