Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2012; 16(02): 088-092
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1311760
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

7T Imaging of the Wrist

Klaus M. Friedrich
1   Department of Radiology, Division of Neuroradiology and Musculoskeletal Radiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
,
Arkadiusz Komorowski
1   Department of Radiology, Division of Neuroradiology and Musculoskeletal Radiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
,
Siegfried Trattnig
2   Department of Radiology, MR Centre of Excellence, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
30 May 2012 (online)

Abstract

Ultra-high-field magnetic resonance (MR) imaging provides a high signal-to-noise ratio and thus is expected to be superior to 1.5T and 3T MR systems that are currently used in daily routine. For use in the musculoskeletal system, expectations are high, particularly for smaller joints such as the wrist, because of the small size of the visualized anatomical structures, where high spatial resolution imaging is mandatory. However, there are technical challenges associated with ultra-high-field MR, and much of the necessary basic research has been done. This article reviews the literature of the past 10 years of research in this field, which reveals a promising pattern of continuing improvements and further developments. For this reason, it is likely that, in the near future, studies with larger study populations and more clinically driven research questions will follow.

 
  • References

  • 1 Spannow AH, Stenboeg E, Pfeiffer-Jensen M , et al. Ultrasound and MRI measurements of joint cartilage in healthy children: a validation study. Ultraschall Med 2011; 32 (Suppl. 01) S110-S116
  • 2 Anderson ML, Skinner JA, Felmlee JP, Berger RA, Amrami KK. Diagnostic comparison of 1.5 Tesla and 3.0 Tesla preoperative MRI of the wrist in patients with ulnar-sided wrist pain. J Hand Surg Am 2008; 33 (7) 1153-1159
  • 3 Benjamin M, Evans EJ, Pemberton DJ. Histological studies on the triangular fibrocartilage complex of the wrist. J Anat 1990; 172: 59-67
  • 4 Saupe N, Prüssmann KP, Luechinger R, Bösiger P, Marincek B, Weishaupt D. MR imaging of the wrist: comparison between 1.5- and 3-T MR imaging—preliminary experience. Radiology 2005; 234 (1) 256-264
  • 5 Ashman CJ, Farooki S, Abduljalil AM, Chakeres DW. In vivo high resolution coronal MRI of the wrist at 8.0 tesla. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2002; 26 (3) 387-391
  • 6 Farooki S, Ashman CJ, Yu JS, Abduljalil A, Chakeres D. In vivo high-resolution MR imaging of the carpal tunnel at 8.0 tesla. Skeletal Radiol 2002; 31 (8) 445-450
  • 7 Borthakur A, Shapiro EM, Akella SV, Gougoutas A, Kneeland JB, Reddy R. Quantifying sodium in the human wrist in vivo by using MR imaging. Radiology 2002; 224 (2) 598-602
  • 8 Gambarota G, Veltien A, Klomp D, Van Alfen N, Mulkern RV, Heerschap A. Magnetic resonance imaging and T2 relaxometry of human median nerve at 7 Tesla. Muscle Nerve 2007; 36 (3) 368-373
  • 9 Friedrich KM, Chang G, Vieira RL , et al. In vivo 7.0-tesla magnetic resonance imaging of the wrist and hand: technical aspects and applications. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2009; 13 (1) 74-84
  • 10 Chang G, Wang L, Liang G , et al. Quantitative assessment of trabecular bone micro-architecture of the wrist via 7 Tesla MRI: preliminary results. MAGMA 2011; 24 (4) 191-199
  • 11 Chang G, Friedrich KM, Wang L , et al. MRI of the wrist at 7 tesla using an eight-channel array coil combined with parallel imaging: preliminary results. J Magn Reson Imaging 2010; 31 (3) 740-746
  • 12 Nordmeyer-Massner JA, Wyss M, Andreisek G, Pruessmann KP, Hodler J. In vitro and in vivo comparison of wrist MR imaging at 3.0 and 7.0 tesla using a gradient echo sequence and identical eight-channel coil array designs. J Magn Reson Imaging 2011; 33 (3) 661-667
  • 13 Donati OF, Nordmeyer-Massner J, Nanz D , et al. Direct MR arthrography of cadaveric wrists: comparison between MR imaging at 3.0 T and 7.0 T and gross pathologic inspection. J Magn Reson Imaging 2011; 34 (6) 1333-1340