Download PDF
Semin Hear 2011; 32(2): 156-162
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1277237
© Thieme Medical Publishers

The Manipulation of Auditory Brain Stem Response Data to Predict the Behavioral Audiogram during Infancy

André M. Marcoux1
  • 1Department of Audiology and Speech Language Pathology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
18 July 2011 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

The auditory brain stem response (ABR) is the current gold standard to estimate hearing thresholds during infancy. The clinical protocols to illicit the ABR are documented, and the correlation between the ABR and auditory sensitivity has been validated extensively. Research also has focused on the maturation of the auditory system and its effects on the ABR threshold. In situ ABR measures were conducted to quantify the maturation of the ABR during infancy for the purposes of controlling for this effect when using ABR thresholds to estimate hearing levels on an audiogram. This article describes a corrective procedure that permits the clinician to obtain the estimated hearing level from ABR thresholds during infancy when immature responses are prevalent.

KEYWORDS

Auditory evoked potentials - auditory brain stem response - hearing loss - pediatric audiology - infants - children

REFERENCES

  • 1 Balfour P B, Pillion J P, Gaskin A E. Distortion product otoacoustic emission and auditory brain stem response measures of pediatric sensorineural hearing loss with islands of normal sensitivity.  Ear Hear. 1998;  19 (6) 463-472
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Elberling C, Don M. Threshold characteristics of the human auditory brain stem response.  J Acoust Soc Am. 1987;  81 (1) 115-121
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Hayes D, Jerger J. Auditory brainstem response (ABR) to tone-pips: results in normal and hearing-impaired subjects.  Scand Audiol. 1982;  11 (3) 133-142
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Gorga M P, Kaminski J R, Beauchaine K L, Bergman B M. A comparison of auditory brain stem response thresholds and latencies elicited by air-and bone-conducted stimuli.  Ear Hear. 1993;  14 85-94
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Stapells D R, Picton T W, Durieux-Smith A, Edwards C G, Moran L M. Thresholds for short-latency auditory-evoked potentials to tones in notched noise in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects.  Audiology. 1990;  29 (5) 262-274
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Stapells D R, Gravel J S, Martin B A. Thresholds for auditory brain stem responses to tones in notched noise from infants and young children with normal hearing or sensorineural hearing loss.  Ear Hear. 1995;  16 (4) 361-371
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Gorga M P, Johnson T A, Kaminski J R, Beauchaine K L, Garner C A, Neely S T. Using a combination of click- and tone burst-evoked auditory brain stem response measurements to estimate pure-tone thresholds.  Ear Hear. 2006;  27 (1) 60-74
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Eiten L R. The challenges and rewards of early identification. In: Seewald RC, Bamford J, eds. A Sound Foundation through Early Amplification: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference. Stäfa, Switzerland: Phonak AG; 2003: 231-246
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Bagatto M, Moodie S, Scollie S et al.. Clinical protocols for hearing instrument fitting in the Desired Sensation Level method.  Trends Amplif. 2005;  9 (4) 199-226
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 American Academy of Pediatrics, Joint Committee on Infant Hearing . Year 2007 position statement: principles and guidelines for early hearing detection and intervention programs.  Pediatrics. 2007;  120 (4) 898-921
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Wood C C, Allison T. Interpretation of evoked potentials: a neurophysiological perspective.  Can J Psychol. 1981;  35 (2) 113-135
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Marcoux A, Hansen M. Ensuring accuracy of the pediatric hearing aid fitting.  Trends Amplif. 2003;  7 (1) 11-27
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Marcoux A M. Maturation of auditory function related to hearing threshold estimations using the auditory brainstem response during infancy.  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2011;  75 (2) 163-170
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Nozza R J, Henson A M. Unmasked thresholds and minimum masking in infants and adults: separating sensory from nonsensory contributions to infant-adult differences in behavioral thresholds.  Ear Hear. 1999;  20 (6) 483-496
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Sininger Y S, Abdala C, Cone-Wesson B. Auditory threshold sensitivity of the human neonate as measured by the auditory brainstem response.  Hear Res. 1997;  104 (1-2) 27-38
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Bagatto M P, Scollie S D, Seewald R C, Moodie K S, Hoover B M. Real-ear-to-coupler difference predictions as a function of age for two coupling procedures.  J Am Acad Audiol. 2002;  13 (8) 407-415
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Seewald R, Scollie S. Infants are not average adults: Implications for audiometric testing.  Hear J. 1999;  52 64-72
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Seewald R C, Cornelisse L E, Ramji K V, Sinclair S T, Moodie K S, Jamieson D G. DSLv4.1 for Windows: A software implementation of the desired sensation level (DSL[i/o]) method for fitting linear gain and wide-dynamic-range compression hearing instruments. User's manual. London, Canada: Hearing Health Care Research Unit; 1997
    Google Scholar
  • 19 Marcoux A M. Considering the real-ear-to-coupler difference during the verification of hearing aid fittings for older children and adults.  Can Hear Rep. 2009;  4 (3) 27-34
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Bentler R A, Pavlovic C V. Transfer functions and correction factors used in hearing aid evaluation and research.  Ear Hear. 1989;  10 (1) 58-63
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Feigin J A, Kopun J G, Stelmachowicz P G, Gorga M P. Probe-tube microphone measures of ear-canal sound pressure levels in infants and children.  Ear Hear. 1989;  10 (4) 254-258
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Kruger B. An update on the external ear resonance in infants and young children.  Ear Hear. 1987;  8 (6) 333-336
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Abdala C, Keefe D H, Oba S I. Distortion product otoacoustic emission suppression tuning and acoustic admittance in human infants: birth through 6 months.  J Acoust Soc Am. 2007;  121 (6) 3617-3627
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Keefe D H, Bulen J C, Arehart K H, Burns E M. Ear-canal impedance and reflection coefficient in human infants and adults.  J Acoust Soc Am. 1993;  94 (5) 2617-2638
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Bredberg G. Cellular pattern and nerve supply of the human organ of corti.  Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 1968;  236 (Suppl) 1-135
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Eggermont J J, Brown D K, Ponton C W, Kimberley B P. Comparison of distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) and auditory brain stem response (ABR) traveling wave delay measurements suggests frequency-specific synapse maturation.  Ear Hear. 1996;  17 (5) 386-394
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Moore J K, Perazzo L M, Braun A. Time course of axonal myelination in the human brainstem auditory pathway.  Hear Res. 1995;  87 (1-2) 21-31
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Ponton C W, Eggermont J J, Coupland S G, Winkelaar R. Frequency-specific maturation of the eighth nerve and brain-stem auditory pathway: evidence from derived auditory brain-stem responses (ABRs).  J Acoust Soc Am. 1992;  91 (3) 1576-1586
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Ribeiro F M, Carvallo R M, Marcoux A M. Auditory steady-state evoked responses for preterm and term neonates.  Audiol Neurootol. 2010;  15 (2) 97-110
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Rance G, Tomlin D. Maturation of auditory steady-state responses in normal babies.  Ear Hear. 2006;  27 (1) 20-29
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

André M MarcouxPh.D. 

Department of Audiology and Speech Language Pathology

University of Ottawa, 451 Smyth Road, Ottawa, Ontario, K1H 8M5, Canada

Email: amarcoux@uottawa.ca

      >