Synlett 2014; 25(10): 1438-1442
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1341252
letter
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Improved Synthesis of a Salicylic Aldehyde C-Nucleoside for Metallo Base Pairs via Heck Reaction

Marco Minuth
Institut für Organische Chemie, Universität Stuttgart, Pfaffenwaldring 55, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany   Email: lehrstuhl-2@oc.uni-stuttgart.de
,
Wolfgang Frey
Institut für Organische Chemie, Universität Stuttgart, Pfaffenwaldring 55, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany   Email: lehrstuhl-2@oc.uni-stuttgart.de
,
Clemens Richert*
Institut für Organische Chemie, Universität Stuttgart, Pfaffenwaldring 55, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany   Email: lehrstuhl-2@oc.uni-stuttgart.de
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 07 March 2014

Accepted after revision: 27 March 2014

Publication Date:
30 April 2014 (online)


Abstract

Salicylic aldehyde C-nucleosides, when incorporated in oligodeoxynucleotides, have been widely used to prepare DNA duplexes with metallo base pairs. Here, we report a synthesis of such nucleosides that involves diastereoselective formation of the glycosidic bond via Heck reaction.

Supporting Information

 
  • References and Notes

  • 1 Clever GH, Kaul C, Carell T. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007; 46: 6226 ; Angew. Chem. 2007, 119, 6340
  • 2 Yang H, Metera KL, Sleiman HF. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2010; 254: 2403
  • 3 Clever GH, Shionoya M. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2010; 254: 2391
  • 4 Müller J. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2008; 3749
  • 5 Ghosh S, Defrancq E. Chem. Eur. J. 2010; 16: 12780
  • 6 Scharf P, Müller J. ChemPlusChem 2013; 78: 20
  • 7 Takezawa Y, Shionoya M. Acc. Chem. Res. 2012; 45: 2066
  • 8 Clever GH, Polborn K, Carell T. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005; 44: 7204 ; Angew.Chem. 2005, 117, 7370
  • 9 Clever GH, Söltl Y, Burks H, Spahl W, Carell T. Chem. Eur. J. 2006; 12: 8708
  • 10 Clever GH, Carell T. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007; 46: 250 ; Angew.Chem. 2007, 119, 254
  • 11 Tanaka K, Clever GH, Takezawa Y, Yamada Y, Kaul C, Shionoya M, Carell T. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2006; 1: 190
  • 12 Clever GH, Reitmeier SJ, Carell T, Schiemann O. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010; 49: 4927 ; Angew. Chem. 2010, 122, 5047.
  • 13 Liu S, Clever GH, Takezawa Y, Kaneko M, Tanaka K, Guo X, Shionoya M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011; 50: 8886 ; Angew. Chem. 2011, 123, 9048
  • 14 Kaul C, Müller M, Wagner M, Schneider S, Carell T. Nat. Chem. 2011; 3: 794
  • 15 Heck RF, Nolley JP. J. Org. Chem. 1972; 37: 2320
  • 16 Štambaský J, Hocek M, Kočovský P. Chem. Rev. 2009; 109: 6729
  • 17 Wellington KW, Benner SA. Nucleosides, Nucleotides Nucleic Acids 2006; 25: 1309
  • 18 Wu Q, Simons C. Synthesis 2004; 1533
  • 19 Wynberg H, Meijer EW. The Reimer–Tiemann Reaction . In Organic Reactions . Vol. 28. John Wiley; Hoboken, NJ: 1982
  • 20 Hofslökken NU, Skatteböl L. Acta Chem. Scand. 1999; 53. 258
  • 21 Himmelsbach F, Pfleiderer W. Tetrahedron Lett. 1982; 23: 4793
  • 22 Himmelsbach F, Schulz B, Trichtinger T, Ramamurthy R, Pfleiderer W. Tetrahedron 1984; 40: 59
  • 23 Minuth M, Richert C. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013; 52: 10874 ; Angew. Chem. 2013, 125, 11074
  • 24 2-(5,5-Dimethyl-1,3-dioxan-2-yl)-5-iodophenol (4b) The following protocol was derived from that for a related compound described in ref. 8. Salicylic aldehyde 3 (1.50 g, 6.05 mmol, 1 equiv), 2,2-dimethyl-1,3-propanediol (2.52 g, 24.20 mmol, 4 equiv), tetrabutylammonium tribromide (0.29 g, 0.61 mmol, 0.1 equiv), and triethylorthoformate (1.10 mL, 0,99 g, 6.66 mmol, 1.1 equiv) were added to a flask. The reaction mixture was stirred at r.t. for 16 h under argon. TLC (PE–EtOAc = 9:1, v/v) showed complete conversion of the starting material. The reaction mixture was diluted with EtOAc (50 mL) and washed with sat. NaHCO3 solution (50 mL). The organic phase was washed twice with H2O and dried over Na2SO4. Solvents were evaporated and the yellow, oily crude was purified by column chromatography on silica (140 g), eluting with a step gradient of EtOAc (7–14%) in PE to give 1.94 g of 4b (5.80 mmol, 96%) as a colorless solid. TLC (PE–EtOAc = 9:1, v/v). Rf = 0.42. HRMS (ESI-TOF): m/z calcd for C12H15IO3 [M + Na]+: 356.996; found: 356.994. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 0.82 (s, 3 H), 1.27 (s, 3 H), 3.66 (d, J = 11.1 Hz, 2 H), 3.81 (d, J = 11.1 Hz, 2 H), 5.49 (s, 1 H), 6.89 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1 H), 7.20 (dd, J = 8.2, 1.6 Hz, 1 H), 7.28 (d, J = 1.6 Hz, 1 H), 8.08 (s, 1 H) ppm. 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 21.9, 23.1, 30.5, 77.7, 95.5, 102.7, 121.7, 126.5, 128.9, 129.4, 156.0 ppm. IR: ν = 3278, 2958, 2869, 1605, 1558, 1478, 1386, 1214, 1093, 1016, 705 cm–1. 2-[4-Iodo-2-(4-nitrophenylethoxy)phenyl]-5,5-dimethyl-1,3-dioxane (5b) Acetal 4b (1.00 g, 2.99 mmol, 1 equiv), Ph3P (1.57 g, 5.98 mmol, 2 equiv), and 2-(4-nitrophenyl)ethanol (1.00 g, 5.98 mmol, 2 equiv) were added to a flask and dried in vacuo. THF (15 mL) was added, and the resulting solution was cooled to 0 °C. DIAD (1.17 mL, 1.21 g, 5.98 mmol, 2 equiv) was added dropwise, and the orange solution was stirred overnight, while the mixture was allowed to warm to 20 °C. Volatiles were removed under reduced pressure, and the resulting brown oil was purified by column chromatography on silica (100 g), eluting with a step gradient of CH2Cl2 (50–75%) in PE, to give 1.36 g of 5b (2.82 mmol, 94%) as a colorless solid. TLC (CH2Cl2–PE = 1:1, v/v). Rf = 0.22. HRMS (ESI-TOF): m/z calcd for C20H22INO5 [M + Na]+: 506.044; found: 506.045. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 0.78 (s, 3 H), 1.27 (s, 3 H), 3.22 (t, J = 6.2 Hz, 2 H), 3.52 (d, J = 10.8 Hz, 2 H), 3.81 (d, J = 10.8 Hz, 2 H,), 4.23 (t, J = 6.2 Hz, 2 H), 5.49 (s, 1 H), 7.17 (s, 1 H), 7.34–7.36 (m, 2 H), 7.44–7.50 (m, 2 H), 8.16–8.22 (m, 2 H) ppm. 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 22.0, 23.1, 30.4, 35.5, 68.3, 77.9, 95.1, 96.6, 121.2, 123.8, 127.0, 129.0, 130.1, 130.6, 146.3, 147.0, 155.9 ppm. IR: ν = 2949, 2866, 2833, 1593, 1513, 1341, 1245, 1093, 1020, 817 cm–1. Enol Ether 7b A mixture of Pd(OAc)2 (50 mg, 220 μmol, 0.2 equiv) and AsPh3 (136 mg, 440 μmol, 0.4 equiv) was dissolved in CHCl3 (10.3 mL) under argon. After stirring for 1 h, Ag2CO3 (459 mg, 1.67 mmol, 1.5 equiv) was added, followed by addition of compound 5b (700 mg, 1.45 mmol, 1.3 equiv) and glycal 6 (257 mg, 1.11 mmol, 1 equiv). The reaction mixture was stirred at 70 °C for 4 h, and then allowed to cool to r.t., followed by filtration over Celite. Volatiles were removed in vacuo, and the resulting crude was purified by chromatography, using silica (30 g), and eluting with a step gradient of Et2O (50–75%) in PE to afford 372 mg of 7b (640 μmol, 58%) as a colorless foam. TLC (PE–Et2O = 1:1, v/v). Rf = 0.19. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 0.22 (s, 3 H), 0.23 (s, 3 H), 0.78 (s, 3 H), 0.95 (s, 9 H), 1.28 (s, 3 H), 3.21 (t, J = 6.2 Hz, 2 H), 3.53 (d, J = 10.7 Hz, 2 H), 3.67–3.77 (m, 4 H), 4.26 (t, J = 6.2 Hz, 2 H), 4.57–4.65 (m, 1 H), 4.79 (br t, J = 1.6 Hz, 1 H), 5.55 (s, 1 H), 5.70 (dd, J = 3.7, 1.6 Hz, 1 H), 6.97–7.02 (m, 2 H), 7.44–7.52 (m, 2 H), 7.63 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1 H), 8.14–8.21 (m, 2 H) ppm. 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ = –4.9, –4.7, 18.2, 22.0, 23.1, 25.7, 30.4, 35.6, 62.7, 67.9, 78.0, 83.4, 84.8, 96.8, 101.4, 110.5, 120.1, 123.7, 127.1, 127.6, 128.8, 130.1, 144.9, 146.8, 146.9, 151.6, 155.7 ppm. IR: ν = 2952, 2929, 2856, 1656, 1518, 1343, 1227, 1094, 1033, 833 cm–1. Ketone 8b To a vessel containing a solution of enol ether 7b (700 mg, 1.20 mmol, 1 equiv) in dry THF (7 mL) under argon at 0 °C was added triethylamine trihydrofluoride (292 μL, 289 mg, 1.80 mmol, 1.5 equiv). CAUTION: HF that may be liberated from this mixture is very hazardous in case of skin contact, eye contact, or ingestion. The mixture was filtered through a short silica column (10 g), eluting with CH2Cl2–MeOH (95:5, v/v, 50 mL). The filtrate was concentrated in vacuo, and 555 mg of the resulting product 8b (1.18 mmol, 99%) were obtained as a colorless foam. TLC (CH2Cl2–MeOH = 95:5, v/v). Rf = 0.44. HRMS (ESI-TOF): m/z calcd for C25H29NO8 [M + Na]+: 494.179; found: 494.176. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 0.71 (s, 3 H), 1.21 (s, 3 H), 2.36 (dd, J = 18.0, 10.4 Hz, 1 H), 2.77 (dd, J = 18.0, 5.9 Hz, 1 H), 3.15 (t, J = 6.4 Hz, 2 H), 3.45 (d, J = 11.0 Hz, 2 H), 3.64 (d, J = 11.0 Hz, 2 H), 3.83–3.87 (m, 2 H), 3.94 (t, J = 3.5 Hz, 1 H), 4.20 (t, J = 6.4 Hz, 2 H), 5.11 (dd, J = 10.4, 5.9 Hz, 1 H), 5.48 (s, 1 H), 6.89 (d, J = 1.3 Hz, 1 H), 6.93 (dd, J = 7.9, 1.3 Hz, 1 H), 7.55–7.62 (m, 2 H), 7.58 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1 H), 8.06–8.14 (m, 2 H) ppm. 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 22.0, 23.1, 30.4, 35.6, 45.5, 61.6, 68.2, 77.4, 78.0, 82.4, 96.7, 109.4, 118.9, 123.8, 127.4, 127.8, 130.1, 142.2, 146.6, 146.9, 155.8, 213.6 ppm. IR: ν = 2954, 2860, 1742, 1518, 1345, 1090, 1009, 831 cm–1. Nucleoside 9b Ketone 8b (555 mg, 1.18 mmol, 1 equiv) was dissolved in dry MeCN (12 mL), and the solution was cooled to 0 °C. Then, NaBH(OAc)3 (499 mg, 2.35 mmol, 2 equiv) was added, and the solution was stirred at 0 °C for 2 h. The reaction was quenched by adding MeOH (10 mL), and volatiles were removed in vacuo. The resulting crude was chromatographed on silica (25 g) with a gradient of 3–5% MeOH in CH2Cl2 to afford 432 mg (912 μmol, 76%) of the desired nucleoside 9b as a colorless solid. TLC (CH2Cl2–MeOH = 95:5, v/v). Rf = 0.14. HRMS (ESI-TOF): m/z calcd for C25H31NO8 [M + Na]+: 496.194; found: 496.194; 1H NMR (300 MHz, MeOD): δ = 0.76 (s, 3 H), 1.24 (s, 3 H), 1.90 (ddd, J = 13.1, 10.3, 6.0 Hz, 1 H), 1.90 (ddd, J = 13.1, 6.0, 1.7 Hz, 1 H), 3.20 (t, J = 6.1 Hz, 2 H), 3.49 (d, J = 10.8 Hz, 2 H), 3.63 (d, J = 10.8 Hz, 2 H), 3.65–3.69 (m, 2 H), 3.94 (dd, J = 5.1, 2.3 Hz, 1 H), 4.30 (m, 3 H), 5.10 (dd, J = 10.3, 6.0 Hz, 1 H), 5.47 (s, 1 H), 6.97 (dd, J = 7.7, 1.2 Hz, 1 H), 7.07 (d, J = 1.2 Hz, 1 H), 7.49 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1 H), 7.52–7.58 (m, 2 H), 8.14–8.20 (m, 2 H) ppm. 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 21.9, 23.3, 31.0, 36.4, 45.0, 63.9, 69.4, 74.2, 78.7, 81.2, 89.2, 98.1, 110.8, 119.3, 124.4, 127.4, 128.2, 131.4, 146.0, 148.1, 148.6, 157.1 ppm. IR: ν = 2953, 2870, 1513, 1343, 1092, 1032, 821 cm–1 .