Download PDF
Semin Speech Lang 2010; 31(3): 168-176
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1257533
© Thieme Medical Publishers

Dogs and Other Metaphors: Reflections on the Influence of Mark Ylvisaker

Skye McDonald1
  • 1School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
03 August 2010 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

Mark Ylvisaker's death in 2009 marked the sad cessation of a prolific and rich discourse regarding what matters in brain injury rehabilitation. In this article, I reflect on how my own work has converged with and been influenced by this great thinker and doer. My own work, like Ylvisaker's, has been oriented toward finding contextually relevant ways of assessing and remediating communication and social impairments in people with severe traumatic brain injury. In this article, common themes between Ylvisaker's work and my own are explored, including the usefulness of pragmatic language theory, which helps clarify why context is important when determining whether language is appropriate or not, and also to help reveal where problems occur in the use of subtle, diplomatic, or inferred meanings. This article also reflects upon Ylvisaker's models for remediation and the extent to which these can be encompassed within (as well as shape) more traditional models of social skills training.

KEYWORDS

Traumatic brain injury - communication - social skills - pragmatics - remediation

REFERENCES

  • 1 Brooks N, Campsie L, Symington C, Beattie A, McKinlay W. The five year outcome of severe blunt head injury: a relative's view.  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1986;  49(7) 764-770
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Jennett B, Adams J H, Murray L S, Graham D I. Neuropathology in vegetative and severely disabled patients after head injury.  Neurology. 2001;  56(4) 486-490
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 McKinlay W W, Brooks D N, Bond M R, Martinage D P, Marshall M M. The short-term outcome of severe blunt head injury as reported by relatives of the injured persons.  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1981;  44(6) 527-533
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Tate R L, Broe G A, Lulham J M. Impairment after severe blunt head injury: the results from a consecutive series of 100 patients.  Acta Neurol Scand. 1989;  79(2) 97-107
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Kinsella G, Packer S, Olver J. Maternal reporting of behaviour following very severe blunt head injury.  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1991;  54(5) 422-426
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 McDonald S, van Sommers P. Differential pragmatic language loss following closed head injury: ability to negotiate requests.  Cogn Neuropsychol. 1992;  10 297-315
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Ylvisaker M, Holland A. Coaching, self-coaching and rehabilitation of head injury. In: Johns D Clinical Management of Neurogenic Communicative Disorders. 2nd ed. Boston, MA; Little, Brown 1986
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Ylvisaker M, Feeney T J. Communication and behavior: collaboration between speech-language pathologists and behavioral psychologists.  Top Lang Disord. 1994;  15 37-54
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Ylvisaker M. Communication outcome in children and adolescents with traumatic brain injury.  Neuropsychol Rehabil. 1993;  3 367-387
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Ylvisaker M, Jacobs H E, Feeney T. Positive supports for people who experience behavioral and cognitive disability after brain injury: a review.  J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2003;  18(1) 7-32
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Ylvisaker M, Hanks R, Johnson-Greene D. Perspectives on rehabilitation of individuals with cognitive impairment after brain injury: rationale for reconsideration of theoretical paradigms.  J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2002;  17(3) 191-209
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Ylvisaker M, Turkstra L S, Coelho C. Behavioral and social interventions for individuals with traumatic brain injury: a summary of the research with clinical implications.  Semin Speech Lang. 2005;  26(4) 256-267
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Ylvisaker M, Feeney T J. Collaborative Brain Injury Intervention: Positive Everyday Routines. San Diego, CA; Singular 1998
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Ylvisaker M, Feeney T J. Everyday people as supports: developing competencies through collaboration. In: Ylvisaker M Traumatic Brain Injury Rehabilitation: Children and Adolescents. 2nd ed. Newton, MA; Butterworth-Heinemann 1998: 429-464
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Ylvisaker M, Mcpherson K, Kayes N, Pellett E. Metaphoric identity mapping: facilitating goal setting and engagement in rehabilitation after traumatic brain injury.  Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2008;  18 713-741
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Ylvisaker M. Traumatic Brain Injury Rehabilitation: Children and Adolescents. 2nd ed. MA; Butterworth-Heinemann 1998
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Ylvisaker M, Feeney T, Urbanczyk B. A social-environmental approach to communication and behavior after traumatic brain injury.  Semin Speech Lang. 1993;  14 74-86
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Ylvisaker M, Feeney T J, Szekeres S F. Social-environmental approach to communication and behavior. In: Ylvisaker M Traumatic Brain Injury Rehabilitation: Children and Adolescents. 2nd ed. Newton, MA; Butterworth-Heinemann 1998: 271-302
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Ylvisaker M, Feeney T. Reflections on Dobermans, poodles, and social rehabilitation for difficult-to-serve individuals with traumatic brain injury.  Aphasiology. 2000;  14 407-431
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Sperber D, Wilson D. Relevance: Communication and Cognition Oxford. United Kingdom; Basil Blackwell 1986
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Grice H P. Logic and conversation. In: Cole P, Morgan J Syntax and Semantics: Speech Acts. New York, New York; Academic Press 1975
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Clark H H. Responding to indirect speech acts.  Cognit Psychol. 1979;  11 430-477
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 McDonald S. Differential pragmatic language loss after closed head injury: ability to comprehend conversational implicature.  Appl Psycholinguist. 1992;  13 295-312
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 McDonald S. Pragmatic language skills after closed head injury: ability to meet the informational needs of the listener.  Brain Lang. 1993;  44(1) 28-46
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 McDonald S, Pearce S. The “dice” game: a new test of pragmatic language skills after closed-head injury.  Brain Inj. 1995;  9(3) 255-271
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 McDonald S, Pearce S. Clinical insights into pragmatic theory: frontal lobe deficits and sarcasm.  Brain Lang. 1996;  53(1) 81-104
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 McDonald S, Pearce S. Requests that overcome listener reluctance: impairment associated with executive dysfunction in brain injury.  Brain Lang. 1998;  61(1) 88-104
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Gumperz J J. Foreword. In: Brown P, Levinson SC Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics. Cambridge, United Kingdom; Cambridge University Press 1987: 4
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Snow P, Douglas J, Ponsford J. Discourse assessment following traumatic brain injury: a pilot study examining some demographic and methodological issues.  Aphasiology. 1995;  9 365-380
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Togher L, Hand L, Code C. Analysing discourse in the traumatic brain injury population: telephone interactions with different communication partners.  Brain Inj. 1997;  11(3) 169-189
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Togher L. Giving information: the importance of context on communicative opportunity for people with traumatic brain injury.  Aphasiology. 2000;  14 365-390
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Ylvisaker M, Urbanczyk B, Feeney T. Social skills following traumatic brain injury.  Semin Speech Lang. 1992;  13 308-322
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Ozonoff S, Miller J N. Teaching theory of mind: a new approach to social skills training for individuals with autism.  J Autism Dev Disord. 1995;  25(4) 415-433
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Kavale K A, Forness S R. Social skill deficits and learning disabilities: a meta-analysis.  J Learn Disabil. 1996;  29(3) 226-237
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Bramston P, Spence S H. Behavioural versus cognitive social-skills training with intellectually-handicapped adults.  Behav Res Ther. 1985;  23(3) 239-246
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Benton M K, Schroeder H E. Social skills training with schizophrenics: a meta-analytic evaluation.  J Consult Clin Psychol. 1990;  58(6) 741-747
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Tate R L. Issues in the management of behaviour disturbance as a consequence of severe head injury.  Scand J Rehabil Med. 1987;  19(1) 13-18
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Croker V, McDonald S. Recognition of emotion from facial expression following traumatic brain injury.  Brain Inj. 2005;  19(10) 787-799
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Green R EA, Turner G R, Thompson W F. Deficits in facial emotion perception in adults with recent traumatic brain injury.  Neuropsychologia. 2004;  42(2) 133-141
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Jackson H F, Moffat N J. Impaired emotional recognition following severe head injury.  Cortex. 1987;  23(2) 293-300
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 McDonald S, Flanagan S. Social perception deficits after traumatic brain injury: interaction between emotion recognition, mentalizing ability, and social communication.  Neuropsychology. 2004;  18(3) 572-579
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Milders M, Ietswaart M, Crawford J R, Currie D. Social behavior following traumatic brain injury and its association with emotion recognition, understanding of intentions, and cognitive flexibility.  J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2008;  14(2) 318-326
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 McDonald S, Saunders J C. Differential impairment in recognition of emotion across different media in people with severe traumatic brain injury.  J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2005;  11(4) 392-399
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Channon S, Pellijeff A, Rule A. Social cognition after head injury: sarcasm and theory of mind.  Brain Lang. 2005;  93(2) 123-134
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Bibby H, McDonald S. Theory of mind after traumatic brain injury.  Neuropsychologia. 2005;  43(1) 99-114
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Martin I, McDonald S. Exploring the causes of pragmatic language deficits following traumatic brain injury.  Aphasiology. 2005;  19 712-730
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 McDonald S, Bornhofen C, Togher L, Flanagan S, Gertler P, Bowen R. Improving First Impressions: A Step by Step Social Skills Program. Sydney, Australia; ASSBI Resources 2008
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Ylvisaker M. Self coaching: a context sensitive, person centred approach to social communication after traumatic brain injury.  Brain Impair. 2006;  7 246-258
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Gresham F M, Sugai G, Horner R H. Interpreting outcomes of social skills training for students with high-incidence disabilities.  Except Child. 2001;  67 331-344
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 McDonald S, Tate R L, Togher L et al. Social skills treatment for people with severe, chronic acquired brain injuries.  Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;  89 1648-1659
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Skye McDonaldPh.D. M.Sc. 

Department of Clinical Neuropsychology, School of Psychology

University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia 2052

Email: s.mcdonald@unsw.edu.au

      >