Semin Respir Crit Care Med 2010; 31(1): 031-038
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1246287
© Thieme Medical Publishers

Severity of Illness

Jean-Louis Vincent1 , Frederico Bruzzi de Carvalho2
  • 1Department of Intensive Care, Erasme University Hospital, Université libre de Bruxelles, Belgium
  • 2Department of Intensive Care, Hospital Mater Dei, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
25 January 2010 (online)

ABSTRACT

Severity of illness scores are increasingly used in the intensive care environment to help predict outcome, to characterize disease severity and degree of organ dysfunction, to stratify patients for clinical trial enrollment, to assess resource use, and to compare intensive care unit (ICU) performance. This article reviews the most commonly used severity of illness scoring systems and discusses some of their uses and limitations.

REFERENCES

  • 1 Teasdale G, Jennett B. Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale.  Lancet. 1974;  2 81-84
  • 2 Baker S P, O'Neill B, Haddon Jr W, Long W B. The injury severity score: a method for describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care.  J Trauma. 1974;  14 187-196
  • 3 Fine M J, Orloff J J, Arisumi D et al.. Prognosis of patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia.  Am J Med. 1990;  88(5N) 1N-8N
  • 4 Cullen D J, Civetta J M, Briggs B A, Ferrara L C. Therapeutic intervention scoring system: a method for quantitative comparison of patient care.  Crit Care Med. 1974;  2 57-60
  • 5 Reis Miranda D, Moreno R, Iapichino G. Nine equivalents of nursing manpower use score (NEMS).  Intensive Care Med. 1997;  23 760-765
  • 6 Knaus W A, Zimmerman J E, Wagner D P, Draper E A, Lawrence D E. APACHE-acute physiology and chronic health evaluation: a physiologically based classification system.  Crit Care Med. 1981;  9 591-597
  • 7 Moreno R, Jordan B, Metnitz P. The changing prognostic determinants in the critically ill patient. In: Vincent JL 2007 Yearbook of Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine. Heidelberg; Springer 2007: 899-907
  • 8 Knaus W A, Draper E A, Wagner D P, Zimmerman J E. APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system.  Crit Care Med. 1985;  13 818-829
  • 9 Knaus W A, Wagner D P, Draper E A et al.. The APACHE III prognostic system: risk prediction of hospital mortality for critically ill hospitalized adults.  Chest. 1991;  100 1619-1636
  • 10 Zimmerman J E, Wagner D P, Draper E A, Wright L, Alzola C, Knaus W A. Evaluation of acute physiology and chronic health evaluation III predictions of hospital mortality in an independent database.  Crit Care Med. 1998;  26 1317-1326
  • 11 Zimmerman J E, Kramer A A, McNair D S, Malila F M. Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) IV: hospital mortality assessment for today's critically ill patients.  Crit Care Med. 2006;  34 1297-1310
  • 12 Le Gall J-R, Loirat P, Alperovitch A et al.. A simplified acute physiology score for ICU patients.  Crit Care Med. 1984;  12 975-977
  • 13 Le Gall J-R, Lemeshow S, Saulnier F. A new simplified acute physiology score (SAPS II) based on a European/North American multicenter study.  JAMA. 1993;  270 2957-2963
  • 14 Moreno R P, Metnitz P G, Almeida E SAPS 3 Investigators et al. SAPS 3—from evaluation of the patient to evaluation of the intensive care unit, II: Development of a prognostic model for hospital mortality at ICU admission.  Intensive Care Med. 2005;  31 1345-1355
  • 15 Lemeshow S, Teres D, Pastides H, Avrunin J S, Steingrub J S. A method for predicting survival and mortality of ICU patients using objectively derived weights.  Crit Care Med. 1985;  13 519-525
  • 16 Lemeshow S, Teres D, Klar J, Avrunin J S, Gehlbach S H, Rapoport J. Mortality Probability Models (MPM II) based on an international cohort of intensive care unit patients.  JAMA. 1993;  270 2478-2486
  • 17 Lemeshow S, Klar J, Teres D et al.. Mortality probability models for patients in the intensive care unit for 48 or 72 hours: a prospective, multicenter study.  Crit Care Med. 1994;  22 1351-1358
  • 18 Higgins T L, Teres D, Copes W S, Nathanson B H, Stark M, Kramer A A. Assessing contemporary intensive care unit outcome: an updated Mortality Probability Admission Model (MPM0-III).  Crit Care Med. 2007;  35 827-835
  • 19 Marshall J C, Cook D J, Christou N V, Bernard G R, Sprung C L, Sibbald W J. Multiple organ dysfunction score: a reliable descriptor of a complex clinical outcome.  Crit Care Med. 1995;  23 1638-1652
  • 20 Vincent J L, Moreno R, Takala J et al.. The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. On behalf of the Working Group on Sepsis-Related Problems of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine.  Intensive Care Med. 1996;  22 707-710
  • 21 Vincent J L, de Mendonça A, Cantraine F et al.. Use of the SOFA score to assess the incidence of organ dysfunction/failure in intensive care units: results of a multicentric, prospective study.  Crit Care Med. 1998;  26 1793-1800
  • 22 Janssens U, Graf C, Graf J et al.. Evaluation of the SOFA score: a single centre experience of a medical intensive care unit in 303 consecutive patients with predominantly cardiovascular disorders.  Intensive Care Med. 2000;  26 1037-1045
  • 23 Ceriani R, Mazzoni M, Bortone F et al.. Application of the sequential organ failure assessment score to cardiac surgical patients.  Chest. 2003;  123 1229-1239
  • 24 Antonelli M, Moreno R, Vincent J L et al.. Application of SOFA score to trauma patients. Sequential Organ Failure Assessment.  Intensive Care Med. 1999;  25 389-394
  • 25 Lorente J A, Vallejo A, Galeiras R et al.. Organ dysfunction as estimated by the sequential organ failure assessment score is related to outcome in critically ill burn patients.  Shock. 2009;  31 125-131
  • 26 Vosylius S, Sipylaite J, Ivaskevicius J. Sequential organ failure assessment score as the determinant of outcome for patients with severe sepsis.  Croat Med J. 2004;  45 715-720
  • 27 Ferreira F L, Bota D P, Bross A, Mélot C, Vincent J L. Serial evaluation of the SOFA score to predict outcome in critically ill patients.  JAMA. 2001;  286 1754-1758
  • 28 Levy M M, Fink M P, Marshall J C SCCM/ESICM/ACCP/ATS/SIS et al. 2001 SCCM/ESICM/ACCP/ATS/SIS International Sepsis Definitions Conference.  Crit Care Med. 2003;  31 1250-1256
  • 29 Marshall J C, Vincent J L, Fink M P et al.. Measures, markers, and mediators: toward a staging system for clinical sepsis: a report of the Fifth Toronto Sepsis Roundtable, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, October 25-26, 2000.  Crit Care Med. 2003;  31 1560-1567
  • 30 Moreno R P, Metnitz B, Adler L, Hoechtl A, Bauer P, Metnitz P G. SAPS 3 Investigators . Sepsis mortality prediction based on predisposition, infection and response.  Intensive Care Med. 2008;  34 496-504
  • 31 Rubulotta F, Marshall J C, Ramsay G, Nelson D, Levy M, Williams M. Predisposition, insult/infection, response, and organ dysfunction: a new model for staging severe sepsis.  Crit Care Med. 2009;  37(4) 1329-1335
  • 32 Lisboa T, Diaz E, Sa-Borges M et al.. The ventilator-associated pneumonia PIRO score: a tool for predicting ICU mortality and health-care resources use in ventilator-associated pneumonia.  Chest. 2008;  134 1208-1216
  • 33 Rello J, Rodriguez A, Lisboa T, Gallego M, Lujan M, Wunderink R. PIRO score for community-acquired pneumonia: a new prediction rule for assessment of severity in intensive care unit patients with community-acquired pneumonia.  Crit Care Med. 2009;  37 456-462
  • 34 Polderman K H, Christiaans H M, Wester J P, Spijkstra J J, Girbes A R. Intra-observer variability in APACHE II scoring.  Intensive Care Med. 2001;  27 1550-1552
  • 35 Polderman K H, Jorna E M, Girbes A R. Inter-observer variability in APACHE II scoring: effect of strict guidelines and training.  Intensive Care Med. 2001;  27 1365-1369
  • 36 Bosman R J, Oudemane van Straaten H M, Zandstra D F. The use of intensive care information systems alters outcome prediction.  Intensive Care Med. 1998;  24 953-958
  • 37 Sirio C A, Shepardson L B, Rotondi A J et al.. Community-wide assessment of intensive care outcomes using a physiologically based prognostic measure: implications for critical care delivery from Cleveland Health Quality Choice.  Chest. 1999;  115 793-801
  • 38 Metnitz B, Schaden E, Moreno R, Le Gall J R, Bauer P, Metnitz P G. ASDI Study Group . Austrian validation and customization of the SAPS 3 Admission Score.  Intensive Care Med. 2009;  35 616-622
  • 39 Sakr Y, Krauss C, Amaral A C et al.. Comparison of the performance of SAPS II, SAPS 3, APACH E II, and their customized prognostic models in a surgical intensive care unit.  Br J Anaesth. 2008;  101 798-803
  • 40 Harrison D A, Parry G J, Carpenter J R, Short A, Rowan K. A new risk prediction model for critical care: the Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre (ICNARC) model.  Crit Care Med. 2007;  35 1091-1098
  • 41 Rivers E, Nguyen B, Havstad S Early Goal-Directed Therapy Collaborative Group et al. Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock.  N Engl J Med. 2001;  345 1368-1377
  • 42 Kahn J M, Kramer A A, Rubenfeld G D. Transferring critically ill patients out of hospital improves the standardized mortality ratio: a simulation study.  Chest. 2007;  131 68-75
  • 43 Glance L G, Osler T, Shinozaki T. Effect of varying the case mix on the standardized mortality ratio and W statistic: a simulation study.  Chest. 2000;  117 1112-1117
  • 44 Bakhshi-Raiez F, Peek N, Bosman R J, de Jonge E, de Keizer N F. The impact of different prognostic models and their customization on institutional comparison of intensive care units.  Crit Care Med. 2007;  35 2553-2560
  • 45 Gutierrez G, Palizas F, Doglio G et al.. Gastric intramucosal pH as a therapeutic index of tissue oxygenation in critically ill patients.  Lancet. 1992;  339 195-199
  • 46 Bernard G R, Vincent J L, Laterre P F Recombinant human protein C Worldwide Evaluation in Severe Sepsis (PROWESS) study group et al. Efficacy and safety of recombinant human activated protein C for severe sepsis.  N Engl J Med. 2001;  344 699-709
  • 47 Vincent J L, Opal S M, Marshall J C. Ten reasons why we should NOT use severity scores as entry criteria for clinical trials or in our treatment decisions*.  Crit Care Med. 2010;  38 283-287
  • 48 Pettilä V, Pettilä M, Sarna S, Voutilainen P, Takkunen O. Comparison of multiple organ dysfunction scores in the prediction of hospital mortality in the critically ill.  Crit Care Med. 2002;  30 1705-1711
  • 49 Peres Bota D, Melot C, Lopes Ferreira F, Nguyen Ba V, Vincent J L. The Multiple Organ Dysfunction Score (MODS) versus the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score in outcome prediction.  Intensive Care Med. 2002;  28 1619-1624
  • 50 Livingston B M, MacKirdy F N, Howie J C, Jones R, Norrie J D. Assessment of the performance of five intensive care scoring models within a large Scottish database.  Crit Care Med. 2000;  28 1820-1827

Jean-Louis VincentM.D. Ph.D. 

Department of Intensive Care, Erasme University Hospital

Route de Lennik 808, 1070 Brussels, Belgium

Email: jlvincen@ulb.ac.be

    >