Download PDF
Synlett 2009(5): 685-703  
DOI: 10.1055/s-0028-1087946
ACCOUNT
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart ˙ New York

Celebrating 20 Years of SYNLETT - Special Account On the Merits of Biocatalysis and the Impact of Arene cis-Dihydrodiols on Enantioselective Synthesis

Tomas Hudlicky*, Josephine W. Reed
Department of Chemistry and Centre for Biotechnology, Brock University, 500 Glenridge Avenue, St. Catharines, ON L2S 3A1, Canada
Fax: +1(905)9844841; e-Mail: thudlick@brocku.ca;
Further Information

Publication History

Received 15 December 2008
Publication Date:
25 February 2009 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints All articles of this category

Abstract

This account is a tribute to Professor David Gibson in recognition of his discovery of enzymatic dihydroxylation of aromatic compounds four decades ago. Here are highlighted some of the milestones in microbiology, biochemistry, molecular biology, and synthetic organic chemistry connected with this unique reaction. Gibson’s discovery greatly contributed to advancing biocatalysis as a discipline with major impact on synthesis of optically pure compounds. Personal recollections of several chemists who have embraced this technology in their own work, along with the authors’ recollections of the early days of research involving the cis-dihydrodiols, are provided as Notes at the end of the article.

1 Introduction: History of Biocatalysis

2 The Discovery of Enzymatic Dihydroxylation

3 Processing of Arenes by Oxidoreductase Enzymes

4 Considerations of the Mechanism

5 Diversity of Metabolites

6 cis-Dihydrodiols as Synthetic Intermediates: Analysis of Reactivity and Symmetry Options

7 Historically Important Milestones in Applications to Synthesis

8 Outlook

9 Notes

Key words

biocatalysis - enzymatic dihydroxylation of aromatics - arene cis-dihydrodiols - enantioselective synthesis - enantiopure metabolites

    References

  • 1 Pasteur L. C. R. Acad. Sci.  1857,  45:  913 
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Dumas JBA. Ann. Chim. Phys.  1874,  (Ser. 5) 3:  57 
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Brown AJ. J. Chem. Soc.  1886,  49:  172 
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Sertürner F. Journal der Pharmacie für Aerzte und Apotheker  1805,  13:  229 
    Google Scholar
  • 5 Wöhler F. Annalen der Physik und Chemie  1828,  88:  253 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Fischer E. Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges.  1894,  27:  2985 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Fischer E. Thierfelder H. Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges.  1894,  27:  2031 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • For a historical overview of yeast-based research see:
  • 8a Barnett JA. Microbiology  2003,  149:  557 
    Google Scholar
  • 8b Barnett JA. Lichtenthaler FW. Yeast  2001,  18:  363 
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Lintner CJ. von Liebig HJ. Z. Physiol. Chem.  1911,  72:  449 
    Google Scholar
  • 10a Neuberg C. Adv. Carbohydr. Chem.  1949,  4:  75 
    Google Scholar
  • 10b Brooks DW. Grothaus PG. Irwin WL. J. Org. Chem.  1982,  47:  2820 
    Google Scholar
  • 10c Ward OP. Young CS. Enzyme Microb. Technol.  1990,  12:  482 
    Google Scholar
  • 10d Servi S. Synthesis  1990,  1 
    Google Scholar
  • 11 Payen A. Persoz JF. Ann. Chim. Phys.  1833,  (Ser. 2) 53:  73 
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Dakin HD. J. Physiol.  1903,  30:  253 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Dakin HD. J. Physiol.  1905,  32:  199 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reviews:
  • 13a Sih CJ. Wu S.-H. In Topics in Stereochemistry   Vol. 19:  Eliel EL. Wilen SH. Wiley; New York: 1989.  p.63-125  
    Google Scholar
  • 13b Ohno M. Otsuka M. Organic Reactions   Vol. 37:  John Wiley and Sons, Inc.; New York: 1989.  p.1 
    Google Scholar
  • 13c Johnson CR. Acc. Chem. Res.  1998,  31:  333 
    Google Scholar
  • 13d Schoffers E. Golebiowski A. Johnson CR. Tetrahedron  1996,  52:  3769 
    Google Scholar
  • 13e Garcia-Urdiales E. Alfonso I. Gotor V. Chem. Rev.  2005,  105:  313 
    Google Scholar
  • 13f Hanefeld U. Org. Biomol. Chem.  2003,  1:  2405 
    Google Scholar
  • 14a For a survey of fermentation-based manufacture of pharmaceuticals see: Bommarius AS. Riebel BR. Biocatalysis   Wiley-VCH; Weinheim: 2004.  Chap. 13.
    Google Scholar
  • 14b for a historical account of industrial biotransformations see: Vasic-Racki D. In Industrial Biotransformations   Liese A. Seelbach K. Wandrey C. Wiley-VCH; Weinheim: 2006.  Chap. 1. p.1-36  ; for a review on biotransformations-based manufactring of pharmaceutical intermediates, see: Patel, R. N. Adv. Appl. Microbiol. 1997, 43, 91
    Google Scholar
  • 15a Minas W. In Microbial Processes and Products   Barredo JL. Humana; Totawa (NJ): 2005.  p.65-90  
    Google Scholar
  • 15b Liu J.-H, and Celebuski JE. inventors; US Patent  5756473.  ; Chem. Abstr. 1998, 131, 112379
  • 15c Stassi DL, Maine GT, Post DA, and Satter MT. inventors; US Patent  5786181.  ; Chem. Abstr. 1998, 129, 157703
  • 16 Gerson DF, and Xiao X. inventors; US Patent  5409820.  ; Chem. Abstr. 1995, 123, 31395
  • 17 Stewart JD. Curr. Org. Chem.  1998,  2:  195 
    Google Scholar
  • 18 Turner MK. Trends Biotechnol.  1995,  13:  173 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 19 The term ‘enantioselective synthesis’ is much more appropriate than ‘asymmetric synthesis’. The latter term has been used so extensively, even by the present authors, that its eradication from usage might be difficult, as was eloquently pointed out by Eliel in his paper ‘Infelicitous Stereochemical Nomenclature’: Eliel EL. Chirality  1997,  9:  428 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 20 For an account of the history and development of microbial transformations and a vast compilation of reactions, strains, and metabolites see: Kieslich K. Microbial Transformations of Non-Steroid Cyclic Compounds   Thieme; Stuttgart: 1976. 
    Google Scholar
  • 21a Faber K. Biotransformations in Organic Chemistry: A Textbook   Springer; Berlin: 1997. 
    Google Scholar
  • 21b Enzyme Catalysis in Organic Synthesis   Vols. 1, 2:  Drauz K. Waldman H. Wiley-VCH; Weinheim: 1995. 
    Google Scholar
  • 21c Wong C.-H. Whitesides GM. Enzymes in Synthetic Organic Chemistry   Pergamon; Kidlington (Oxford UK): 1994. 
    Google Scholar
  • 22 Review: ZoBell CE. Bacteriol. Rev.  1946,  10:  1 
    Google Scholar
  • 23 Rahn O. Zentralbl. Bakteriol. Parasitenkd. Infektionskr. 2  1906,  16:  382 
    Google Scholar
  • 24 Störmer K. Zentralbl. Bakteriol. Parasitenkd. Infekitonskr. 2  1908,  20:  282 
    Google Scholar
  • 25a Gibson DT. Koch JR. Kallio RE. Biochemistry  1968,  7:  2653 
    Google Scholar
  • 25b Gibson DT. Koch JR. Schuld CL. Kallio RE. Biochemistry  1968,  7:  3795 
    Google Scholar
  • 25c Review: Gibson DT. Subramanian V. In Microbial Degradation of Organic Compounds   Gibson DT. Marcel Dekker; New York: 1984.  p.181-252  
    Google Scholar
  • This compound was produced with relatively low enantiomeric excess:
  • 26a Ziffer H. Kabuto K. Gibson DT. Kobal VM. Jerina DM. Tetrahedron  1977,  33:  2491 (racemate was reported)
    Google Scholar
  • 26b Boyd DR. Sharma ND. Coen GP. Grey PJ. Malone JF. Gawronski J. Chem. Eur. J.  2007,  13:  5804  (6% ee was reported)
    Google Scholar
  • 26c

    Reference 47d (15% ee was reported).

    Google Scholar
  • 27 Ballard DGH. Courtis A. Shirley IM. Taylor SC. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun.  1983,  954 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 28-a Ley SV. Sternfeld F. Taylor S. Tetrahedron Lett.  1987,  28:  225 
    Google Scholar
  • 28-b Ley SV. Sternfeld F. Tetrahedron  1989,  45:  3463 
    Google Scholar
  • 29 Hudlicky T. Luna H. Barbieri G. Kwart LD. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  1988,  110:  4735 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • For compilations of prostaglandin syntheses see:
  • 30a Axen U. Pike JE. Schneider WP. In The Total Synthesis of Natural Products   Vol. 1:  Apsimon J. Wiley-Interscience; New York: 1972.  p.81-142  
    Google Scholar
  • 30b Corey EJ. Cheng X.-M. In The Logic of Chemical Synthesis   John Wiley & Sons; New York: 1989.  p.250-309  
    Google Scholar
  • 32 Boyland E. Levi AA. Biochem. J.  1935,  29:  2679 
    Google Scholar
  • 33 Hayaishi O. Katagiri M. Rothberg S. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  1955,  77:  5450 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 34 For a review of diogygenase enzymes see: Bugg TDH. Tetrahedron  2003,  59:  7075 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Gibson DT. Hensley M. Yoshioka H. Mabry TJ. Biochemistry  1970,  9:  1626 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Zylstra GJ. Gibson DT. J. Biol. Chem.  1989,  264:  14940 
    Google Scholar
  • 37a Bui VP. Hansen TV. Stenstrom Y. Hudlicky T. Green Chem.  2000,  2:  263 
    Google Scholar
  • 37b Bui VP. Hudlicky T. Hansen TV. Stenstrom Y. Tetrahedron Lett.  2002,  43:  2839 
    Google Scholar
  • 38a Draths KM. Pompliani DL. Conley DL. Frost JW. Berry A. Disbrow GL. Staversky RJ. Lievense JC. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  1992,  114:  3956 
    Google Scholar
  • 38b Draths KM. Frost JW. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  1995,  117:  2395 
    Google Scholar
  • 39 Yoshida Y. Ikura Y. Kudo T. Biosci., Biotechnol., Biochem.  1997,  61:  46 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Endoma MA. Bui VP. Hansen J. Hudlicky T. Org. Process Res. Dev.  2002,  6:  525 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Hudlicky T. Stabile M. Gibson DT. Whited GM. Org. Synth.  1999,  76:  77 
    Google Scholar
  • 42 Karlsson A. Parales JV. Parales RE. Gibson DT. Eklund H. Ramaswamy S. Science  2003,  299:  1039 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Jeffrey AM. Yah HJC. Jerina DM. Patel TR. Davey JF. Gibson DT. Biochemistry  1975,  14:  575 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Carredano E. Karlsson A. Kauppi B. Choudhury D. Parales RE. Parales JV. Lee K. Gibson DT. Eklund H. Ramaswamy S. J. Mol. Biol.  2000,  296:  701 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Bui VP. Nguyen M. Hansen J. Baker J. Hudlicky T. Can. J. Chem.  2002,  80:  708 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 46 For recent discussion of possible mechanisms for the enzymatic dihydroxylation see: Boyd DR. Bugg TDH. Org. Biomol. Chem.  2006,  4:  181 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 47a Johnson RA. Organic Reactions   Vol. 63:  John Wiley and Sons, Inc.; New York: 2004.  p.117-264  
    Google Scholar
  • 47b Boyd DR. Sharma ND. Allen CCR. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol.  2001,  12:  564 
    Google Scholar
  • 47c Hudlicky T. Gonzalez D. Gibson DT. Aldrichimica Acta  1999,  32:  35 
    Google Scholar
  • 47d Boyd DR. Sheldrake GN. Nat. Prod. Rep.  1998,  309 
    Google Scholar
  • 47e Hudlicky T. Reed JW. In Advances in Asymmetric Synthesis   Vol. 1:  Hassner A. JAI Press; Greenwich (CT): 1995.  p.271-312  
    Google Scholar
  • 47f Carless HAJ. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry  1992,  3:  795 
    Google Scholar
  • 47g Brown SM. Hudlicky T. In Organic Synthesis: Theory and Applications   Vol. 2:  Hudlicky T. JAI Press; Greenwich (CT): 1993.  p.113-176  
    Google Scholar
  • 47h Widdowson DA. Ribbons DW. Thomas SD. Janssen Chim. Acta  1990,  8:  3 
    Google Scholar
  • 49 Boyd DR. Sharma ND. Hand MV. Groocock MR. Kerley NA. Dalton H. Chima J. Sheldrake GN. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun.  1993,  974 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Gonzalez D. Schapiro V. Seoane G. Hudlicky T. Abboud K. J. Org. Chem.  1997,  62:  1194 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 51a Hudlicky T. Boros CH. Boros EE. Synthesis  1992,  174 
    Google Scholar
  • 51b Butora G. Gum AG. Hudlicky T. Abboud KA. Synthesis  1998,  275 
    Google Scholar
  • 52 Hudlicky T. Rulin F. Tsunoda T. Price JD. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  1990,  112:  9439 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Ensley BD. Ratzkin BJ. Osslund TD. Simon MJ. Wackett LP. Gibson DT. Science  1983,  222:  167 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 55a Ensley BD. inventors; US Patent  4520103.  ; Chem. Abstr. 1985, 101, 108957
  • 55b

    Amgen-Genencor process for indigo: Presented by G. Whited at 1995 Biotrans Conference, Warwick UK.

  • 56 Hudlicky T. Seoane G. Pettus T. J. Org. Chem.  1989,  54:  4239 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 57a Hudlicky T. Entwistle DA. Pitzer KK. Thorpe AJ. Chem. Rev.  1996,  96:  1195 
    Google Scholar
  • 57b Hudlicky T. Chem. Rev.  1996,  96:  3 
    Google Scholar
  • 58 Hudlicky T. Olivo HF. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  1992,  114:  9694 
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 59 Tian X. Hudlicky T. Königsberger K. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  1995,  117:  3643 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 60 Gonzalez D. Martinot T. Hudlicky T. Tetrahedron Lett.  1999,  40:  3077 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 61a ent-7-deoxypancratistatin: Akgün H. Hudlicky T. Tetrahedron Lett.  1999,  40:  3081 
    Google Scholar
  • 61b ent-Lycoricidine: Matveenko M. Kokas OJ. Banwell MG. Willis AC. Org. Lett.  2007,  9:  3683 
    Google Scholar
  • 61c ent-Narciclasine: Matveenko M. Banwell MG. Willis AC. Tetrahedron  2008,  64:  4817 
    Google Scholar
  • 62 Omori AT. Finn KJ. Leisch H. Carroll RJ. Hudlicky T. Synlett  2007,  2859 
    Article in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • 63 Kokas OJ. Banwell MG. Willis AC. Tetrahedron  2008,  64:  6444 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 64a Ley SV. Redgrave AJ. Synlett  1990,  393 
    Google Scholar
  • 64b Hudlicky T. Mandel M. Rouden J. Lee RS. Bachmann B. Dudding T. Yost K. Merola JS. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1  1994,  1553 
    Google Scholar
  • 64c Nguyen BV. York C. Hudlicky T. Tetrahedron  1997,  53:  8807 
    Google Scholar
  • 64d Brammer LE. Hudlicky T. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry  1998,  9:  2011 
    Google Scholar
  • 64e Vitelio C. Bellomo A. Brovetto M. Seoane G. Gonzalez D. Carbohydr. Res.  2004,  339:  1773 
    Google Scholar
  • 64f Bellomo A. Giacomini C. Brenta B. Seoane G. Gonzalez D. Synth. Commun.  2007,  37:  3509 
    Google Scholar
  • 65a Hudlicky T. Abboud KA. Bolonick J. Maurya R. Stanton ML. Thorpe AJ. Chem. Commun.  1996,  1717 
    Google Scholar
  • 65b Paul BJ. Martinot TA. Willis J. Hudlicky T. Synthesis  2001,  952 
    Google Scholar
  • 65c Paul BJ. Willis J. Martinot TA. Ghiviriga I. Hudlicky T. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  2002,  124:  10416 
    Google Scholar
  • 66-a Ley SV. Sternfeld F. Terahedron Lett.  1988,  29:  5305 
    Google Scholar
  • 66-b Ley SV. Parra M. Redgrave AJ. Sternfeld F. Tetrahedron  1990,  46:  4995 
    Google Scholar
  • 66-c Ley SV. Pure Appl. Chem.  1990,  62:  2031 
    Google Scholar
  • 67 Hudlicky T. Natchus MG. J. Org. Chem.  1992,  57:  4740 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 68 Banwell MG. Edwards AJ. Harfoot GJ. Jolliffe KA. Tetrahedron  2004,  60:  535 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 69 Banwell MG. Austin KAB. Willis AC. Tetrahedron  2007,  63:  6388 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 70 Banwell MG. McLeod MD. Riches AG. Aust. J. Chem.  2004,  57:  53 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 71 Banwell MG. Forman GS. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1  1996,  2565 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 72 Bui VP. Hudlicky T. Tetrahedron  2004,  60:  661 
    Google Scholar
  • 73 Banwell MG. Loong DTJ. Willis AC. Aust. J. Chem.  2005,  58:  511 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 74 Boyd DR. Sharma ND. Llamas NM. Malone JF. O’Dowd CR. Allen CCR. Org. Biomol. Chem.  2005,  3:  1953 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 75 Hudlicky T. Rouden J. Luna H. Allen S. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  1994,  116:  5099 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 76a Hudlicky T. Luna H. Price JD. Rulin F. J. Org. Chem.  1990,  55:  4683 
    Google Scholar
  • 75b Hudlicky T. Seoane G. Price JD. Gadamasetti K. Synlett  1990,  433 
    Google Scholar
  • 77a Hudlicky T. Nugent T. Griffith W. J. Org. Chem.  1994,  59:  7944 
    Google Scholar
  • 77b Nugent TC. Hudlicky T. J. Org. Chem.  1998,  63:  510 
    Google Scholar
  • 78a Boyd DR. Sharma ND. Sbircea L. Murphy D. Belhocine T. Malone JF. James SL. Allen CCR. Hamilton JTG. Chem. Commun.  2008,  5535 
    Google Scholar
  • 78b Sbircea L. Sharma ND. Clegg W. Harrington RW. Horton PN. Hursthouse MB. Apperley DC. Boyd DR. James SL. Chem. Commun.  2008,  5538 
    Google Scholar
  • 79a Bellomo A. Gonzalez D. Stefani HA. J. Organomet. Chem.  2008,  693:  1136 
    Google Scholar
  • 79b Heguaburu V. Mandolesi SM. Schapiro V. Pandolfi E. Tetrahedron Lett.  2008,  49:  6787 
    Google Scholar
  • 80a Boyd DR. Sharma ND. Barr SA. Dalton H. Chima J. Whited G. Seemayer R. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  1994,  116:  1147 
    Google Scholar
  • 80b Allen CCR. Boyd DR. Dalton H. Sharma ND. Brannigan I. Kerley NA. Sheldrake GN. Taylor SC. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun.  1995,  117 
    Google Scholar
  • 81 Motherwell WB. Williams AS. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl.  1995,  34:  2031 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 82 Jung PMJ. Motherwell WB. Williams AS. Chem. Commun.  1997,  1283 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 83 Feng Y. Ke C. Xue G. Que L. Chem. Commun.  2009,  50 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 84a Hudlicky T. Chem. Rev.  1996,  96:  3 
    Google Scholar
  • 84b Hudlicky T. Natchus MB. In Organic Synthesis: Theory and Applications   Vol. 2:  Hudlicky T. JAI Press; Greenwich (CT): 1993.  p.1-23  
    Google Scholar
  • 86 Anastas PT. Warner JC. Green Chemistry: Theory and Practice   Oxford University Press; New York: 1998. 
    Google Scholar
  • 87 Schultzen O. Naunyn B. Arch. Anat. Physiol.  1867,  349 
    Google Scholar
  • 88 Munk J. Pfluegers Arch. Physiol.  1876,  12:  142 
    Google Scholar
  • 89 Abstract by: Stephens T. J. Chem. Soc. Abstr.  1876,  212 
    Google Scholar
  • 89a Bui V. Hansen TV. Stenstrom Y. Ribbons DW. Hudlicky T. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1  2000,  1669 
    Google Scholar
  • 89b Bui VP. Hansen TV. Stenstrom Y. Hudlicky T. Ribbons DW. New. J. Chem.  2001,  25:  116 
    Google Scholar
  • 91 For a list of unsolved problems in synthesis see: Hudlicky T. Reed JW. The Way of Synthesis   Wiley-VCH; Weinheim: 2007.  p.11 
    Google Scholar
31

Aldrich catalog numbers for cis-dihydrodiols derived from various aromatic compounds: bromobenzene (48-949-2), chlorobenzene (48,950-6), biphenyl (48,963-8), and naphthalene (49,032-6).

48

Safety notice: There are some hazards in handling and storage, especially for the cis-dihydrodiol derived from β-bromobenzene. This particular compound cannot be stored in solid form free of solvent. On several occasions it exploded on vacuum drying and on one occasion a bottle with about 25 g of crystalline solid exploded and burned in a freezer at -78 ˚C. The aromatization of this material is highly exothermic and catalyzed by trace amounts of phenol; therefore, the isolation and handling of cis-dihydrodiols in amounts over 5-10 g must be attended to with caution. Ethyl acetate extracts must be washed with saturated carbonate solution to remove any trace amounts of the corresponding phenols, which may catalyze aromatization. In our own experience, we have encountered no problems with the cis-dihydrodiols derived from chloro- and bromobenzene; however, it is advisable to handle larger amounts in solution rather than in solid state.

53

For more detailed discussion of enantiodivergent design see references 47c, 47e, 83a, and 90.

85

‘Bibliometric Analysis for Papers on Topics Related to Pollution Prevention (P2)’ can be accessed at http://es.epa.gov/ncer/publications/bibliometrics/p2_bibliometric_032905.html, 2005.