Synlett 2014; 25(12): 1756-1758
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1341155
letter
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

An Improved Method for Difluorocyclopropanation of Alkenes

Duncan M. Gill
a   Department of Chemical Sciences, University of Huddersfield, Queensgate, Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, HD1 3DH, UK
,
Neil McLay
a   Department of Chemical Sciences, University of Huddersfield, Queensgate, Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, HD1 3DH, UK
,
Michael J. Waring
b   Oncology Innovative Medicines, AstraZeneca PLC, Mereside, Alderley Park, Macclesfield, Cheshire, SK10 4TF, UK   Email: j.b.sweeney@hud.ac.uk
,
Christopher T. Wilkinson
a   Department of Chemical Sciences, University of Huddersfield, Queensgate, Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, HD1 3DH, UK
,
Joseph B. Sweeney*
a   Department of Chemical Sciences, University of Huddersfield, Queensgate, Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, HD1 3DH, UK
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 28 February 2014

Accepted: 14 March 2014

Publication Date:
26 June 2014 (online)


Abstract

Difluorocyclopropanation of alkenes using fluorinated acetate salts using convential heating is often a slow, inefficient, and energy-intensive process. We report here a modified protocol which enables the rapid (<5 min) preparation of 1,1-difluorocyclopropanes, using microwave irradiation. The new procedure is not only considerably faster than previously reported methods, but it also employs easily removed, low boiling-point solvents and avoids the use of highly toxic or ozone-depleting substances.

 
  • References

  • 1 Purser S, Moore PR, Swallow S, Gouverneur V. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2008; 37: 320
  • 2 Birchall JM, Cross GE, Haszeldine RN. Proc. Chem. Soc. 1960; 81

    • For reports of difluorocarbene addition to olefins, see:
    • 3a Seyferth D, Hopper SP, Darragh KV. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1969; 91: 6536
    • 3b Sargeant PB. J. Org. Chem. 1970; 35: 678
    • 3c Wheaton GA, Burton DJ. J. Fluorine Chem. 1976; 9: 25
    • 3d Dolbier WR, Wojtowicz H, Burkholder CR. J. Org. Chem. 1990; 55: 5420
    • 3e Tian F, Kruger V, Bautista O, Duan JX, Li AR, Dolbier WR. Jr, Chen QY. Org. Lett. 2000; 2: 563
    • 3f Dolbier WR. Jr, Tian F, Duan JX, Li AR, Ait-Mohand S, Bautista O, Buathong S, Baker JM, Crawford J, Anselme P, Cai XH, Modzelewska A, Koroniak H, Battiste MA, Chen QY. J. Fluorine Chem. 2004; 125: 459
    • 3g Nowak I, Cannon JF, Robins MJ. Org. Lett. 2004; 6: 4767
    • 3h Dolbier WR, Gautriaud E, Cai X. J. Fluorine Chem. 2005; 126: 339
    • 3i Oshiro K, Morimoto Y, Amii H. Synthesis 2010; 2080
    • 3j Wang F, Zhang W, Zhu J, Li H, Huang KW, Hu J. Chem. Commun. 2011; 47: 2411
    • 3k Wang F, Luo T, Hu J, Wang Y, Krishnan HS, Jog PV, Ganesh SK, Prakash GK, Olah GA. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011; 50: 7153
  • 4 Brahms DL. S, Dailey WP. Chem. Rev. 1996; 96: 1585
  • 5 See, for instance: Kubyshkin VS, Mykhailiuk PK, Afonin S, Ulrich AS, Komarov IV. Org. Lett. 2012; 14: 5254
  • 6 Fujioka Y, Amii H. Org. Lett. 2008; 10: 769
  • 7 Burton DJ, Naae DG. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1973; 95: 8467
  • 8 Cullen WR, Leeder WR. Inorg. Chem. 1966; 5: 1004
  • 9 Fuqua SA, Duncan WG, Silverstein RM. J. Org. Chem. 1965; 30: 1027
  • 10 Data for 2a Clear colorless oil (269.5 mg, 75%); Rf = 0.30 (100% hexanes). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.37–7.25 (5 H, m), 1.71–1.66 (1 H, m), 1.52 (3 H, dd, J = 3.0, 2.0 Hz), 1.43–1.40 (1 H, m). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 139.1, 128.5, 128.3, 127.2, 114.5, 31.2, 22.5, 21.4. 19F NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = –132.3 to –132.7 (1 F, m), –137.3 to –137.7 (1 F, m). IR: νmax = 2981, 1500, 1469, 1445, 1369, 1300, 1208.9, 1172, 1097, 1065, 1006, 932, 902, 869, 765, 716, 610, 545, 480 cm–1. MS: m/z calcd for C10H10F2: 168.0751; found: 168.9; m/z calcd for C9H7F2 = 153.0506; found: 153.1.
  • 11 Typical Experimental Procedure Sodium chlorodifluoroacetate (914 mg 6.0 mmol) was completely dissolved in a THF solution (4.0 mL) of alkene (2.0 mmol) and exposed to MW irradiation (using a Milestone MicroSYNTH reactor and Q20 vessel with Weflon® button and magnetic stirring bead). Twist control, rotor control, start parameters, and continuous power were all selected. T2 control was used with 89% stirring. Method parameters were set at 300 W, 170 °C, 00:05:00). After sampling for quantitative NMR studies, the reaction mixture was diluted with H2O (20.0 mL) and the crude reaction product extracted into Et2O (3 × 20.0 mL). The combined organic extracts were dried over anhydrous MgSO4 and the solvent removed in vacuo to yield the crude product as a brown oil. The crude reaction products were purified by column chromatography using 100% hexanes as eluent.