Value and Pitfalls of Neurophysiological Monitoring in Thoracic and Thoracoabdominal Aortic Replacement and Endovascular Repair

Abstract

Background: The aim of our study was to analyze the neurophysiological monitoring method with regard to its potential problems during thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic open or endovascular repair. Furthermore, preventive strategies to the main pitfalls with this method were developed. Methods: Between 11/2000 and 05/2007 in 97 cases open surgery or endovascular stentgraft-implantation was performed on the thoracic or thoracoabdominal aorta. Intraoperatively, neurophysiologic motor- and somatosensory-evoked potentials were monitored. Results: Our cases were divided into four groups: event-free patients with normal potentials (A, 63 cases), with correlation of modified evoked potentials and neurological outcome (B, 14 cases), false-positive or false-negative results (C, 4 cases), and medication interaction or technical issues (D, 16 cases). We observed a sensitivity of 93 % and a specificity of 96 % for the neurophysiological monitoring. Conclusions: Monitoring spinal cord function during surgical and endovascular interventions on the thoracic and thoracoabdominal aorta is necessary. It can be made more effective by precisely analyzing the interference factors of the neurophysiological monitoring method itself. Successful strategies of immediate troubleshooting could be identified.

Key words

thoracic and thoracoabdominal replacement - thoracic and thoracoabdominal endovascular repair (TEVAR) - neurophysiological monitoring - motor‐evoked potential (MEP) - somatosensory‐evoked potential (SSEP)

References

• 1 Dong C C J, MacDonald D B, Janusz M D. Intraoperative spinal cord monitoring during descending thoracic and thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair.  Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;  74 1873-1876
• 2 Jacobs M J, Mess W, Mochtar B et al. The value of motor evoked potentials in reducing paraplegia during thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair.  J Vasc Surg. 2006;  43 239-246
• 3 Sloan T B. Electrophysiologic monitoring during surgery to repair the thoracoabdominal aorta.  Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2004;  8 113-125
• 4 Cheung A T, Pochettino A, McGarvey M L et al. Strategies to manage paraplegia risk after endovascular stent repair of descending thoracic aortic aneurysms.  Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;  80 1280-1289
• 5 Cooley D A. The history of surgery of the thoracic aorta.  Cardiol Clin. 1999;  17 609-613
• 6 Weigang E, Hartert M, von Samson P et al. Improved spinal cord perfusion during thoracoabdominal aortic repair.  Thorac Cardiov Surg. 2005;  53 69-73
• 7 Weigang E, Hartert M, Sircar R et al. Setup of neurophysiological monitoring with tcMEP/SSEP during thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair.  Thorac Cardiov Surg. 2005;  53 28-32
• 8 Weigang E, Sircar R, von Samson P et al. Efficacy and frequency of cerebrospinal fluid drainage in operative management of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms.  Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007;  55 73-78
• 9 Hartert M, Sircar R, Luehr M et al. Klinische Anwendung evozierter Potentiale und neuroprotektiver Maßnahmen in der Aortenchirurgie.  Z Herz-Thorax-Gefäßchir. 2005;  19 239-251
• 10 Svensson L G. Paralysis after aortic surgery: in search of lost cord function.  Surgeon. 2005;  3 396-405
• 11 Kouchoukos N T, Masetti P, Rokkas C K, Murphy S F, Blackstone E H. Safety and efficacy of hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass and circulatory arrest for operations on the descending thoracic and thoracoabdominal aorta.  Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;  72 699-707
• 12 MacDonald D B. Safety of intraoperative transcranial electrical stimulation motor evoked potential monitoring.  J Clin Neurophysiol. 2002;  19 416-429
• 13 Jones S J, Harrison R, Koh K F, Mendoza N, Crockard H A. Motor evoked potential monitoring during spinal surgery: responses of distal limb muscles to transcranial cortical stimulation with pulse trains.  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1996;  100 375-383
• 14 Kothbauer K F, Deletis V, Epstein F J. Motor-evoked potential monitoring for intramedullary spinal cord tumor surgery: correlation of clinical and neurophysiological data in series of 100 consecutive procedures.  Neurosurg Focus. 1998;  4 (5) E3
• 15 Calancie B, Harris W, Brindle G F, Green B A, Landy H J. Threshold-level repetitive transcranial electrical stimulation for intraoperative monitoring of central motor conduction.  J Neurosurg. 2001;  95 161-168
• 16 Wassermann E M. Risk and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: report and suggested guidelines from the International Workshop on the safety of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.  Encephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1998;  108 1-16
• 17 Digitimer Ltd. .Multipulse stimulator model D185 operators manual. Welwyn Garden City, UK; Digitimer, Ltd. 2002
• 18 Keyhani K, Miller C C, Estrera A L, Wegryn T, Sheinbaum R, Safi H J. Analysis of motor and somatosensory evoked potentials during thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair.  J Vasc Surg. 2009;  49 36-41