Endoscopy 2011; 43(5): 419-424
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1256215
Original article

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Fluorescein-enhanced autofluorescence imaging for accurate differentiation of neoplastic from non-neoplastic colorectal polyps: a feasibility study

L.  G.  Lim1 , 2 , M.  Bajbouj1 , S.  von Delius1 , A.  Meining1
  • 1Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
  • 2Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, National University Health System, Singapore
Further Information

Publication History

submitted 16 June 2010

accepted after revision 27 November 2010

Publication Date:
28 February 2011 (online)

Background: Autofluorescence imaging (AFI) is sensitive but not specific for differentiating neoplastic from non-neoplastic colorectal polyps. We aimed to determine the sensitivity and specificity of fluorescein-enhanced AFI (FAFI) in differentiating neoplastic from non-neoplastic colorectal polyps.

Methods: All patients with colorectal polyps detected during AFI colonoscopy received intravenous fluorescein followed by AFI (FAFI). The video sequences were recorded and divided into a learning group and a test group. AFI and FAFI criteria for neoplastic and non-neoplastic lesions were determined after viewing videos in the learning group unblinded to histology. Videos in the test group were viewed blinded to histology, and diagnoses of neoplastic versus non-neoplastic were made for AFI and FAFI using the predetermined criteria. Still frames were objectively measured for red:green ratio (AFI) and green contrast (FAFI).

Results: Eight videos (four neoplastic, four non-neoplastic) were used for the learning group. Criteria for neoplasia when using FAFI were determined as the presence of a patchy or granular pattern which appeared more fluorescent green compared with the background. For AFI, purple or pink represented neoplasia; green represented non-neoplasia. In the test group (13 neoplastic, 12 non-neoplastic), for differentiating between neoplasia and non-neoplasia, subjective analysis of video sequences yielded a sensitivity of 100 % for AFI and 100 % for FAFI (P = 1.000), and a specificity of 16.7 % for AFI and 91.7 % for FAFI (P = 0.004). Using objective color analysis, the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve was 0.647 for AFI using the red:green ratio to distinguish between neoplasia and non-neoplasia, and 0.994 for FAFI using green contrast.

Conclusions: FAFI accurately differentiated between neoplastic and non-neoplastic colorectal polyps.

References

  • 1 Byeon J-S, Yang S-K, Kim T I et al., for the Asia Pacific Working Group for Colorectal Cancer. Colorectal neoplasm in asymptomatic Asians: a prospective multinational multicenter colonoscopy survey.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;  65 1015-1022
  • 2 Soetikno R M, Kaltenbach T, Rouse R V et al. Prevalence of nonpolypoid (flat and depressed) colorectal neoplasms in asymptomatic and symptomatic adults.  JAMA. 2008;  299 1027-1035
  • 3 Heresbach D, Barrioz T, Lapalus M G et al. Miss rate for colorectal neoplastic polyps: a prospective multicenter study of back-to-back video colonoscopies.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 284-290
  • 4 DaCosta R S, Andersson H, Cirocco M et al. Autofluorescence characterisation of isolated whole crypts and primary cultured human epithelial cells from normal, hyperplastic, and adenomatous colonic mucosa.  J Clin Pathol. 2005;  58 766-774
  • 5 Van den Broek F J, Fockens P, Van Eeden S et al. Clinical evaluation of endoscopic trimodal imaging for the detection and differentiation of colonic polyps.  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;  7 288-295
  • 6 Raica M, Cimpean A M, Ribatti D. Angiogenesis in pre-malignant conditions.  Eur J Cancer. 2009;  45 1924-1934
  • 7 Schirner M, Menrad A, Stephens A et al. Molecular imaging of tumor angiogenesis.  Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2004;  1014 67-75
  • 8 Cercek L, Cercek B, Ockey C H. Fluorescein excitation and emission polarization spectra in living cells: changes during the cell cycle.  Biophys J. 1978;  23 395-405
  • 9 Matsuda T, Saito Y, Fu K I et al. Does autofluorescence imaging videoendoscopy system improve the colonoscopic polyp detection rate? – a pilot study.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;  103 1926-1932
  • 10 Ramsoekh D, Haringsma J, Poley J W et al. A back-to-back comparison of white light video endoscopy with autofluorescence endoscopy for adenoma detection in high-risk subjects.  Gut. 2010;  59 785-793
  • 11 McCallum A L, Jenkins J T, Gillen D et al. Evaluation of autofluorescence colonoscopy for the detection and diagnosis of colonic polyps.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;  68 283-290
  • 12 Kessler W R. Autofluorescence colonoscopy: a green light on the long road to ”real-time” histology.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;  68 291-293
  • 13 Levin T R, Zhao W, Conell C et al. Complications of colonoscopy in an integrated health care delivery system.  Ann Intern Med. 2006;  145 880-886
  • 14 Aihara H, Sumiyama K, Saito S et al. Numerical analysis of the autofluorescence intensity of neoplastic and non-neoplastic colorectal lesions by using a novel videoendoscopy system.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;  69 726-733
  • 15 Wallace M B, Meining A, Canto M I et al. The safety of intravenous fluorescein for confocal laser endomicroscopy in the gastrointestinal tract.  Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2010;  31 548-552
  • 16 Eichten A, Hyun W C, Coussens L M. Distinctive features of angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis determine their functionality during de novo tumor development.  Cancer Res. 2007;  67 5211-5220
  • 17 Machida H, Sano Y, Hamamoto Y et al. Narrow-band imaging in the diagnosis of colorectal mucosal lesions: a pilot study.  Endoscopy. 2004;  36 1094-1098
  • 18 Su M Y, Hsu C M, Ho Y P et al. Comparative study of conventional colonoscopy, chromoendoscopy, and narrow-band imaging systems in differential diagnosis of neoplastic and nonneoplastic colonic polyps.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;  101 2711-2716
  • 19 Tischendorf J J, Wasmuth H E, Koch A et al. Value of magnifying chromoendoscopy and narrow band imaging (NBI) in classifying colorectal polyps: a prospective controlled study.  Endoscopy. 2007;  39 1092-1096
  • 20 Hirata M, Tanaka S, Oka S et al. Magnifying endoscopy with narrow band imaging for diagnosis of colorectal tumors.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;  65 988-995
  • 21 East J E, Suzuki N, Saunders B P. Comparison of magnified pit pattern interpretation with narrow band imaging versus chromoendoscopy for diminutive colonic polyps: a pilot study.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;  66 310-316
  • 22 Chiu H M, Chang C Y, Chen C C et al. A prospective comparative study of narrow-band imaging, chromoendoscopy, and conven conventional colonoscopy in the diagnosis of colorectal neoplasia.  Gut. 2007;  56 373-379
  • 23 Rastogi A, Bansal A, Wani S et al. Narrow-band imaging colonoscopy – a pilot feasibility study for the detection of polyps and correlation of surface patterns with polyp histologic diagnosis.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;  67 280-286

A. MeiningMD 

Department of Medicine II
Klinikum rechts der Isar
Technical University of Munich

Ismaningerstrasse 22
D-81675 Munich
Germany

Email: Alexander.Meining@lrz.tu-muenchen.de

    >