Synlett 2013; 24(9): 1142-1146
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1316909
letter
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Indium-Catalyzed Friedel–Crafts Alkylation of Monosubstituted Benzenes by 1-Bromoadamantane

Paul Mosset*
Université de Rennes 1, Institut des Sciences Chimiques de Rennes, CNRS UMR 6226, Avenue du Général Leclerc, 35042 Rennes Cedex, France   Fax: +33(2)23236978   Email: paul.mosset.1@univ-rennes1.fr
,
René Grée
Université de Rennes 1, Institut des Sciences Chimiques de Rennes, CNRS UMR 6226, Avenue du Général Leclerc, 35042 Rennes Cedex, France   Fax: +33(2)23236978   Email: paul.mosset.1@univ-rennes1.fr
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 12 February 2013

Accepted after revision: 19 March 2013

Publication Date:
12 April 2013 (online)


Abstract

Indium salts such as InCl3 and InBr3 (ca. 1–5 mol%) ­efficiently catalyzed the Friedel–Crafts reaction of 1-bromo­adamantane with benzene and monosubstituted benzenes to give 1-adamantyl benzenes. Indium bromide enabled faster reactions than indium chloride but the latter was more suitable in the case of halobenzenes.

Supporting Information

 
  • References and Notes

    • 1a Friedel C, Crafts J.-M. Compt. Rend. 1877; 84: 1392
    • 1b Friedel C, Crafts J.-M. Compt. Rend. 1877; 84: 1450
    • 2a Friedel–Crafts and Related Reactions . Vols. I–IV. Olah GA. Wiley-Interscience; New York: 1964
    • 2b Olah GA In Friedel–Crafts Chemistry . Wiley-Interscience; New York: 1973
    • 2c Roberts RM, Khalaf AA In Friedel–Crafts Alkylation Chemistry: A Century of Discovery. Dekker; New York: 1984
    • 2d Olah GA, Krishnamurthi R, Prakash GK. S In Friedel–Crafts Alkylations in Comprehensive Organic Synthesis . Trost BM, Fleming I. Pergamon Press; Oxford: 1991
    • 2e Bandini M, Melloni A, Umani-Ronchi A. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004; 43: 550
    • 2f Rueping M, Nachtsheim BJ. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2010; 6 doi: 10.3762/bjoc.6.6
    • 2g Sartori G, Maggi R In Advances in Friedel–Crafts Acylation Reactions, Catalytic and Green Processes . CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group; Boca Raton/London/New York: 2010

      For reviews for indium Lewis acids, see:
    • 3a Frost CG, Chauhan KK. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 2000; 3015
    • 3b Fringuelli F, Piermatti O, Pizzo F, Vaccaro L. Curr. Org. Chem. 2003; 7: 1661
    • 3c Frost CG, Hartley JP. Mini-Rev. Org. Chem. 2004; 1: 1
    • 3d Yadav JS, Antony A, George J, Subba Reddy BV. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2010; 591
    • 3e Shankar Singh M, Raghuvanshi K. Tetrahedron 2012; 68: 8683
    • 3f For organoindium species, see: Xu B, Hammond GB. Chem. Eur. J. 2008; 14: 10029
  • 4 Hayashi R, Cook GR. Org. Lett. 2007; 9: 1311 ; and references cited within
    • 5a Kaneko M, Hayashi R, Cook GR. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007; 48: 7085
    • 5b Choudhary VR, Jana SK, Patil NS, Bhargava SK. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials 2003; 57: 21
    • 5c Bachari K, Cherifi O. J. Porous Mater. 2008; 15: 325
  • 6 Duquenne C, Gillet J.-P, Kervennal J, Ruppin C, Vaultier M. WO Patent 067490, 2004 ; Chem. Abstr. 2004, 141, 140181
  • 7 J. Ichikawa, presented in part at the 2012 Dasan Conference: Fluorine Chemistry to Environment and Health Aspects (FCEHA), The City7 Pullman Ambassador Hotel, Changwon, South Korea, November 14–16, 2012; Invited Lecture-03: Electrophilic Activation and Cyclization of Fluoro Alkenes Directed toward PAH Synthesis, page 51 of abstract book: 2012-Dasan Conference-Program Book-DSSHIN.pdf�.
    • 8a Miyai T, Onishi Y, Baba A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998; 39: 6291
    • 8b Miyai T, Onishi Y, Baba A. Tetrahedron 1999; 55: 1017
    • 9a For a recent review, see: Liu J, Obando D, Liao V, Lifa T, Codd R. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2011; 46: 1949
    • 9b Battilocchio C, Baxendale IR, Biava M, Kitching MO, Ley SV. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2012; 16: 798; and references cited therein

      Adamantylphosphines:
    • 10a Zapf A, Ehrentraut A, Beller M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2000; 39: 4153
    • 10b Köllhofer A, Pullmann T, Plenio H. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2003; 42: 1056
    • 10c Ehrentraut A, Zapf A, Beller M. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2002; 344: 209
    • 10d Neumann H, Brennführer A, Beller M. Chem. Eur. J. 2008; 14: 3645
    • 10e Neumann H, Brennführer A, Beller M. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2008; 350: 2437
    • 10f Wu X.-F, Neumann H, Beller M. Chem. Eur. J. 2010; 16: 9750

      NHCs:
    • 11a Arduengo AJ. III, Harlow RL, Kline M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991; 113: 361
    • 11b Dinger MB, Nieczypor P, Mol JC. Organometallics 2003; 22: 5291
    • 11c Song JJ, Tan Z, Reeves JT, Fandrick DR, Yee NK, Senanayake CH. Org. Lett. 2008; 10: 877
    • 11d Seo H, Roberts BP, Abboud KA, Merz KM. Jr, Hong S. Org. Lett. 2010; 12: 4860
    • 11e Endo K, Grubbs RH. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011; 133: 8525
    • 11f Keitz BK, Endo K, Patel PR, Herbert MB, Grubbs RH. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012; 134: 693
    • 12a Boulch R, Scheurer A, Mosset P, Saalfrank RW. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000; 41: 1023
    • 12b Clariana J, Comelles J, Moreno-Mañas M, Vallribera A. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2002; 13: 1551
    • 12c Matsumura S, Maeda Y, Nishimura T, Uemura S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003; 125: 8862
    • 12d Busch M, Schlageter M, Weingand D. Chem. Eur. J. 2009; 15: 8251
    • 12e Yang J, Wu S, Chen F.-X. Synlett 2010; 2725
    • 12f Dong S, Liu X, Zhang Y, Lin L, Feng X. Org. Lett. 2011; 13: 5060
    • 12g Beckendorf S, Mancheño OG. Synthesis 2012; 44: 2162
    • 13a Dondoni A, Marra A. J. Org. Chem. 2006; 71: 7546
    • 13b Nasr K, Pannier N, Frangioni JV, Maison W. J. Org. Chem. 2008; 73: 1056
    • 13c Pannier N, Maison W. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2008; 1278
    • 13d Tominaga M, Masu H, Azumaya I. J. Org. Chem. 2009; 74: 8754
    • 13e Humblet V, Misra P, Bhushan KR, Nasr K, Ko Y.-S, Tsukamoto T, Pannier N, Frangioni JV, Maison W. J. Med. Chem. 2009; 52: 544
    • 13f Singh A, Tolev M, Schilling CI, Bräse S, Griesser H, Richert C. J. Org. Chem. 2012; 77: 2718
    • 13g Grigg R, Elboray EE, Aly MF, Abbas-Temirek HH. Chem. Commun. 2012; 48: 11504
  • 14 Newman H. Synthesis 1972; 692
  • 15 Perkins R, Bennett S, Bowering E, Burke J, Reid K, Wall D. Chem. Ind. 1980; 790
  • 16 Shortly before the report of the FeCl3-catalyzed reaction, the reaction of 1-fluoroadamantane (very expensive, in contrast to 1, which is inexpensive) with benzene, toluene and bromobenzene under catalysis by PhPF4 was reported, see: Weiß J.-V, Wray V, Schmutzler R. Z. Naturforsch. 1979; 34b: 1286. Furthermore, benzene was not reported to give 3a under these conditions but instead gave p-di(1-adamantyl)benzene. Toluene gave a mixture of meta and para isomers of mono(1-adamantyl)toluene
  • 17 Olah GA, Farooq O, Farnia SM. F, Wu A.-h. J. Org. Chem. 1990; 55: 1516
  • 18 Olah GA, Török B, Shamma T, Török M, Surya Prakash GK. Catal. Lett. 1996; 42: 5
    • 19a Beregszászi T, Török B, Molnár Á, Olah GA, Surya Prakash GK. Catal. Lett. 1997; 48: 83
    • 19b Török B, Molnár Á. Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. Paris, Série IIc 1998; 381
    • 19c Török B, Kiricsi I, Molnár Á, Olah GA. J. Catal. 2000; 193: 132
  • 20 Using more InBr3 than 0.05 equiv favored the formation of a small amount of the more polar 1,3-diphenyladamantane.
  • 21 Indium mesylate and tosylate were prepared by dissolving metallic indium powder in aqueous methanesulfonic acid (3.2 equiv) or p-toluenesulfonic acid (3.0 equiv) at 70 °C (respectively 0.3 and 0.8 mL H2O/mmol In was used) for respectively 2 and 20 h, followed by removal of water under vacuum at 70 °C. Remarkably, in contrast to indium mesylate and halides, indium tosylate did not exhibit appreciable hygroscopicity, a fact that made it far more convenient to handle.
  • 22 Representative Procedure: InBr3 (7.1 mg, 0.02 mmol) was introduced in an oven- or flame-dried 10 mL round-bottomed flask followed by an olive-shaped magnetic stirring bar. The apparatus was dried by heating for 1–2 min with a heat gun under vacuum. 1-Bromoadamantane (1; 86 mg, 0.4 mmol) and the monosubstituted benzene 2ah (or benzene itself, 1 mL) were added. The flask was flushed under nitrogen and well stoppered.26 The reaction was left under gentle stirring in a water or oil bath at the specified temperature (see Tables) with protection against light by aluminum foil. After reaction for the specified time (see Tables), abundant evolution of hydrogen bromide (white smoke, caution!) occurred on opening. The reaction mixture was taken up with pentane and washed with water until neutral. After drying (Na2SO4) and concentration, chromatography on silica gel (ca. 3 g), eluting with pentane, afforded monoadamantylated benzene 3ah followed in some cases by more polar 1-bromo-3-aryladamantane (4) and 1,3-diaryladamantane (5). 1-Phenyladamantane (3a): Mp 82 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.37 (dm, J ~ 8 Hz, 2 H), 7.31 (ddm, J = 8.2, 6.8 Hz, 2 H), 7.17 (ddt, J = 7.6, 6.7, 1.4 Hz, 1 H), 2.12–2.07 (m, 3 H), 1.92 (d, J = 2.8 Hz, 6 H), 1.83–1.72 (m, 6 H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 151.34 (1Cq), 128.10 (2CH), 125.50 (1CH), 124.84 (2CH), 43.23 (3CH2), 36.88 (3CH2), 36.22 (1Cq), 29.04 (3CH). 1-(4-Methylphenyl)adamantane (3b): Mp 97–98 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.26 (half of an A2X2 system, 2 H), 7.13 (half of an A2X2 system coupled with CH3, J with Me = 0.7 Hz, 2 H), 2.32 (t, J = 0.7 Hz, 3 H, CH 3), 2.12–2.05 (m, 3 H), 1.90 (broad d, J = 2.8 Hz, 6 H), 1.82–1.71 (m, 6 H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 148.48 (1Cq), 134.90 (1Cq), 128.81 (2CH), 124.72 (2CH), 43.30 (3CH2), 36.87 (3CH2), 35.85 (1Cq), 29.03 (3CH), 20.87 (1CH3). 1-(4-Ethylphenyl)adamantane (3c): Mp 58 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.28 (half of an A2X2 system, 2 H), 7.15 (half of an A2X2 system coupled with CH2, J with CH2 = 0.6 Hz, 2 H), 2.62 (q, J = 7.6 Hz, 2 H, CH 2CH3), 2.12–2.05 (m, 3 H), 1.91 (broad d, J = 2.8 Hz, 6 H), 1.82–1.71 (m, 6 H), 1.23 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 3 H, CH2CH 3). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 148.68 (1Cq), 141.23 (1Cq), 127.55 (2CH), 124.75 (2CH), 43.29 (3CH2), 36.87 (3CH2), 35.88 (1Cq), 29.03 (3CH), 28.29 (1CH2), 15.45 (1CH3). 1-(4-Isopropylphenyl)adamantane (3d): Mp 87 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.28 (half of an A2X2 system, 2 H), 7.18 (half of an A2X2 system coupled with CH, J with CH = 0.6 Hz, 2 H), 2.88 [qq, J = 6.9, 6.9 Hz, 1 H, CH(CH3)2], 2.12–2.05 (m, 3 H), 1.91 (broad d, J = 2.8 Hz, 6 H), 1.82–1.70 (m, 6 H), 1.24 [d, J = 6.9 Hz, 6 H, CH(CH 3)2]. 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 148.74 (1Cq), 145.81 (1Cq), 126.09 (2CH), 124.69 (2CH), 43.29 (3CH2), 36.88 (3CH2), 35.87 (1Cq), 33.55 (1CH), 29.03 (3CH), 24.02 (2CH3). 1-(4-Isobutylphenyl)adamantane (3e): Mp 34.5 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.25 (half of an A2X2 system, 2 H), 7.08 (half of an A2X2 system coupled with CH2, J with CH2 = 0.6 Hz, 2 H), 2.44 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 2 H, CH2 of i-Bu), 2.12–2.05 (m, 3 H), 1.91 (broad d, J = 2.8 Hz, 6 H), 1.85 [tqq, J = 7.2, 6.6, 6.6 Hz, 1 H, CH(CH3)2], 1.82–1.70 (m, 6 H), 0.90 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 6 H, CH(CH 3)2). 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ = 148.67 (1Cq), 138.70 (1Cq), 128.80 (2CH), 124.49 (2CH), 45.00 (CH2), 43.30 (3CH2), 36.89 (3CH2), 35.88 (1Cq), 30.19 (1CH), 29.04 (3CH), 22.48 (2CH3). Anal. Calcd for C20H28 (268.44): C, 89.49; H, 10.51. Found: C, 89.57; H, 10.46. 1-(4-tert-Butylphenyl)adamantane (3i): Mp 127.5 °C. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ = 7.34 (half of an A2X2 system, 2 H), 7.29 (half of an A2X2 system, 2 H), 2.12–2.05 (m, 3 H), 1.91 (d, J = 2.8 Hz, 6 H), 1.83–1.70 (m, 6 H), 1.31 [s, 9 H, C(CH 3)3]. 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ = 148.30 (1Cq), 148.06 (1Cq), 124.92 (2CH), 124.42 (2CH), 43.22 (3CH2), 36.85 (3CH2), 35.76 (1Cq), 34.25 (1Cq), 31.40 (3CH3), 28.99 (3CH). 1,4-Di-1-adamantylbenzene (3j) 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.31 (s, 4 H), 2.12–2.05 (m, 6 H), 1.91 (d, J = 2.8 Hz, 12 H), 1.82–1.71 (m, 12 H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 148.35 (2Cq), 124.45 (4CH), 43.21 (6CH2), 36.86 (6CH2), 35.79 (2Cq), 28.99 (6CH). For data of other compounds, see the Supporting Information.
  • 23 For instance, no reaction was observed with 1 and isobutylbenzene at 40 °C in CCl4. In 1,2-dichloroethane and 1-chlorobutane at 35–40 °C, the reactions of 1 with isobutylbenzene and tert-butylbenzene afforded complex mixtures.
  • 24 Halobenzenes were not studied in CH2Cl2 as solvent because of their reduced reactivity and also due to the fact that InBr3 was not a good catalyst in their case.
  • 25 The same procedure as previously described was used, except that a reduced amount of aromatic substrate was used (see Table 3) and dichloromethane was added (its amount was adjusted by weight after flushing with nitrogen and stoppering).
  • 26 Based on two experiments that were performed with toluene and ethylbenzene with HBr vented through a bubbler, no change was observed in reaction rate or selectivity (same para/meta ratios). Yields of 99% were obtained compared with 90 and 92% (InCl3 as a catalyst).