Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013; 61(05): 392-397
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1322606
Original Cardiovascular
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Left Atrial Radiofrequency Ablation Associated with Valve Surgery: Midterm Outcomes

Paolo Nardi
1   Division of Cardiac Surgery, Policlinico Universitario Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
,
Charles Mve Mvondo
1   Division of Cardiac Surgery, Policlinico Universitario Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
,
Antonio Scafuri
1   Division of Cardiac Surgery, Policlinico Universitario Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
,
Antonio Pellegrino
1   Division of Cardiac Surgery, Policlinico Universitario Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
,
Francesca D'Auria
1   Division of Cardiac Surgery, Policlinico Universitario Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
,
Patrizio Polisca
1   Division of Cardiac Surgery, Policlinico Universitario Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
,
Jacob Zeitani
1   Division of Cardiac Surgery, Policlinico Universitario Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
,
Luigi Chiariello
1   Division of Cardiac Surgery, Policlinico Universitario Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

08 November 2011

26 March 2012

Publication Date:
20 November 2012 (online)

Abstract

Background Left atrial ablation is a surgical standard technique for the treatment of persistent or chronic atrial fibrillation (p-AF and c-AF, respectively).

Objective The aim of the study is to evaluate midterm results of left atrial ablation according to modified Maze procedure in patients affected by p-AF or c-AF and concomitant mitral or aortic valve disease requiring surgical treatment.

Methods A total of 108 patients (age, mean ± standard deviation [SD]: 66 ± 8.5 years) underwent left atrial ablation by means of unipolar (n = 62) or bipolar (n = 66) radiofrequency for p-AF (n = 28) or c-AF (n = 100) in association with mitral (n = 93) or mitral and aortic valve (n = 35) surgery.

Results In-hospital mortality was 0.8%. Patients with preoperative c-AF had preoperative greater value of left atrial diameter (56.7 ± 7.4 vs. 52 ± 9 mm, p = 0.05) than those with p-AF. At 9 years after Maze procedure, 86% (n = 24/28) of patients with preoperative p-AF were in sinus rhythm versus 28% (n = 27/95) with c-AF (p < 0.0001). Preoperative c-AF and left atrial diameter of 75 mm or more predicted atrial fibrillation recurrence. In patients in sinus rhythm compared with those in residual atrial fibrillation, survival was 100 versus 86% ± 6.4%, New York Heart Association class was 1.3 ± 0.5 versus 1.7 ± 0.6, and need of lifelong anticoagulation therapy was 43 versus 91% (p < 0.05, for all comparisons).

Conclusions Left atrial Maze procedure for p-AF offers better chances to conversion in sinus rhythm as compared with long-standing c-AF. Survival, functional status, and quality of life are superior in patients who benefit from sinus rhythm.

 
  • References

  • 1 Voeller RK, Schuessler RB, Damiano RJ. Surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation. In: Cohn LH, , ed. Cardiac Surgery in the Adult. New York, NY: McGraw Hill; 2008: 1375-1394
  • 2 Cox JL, Schuessler RB, D'Agostino Jr HJ , et al. The surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation. III. Development of a definitive surgical procedure. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1991; 101 (4) 569-583
  • 3 Wang J, Meng X, Li H, Cui Y, Han J, Xu C. Prospective randomized comparison of left atrial and biatrial radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of atrial fibrillation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2009; 35 (1) 116-122
  • 4 Khargi K, Hutten BA, Lemke B, Deneke T. Surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation; a systematic review. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2005; 27 (2) 258-265
  • 5 Sie HT, Beukema WP, Ramdat Misier AR, Elvan A, Ennema JJ, Wellens HJ. The radiofrequency modified Maze procedure. A less invasive surgical approach to atrial fibrillation during open-heart surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2001; 19 (4) 443-447
  • 6 Edmunds Jr LH, Clark RE, Cohn LH, Grunkemeier GL, Miller DC, Weisel RD. Guidelines for reporting morbidity and mortality after cardiac valvular operations. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1996; 10 (9) 812-816
  • 7 von Oppell UO, Masani N, O'Callaghan P, Wheeler R, Dimitrakakis G, Schiffelers S. Mitral valve surgery plus concomitant atrial fibrillation ablation is superior to mitral valve surgery alone with an intensive rhythm control strategy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2009; 35 (4) 641-650
  • 8 Sternik L, Luria D, Glikson M, Malachy A, First M, Raanani E. Efficacy of surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with rheumatic heart disease. Ann Thorac Surg 2010; 89 (5) 1437-1442
  • 9 Gillinov AM, Sirak J, Blackstone EH , et al. The Cox maze procedure in mitral valve disease: predictors of recurrent atrial fibrillation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005; 130 (6) 1653-1660
  • 10 Itoh A, Kobayashi J, Bando K , et al. The impact of mitral valve surgery combined with maze procedure. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2006; 29 (6) 1030-1035
  • 11 Bando K, Kobayashi J, Hirata M , et al. Early and late stroke after mitral valve replacement with a mechanical prosthesis: risk factor analysis of a 24-year experience. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003; 126 (2) 358-364
  • 12 Raanani E, Albage A, David TE, Yau TM, Armstrong S. The efficacy of the Cox/maze procedure combined with mitral valve surgery: a matched control study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2001; 19 (4) 438-442
  • 13 Bando K, Kasegawa H, Okada Y , et al. Impact of preoperative and postoperative atrial fibrillation on outcome after mitral valvuloplasty for nonischemic mitral regurgitation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005; 129 (5) 1032-1040
  • 14 Rahimtoola SH. Choice of prosthetic heart valve in adults an update. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010; 55 (22) 2413-2426
  • 15 Beukema WP, Elvan A, Sie HT, Misier AR, Wellens HJ. Successful radiofrequency ablation in patients with previous atrial fibrillation results in a significant decrease in left atrial size. Circulation 2005; 112 (14) 2089-2095