Download PDF
Neuropediatrics 2011; 42(03): 104-109
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1280796
Original Article
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Medical, Psychological and Intellectual Development of 5-Year-Old Children Born after Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection

I. Sanchez-Albisua
1   University Children’s Hospital, Tübingen, Germany
,
K. Lidzba
1   University Children’s Hospital, Tübingen, Germany
,
S. Borell-Kost
1   University Children’s Hospital, Tübingen, Germany
,
U. A. Mau-Holzmann
2   University of Tübingen, Department of Medical Genetics, Germany
,
P. Licht
3   University of Tübingen, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Tübingen, Germany
,
I. Krägeloh-Mann
1   University Children’s Hospital, Tübingen, Germany
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

received 09 November 2010

accepted 20 May 2011

Publication Date:
29 June 2011 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background:

The neurodevelopmental outcome of children born after intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) is controversial.

Patients and Methods:

Thus, we compared the medical and developmental outcome at a mean age of 5 years and 6 months of 35 singletons born after an ICSI procedure performed at the Tübingen Medical Center with those of 37 naturally conceived (NC) matched control singletons born at the Tübingen Medical Center. Children with congenital anomalies which could interfere with mental development were excluded, these were reported earlier. Each child was assessed neurologically and physically. Cognitive function was assessed using the Kaufman assessment battery for children (K-ABC). Behaviour was tested using a German behavioural questionnaire for preschoolers (VBV).

Results:

Medical and cognitive outcome, and behaviour pattern were similar in both groups. Nevertheless, there were sex-related differences in favour of ICSI children: ICSI boys had better social competence than the control boys, while ICSI girls had less emotional problems than the control girls.

Conclusions:

Once severe congenital anomalies were excluded, there were no differences in physical and neurodevelopmental outcome of 5-year-old ICSI children compared with controls. With regard to behaviour and emotional development, ICSI children seem to be similar or might be even more stable and socially competent than the control children. As our study is limited by the small sample size, further research is needed to confirm our results.

Key words

ICSI - psychological behaviour - intellectual development - behaviour
 

  • References

  • 1 Barnes J, Sutcliffe AG, Kristoffersen I et al. The influence of assisted reproduction on family functioning and children’s socio-emotional development: results from a European study. Hum Reprod 2004; 19: 1480-1487
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Belva F, Henriet S, Liebaers I et al. Medical outcome of 8-year-old singleton ICSI children (born > or =32 weeks’ gestation) and a spontaneously conceived comparison group. Hum Reprod 2006; 22: 506-515
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Bonduelle M, Ponjaert I, Van Steiteghem A et al. Developmental outcome at 2 years of age for children born after ICSI compared with children born after IVF. Hum Reprod 2003; 18: 342-350
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Bonduelle M, Wennerholm UB, Loft A et al. A multi-centre cohort study of the physical health of 5-year-old children conceived after intracytoplasmic sperm injection, in vitro fertilization and natural conception. Hum Reprod 2005; 20: 413-419
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Bowen JR, Gibson FL, Leslie GI et al. Medical and developmental outcome at 1 year for children conceived by intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Lancet 1998; 351: 1529-1534
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Bowen JR, Gibson FL, Leslie GI et al. Predictive value of the Griffiths assessment in extremely low birthweight infants. J Paediatr Child Health 1998; 32: 25-30
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Colpin H, Bossaert G. Adolescents conceived by IVF: parenting ans psychosocial adjustment. Human Reprod 2008; 12: 2724-2730
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Cox GF, Bürger J, Lip V et al. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection may increase the risk of imprinting defects. Am J Hum Genet 2002; 71: 162-164
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Golombok S, Brewaeys A, Cook R et al. The European study of assisted reproducion families: family functioning and child development. Hum Reprod 1996; 10: 2324-2331
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Golombok S, Owen L, Blake L et al. Parent-child relationships and the psychological well-being of 18-year-old adolescents conceived by in vitro fertilisation. Human Fertil 2009; 12: 63-72
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Hahn CS. Review: Psychosocial well-being of parents and their children born after assisted reproduction. J Pediatr Psychol 2001; 26: 525-538
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Hahn CS, DiPietro JA. In vitro fertilization and the family: quality of parenting, family functioning, and child psychosocial adjustment. Dev Psychol 2001; 37: 37-48
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Hansen M, Kurinczuk JJ, Bower C et al. The risk of major birth defects after intracytoplasmic sperm injection and in vitro fertilization. N Engl J Med 2002; 346: 725-730
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Källén B, Finnström O, Lindam A et al. Trends in delivery and neonatal outcome after in vitro fertilization in Sweden. Data for 25 years. Hum Reprod 2010; 25: 1026-1034
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Healy DL, Tounson AO, Andersen AN. Female infertility: causes and treatment. Lancet 1994; 1539-1544
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Knoester M, Helmerhosrt FM, Vandenbroucke JP et al. Cognitive development of singletons born after intracytoplasmic sperm injection compared with in vitro fertilization and natural conception. Fertil Steril 2008; 90: 289-296
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 La Sala GB, Gallinelli A, Fagandini P et al. Developmental outcomes at one and two years of children conceived by intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Int J Fertil Womens Med 2004; 49: 113-119
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Leunens L, Celestin-Westreich S, Bonduelle M et al. Cognitive and motor development of 8-year-old children born after ICSI compared to spontaneously conceived children. Hum Reprod 2006; 21: 2922-2929
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Leslie GI, Gibson FL, McMahon C et al. Children conceived using ICSI do not have an increased risk of delayed mental development at 5 years of age. Hum Reprod 2003; 18: 2067-2072
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Ludwig M, Katalinic A. Malformation rate in fetuses and children conceived after ICSI: results of a prospective cohort study. Reprod Biomed Online 2002; 5: 171-178
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 McMahon CA, Ungerer J, Tennant C et al. Psychosocial adjustment and the quality of the mother-child relationship at four months postpartum after conception by in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 1997; 68: 492-500
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Palermo G, Joris H, Devroey P et al. Pregnancies after intracytoplasmic injection of single spermatozzon into an oocyte. Lancet 1992; 340: 17-18
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Place I, Englert YA. prospective longitudinal study of the physical, psychomotor, and intellectual development of singleton children up to 5 years who were conceived by intracytoplasmic sperm injection compared with children conceived spontaneously and by in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 2003; 80: 1388-1397
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Ponjaert-Kristoffersen I, Tjus T, Nekkebroeck J et al. Psychological follow-up study of 5-year-old ICSI children. Hum Reprod 2004; 19: 2791-2797
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Ponjaert-Kristoffersem I, Bonduelle M, Barnes J et al. International collaborative study of intracytoplasmic sperm injection-conceived, in vitro-conceived, and naturally conceived 5-year-old child outcomes: cognitive and motor assessments. Pediatrics 2005; 115: 283-289
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Sánchez-Albisua I, Borell-Kost S, Mau-Holzmann UA et al. Increased frequency of severe major anomalies in children conceived by intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Dev Med Child Neurol 2007; 49: 129-134
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Sutcliffe AG, Taylor B, Saunders K et al. Outcome in the second year of life after in-vitro fertilisation by intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a UK case-control study. Lancet 2001; 357: 2080-2084
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Wagenaar K, Ceelen M, van Weissenbruch MM et al. School functioning in 8- to 18-year-old children born after in vitro fertilization. Eur J Pediatr 2008; 167: 1289-1295
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Wagenaar K, van Weissenbruch MM, van Leeuwen FE et al. Self-reported behavioral and socioemotional functioning of 11- to 18-year-old adolescents conceived by in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 2010; Jun 8. [Epub ahead of print]
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Weaver SM, Clifford E, Gordon AG et al. A follow-up study of “successful” IVF/GIFT couples: social-emotional well-being and adjustment to parenthood. J Psychosom Obst Gyn 1993; 14: 5-16
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Wennerholm UB, Bergh C, Hamberger L et al. Incidence of congenital malformations in children born after ICSI. Human Reprod 2000; 15: 944-948
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar