Download PDF
Synlett 2010(18): 2813-2817  
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1258801
LETTER
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart ˙ New York

Highly Efficient Friedel-Crafts Alkylation of Indoles and Pyrrole Catalyzed by Mesoporous 3D Aluminosilicate Catalyst with Electron-Deficient Olefins

T. Siddulu Naidua, V. V. Balasubramanianb, M. A. Charib, T. Moria,b,e, S. M. J. Zaidic, Salem S. Al-Deyabd, B. V. Subba Reddy*b,e, A. Vinu*a,b,e
a Ionics Materials Chemistry Group, Department of Chemistry, Hokkaido University
e-Mail: Sapporo 060-0810, Japan;
b International Center for Materials Nanoarchitectonics, WPI Research Center, National Institute for Materials Science, 1-1 Namiki, Tsukuba, 305-0044, Japan
Fax: +81(29)8604706; e-Mail: vinu.ajayan@nims.go.jp;
c Department of Chemical Engineering, King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia
d Department of Chemistry, Petrochemicals Research Chair, Faculty of Science, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2455 Riyadh 11451, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
e NIMS-IICT Materials Research Center, Indian Institute of Chemical Technology, Hyderabad 500007, India
Further Information

Publication History

Received 6 August 2010
Publication Date:
30 September 2010 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints All articles of this category

Abstract

The C3-selective Friedel-Crafts alkylation of indoles with electron-deficient olefins has been achieved using a mesoporous aluminosilicate catalyst with 3D cage-type porous structure to furnish the 3-alkylindole derivatives in excellent yields due to its high surface area, large pore volume and high acidity. Pyrrole also reacted efficiently under similar reaction conditions to give the corresponding 2-alkylated pyrrole derivatives in good yields.

Key words

nanoporous aluminosilicate - conjugate addition - electron-deficient olefins - C3-alkylation of indoles - C2-alkylation of pyrrole

    References and Notes

  • 1 Tabata N. Tomoda H. Takahashi Y. Haneda K. Iwai Y. Woodruff HB. Omura S. J. Antibiot.  1993,  46:  756 
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Moore RE. Cheuk C. Patterson GML. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  1984,  106:  6456 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Moore RE. Cheuk C. Yang X.-QG. Patterson GML. Bonjouklian R. Smitka TA. Mynderse JS. Foster RS. Jones ND. Swartzendruber JK. Deeter JB. J. Org. Chem.  1987,  52:  1036 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 4a Szmuszkovicz J. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  1957,  79:  2819 
    Google Scholar
  • 4b Noland WE. Christensen GM. Sauer GL. Dutton GGS. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  1955,  77:  456 
    Google Scholar
  • 4c Iqbal Z. Jackson AH. Rao KRN. Tetrahedron Lett.  1988,  29:  2577 
    Google Scholar
  • 4d Azizi N. Arynasab F. Saidi MR. Org. Biomol. Chem.  2006,  4:  4275 
    Google Scholar
  • 4e Li D.-P. Guo Y.-C. Ding Y. Xiao W.-J. Chem. Commun.  2006,  799 
    Google Scholar
  • 4f Silvanus AC. Heffernan SJ. Liptrot DJ. Kociok-Köhn G. Andrews BI. Carbery DR. Org. Lett.  2009,  11:  1175 
    Google Scholar
  • 5a Kobayashi S. Hachiya I. Takahori T. Araki M. Ishitani H. Tetrahedron Lett.  1992,  33:  6815 
    Google Scholar
  • 5b Kobayashi S. Synlett  1994,  689 
    Google Scholar
  • 5c Harrington PE. Kerr MA. Synlett  1996,  1047 
    Google Scholar
  • 5d Mori Y. Kakumoto K. Manabe K. Kobayashi S. Tetrahedron Lett.  2000,  41:  3107 
    Google Scholar
  • 5e Yadav JS. Abraham S. Reddy BVS. Sabitha G. Synthesis  2001,  2165 
    Google Scholar
  • 5f Bandini M. Melchiorre P. Melloni A. Umani-Ronchi A. Synthesis  2002,  1110 
    Google Scholar
  • 5g Bandini M. Cozzi PG. Giacomini M. Melchiorre P. Selva S. Umani-Ronchi A. J. Org. Chem.  2002,  67:  3700 
    Google Scholar
  • 5h Alam MM. Varala R. Adapa SR. Tetrahedron Lett.  2003,  44:  5115 
    Google Scholar
  • 5i Srivastava N. Banik BK. J. Org. Chem.  2003,  68:  2109 
    Google Scholar
  • 6a Austin JF. MacMillan DWC. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  2002,  124:  1172 
    Google Scholar
  • 6b Blay G. Fernández I. Pedro JR. Vila C. Org. Lett.  2007,  9:  2601 
    Google Scholar
  • 6c Bandini M. Fagioli M. Melchiorre P. Melloni A. Umani-Ronchi A. Tetrahedron Lett.  2003,  44:  5843 
    Google Scholar
  • 6d Jensen KB. Thorhauge J. Hazell RG. Jorgensen KA. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.  2001,  40:  160 
    Google Scholar
  • 6e Scettri A. Villano R. Acocella MR. Molecules  2009,  14:  3030 
    Google Scholar
  • 7a Bartoli G. Bartolacci M. Bosco M. Foglia G. Giuliani A. Marcantoni E. Sambri L. Torregiani E.
    J. Org. Chem.  2003,  68:  4594 
    Google Scholar
  • 7b Zhan Z.-P. Yang R.-F. Lang K. Tetrahedron Lett.  2005,  46:  3859 
    Google Scholar
  • 7c Yadav JS. Reddy BVS. Baishya G. Reddy KV. Narsaiah AV. Tetrahedron  2005,  61:  9541 
    Google Scholar
  • 7d Huang ZH. Zou JP. Jiang WQ. Tetrahedron Lett.  2006,  47:  7965 
    Google Scholar
  • 7e Kumar V. Kaur S. Kumar S. Tetrahedron Lett.  2006,  47:  7001 
    Google Scholar
  • 7f Ko S. Lin C. Tu Z. Wang YF. Wang CC. Yao CF. Tetrahedron Lett.  2006,  47:  487 
    Google Scholar
  • 7g Firouzabadi H. Iranpoor N. Nowrouzi F. Chem. Commun.  2005,  789 
    Google Scholar
  • 8a Chakravarti R. Kalita P. Selvan ST. Oveisi H. Balasubramanian VV. Kantam ML. Vinu A. Green Chem.  2010,  12:  49 
    Google Scholar
  • 8b Shobha D. Chari MA. Mano A. Selvan ST. Mukkanti K. Vinu A. Tetrahedron  2009,  65:  10608 
    Google Scholar
  • 8c Vinu A. Kalita P. Balasubramanian VV. Oveisi H. Selvan ST. Mano A. Chari MA. Reddy BVS. Tetrahedron Lett.  2009,  50:  7132 
    Google Scholar
  • 9a Chakravarti R. Oveisi H. Kalita P. Pal RR. Halligudi SB. Kantam ML. Vinu A. Micropor. Mesopor. Mater.  2009,  123:  338 
    Google Scholar
  • 9b Balasubramanian VV. Srinivasu P. Anand C. Pal RR. Ariga K. Velmathi S. Alam S. Vinu A. Micropor. Mesopor. Mater.  2008,  114:  303 
    Google Scholar
  • 9c Shobha D. Chari MA. Selvan ST. Oveisi H. Mano A. Mukkanti K. Vinu A. Micropor. Mesopor. Mater.  2010,  129:  112 
    Google Scholar
  • 9d Chari MA. Karthikeyan G. Pandurangan A. Naidu TS. Sathyaseelan B. Zaidi SMJ. Vinu A. Tetrahedron Lett.  2010,  51:  2629 
    Google Scholar
10

General Procedure. A mixture of activated olefin (1.0 mmol), indole or pyrrole (1.0 mmol) and AlKIT-5 (100 mg) in DCE (5 mL) was stirred at reflux temperature for the appropriate time (Table  [¹] ). After completion of the reaction, as monitored by TLC, the reaction mixture was diluted with EtOAc (20 mL) and the catalyst was separated by filtration. The organic layer was concentrated under reduced pressure and the crude product was purified by silica gel column chromatography using EtOAc-n-hexane (1:9) as eluent to afford the pure 3-alkylindole or 2-alkylpyrrole. The spectral data are in full agreement with the data reported in the literature.5 Spectral data for the selected products: 2-Phenyl-3-indolyl-1-nitroethane(3g): ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3):
δ = 4.91-5.12 (m, 2 H), 5.22 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 1 H), 7.01 (d, J = 2.2 Hz, 1 H), 7.07-7.37 (m, 8 H), 7.47 (d, 1 H, J = 8.0 Hz, 1 H), 8.06 (br s, 1 H, NH). ¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 40.9, 78.4, 110.6, 118.7, 120.2, 121.9, 123.0, 126.3, 127.9, 128.2, 129.1, 135.8, 140.2. EIMS: m/z (%) = 266 (100) [M+]. 2-Phenyl-2-pyrrolyl-1-nitroethane (3m): ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 4.76 (dd, J = 11.6, 7.4 Hz, 1 H), 4.86 (dd, J = 7.4, 7.1 Hz, 1 H), 4.96 (dd, J = 11.6, 7.1 Hz, 1 H), 6.03-6.05 (m, 1 H), 6.14 (dd, J = 6.0, 2.7 Hz, 1 H), 6.40 (dd, J = 4.0, 2.5 Hz, 1 H), 7.20-7.31 (m, 5 H), 7.85 (s, 1 H). ¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 137.9, 129.2, 128.9, 128.0, 127.9, 118.2, 108.6, 105.8, 79.2, 42.9. EIMS: m/z (%) = 216 (30) [M+], 169 (100).