Anästhesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther 2011; 46(3): 182-188
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1274930
Fachwissen Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin
Topthema: Ultraschall in der Anästhesie und Intensivmedizin
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Ultraschall in der Anästhesie und Intensivmedizin – Ultraschall in der Regionalanästhesie

Ultrasound in regional anesthesiaThomas Ermert, Alexander Schnabel
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
11 March 2011 (online)

Zusammenfassung

Die ultraschallgesteuerte Regionalanästhesie verbreitet sich zunehmend. Von grundlegender Bedeutung für eine erfolgreiche Blockade ist jedoch nicht nur der direkte Vorgang. Viele Entscheidungen, die bereits im Vorfeld getroffen werden, haben enormen Einfluss auf die Qualität der Durchführung. Ziel dieses Artikels ist es, auf aktuellem Stand des Wissens Durchführungshinweise bezüglich der Risikostratifizierung, der Hygiene, Wahl der Nadel, der Ausbildung sowie des Ablaufs der ultraschallgesteuerten Regionalanästhesie zu geben. Es werden Stolperfallen und wesentliche Voraussetzungen für eine erfolgreiche Arbeit mit dieser Methode dargestellt.

Abstract

The ultrasound in regional anesthesia is gaining currency. Of fundamental importance for a successful blockade is not only the direct process. Many decisions taken in advance, have enormous impact on the quality of implementation. The aim of this article is about the current state of knowledge on implementing instructions of the risk stratification, hygiene, choice of the needle, the training and the sequence concerning ultrasound regional anesthesia. There are pitfalls and presented important conditions for successful work with this method.

Kernaussagen

  • Die Kenntnisse der Ultraschallgrundlagen tragen zu einer Verbesserung der Bildqualität bei.

  • Die Sterilität des Regionalanästhesieverfahrens beinhaltet auch die Sterilität des Ultraschall-kopfes.

  • Ultraschall und Nervenstimulator können sich sinnvoll ergänzen.

  • Die Wahl der Punktionsnadel beeinflusst die Sichtbarkeit und das potentielle Risiko der Punktion.

  • Es gibt verschiedene Möglichkeiten (Nadel, Ultraschallgerät, Stichtechnik), welche die Sichtbarkeit der Nadel unter Punktion verbessern können.

  • Ausbildung ist ein zentraler Faktor, um die Qualität einer neuen Methode sicherzustellen.

  • Im Rahmen einer individuellen Risiko-Nutzen-Abwägung können Regionalanästhesien auch am tief sedierten Patienten durchgeführt werden.

Weiteres Material zum Artikel

Literatur

  • 1 Halaszynski TM, Kurup V, Souzdalnitski D. Needle visualization in ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia: technological challenges and educational solutions.  Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2009;  34 527-528
  • 2 Sites BD et al.. Artifacts and pitfall errors associated with ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia. Part I: understanding the basic principles of ultrasound physics and machine operations.  Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2007;  32 412-418
  • 3 Brull R, Macfarlane AJ, Tse CC. Practical knobology for ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia.  Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2010;  35 (S 02) 68-73
  • 4 Sites BD et al.. Artifacts and pitfall errors associated with ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia. Part II: a pictorial approach to understanding and avoidance.  Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2007;  32 419-433
  • 5 Morin AM et al.. Hygieneempfehlungen für die Anlage und weiterführende Versorgung von Regionalanästhesie-Verfahren.  Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin. 2006;  47 372-379
  • 6 Grau T. Ultraschall in der Anästhesie und Intensivmedizin: Lehrbuch der Ultraschalldiagnostik. überarbeitete Auflage ed Köln: Deutscher Ärzte-Verlag; 2009. 2
  • 7 Bloc S et al.. [Ultrasound guided regional anaesthesia: An effective method for cleaning the probes.]  Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2008;  27 994-998
  • 8 Belavy D. Regional anesthesia needles can introduce ultrasound gel into tissues.  Anesth Analg. 2010;  111 811-812
  • 9 Montgomery SJ et al.. The Use of the Nerve Stimulator With Standard Unsheathed Needles in Nerve Blockade.  Anesth Analg. 1973;  52 827-831
  • 10 Neal JM. Ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia and patient safety: An evidence-based analysis.  Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2010;  35 (S 02) 59-67
  • 11 Brull R et al.. Neurological complications after regional anesthesia: contemporary estimates of risk.  Anesth Analg. 2007;  104 965-974
  • 12 Barrington MJ et al.. Preliminary results of the Australasian Regional Anaesthesia Collaboration: a prospective audit of more than 7000 peripheral nerve and plexus blocks for neurologic and other complications.  Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2009;  34 534-541
  • 13 Auroy Y et al.. Major complications of regional anesthesia in France: The SOS Regional Anesthesia Hotline Service.  Anesthesiology. 2002;  97 1274-1280
  • 14 Benhamou D, Auroy Y, Amalberti R. Safety during regional anesthesia: what do we know and how can we improve our practice?.  Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2010;  35 1-3
  • 15 Abrahams MS et al.. Ultrasound guidance compared with electrical neurostimulation for peripheral nerve block: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.  Br J Anaesth. 2009;  102 408-417
  • 16 Rodriguez J et al.. A comparison of single versus multiple injections on the extent of anesthesia with coracoid infraclavicular brachial plexus block.  Anesth Analg. 2004;  99 1225-1230
  • 17 Fanelli G et al.. Interscalene brachial plexus anaesthesia with small volumes of ropivacaine 0.75%: effects of the injection technique on the onset time of nerve blockade.  Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2001;  18 54-58
  • 18 Robards C, Clendenen S, Greengrass R. Intravascular injection during ultrasound-guided axillary block: negative aspiration can be misleading.  Anesth Analg. 2008;  107 1754-1755
  • 19 Perlas A et al.. The sensitivity of motor response to nerve stimulation and paresthesia for nerve localization as evaluated by ultrasound.  Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2006;  31 445-450
  • 20 Tsai TP et al.. Intensity of the stimulating current may not be a reliable indicator of intraneural needle placement.  Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2008;  33 207-210
  • 21 Chin KJ et al.. Needle visualization in ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia: challenges and solutions.  Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2008;  33 532-544
  • 22 Saranteas T et al.. Limitations and technical considerations of ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve blocks: edema and subcutaneous air.  Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2008;  33 353-356
  • 23 Saranteas T et al.. Ultrasound and regional anesthesia techniques--is there any limitation?.  Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2007;  32 546-547
  • 24 Jochum D et al.. One size does not fit all: proposed algorithm for ultrasonography in combination with nerve stimulation for peripheral nerve blockade.  Br J Anaesth. 2009;  103 771-774
  • 25 Okuda Y et al.. Combined use of ultrasound and nerve stimulation for phrenic nerve block.  Can J Anaesth. 2008;  55 195-196
  • 26 Beach ML, Sites BD, Gallagher JD. Use of a nerve stimulator does not improve the efficacy of ultrasound-guided supraclavicular nerve blocks.  J Clin Anesth. 2006;  18 580-584
  • 27 Sites BD et al.. A comparison of sensory and motor loss after a femoral nerve block conducted with ultrasound versus ultrasound and nerve stimulation.  Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2009;  34 508-513
  • 28 Maecken T, Zenz M, Grau T. Ultrasound characteristics of needles for regional anesthesia.  Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2007;  32 440-447
  • 29 Schafhalter-Zoppoth I, McCulloch CE, Gray AT. Ultrasound visibility of needles used for regional nerve block: an in vitro study.  Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2004;  29 480-488
  • 30 Steinfeldt T et al.. Nerve injury by needle nerve perforation in regional anaesthesia: does size matter?.  Br J Anaesth. 2010;  104 245-253
  • 31 Deam RK et al.. Investigation of a new echogenic needle for use with ultrasound peripheral nerve blocks.  Anaesth Intensive Care. 2007;  35 582-586
  • 32 Selander D, Dhuner KG, Lundborg G. Peripheral nerve injury due to injection needles used for regional anesthesia. An experimental study of the acute effects of needle point trauma.  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1977;  21 182-188
  • 33 Gentili F, Hudson AR, Hunter D. Clinical and experimental aspects of injection injuries of peripheral nerves.  Can J Neurol Sci. 1980;  7 143-151
  • 34 Gentili F et al.. Nerve injection injury with local anesthetic agents: a light and electron microscopic, fluorescent microscopic, and horseradish peroxidase study.  Neurosurgery. 1980;  6 263-272
  • 35 Fredrickson MJ, Kilfoyle DH. Neurological complication analysis of 1000 ultrasound guided peripheral nerve blocks for elective orthopaedic surgery: a prospective study.  Anaesthesia. 2009;  64 836-844
  • 36 Bigeleisen PE. Nerve puncture and apparent intraneural injection during ultrasound-guided axillary block does not invariably result in neurologic injury.  Anesthesiology. 2006;  105 779-783
  • 37 Baciarello M, Casati A, Fanelli G. Ultrasound-guided intraneural injections and neurologic injury.  Anesthesiology. author reply 2007;  106
  • 38 Brull R et al.. Ultrasound detects intraneural injection.  Anesthesiology. author reply 2007;  106
  • 39 Borgeat A. Regional anesthesia, intraneural injection, and nerve injury: beyond the epineurium.  Anesthesiology. 2006;  105 647-648
  • 40 Hopkins RE, Bradley M. In-vitro visualization of biopsy needles with ultrasound: a comparative study of standard and echogenic needles using an ultrasound phantom.  Clin Radiol. 2001;  56 499-502
  • 41 Nichols K et al.. Changes in ultrasonographic echogenicity and visibility of needles with changes in angles of insonation.  J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2003;  14 1553-1557
  • 42 Chapman GA, Johnson D, Bodenham AR. Visualisation of needle position using ultrasonography.  Anaesthesia. 2006;  61 148-158
  • 43 Mesurolle B et al.. Contribution of tissue harmonic imaging and frequency compound imaging in interventional breast sonography.  J Ultrasound Med. 2006;  25 845-855
  • 44 Baker JA, Soo MS, Mengoni P. Sonographically guided percutaneous interventions of the breast using a steerable ultrasound beam.  AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999;  172 157-159
  • 45 Bloc S, Ecoffey C, Dhonneur G. Controlling needle tip progression during ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia using the hydrolocalization technique.  Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2008;  33 382-383
  • 46 Dhir S, Ganapathy S. Use of ultrasound guidance and contrast enhancement: a study of continuous infraclavicular brachial plexus approach.  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2008;  52 338-342
  • 47 Swenson JD, Davis JJ, DeCou JA. A novel approach for assessing catheter position after ultrasound-guided placement of continuous interscalene block.  Anesth Analg. table of contents 2008;  106
  • 48 Kort A, Kronzon I. Microbubble formation: in vitro and in vivo observation.  J Clin Ultrasound. 1982;  10 117-120
  • 49 Sites BD et al.. The American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine and the European Society Of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy Joint Committee recommendations for education and training in ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia.  Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2009;  34 40-46
  • 50 Pollard BA. New model for learning ultrasound-guided needle to target localization.  Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2008;  33 360-362
  • 51 Dessieux T et al.. [Evaluation of the learning curve of residents in localizing a phantom target with ultrasonography].  Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2008;  27 797-801
  • 52 Langford RA, Hockey B, Leslie K. Monitor position and the accuracy and speed of ultrasound-guided nerve blocks.  Anaesthesia. 2009;  64 845-849

Dr. med. Thomas Ermert
Dr. med. Alexander Schnabel

Email: ermert@uni-muenster.de

Email: alexander_schnabel@gmx.de

>