Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014; 62(02): 133-139
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1343980
Original Thoracic
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Serial Changes in Pulmonary Function after Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery Lobectomy in Lung Cancer Patients

Yangki Seok
1   Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoungnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea
,
Sanghoon Jheon
1   Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoungnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea
,
Sukki Cho
1   Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoungnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

25 January 2013

28 March 2013

Publication Date:
25 April 2013 (online)

Abstract

Background The aim of this study is to evaluate the serial changes in pulmonary function and the recovery time for the observed postoperative values to reach the predicted postoperative values after video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) lobectomy for lung cancer.

Patients and Methods Patients undergoing VATS lobectomy for lung cancer were prospectively evaluated using complete preoperative and repeated postoperative pulmonary function tests (PFTs). The parameters of PFT at each time were compared according to the resected lobe as well as the presence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The differences between the observed and predicted postoperative values of PFT and the recovery time for the observed values to reach the predicted values were calculated.

Results Seventy-two patients (33 men, 39 women; mean age: 63.9 years) received complete pre- and postoperative regular PFT after undergoing VATS lobectomy. Of these patients, 24 (33.3%) patients satisfied the criteria for COPD. During the immediate postoperative period, forced vital capacity (FVC) percentage of the patients who received right lower lobectomy patients was decreased most significantly compared with the preoperative values. Compared with the upper lobectomy (UL) group, the lower lobectomy (LL) group showed a significant decrease of FVC% up to 6 months. However, there was no significant difference at 12 months after surgery. Patients with COPD showed little reduction of FEV1% that persisted significantly until 1 month after the surgery in both UL and LL groups. The recovery time was shortest in the left lower lobectomy patients, and it was shorter in the LL group than in the UL group.

Conclusions Postoperative pulmonary function and recovery time were different depending on the lobe resected and presence of COPD in VATS lobectomy patients. The information obtained from postoperative serial PFT would help accurately predict postoperative pulmonary function changes and recovery time after VATS lobectomy for lung cancer.

 
  • References

  • 1 Handy Jr JR, Asaph JW, Douville EC, Ott GY, Grunkemeier GL, Wu Y. Does video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy for lung cancer provide improved functional outcomes compared with open lobectomy?. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2010; 37 (2) 451-455
  • 2 Bolliger CT, Jordan P, Solèr M , et al. Pulmonary function and exercise capacity after lung resection. Eur Respir J 1996; 9 (3) 415-421
  • 3 Subotic DR, Mandaric DV, Eminovic TM , et al. Influence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease on postoperative lung function and complications in patients undergoing operations for primary non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007; 134 (5) 1292-1299
  • 4 Sekine Y, Iwata T, Chiyo M , et al. Minimal alteration of pulmonary function after lobectomy in lung cancer patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Ann Thorac Surg 2003; 76 (2) 356-361 , discussion 362
  • 5 Brunelli A, Monteverde M, Borri A, Salati M, Al Refai M, Fianchini A. Predicted versus observed maximum oxygen consumption early after lung resection. Ann Thorac Surg 2003; 76 (2) 376-380
  • 6 Ueda K, Tanaka T, Hayashi M , et al. Compensation of pulmonary function after upper lobectomy versus lower lobectomy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2011; 142 (4) 762-767
  • 7 Pauwels RA, Buist AS, Calverley PM, Jenkins CR, Hurd SS. GOLD Scientific Committee. Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. NHLBI/WHO Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) Workshop summary. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001; 163 (5) 1256-1276
  • 8 Fountain SW. British Thoracic Society; Society of Cardiothoracic Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland Working Party. BTS guidelines: guidelines on the selection of patients with lung cancer for surgery. Thorax 2001; 56 (2) 89-108
  • 9 Nagahiro I, Andou A, Aoe M, Sano Y, Date H, Shimizu N. Pulmonary function, postoperative pain, and serum cytokine level after lobectomy: a comparison of VATS and conventional procedure. Ann Thorac Surg 2001; 72 (2) 362-365
  • 10 Korst RJ, Ginsberg RJ, Ailawadi M , et al. Lobectomy improves ventilatory function in selected patients with severe COPD. Ann Thorac Surg 1998; 66 (3) 898-902
  • 11 Edwards JG, Duthie DJ, Waller DA. Lobar volume reduction surgery: a method of increasing the lung cancer resection rate in patients with emphysema. Thorax 2001; 56 (10) 791-795
  • 12 Kushibe K, Kawaguchi T, Kimura M, Takahama M, Tojo T, Taniguchi S. Influence of the site of lobectomy and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease on pulmonary function: a follow-up analysis. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2009; 8 (5) 529-533
  • 13 Brunelli A, Sabbatini A, Xiume' F , et al. A model to predict the decline of the forced expiratory volume in one second and the carbon monoxide lung diffusion capacity early after major lung resection. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2005; 4 (1) 61-65
  • 14 Varela G, Brunelli A, Rocco G , et al. Predicted versus observed FEV1 in the immediate postoperative period after pulmonary lobectomy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2006; 30 (4) 644-648
  • 15 Bolliger CT, Wyser C, Roser H, Solèr M, Perruchoud AP. Lung scanning and exercise testing for the prediction of postoperative performance in lung resection candidates at increased risk for complications. Chest 1995; 108 (2) 341-348
  • 16 Bolliger CT, Jordan P, Solèr M , et al. Exercise capacity as a predictor of postoperative complications in lung resection candidates. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1995; 151 (5) 1472-1480