Semin Speech Lang 2010; 31(3): 145-161
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1257531
© Thieme Medical Publishers

There's Always Something That Works: Principles and Practices of Positive Support for Individuals with Traumatic Brain Injury and Problem Behaviors

Timothy J. Feeney1
  • 1School and Community Support, Inc., Latham, New York
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
03 August 2010 (online)

Abstract

Behavioral and cognitive problems are among the most common and troubling consequences of traumatic brain injury Furthermore, behavioral and cognitive challenges typically develop in complex ways, necessitating an integrated approach to intervention and supports. This article summarizes literature on interventions positively affecting the behavioral outcomes for individuals with brain injury. This literature extends many of the traditional approaches to behavioral intervention and cognitive rehabilitation to include positive behavioral support and the development of personally meaningful activities for program development. In addition, the article provides a framework for intervention based on the decades-long work of Mark Ylvisaker, which is founded on positive principles of assessment and treatment and is implemented in a context-sensitive manner that integrates cognitive and behavioral intervention themes and focuses on the development of self-regulation.

REFERENCES

  • 1 Deb S, Lyons I, Koutzoukis C. Neuropsychiatric sequelae one year after a minor head injury.  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1998;  65(6) 899-902
  • 2 Deb S, Lyons I, Koutzoukis C. Neurobehavioural symptoms one year after a head injury.  Br J Psychiatry. 1999;  174 360-365
  • 3 Brooks D N, Campsie L, Symington C et al.. The effects of severe head injury upon patient and relative within seven years of injury.  J Head Trauma Rehabil. 1987;  2 1-13
  • 4 Tateno A, Jorge R E, Robinson R G. Clinical correlates of aggressive behavior after traumatic brain injury.  J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2003;  15(2) 155-160
  • 5 Perlesz A, Kinsella G, Crowe S. Psychological distress and family satisfaction following traumatic brain injury: injured individuals and their primary, secondary, and tertiary carers.  J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2000;  15(3) 909-929
  • 6 Schwartz L, Taylor H G, Drotar D, Yeates K O, Wade S L, Stancin T. Long-term behavior problems following pediatric traumatic brain injury: prevalence, predictors, and correlates.  J Pediatr Psychol. 2003;  28(4) 251-263
  • 7 Winkler D, Unsworth C, Sloan S. Factors that lead to successful community integration following severe traumatic brain injury.  J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2006;  21(1) 8-21
  • 8 Lishman W A. The psychiatric sequelae of head injury: a review.  Psychol Med. 1973;  3(3) 304-318
  • 9 Cattelani R, Lombardi F, Brianti R, Mazzucchi A. Traumatic brain injury in childhood: intellectual, behavioural and social outcome into adulthood.  Brain Inj. 1998;  12(4) 283-296
  • 10 Greve K W, Sherwin E, Stanford M S, Mathias C, Love J, Ramzinski P. Personality and neurocognitive correlates of impulsive aggression in long-term survivors of severe traumatic brain injury.  Brain Inj. 2001;  15(3) 255-262
  • 11 MacMillan P J, Hart R P, Martelli M F, Zasler N D. Pre-injury status and adaptation following traumatic brain injury.  Brain Inj. 2002;  16(1) 41-49
  • 12 Tate R L. “It is not only the kind of injury that matters, but the kind of head”: the contribution of premorbid psychosocial factors to rehabilitation outcomes after severe traumatic brain injury.  Neuropsychol Rehabil. 1998;  8 1-18
  • 13 Max J E, Robin D A, Lindgren S D et al.. Traumatic brain injury in children and adolescents: psychiatric disorders at two years.  J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1997;  36 1595-1601
  • 14 Costeff H, Groswasser Z, Landman Y, Brenner T. Survivors of severe traumatic brain injury in childhood. II. Late residual disability.  Scand J Rehabil Med Suppl. 1985;  12(Suppl) 10-15
  • 15 Baguley I J, Cooper J, Felmingham K. Aggressive behavior following traumatic brain injury: how common is common?.  J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2006;  21(1) 45-56
  • 16 Gualtieri C T. Neuropsychiatry and Behavioral Pharmacology. New York, New York; Springer Verlag 1991
  • 17 Eames P, Wood R. Rehabilitation after severe brain injury: a special-unit approach to behaviour disorders.  Int Rehabil Med. 1985;  7(3) 130-133
  • 18 Grafman J. Alternative frameworks for the conceptualization of prefrontal lobe functions. In: Boller F, Grafman J Handbook of Neuropsychology. Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Elsevier 1994: 187-202
  • 19 Baer D M, Wolf M M, Risley T R. Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis.  J Appl Behav Anal. 1968;  1(1) 91-97
  • 20 Ylvisaker M, Jacobs H, Feeney T. Positive supports for people who experience disability following brain injury: a review.  J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2003;  18 7-32
  • 21 Alderman N. Contemporary approaches to the management of irritability and aggression following traumatic brain injury.  Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2003;  13 211-240
  • 22 Corrigan P W, Bach P A. Behavioral treatment. In: Silver, JM, McAllister TW, Yudofsky SC Textbook of Traumatic Brain Injury. Washington, DC; American Psychiatric Publishing 2005: 661-678
  • 23 Baddeley A D, Wilson B A. When implicit learning fails: amnesia and the problem of error elimination.  Neuropsychologia. 1994;  32(1) 53-68
  • 24 Slifer K J, Tucker C L, Gerson A C et al.. Operant conditioning for behavior during posttraumatic amnesia in children and adolescents with brain injury.  J Head Trauma Rehabil. 1996;  11 39-50
  • 25 Carr E G. The expanding vision of positive behavior support: research perspectives on happiness, helpfulness, hopefulness.  J Posit Behav Interv. 2007;  9 3-14
  • 26 Deci E L. Why We Do What We Do: Understanding Self-Motivation. New York, New York; Penguin Books 1995
  • 27 Ryan R M, Deci E L. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being.  Am Psychol. 2000;  55(1) 68-78
  • 28 Dikmen S S, Machamer J E, Powell J M, Temkin N R. Outcome 3 to 5 years after moderate to severe traumatic brain injury.  Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;  84(10) 1449-1457
  • 29 Tate R L, Broe G, Cameron I et al.. Pre-injury, injury and early post-injury predictors of long-term functional and psychosocial recovery after severe traumatic brain injury.  Brain Impair. 2005;  6 75-89
  • 30 Wade D, King N, Wenden F et al.. Routine follow-up after head injury: a second randomized controlled trial.  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1998;  65 77-183
  • 31 Douglas J M, Spellacy F J. Correlates of depression in adults with severe traumatic brain injury and their carers.  Brain Inj. 2000;  14(1) 71-88
  • 32 Corrigan J D, Bogner J A, Mysiw W J, Clinchot D, Fugate L. Life satisfaction after traumatic brain injury.  J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2001;  16(6) 543-555
  • 33 Huebner R A, Johnson K, Bennett C M, Schneck C. Community participation and quality of life outcomes after adult traumatic brain injury.  Am J Occup Ther. 2003;  57(2) 177-185
  • 34 Ylvisaker M, Feeney T, Capo M. Long-term community supports for individuals with co-occurring disabilities: cost effectiveness and project-based intervention.  Brain Impair. 2007;  8 1-17
  • 35 Cicerone K D, Azulay J. Perceived self-efficacy and life satisfaction after traumatic brain injury.  J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2007;  22(5) 257-266
  • 36 Ylvisaker M. Self-coaching: a context-sensitive approach to social communication after traumatic brain injury.  Brain Impair. 2006;  7 246-258
  • 37 Ylvisaker M, Feeney T. Construction of identity after traumatic brain injury.  Brain Impair. 2000;  1 12-28
  • 38 Ylvisaker M, McPherson K, Kayes N, Pellett E. Metaphoric identity mapping: facilitating goal setting and engagement in rehabilitation after traumatic brain injury.  Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2008;  18(5-6) 713-741
  • 39 Teasdale J D, Barnard P J. Affect, Cognition, and Change: Remodeling Depressive Thought. Hillsdale, NJ; Lawrence Erlbaum 1993
  • 40 Damasio A R. The somatic marker hypothesis and the possible functions of the prefrontal cortex. In: Roberts AC, Robbins TW, Weiskrantz L The Prefrontal Cortex: Executive and Cognitive Functions. Oxford, United Kingdom; Oxford University Press 1998: 36-50
  • 41 Rolls E T. The functions of the orbitofrontal cortex. In: Stuss DT, Knight RT Principles of Frontal Lobe Function. New York, NY; Oxford University Press 2002: 354-375
  • 42 Mesulam M. The human frontal lobes: transcending the default mode through contingent encoding. In: Stuss DT, Knight RT Principles of Frontal Lobe Function. New York, NY; Oxford University Press 2002: 8-30
  • 43 Grafman J. The structured event complex and the human prefrontal cortex. In: Stuss DT, Knight RT Principles of Frontal Lobe Function. New York, NY; Oxford University Press 2002: 292-311
  • 44 Ylvisaker M, Turkstra L, Coehlo C et al.. Behavioural interventions for children and adults with behaviour disorders after TBI: a systematic review of the evidence.  Brain Inj. 2007;  21(8) 769-805
  • 45 Horner R D, Carr E G, Halle J et al.. The use of single-subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education.  Except Child. 2005;  71 165-180
  • 46 Feeney T J, Ylvisaker M, Rosen B H, Greene P. Community supports for individuals with challenging behavior after brain injury: an analysis of the New York state behavioral resource project.  J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2001;  16(1) 61-75

Tim FeeneyPh.D. 

School and Community Support, Inc., 17 British American Boulevard

Latham, NY 12110

Email: tfeeney@scssconsulting.com

    >