Download PDF
Endoskopie heute 2009; 22(1): 2-12
DOI: 10.1055/s-0028-1098831
Originalarbeit

© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart ˙ New York

Nicht polypoide mukosale kolorektale Neoplasien – die Kyoto-Konferenz

Kyoto Conference on Non-Polypoid Mucosal Colorectal NeoplasiaM. Jung1
  • 1St. Hildegardis-Krankenhaus KKM, Klinik für Innere Medizin und Gastroenterologie, Mainz
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
13 March 2009 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Adenome sind neoplastische Läsionen der kolorektalen Schleimhaut und Vorläufer des kolorektalen Karzinoms. 40 % der Kolonpolypen zeigen einen flachen / eingesunkenen Aspekt und unterscheiden sich in Malignitätsgrad und genetischem Profil von klassischen Adenomen. Das derzeitige Wissen um die Bedeutung dieser flachen Polypen wurde auf einem Workshop in Kyoto 2008 unter Experten aus Ost und West diskutiert. Die Ergebnisse der Kyoto-Konferenz geben eine neue strategische Grundlage zur Diagnostik und Therapie der flachen Schleimhautprozesse im Kolon.

Abstract

Adenoma are neoplastic lesions of the colorectal mucosa and precursors of colorectal carcinoma. 40 % of all colonic polyps are flat depressed and differ in the grade of malignancy and genetic profile from classic adenoma. The current knowledge of the importance of these flat polyps was dis­cussed among experts from East and West on a workshop in Kyoto 2008. The results of the Kyoto conference give a new strategic basis for diagnostic and therapy of flat colorectal lesions.

Schlüsselwörter

flache Neoplasie - Kolon - Paris-Klassifikation - Pit-Pattern-Klassifikation - serratierte Läsionen - laterally spreading Tumoren

Key words

flat neoplasia - colon - Paris classification - pit pattern classification - serrated lesions - laterally spreading tumours

Literatur

  • 1 Adler A, Pohl H, Papanikolaou S et al. A prospective randomised study on narrow-band imaging versus conventional colonoscopy for ade­noma detection: does narrow-band imaging induce a learning effect?.  Gut. 2008;  57 59-64
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Bressler B, Paszat L F, Chen Z et al. Rates of new or missed colorectal ­cancers after colonoscopy and their risk factors: a population-based ­analysis.  Gastroenterology. 2007;  132 96-102
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Chiu H M, Chang C Y, Chen C C et al. A prospective comparative study of narrow-band imaging, chromoendoscopy, and conventional colonoscopy in the diagnosis of colorectal neoplasia.  Gut. 2007;  56 373-379
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Farrar W D, Sawhney M S, Nelson D B et al. Colorectal cancers found after a complete colonoscopy.  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;  4 1259-1264
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Fujii T, Rembacken B J, Dixon M F et al. Flat adenoma in the United Kingdom: are treatable cancers being missed?.  Endoscopy. 1998;  30 437-443
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Gorski T F, Rosen L, Riether R et al. Colorectal cancer after surveillance colonoscopy.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1999;  42 877-880
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Heresbach D, Barrioz T, Lapalus M G et al. Miss rate for colorectal neoplastic polyps: a prospective multicentre study of back-to-back video colonoscopies.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 284-290
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Hosokawa O, Shirasaki S, Kaizaki Y et al. Invasive colorectal cancer ­detected up to 3 years after a colonoscopy negative for cancer.  Endoscopy. 2003;  35 506-510
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Jass J R, Baker K, Zlobec I et al. Advanced colorectal polyps with the ­molecular and morphological features of serrated polyps and adenomas: concept of a “fusion” pathway to colorectal cancer.  Histopathol­ogy. 2006;  49 121-131
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Jass J R. Colorectal cancer: a multipathway disease.  Crit Rev Oncog. 2006;  12 273-287
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Kiesslich R, Jung M. Magnification endoscopy: does it improve muco­sal surface analysis for the diagnosis of gastrointestinal neoplasias?.  ­Endoscopy. 2002;  34 819-822
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Kiesslich R, von Bergh M, Hahn M et al. Chromoendoscopy with indigo carmine improves the detection of adenomatous and nonadenomatous lesions in the colon.  Endoscopy. 2001;  33 1001-1006
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Konishi K, Kaneko K, Kurahashi T et al. A comparison of magnifying and nonmagnifying colonoscopy for diagnosis of colorectal polyps: a prospective study.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;  57 48-53
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Kudo S, Hirota S, Nakajima T et al. Colorectal tumours and pit pattern.  J Clin Pathol. 1994;  47 880-885
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Kudo S, Kashida H, Tamura S et al. The problem of “flat” colonic ade­noma.  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 1997;  7 87-98
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Kudo S, Kashida H, Tamura T et al. Colonoscopic diagnosis and management of non polypoid early colorectal cancer.  World J Surg. 2000;  24 1081-1190
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Kudo S, Lambert R. Nonpolypoid neoplastic lesions of the colorectal mucosa. Workshop in Kyoto, 10th–11th February 2008.  Gastrointest ­Endosc. 2008;  68 No. 4 Suppl 1-47
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Lambert R. Endoscopic Classification Review Group . Update on the Paris classification of superficial neoplastic lesions in the digestive tract.  ­Endoscopy. 2005;  37 570-578
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Leaper M, Johnston M J, Barclay M et al. Reasons for failure of diagnose colorectal carcinoma at colonoscopy.  Endoscopy. 2004;  36 499-503
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Mäkinen M J. Colorectal serrated adenocarcinoma.  Histopathology. 2007;  50 131-150
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Muto T, Bussey H J, Morson B C. The evolution of cancer of the colon and rectum.  Cancer. 1975;  36 2251-2270
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Rembacken B J, Fujii T, Cairns A et al. Flat and depressed colonic neoplasms: a prospective study of 1 000 colonoscopies in the UK.  Lancet. 2000;  355 1211-1214
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Rex D K, Cutler C S, Lemmel G T et al. Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies.  Gastroenterology. 1997;  112 24-28
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Rex D K, Helbig C C. High yields of small and flat adenomas with high-definition colonoscopes using either white light or narrow band imaging.  Gastroenterology. 2007;  133 42-47
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Robert Koch Institut und Gesellschaft der epidemiologischen Krebsregister in Deutschland e. V. . Krebs in Deutschland 2003–2004. 6. überarbeitete Auflage. Gesundheitsberichterstattung des Bundes 2008
    Google Scholar
  • 26 Robertson D J, Greeenberg E R, Beach M et al. Colorectal cancer in patients under close colonoscopic surveillance.  Gastroenterology. 2005;  129 34-41
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Singh H, Turner D, Xue L et al. Risk of developing colorectal cancer following a negative colonoscopy examination. Evidence for a 10-year ­interval between colonoscopies.  JAMA. 2006;  295 2366-2373
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Snover D C, Jass J R, Fenoglio-Preiser C et al. Serrated polyps of the large intestine: a morphologic and molecular review of an evolving concept.  Am J Clin Pathol. 2005;  124 380-391
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Soetikno R M, Kaltenbach T, Rouse R V et al. Prevalence of nonpolypoid (flat and depressed) colorectal neoplasms in asymptomatic and symptomatic adults.  JAMA. 2008;  299 1027-1035
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Takahashi T, Nosho K, Yamamoto H et al. Flat-type colorectal advanced adenomas (laterally spreading tumours) have different genectic and epigenetic alterations from protruded-type advanced adenomas.  Mod Pathol. 2007;  20 139-147
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Wong Kee Song L M, Adler D G, Conway J D et al. Technology Status Evaluation Report: Narrow Band Imaging and multiband imaging.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;  67 581-589
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Torlakovic E E, Gomez J D, Driman D K et al. Seissile serrated adenoma (SSA) vs. traditional serrrated adenoma (TSA).  Am J Surg Pathos. 2008;  32 21-29
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Zentralinstitut für die kassenärztliche Versorgung in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland .Projekt wissenschaftliche Begleitung von Früherkennungs-Koloskopien in Deutschland. Berichtszeitraum 2006, 4. Jahresbericht
    Google Scholar

Prof. Dr. med. M. Jung

St. Hildegardis-Krankenhaus KKM · Klinik für Innere Medizin und Gastroenterologie

Hildegardstr. 2

55131 Mainz

Phone: 0 61 31 / 14 74 27

Fax: 0 61 31 / 14 77 53

Email: M.Jung.Hildegardis-Mz@t-online.de

      >