Endoscopy 2011; 43(12): 1076-1081
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1256767
Original article
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

New classification for probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy in the colon

T. Kuiper
1   Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
,
F. J. C. van den Broek
1   Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
,
S. van Eeden
1   Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
,
M. B. Wallace
2   Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
,
A. M. Buchner
2   Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
,
A. Meining
3   Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
,
K. van Hee
1   Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
,
P. Fockens
1   Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
,
E. Dekker
1   Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

submitted 08 February 2011

accepted after revision 11 July 2011

Publication Date:
04 October 2011 (online)

Background and aims: Probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (pCLE; Cellvizio, Mauna Kea Technologies, Paris, France) enables in vivo histology during colonoscopy and may allow endoscopists to make real-time diagnoses. A collaboration of five experts proposed a new pCLE classification for colonic use. The aim of this study was to assess interobserver agreement and accuracy of the new pCLE classification in the colon.

Patients and methods: Eligible patients were prospectively investigated by pCLE. A subset of 13 pCLE video sequences was reviewed post hoc for the establishment of a new classification, which comprised three vessel categories and seven crypt categories. All five blinded observers then scored another set of 102 video sequences, using the new classification. Histopathology was used as a reference standard.

Results: The interobserver agreements on vessel and crypt architecture were ‘fair’ with kappa values of 0.29 and 0.27, respectively. When the classification was reduced to neoplasia vs. non-neoplasia (i. e. vessel or crypt type 3), overall agreement became ‘moderate’ (κ = 0.56). Overall sensitivity and specificity for predicting neoplasia was 66 % and 83 %, respectively. When all observers agreed (69 % of videos), the corresponding figures became 80 % and 95 %.

Conclusion: A new classification for pCLE in the colon had a ‘moderate’ interobserver agreement for differentiating neoplasia from non-neoplastic tissue in the colon. The overall accuracy (81 %) for predicting neoplasia was acceptable and became excellent (94 %) when all five observers agreed. Future research should focus on refinement and validation of the classification.

 
  • References

  • 1 Anandasabapathy S. Endoscopic imaging: emerging optical techniques for the detection of colorectal neoplasia. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 2008; 24: 64-69
  • 2 Van den Broek FJ, Fockens P, van Eden S et al Clinical evaluation of endoscopic trimodal imaging for the detection and differentiation of colonic polyps. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009; 7: 288-295
  • 3 Polglase AL, McLaren WJ, Skinner SA et al A fluorescence confocal endomicroscope for in vivo microscopy of the upper- and the lower-GI tract. Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 62: 686-695
  • 4 Rabeneck L, Paszat LF, Hilsden RJ et al Bleeding and perforation after outpatient colonoscopy and their risk factors in usual clinical practice. Gastroenterology 2008; 135: 1899-1906
  • 5 Buchner AM, Shahid MW, Van den Broek FJ et al Probe based confocal laser endomicroscopy (pCLE) in predicting recurrence of neoplasia after endoscopic mucosal resection of colorectal lesions. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 69: AB367
  • 6 Kiesslich R, Burg J, Vieth M et al Confocal laser endoscopy for diagnosing intraepithelial neoplasias and colorectal cancer in vivo. Gastroenterology 2004; 127: 706-713
  • 7 Hurlstone DP, Thomson M, Brown S et al Confocal endomicroscopy in ulcerative colitis: differentiating dysplasia-associated lesional mass and adenoma-like mass. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007; 5: 1235-1241
  • 8 Hurlstone DP, Baraza W, Brown S et al In vivo real-time confocal laser scanning endomicroscopic colonoscopy for the detection and characterization of colorectal neoplasia. Br J Surg 2008; 95: 636-645
  • 9 Kiesslich R, Goetz M, Lammersdorf K et al Chromoscopy-guided endomicroscopy increases the diagnostic yield of intraepithelial neoplasia in ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology 2007; 132: 874-882
  • 10 Sanduleanu S, Driessen A, Gomez-Garcia E et al In vivo diagnosis and classification of colorectal neoplasia by chromoendoscopy-guided confocal laser endomicroscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010; 8: 371-378
  • 11 Buchner AM, Shahid MW, Heckman MG et al Comparison of probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy with virtual chromoendoscopy for classification of colon polyps. Gastroenterology 2010; 138: 834-842
  • 12 Li CQ, Xie XJ, Yu T et al Classification of inflammation activity in ulcerative colitis by confocal laser endomicroscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2010; 105: 1391-1396
  • 13 Watanabe O, Ando T, Maeda O et al Confocal endomicroscopy in patients with ulcerative colitis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008; 23 (Suppl. 02) S286-S290
  • 14 Lipson BK, Yannuzzi LA. Complications of intravenous fluorescein injections. Int Ophthalmol Clin 1989; 29: 200-205
  • 15 Wallace MB, Meining A, Canto MI et al The safety of intravenous fluorescein for confocal laser endomicroscopy in the gastrointestinal tract. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2010; 31: 548-552
  • 16 Schlemper RJ, Riddell RH, Kato Y et al The Vienna classification of gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia. Gut 2000; 47: 251-255
  • 17 Jass JR, Baker K, Zlobec I et al Advanced colorectal polyps with the molecular and morphological features of serrated polyps and adenomas: concept of a ‘fusion’ pathway to colorectal cancer. Histopathology 2006; 49: 121-131
  • 18 Matsumoto T, Mizuno M, Shimizu M et al Serrated adenoma of the colorectum: colonoscopic and histologic features. Gastrointest Endosc 1999; 49: 736-742
  • 19 Snover DC, Jass JR, Fenoglio-Preiser C et al Serrated polyps of the large intestine: a morphologic and molecular review of an evolving concept. Am J Clin Pathol 2005; 124: 380-391
  • 20 Chmura KH, Periyakoil VS, Noda A. Kappa coefficients in medical research. Stat Med 2002; 21: 2109-2129
  • 21 Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33: 159-174
  • 22 Kiesslich R, Anagnostopoulos GK, Axon A et al Interobserver variation and standardized training for confocal laser endomicroscopy image interpretation in the upper and lower GI tract. Gastrointest Endosc 2007; 65: AB354
  • 23 Dunbar K, Kiesslich R, Deinert K et al Confocal laser endomicroscopy image interpretation: interobserver agreement among gastroenterologists and pathologists. Gastrointest Endosc 2007; 65: AB348
  • 24 Meining A, Saur D, Bajbouj M et al In vivo histopathology for detection of gastrointestinal neoplasia with a portable, confocal miniprobe: an examiner blinded analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007; 5: 1261-1267
  • 25 Nguyen VX, Nguyen CC, Leighton JA et al Accuracy and inter-observer agreement in identifying neoplastic gastrointestinal mucosal pathology by probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (pCLE). Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 69: AB364
  • 26 Gomez V, Buchner AM, Dekker E et al Interobserver agreement and accuracy among international experts with probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy in predicting colorectal neoplasia. Endoscopy 2010; 42: 286-291
  • 27 Sandmeier D, Seelentag W, Bouzourene H. Serrated polyps of the colorectum: is sessile serrated adenoma distinguishable from hyperplastic polyp in a daily practice?. Virchows Arch 2007; 450: 613-618
  • 28 Wong NA, Hunt LP, Novelli MR et al Observer agreement in the diagnosis of serrated polyps of the large bowel. Histopathology 2009; 55: 63-66
  • 29 Li SC, Burgart L. Histopathology of serrated adenoma, its variants, and differentiation from conventional adenomatous and hyperplastic polyps. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2007; 131: 440-445
  • 30 Hata K, Watanabe T, Motoi T et al Pitfalls of pit pattern diagnosis in ulcerative colitis-associated dysplasia. Gastroenterology 2004; 126: 374-376
  • 31 Ignjatovic A, East JE, Suzuki N et al Optical diagnosis of small colorectal polyps at routine colonoscopy (Detect InSpect ChAracterise Resect and Discard; DISCARD trial): a prospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol 2009; 10: 1171-1178
  • 32 Rex DK. Narrow-band imaging without optical magnification for histologic analysis of colorectal polyps. Gastroenterology 2009; 136: 1174-1181