Eur J Pediatr Surg 2012; 22(06): 420-425
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1331459
Review
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Long-Gap Esophageal Atresia: a Meta-Analysis of Jejunal Interposition, Colon Interposition, and Gastric Pull-Up

Gabriele Gallo
1   Department of Paediatric Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
,
Sander Zwaveling
2   Department of Paediatric Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
,
Henk Groen
3   Department of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
,
David Van der Zee
2   Department of Paediatric Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
,
Jan Hulscher
1   Department of Paediatric Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

08 September 2012

09 October 2012

Publication Date:
04 December 2012 (online)

Abstract

Aim There is still no consensus about the optimal surgical approach for esophageal replacement in the case of long-gap esophageal atresia (LGEA) or extensive corrosive strictures. The aim of this article was to perform a meta-analysis comparing the most widely used techniques for esophageal replacement in children: jejunal interposition (JI), colon interposition (CI), and gastric pull-up (GPU).

Methods Review of the English-language literature published in the past 5 years about esophageal replacement in children was done. The focus was on postoperative survival rate, morbidity (gastrointestinal complications such as anastomotic stenosis/leakage and respiratory complications such as pneumothorax, pneumonia, and atelectasis), and long-term follow-up when available. Among long-term gastrointestinal outcomes were dysphagia, reflux, and dumping; among long-term respiratory outcomes were recurrent pneumonia and recurrent aspiration leading to chronic lung disease. Data were computed by Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software (Version 2.2.064).

Main Results A total of 15 studies (4 comparative retrospective, 8 retrospective, and 3 prospective) including 470 patients (264 LGEA) were identified; 344 (73%) patients underwent CI, 99 (21%) GPU, and 27 (6%) JI. Among these 15 studies, 9 provided data about long-term follow-up.

Conclusion Proper prospective comparative studies are lacking. GPU and CI appear comparable regarding postoperative mortality, anastomotic complications, and graft loss. On the long-term, GPU seems to be associated with a higher respiratory morbidity but fewer gastrointestinal complications than CI. Based on this article only two series provide data about JI, and they show highly divergent results. JI appears to be a valid replacement technique when performed by experienced centers; however larger numbers are needed to assess the outcomes of this procedure.

 
  • References

  • 1 Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JPT, Rothstein HR. Introduction to Meta-Analysis. John Wiley and Sons; 2009
  • 2 Burgos L, Barrena S, Andrés AM , et al. Colonic interposition for esophageal replacement in children remains a good choice: 33-year median follow-up of 65 patients. J Pediatr Surg 2010; 45 (2) 341-345
  • 3 Hamza AF. Colonic replacement in cases of esophageal atresia. Semin Pediatr Surg 2009; 18 (1) 40-43
  • 4 Esteves E, Sousa-Filho HB, Watanabe S, Silva JF, Neto EC, da Costa AL. Laparoscopically assisted esophagectomy and colon interposition for esophageal replacement in children: preliminary results of a novel technique. J Pediatr Surg 2010; 45 (5) 1053-1060
  • 5 Coopman S, Michaud L, Halna-Tamine M , et al. Long-term outcome of colon interposition after esophagectomy in children. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2008; 47 (4) 458-462
  • 6 Tannuri U, Maksoud-Filho JG, Tannuri AC, Andrade W, Maksoud JG. Which is better for esophageal substitution in children, esophagocoloplasty or gastric transposition? A 27-year experience of a single center. J Pediatr Surg 2007; 42 (3) 500-504
  • 7 Hunter CJ, Petrosyan M, Connelly ME, Ford HR, Nguyen NX. Repair of long-gap esophageal atresia: gastric conduits may improve outcome-a 20-year single center experience. Pediatr Surg Int 2009;
  • 8 Holland AJ, Ron O, Pierro A , et al. Surgical outcomes of esophageal atresia without fistula for 24 years at a single institution. J Pediatr Surg 2009; 44 (10) 1928-1932
  • 9 Bax KM. Jejunum for bridging long-gap esophageal atresia. Semin Pediatr Surg 2009; 18 (1) 34-39
  • 10 Cauchi JA, Buick RG, Gornall P, Simms MH, Parikh DH. Oesophageal substitution with free and pedicled jejunum: short- and long-term outcomes. Pediatr Surg Int 2007; 23 (1) 11-19
  • 11 Sharma S, Gupta DK. Primary gastric pull-up in pure esophageal atresia: technique, feasibility and outcome. A prospective observational study. Pediatr Surg Int 2011; 27 (6) 583-585
  • 12 Gupta DK, Sharma S, Arora MK, Agarwal G, Gupta M, Grover VP. Esophageal replacement in the neonatal period in infants with esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistula. J Pediatr Surg 2007; 42 (9) 1471-1477
  • 13 Tannuri U, Tannuri AC, Gonçalves ME, Cardoso SR. Total gastric transposition is better than partial gastric tube esophagoplasty for esophageal replacement in children. Dis Esophagus 2008; 21 (1) 73-77
  • 14 Esteves E, Silva MC, Paiva KC , et al. Laparoscopic gastric pull-up for long gap esophageal atresia. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2009; 19 (Suppl. 01) S191-S195
  • 15 Stanwell J, Drake D, Pierro A, Kiely E, Curry J. Pediatric laparoscopic-assisted gastric transposition: early experience and outcomes. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2010; 20 (2) 177-181
  • 16 Javed A, Pal S, Dash NR, Sahni P, Chattopadhyay TK. Outcome following surgical management of corrosive strictures of the esophagus. Ann Surg 2011; 254 (1) 62-66
  • 17 Gallo G, Koppelman GH, Vrijlandt EJLE, De Langen ZJ, Hulscher JBF. Pulmonary function in children after gastric pull-up for long gap oesophageal atresia (Abstract). EUPSA Congress; Barcelona 2011