Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 2012; 229(4): 343-347
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1299250
Originalarbeit
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

The Predictive Value of OCT Characteristics for the Visual Outcome in Neovascular AMD

Prognostischer Wert von OCT-Baseline-Charakteristiken für den Therapieerfolg bei neovaskulärer AMD
S. Kolb
1   Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Zurich, Switzerland
,
M. Menghini
1   Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Zurich, Switzerland
,
D. Barthelmes
2   Save Sight Institute, The University of Sydney, Australia
,
F. Sutter
1   Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Zurich, Switzerland
,
M. Kurz-Levin
1   Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Zurich, Switzerland
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

17 September 2011

29 September 2011

Publication Date:
11 April 2012 (online)

Abstract

Background: The intravitreal injection of an anti-VEGF compound is the current standard of care in neovascular AMD. The response to this therapy varies greatly. To date it was not possible to determine clear predictive factors in regard to therapy response, thus making it difficult when counselling patients regarding the probability for visual improvement. The aim of this study was to evaluate baseline OCT characteristics in regard to their predictive value on the outcome of visual acuity (VA) after 12 months.

Patients and Methods: A retrospective analysis of 75 eyes with neovascular AMD treated with intravitreal anti-VEGF injections at the University Hospital of Zurich with a documented follow-up of at least 12 months. Measurement and comparison of the following OCT structures were undertaken: central retinal thickness (CRT), integrity of the IS/OS junction, and presence of intra- or subretinal fluid. VA at baseline and after 12 months was evaluated. OCT findings were compared between eyes that gained ≥ 5 letters ETDRS (group 1) and eyes that did not (group 2).

Results: 75 eyes with a mean baseline VA of 57.2 ± 15 letters and a mean baseline CRT of 430 ± 226 μm were analyzed. Although baseline VA did not differ statistically significantly, eyes in group 2 had a higher VA than eyes in group 1 (60.2 ± 16.2 vs. 54.9 ± 13.6, p = 0.123). In group 1 the change of VA after 12 months was 12.6 ± 8.0 letters while it was –5.0 ± 7.8 letters in group 2. No statistically significant differences between the two groups with respect to the analyzed OCT parameters were found. None of the analyzed OCT factors had a predictive value regarding the VA outcome at month 12.

Conclusions: Our study was not able to find baseline OCT parameters that could predict the course of VA after 12 months. However, eyes with a thicker central retinal thickness at presentation showed a greater reduction in CRT during the analyzed period. This was associated with a more favourable course in VA. Perhaps this might be due to a less pronounced initial morphological retinal damage.

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund: Die intravitreale Injektion eines Anti-VEGF-Medikaments stellt momentan die Standardbehandlung bei neovaskulärer AMD dar. Die Visusverläufe variieren jedoch stark unter dieser Therapie und bis heute konnten keine prädiktiven Faktoren für das Ansprechen eruiert werden, was eine Beratung des Patienten hinsichtlich des Therapieverlaufs erschwert. Ziel dieser Studie war es, Charakteristiken der OCT-Untersuchung bei der Erstvorstellung im Hinblick auf ihren prädiktiven Wert auf den Visusverlauf nach 12 Monaten zu evaluieren.

Patienten und Methoden: Retrospektive Analyse von 75 Augen mit neovaskulärer AMD, welche am Universitätsspital Zürich mit intravitrealen Anti-VEGF-Injektionen behandelt wurden und einen dokumentierten Untersuchungsverlauf von mindestens 12 Monaten hatten. Messung und Vergleich folgender OCT-Parameter: zentrale Retinadicke (CRT), Intaktheit der IS/OS-Linie, Vorhandensein von intra- und subretinaler Flüssigkeit. Die Messresultate wurden zwischen Augen mit einer Visusverbesserung ≥ 5 Buchstaben ETDRS (Gruppe 1) nach 12 Monaten und denen, die dies nicht erreichten (Gruppe 2), verglichen.

Ergebnisse: 75 Augen mit einem durchschnittlichen Ausgangsvisus von 57,2 ± 15 Buchstaben und einer mittleren zentralen Retinadicke von 430 ± 226 μm wurden analysiert. Augen in Gruppe 2 hatten einen statistisch nicht signifikanten besseren Ausgangsvisus als Augen in Gruppe 1 (60,2 ± 16,2 vs. 54,9 ± 13,6, p = 0,123). In Gruppe 1 betrug der durchschnittliche Visusgewinn nach 12 Monaten 12,6 ± 8,0 Buchstaben, während in Gruppe 2 ein durchschnittlicher Visusverlust von –5,0 ± 7,8 Buchstaben zu beobachten war. Bezüglich der analysierten OCT-Parameter konnten keine statistisch signifikanten Unterschiede gefunden werden. Ausgehend von den analysierten Daten konnten keine prädiktiven Werte für den Visusverlauf nach 12 Monaten eruiert werden.

Schlussfolgerung: In unserer Studie zeigte keiner der gemessenen Faktoren einen prädiktiven Wert für den Visusverlauf nach 12 Monaten. Eine dickere zentrale Retinadicke bei Erstvorstellung wies eine durchschnittlich größere Reduktion der zentralen Retinadicke auf. Dies war assoziiert mit einem besseren Visusverlauf. Möglicherweise ist dies durch einen geringeren initialen morphologischen Schaden der Retina bedingt.

 
  • References

  • 1 Rosenfeld PJ, Brown DM, Heier JS et al. Ranibizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. N Engl J Med 2006; 355: 1419-1431
  • 2 Brown DM, Kaiser PK, Michels M et al. Ranibizumab versus verteporfin for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. N Engl J Med 2006; 355: 1432-1444
  • 3 Regillo CD, Brown DM, Abraham P et al. Randomized, double-masked, sham-controlled trial of ranibizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration: PIER Study year 1. Am J Ophthalmol 2008; 145: 239-248
  • 4 Rosenfeld PJ. Bevacizumab versus ranibizumab for AMD. N Engl J Med 2011; 364: 1966-1967
  • 5 Menghini M, Kurz-Levin MM, Amstutz C et al. Response to ranibizumab therapy in neovascular AMD – an evaluation of good and bad responders. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 2010; 227: 244-248
  • 6 Bindewald A, Bird AC, Dandekar SS et al. Classification of fundus autofluorescence patterns in early age-related macular disease. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005; 46: 3309-3314
  • 7 Einbock W, Moessner A, Schnurrbusch UE et al. Changes in fundus autofluorescence in patients with age-related maculopathy. Correlation to visual function: a prospective study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2005; 243: 300-305
  • 8 Heimes B, Lommatzsch A, Zeimer M et al. Foveal RPE autofluorescence as a prognostic factor for anti-VEGF therapy in exudative AMD. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2008; 246: 1229-1234
  • 9 Kloeckener-Gruissem B, Barthelmes D, Labs S et al. Genetic association with response to intravitreal ranibizumab in patients with neovascular AMD. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011; 52: 4694-4702
  • 10 Einwallner E, Ahlers C, Golbaz I et al. Neovascular age-related macular degeneration under anti-angiogenic therapy: Subretinal fluid is a relevant prognostic parameter. Ophthalmologe 2010; 107: 158-164
  • 11 Singh RP, Fu EX, Smith SD et al. Predictive factors of visual and anatomical outcome after intravitreal bevacizumab treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration: an optical coherence tomography study. Br J Ophthalmol 2009; 93: 1353-1358
  • 12 Ritter M, Elledge J, Simader C et al. Evaluation of optical coherence tomography findings in age-related macular degeneration: a reproducibility study of two independent reading centres. Br J Ophthalmol 2011; 95: 381-385
  • 13 Golbaz I, Ahlers C, Stock G et al. Quantification of the therapeutic response of intraretinal, subretinal, and subpigment epithelial compartments in exudative AMD during anti-VEGF therapy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011; 52: 1599-1605
  • 14 Hayashi H, Yamashiro K, Tsujikawa A et al. Association between foveal photoreceptor integrity and visual outcome in neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Am J Ophthalmol 2009; 148: 83-89, e81
  • 15 Moutray T, Alarbi M, Mahon G et al. Relationships between clinical measures of visual function, fluorescein angiographic and optical coherence tomography features in patients with subfoveal choroidal neovascularisation. Br J Ophthalmol 2008; 92: 361-364
  • 16 Augustin AJ, Puls S, Offermann I. Triple therapy for choroidal neovascularization due to age-related macular degeneration: verteporfin PDT, bevacizumab, and dexamethasone. Retina 2007; 27: 133-140
  • 17 Sahni J, Stanga P, Wong D et al. Optical coherence tomography in photodynamic therapy for subfoveal choroidal neovascularisation secondary to age related macular degeneration: a cross sectional study. Br J Ophthalmol 2005; 89: 316-320
  • 18 Costa RA, Calucci D, Skaf M et al. Optical coherence tomography 3: Automatic delineation of the outer neural retinal boundary and its influence on retinal thickness measurements. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004; 45: 2399-2406
  • 19 Boyer DS, Antoszyk AN, Awh CC et al. Subgroup analysis of the MARINA study of ranibizumab in neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology 2007; 114: 246-252
  • 20 Byun YJ, Lee SJ, Koh HJ. Predictors of response after intravitreal bevacizumab injection for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Jpn J Ophthalmol 2010; 54: 571-577
  • 21 Yoganathan P, Deramo VA, Lai JC et al. Visual improvement following intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin) in exudative age-related macular degeneration. Retina 2006; 26: 994-998
  • 22 Sayanagi K, Sharma S, Kaiser PK. Photoreceptor status after antivascular endothelial growth factor therapy in exudative age-related macular degeneration. Br J Ophthalmol 2009; 93: 622-626
  • 23 Villate N, Lee JE, Venkatraman A et al. Photoreceptor layer features in eyes with closed macular holes: optical coherence tomography findings and correlation with visual outcomes. Am J Ophthalmol 2005; 139: 280-289
  • 24 Murakami T, Tsujikawa A, Ohta M et al. Photoreceptor status after resolved macular edema in branch retinal vein occlusion treated with tissue plasminogen activator. Am J Ophthalmol 2007; 143: 171-173
  • 25 Duncan JL, Zhang Y, Gandhi J et al. High-resolution imaging with adaptive optics in patients with inherited retinal degeneration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2007; 48: 3283-3291