RSS-Feed abonnieren
DOI: 10.1055/a-2769-1052
The Role of Perioperative Artificial Intelligence in Colon and Rectal Surgery
Autor*innen
Funding Information While this work was not directly supported by any funding, we would like to acknowledge support from the Cleveland Clinic Digestive Disease Institute Chief's Innovation and Research Award (grant number DDICIRA033) and the Cleveland Clinic Catalyst Grant for our ongoing AI-based projects.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming surgical practice with growing applications in colon and rectal surgery. This review explores perioperative AI tools that assist with operative planning, intraoperative guidance, and outcome optimization. Preoperative innovations include machine learning models that outperform traditional risk calculators for predicting complications and readmissions, as well as computer vision and radiomics for analyzing imaging in colorectal cancer and inflammatory bowel disease. The integration of molecular and multiomics data further enhances personalized, precision surgical planning. Intraoperatively, deep learning enables computational identification of critical anatomy, including vascular structures, ureters, and pelvic nerves, and supports the objective analysis of advanced imaging techniques such as indocyanine green fluorescence. In terms of surgical techniques, AI-driven video analysis facilitates surgical phase recognition and automated skill assessment, whereas emerging vision–language models and surgical foundation models promise improved documentation and context-aware guidance. Future directions include generative AI for simulation, AI-based coaching, and progress toward autonomous surgical robotics. Although research remains in the early stages and is not yet ready for widespread clinical implementation, ongoing work within the field of colorectal surgery underscores the potential of AI to augment decision-making and standardize surgical care.
Keywords
artificial intelligence - machine learning - deep learning - computer vision - radiomics - semantic segmentation - surgical phase recognition - automated skill assessment - vision–language models - generative artificial intelligenceDeclaration of GenAI Use
Generative AI was not used to write any part of this work. During the preparation of this work, the author used PaperPal to proofread the final version for grammar and punctuation. After using this tool/service, the author(s) reviewed and edited the content as needed and take full responsibility for the publication's content.
Publikationsverlauf
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
31. Dezember 2025
© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
-
References
- 1 Hinton G. Deep learning-A technology with the potential to transform health care. JAMA 2018; 320 (11) 1101-1102
- 2 Moor M, Banerjee O, Abad ZSH. et al. Foundation models for generalist medical artificial intelligence. Nature 2023; 616 (7956) 259-265
- 3 Hyde LZ, Valizadeh N, Al-Mazrou AM, Kiran RP. ACS-NSQIP risk calculator predicts cohort but not individual risk of complication following colorectal resection. Am J Surg 2019; 218 (01) 131-135
- 4 Lubitz AL, Chan E, Zarif D. et al. American College of Surgeons NSQIP Risk Calculator accuracy for emergent and elective colorectal operations. J Am Coll Surg 2017; 225 (05) 601-611
- 5 Bergquist JR, Thiels CA, Etzioni DA, Habermann EB, Cima RR. Failure of colorectal surgical site infection predictive models applied to an independent dataset: Do they add value or just confusion?. J Am Coll Surg 2016; 222 (04) 431-438
- 6 Merath K, Hyer JM, Mehta R. et al. Use of machine learning for prediction of patient risk of postoperative complications after liver, pancreatic, and colorectal surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 2020; 24 (08) 1843-1851
- 7 Chen KA, Berginski ME, Desai CS. et al. Differential performance of machine learning models in prediction of procedure-specific outcomes. J Gastrointest Surg 2022; 26 (08) 1732-1742
- 8 Chen KA, Joisa CU, Stitzenberg KB. et al. Development and validation of machine learning models to predict readmission after colorectal surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 2022; 26 (11) 2342-2350
- 9 Chen KA, Joisa CU, Stem JM, Guillem JG, Gomez SM, Kapadia MR. Improved prediction of surgical-site infection after colorectal surgery using machine learning. Dis Colon Rectum 2023; 66 (03) 458-466
- 10 Wen R, Zheng K, Zhang Q. et al. Machine learning-based random forest predicts anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer. J Gastrointest Oncol 2021; 12 (03) 921-932
- 11 Celotto F, Bao QR, Capelli G, Spolverato G, Gumbs AA. Machine learning and deep learning to improve prevention of anastomotic leak after rectal cancer surgery. World J Gastrointest Surg 2025; 17 (01) 101772
- 12 Taha-Mehlitz S, Wentzler L, Angehrn F. et al. Machine learning-based preoperative analytics for the prediction of anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery: A Swiss pilot study. Surg Endosc 2024; 38 (07) 3672-3683
- 13 Fan ZQ, Chen Y, Fu XA. et al. Nomogram for predicting prolonged postoperative ileus in colorectal cancer based on age and inflammatory markers. Biomarkers Med 2023; 17 (22) 921-933
- 14 Chen KA, Joisa CU, Stem JM, Guillem JG, Gomez SM, Kapadia MR. Prediction of ureteral injury during colorectal surgery using machine learning. Am Surg 2023; 89 (12) 5702-5710
- 15 Bertsimas D, Dunn J, Velmahos GC, Kaafarani HMA. Surgical risk is not linear: Derivation and validation of a novel, user-friendly, and machine-learning-based Predictive OpTimal Trees in Emergency Surgery Risk (POTTER) Calculator. Ann Surg 2018; 268 (04) 574-583
- 16 El Moheb M, Gebran A, Maurer LR. et al. Artificial intelligence versus surgeon gestalt in predicting risk of emergency general surgery. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2023; 95 (04) 565-572
- 17 Panossian VS, Argandykov D, Arnold SC. et al; POTTER Validation Group. Validation of artificial intelligence-based POTTER Calculator in emergency general surgery patients undergoing laparotomy: Prospective, bi-institutional study. J Am Coll Surg 2025; 240 (03) 254-262
- 18 Strömblad CT, Baxter-King RG, Meisami A. et al. Effect of a predictive model on planned surgical duration accuracy, patient wait time, and use of presurgical resources: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg 2021; 156 (04) 315-321
- 19 Zaribafzadeh H, Webster WL, Vail CJ. et al. Development, deployment, and implementation of a machine learning surgical case length prediction model and prospective evaluation. Ann Surg 2023; 278 (06) 890-895
- 20 Kendale S, Bishara A, Burns M, Solomon S, Corriere M, Mathis M. Machine learning for the prediction of procedural case durations developed using a large multicenter database: Algorithm development and validation study. JMIR AI 2023; 2 (01) e44909
- 21 Naylor CD. On the prospects for a (deep) learning health care system. JAMA 2018; 320 (11) 1099-1100
- 22 Yang X, Chen A, PourNejatian N. et al. A large language model for electronic health records. NPJ Digit Med 2022; 5 (01) 194
- 23 Skube SJ, Hu Z, Simon GJ. et al. Accelerating surgical site infection abstraction with a semi-automated machine-learning approach. Ann Surg 2022; 276 (01) 180-185
- 24 Li H, Zhuang Y, Yuan W. et al. Radiomics in precision medicine for colorectal cancer: A bibliometric analysis (2013-2023). Front Oncol 2024; 14: 1464104
- 25 Shin J, Seo N, Baek SE. et al. MRI radiomics model predicts pathologic complete response of rectal cancer following chemoradiotherapy. Radiology 2022; 303 (02) 351-358
- 26 Liang H, Ma D, Ma Y. et al. Comparison of conventional MRI analysis versus MRI-based radiomics to predict the circumferential margin resection involvement of rectal cancer. BMC Gastroenterol 2024; 24 (01) 209
- 27 Zhang H, Wang K, Liu S. et al. Development and validation of machine learning models for predicting no. 253 lymph node metastasis in left-sided colorectal cancer using clinical and CT-based radiomic features. Cancer Imaging 2025; 25 (01) 57
- 28 Baltus SC, Geitenbeek RTJ, Frieben M. et al. Deep learning-based pelvimetry in pelvic MRI volumes for pre-operative difficulty assessment of total mesorectal excision. Surg Endosc 2025; 39 (03) 1536-1543
- 29 Yu M, Yuan Z, Li R, Shi B, Wan D, Dong X. Interpretable machine learning model to predict surgical difficulty in laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer. Front Oncol 2024; 14: 1337219
- 30 Sun Z, Hou W, Liu W. et al. Establishment of surgical difficulty grading system and application of MRI-based artificial intelligence to stratify difficulty in laparoscopic rectal surgery. Bioengineering (Basel) 2023; 10 (04) 468
- 31 Chirra P, Sharma A, Bera K. et al. Integrating radiomics with clinicoradiological scoring can predict high-risk patients who need surgery in Crohn's disease: A pilot study. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2023; 29 (03) 349-358
- 32 Chirra P, Sleiman J, Gandhi NS. et al. Radiomics to detect inflammation and fibrosis on magnetic resonance enterography in stricturing Crohn's disease. J Crohns Colitis 2024; 18 (10) 1660-1671
- 33 Li X, Zhang N, Hu C. et al. CT-based radiomics signature of visceral adipose tissue for prediction of disease progression in patients with Crohn's disease: A multicentre cohort study. EClinicalMedicine 2022; 56: 101805
- 34 Holubar SD. Unraveling twisted Pouch Syndrome: A narrative review of classification, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2025; 31 (03) 850-856
- 35 Holubar SD, Nachand D, Lavryk O. et al. Three-dimensional pouchography: A proof-of-concept study of a breakthrough technique for visualising ileoanal pouch anatomy and morphology in normal and mechanical pouch complication patients. J Crohns Colitis 2024; 18 (09) 1514-1519
- 36 O'Sullivan J, Patel S, Leventhal GE. et al. Host-microbe multi-omics and succinotype profiling have prognostic value for future relapse in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Gut Microbes 2025; 17 (01) 2450207
- 37 Cushing KC, Mclean R, McDonald KG. et al. Predicting risk of postoperative disease recurrence in Crohn's disease: Patients with indolent Crohn's disease have distinct whole transcriptome profiles at the time of first surgery. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2019; 25 (01) 180-193
- 38 Chen KA, Nishiyama N, Ng MMK. et al. Linking gene expression to clinical outcomes in pediatric Crohn's disease using machine learning. bioRxiv 2022:2022.11.07.515480
- 39 Chen KA, Gartner V, Darlington KC. et al. Post-operative Crohn's disease recurrence and infectious complications: A transcriptomic analysis. Dig Dis Sci 2025; 70: 203-214
- 40 Chatila WK, Kim JK, Walch H. et al. Genomic and transcriptomic determinants of response to neoadjuvant therapy in rectal cancer. Nat Med 2022; 28 (08) 1646-1655
- 41 Ali S, Dmitrieva M, Ghatwary N. et al. Deep learning for detection and segmentation of artefact and disease instances in gastrointestinal endoscopy. Med Image Anal 2021; 70: 102002
- 42 Seager A, Sharp L, Neilson LJ. et al; COLO-DETECT Trial Team. Polyp detection with colonoscopy assisted by the GI Genius artificial intelligence endoscopy module compared with standard colonoscopy in routine colonoscopy practice (COLO-DETECT): a multicentre, open-label, parallel-arm, pragmatic randomised controlled trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024; 9 (10) 911-923
- 43 Madani A, Namazi B, Altieri MS. et al. Artificial intelligence for intraoperative guidance: Using semantic segmentation to identify surgical anatomy during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Surg 2022; 276 (02) 363-369
- 44 Namazi B, Iyengar N, Hasan S. et al. AI for automated detection of the establishment of critical view of safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy videos. J Am Coll Surg 2020; 231 (04) e48
- 45 Zhang S, Yang G, Qian J. et al. A novel 3D deep learning model to automatically demonstrate renal artery segmentation and its validation in nephron-sparing surgery. Front Oncol 2022; 12: 997911
- 46 Hattab G, Arnold M, Strenger L. et al. Kidney edge detection in laparoscopic image data for computer-assisted surgery: Kidney edge detection. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 2020; 15 (03) 379-387
- 47 Ryu K, Kitaguchi D, Nakajima K. et al. Deep learning-based vessel automatic recognition for laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. Surg Endosc 2024; 38 (01) 171-178
- 48 Narihiro S, Kitaguchi D, Hasegawa H, Takeshita N, Ito M. Deep learning-based real-time ureter identification in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 2024; 67 (10) e1596-e1599
- 49 Khojah B, Enani G, Saleem A. et al. Deep learning-based intraoperative visual guidance model for ureter identification in laparoscopic sigmoidectomy. Surg Endosc 2025; 39 (06) 3610-3623
- 50 Lin TY, Dollár P, Girshick R, He K, Hariharan B, Belongie S. Feature pyramid networks for object detection. arXiv:1612.03144 2017 (preprint)
- 51 Redmon J, Divvala S, Girshick R, Farhadi A. You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detection. Paper presented at: 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). IEEE; 2016: 779-788
- 52 Kitaguchi D, Takeshita N, Matsuzaki H. et al. Computer-assisted real-time automatic prostate segmentation during TaTME: A single-center feasibility study. Surg Endosc 2021; 35 (06) 2493-2499
- 53 Igaki T, Kitaguchi D, Kojima S. et al. Artificial intelligence-based total mesorectal excision plane navigation in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 2022; 65 (05) e329-e333
- 54 Kojima S, Kitaguchi D, Igaki T. et al. Deep-learning-based semantic segmentation of autonomic nerves from laparoscopic images of colorectal surgery: An experimental pilot study. Int J Surg 2023; 109 (04) 813-820
- 55 Han F, Qin Y, Li W. Artificial intelligence recognition system of pelvic autonomic nerves in total mesorectal excision. Dis Colon Rectum 2025; 68: 308-315 . Accessed December 16, 2025 at: https://journals.lww.com/dcrjournal/fulltext/2025/03000/artificial_intelligence_recognition_system_of.10.aspx
- 56 Kitaguchi D, Harai Y, Kosugi N. et al. Artificial intelligence for the recognition of key anatomical structures in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 2023; 110 (10) 1355-1358
- 57 Watanabe J, Takemasa I, Kotake M. et al; EssentiAL Trial Group. Blood perfusion assessment by indocyanine green fluorescence imaging for minimally invasive rectal cancer surgery (EssentiAL trial): A randomized clinical trial. Ann Surg 2023; 278 (04) e688-e694
- 58 Faber RA, Meijer RPJ, Droogh DHM. et al. Indocyanine green near-infrared fluorescence bowel perfusion assessment to prevent anastomotic leakage in minimally invasive colorectal surgery (AVOID): a multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024; 9 (10) 924-934
- 59 Rinne JKA, Huhta H, Pinta T. et al. Indocyanine green fluorescence imaging in prevention of colorectal anastomotic leakage: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg 2025; 160 (05) 486-493
- 60 Van Den Hoven P, Tange F, Van Der Valk J. et al. Normalization of time-intensity curves for quantification of foot perfusion using near-infrared fluorescence imaging with indocyanine green. J Endovasc Ther 2023; 30 (03) 364-371
- 61 Elliott JT, Addante RR, Slobegean GP. et al. Intraoperative fluorescence perfusion assessment should be corrected by a measured subject-specific arterial input function. J Biomed Opt 2020; 25 (06) 1-14
- 62 Faber RA, Tange FP, Galema HA. et al. Quantification of indocyanine green near-infrared fluorescence bowel perfusion assessment in colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 2023; 37 (09) 6824-6833
- 63 Goncalves LN, van den Hoven P, van Schaik J. et al. Perfusion parameters in near-infrared fluorescence imaging with indocyanine green: A systematic review of the literature. Life (Basel) 2021; 11 (05) 433
- 64 Depalma N, D'Ugo S, Manoochehri F. et al. NIR ICG-enhanced fluorescence: A quantitative evaluation of bowel microperfusion and its relation to central perfusion in colorectal surgery. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15 (23) 5528
- 65 Park SH, Park HM, Baek KR, Ahn HM, Lee IY, Son GM. Artificial intelligence based real-time microcirculation analysis system for laparoscopic colorectal surgery. World J Gastroenterol 2020; 26 (44) 6945-6962
- 66 McEntee PD, Singaravelu A, McCarrick CA, Murphy E, Boland PA, Cahill RA. Quantification of indocyanine green fluorescence angiography in colorectal surgery: A systematic review of the literature. Surg Endosc 2025; 39 (04) 2677-2691
- 67 Arpaia P, Bracale U, Corcione F. et al. Assessment of blood perfusion quality in laparoscopic colorectal surgery by means of machine learning. Sci Rep 2022; 12 (01) 14682
- 68 Achterberg FB, Bijlstra OD, Slooter MD. et al; Dutch Liver Surgery Group. ICG-fluorescence imaging for margin assessment during minimally invasive colorectal liver metastasis resection. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7 (04) e246548
- 69 Cahill RA, O'Shea DF, Khan MF. et al. Artificial intelligence indocyanine green (ICG) perfusion for colorectal cancer intra-operative tissue classification. Br J Surg 2021; 108 (01) 5-9
- 70 Dalli J, Loughman E, Hardy N. et al. Digital dynamic discrimination of primary colorectal cancer using systemic indocyanine green with near-infrared endoscopy. Sci Rep 2021; 11 (01) 11349
- 71 Han F, Zhong G, Zhi S. et al. Artificial intelligence recognition system of pelvic autonomic nerve during total mesorectal excision. Dis Colon Rectum 2025; 68: 308-315
- 72 Jansen-Winkeln B, Germann I, Köhler H. et al. Comparison of hyperspectral imaging and fluorescence angiography for the determination of the transection margin in colorectal resections-a comparative study. Int J Colorectal Dis 2021; 36 (02) 283-291
- 73 Skinner GC, Liu YZ, Harzman AE. et al. Clinical utility of laser speckle contrast imaging and real-time quantification of bowel perfusion in minimally invasive left-sided colorectal resections. Dis Colon Rectum 2024; 67 (06) 850-859
- 74 Heeman W, Calon J, van der Bilt A. et al. Dye-free visualisation of intestinal perfusion using laser speckle contrast imaging in laparoscopic surgery: A prospective, observational multi-centre study. Surg Endosc 2023; 37 (12) 9139-9146
- 75 Kiyasseh D, Ma R, Haque TF. et al. A vision transformer for decoding surgeon activity from surgical videos. Nat Biomed Eng 2023; 7 (06) 780-796
- 76 Maier-Hein L, Wagner M, Ross T. et al. Heidelberg colorectal data set for surgical data science in the sensor operating room. Sci Data 2021; 8 (01) 101
- 77 Ghamrawi W, Curtis N, Xu J. et al. A Rectal Cancer Surgery Dataset: Use of artificial intelligence to aid automation of error identification. Sci Data 2025; 12 (01) 180
- 78 Kitaguchi D, Takeshita N, Matsuzaki H. et al. Real-time automatic surgical phase recognition in laparoscopic sigmoidectomy using the convolutional neural network-based deep learning approach. Surg Endosc 2020; 34 (11) 4924-4931
- 79 Honda R, Kitaguchi D, Ishikawa Y. et al. Deep learning-based surgical step recognition for laparoscopic right-sided colectomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2024; 409 (01) 309
- 80 Kitaguchi D, Takeshita N, Matsuzaki H. et al. Deep learning-based automatic surgical step recognition in intraoperative videos for transanal total mesorectal excision. Surg Endosc 2022; 36 (02) 1143-1151
- 81 Kolbinger FR, Bodenstedt S, Carstens M. et al. Artificial Intelligence for context-aware surgical guidance in complex robot-assisted oncological procedures: An exploratory feasibility study. Eur J Surg Oncol 2024; 50 (12) 106996
- 82 Kitaguchi D, Takeshita N, Matsuzaki H, Igaki T, Hasegawa H, Ito M. Development and validation of a 3-dimensional convolutional neural network for automatic surgical skill assessment based on spatiotemporal video analysis. JAMA Netw Open 2021; 4 (08) e2120786
- 83 Igaki T, Kitaguchi D, Matsuzaki H. et al. Automatic surgical skill assessment system based on concordance of standardized surgical field development using artificial intelligence. JAMA Surg 2023; 158 (08) e231131
- 84 Wu J, Hines OJ. Using artificial intelligence to assess surgeon skill. JAMA Surg 2023; 158 (08) e231140
- 85 Sasaki S, Kitaguchi D, Takenaka S. et al. Machine learning-based automatic evaluation of tissue handling skills in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: A retrospective experimental study. Ann Surg 2023; 278 (02) e250-e255
- 86 Obuchi K, Takenaka S, Kitaguchi D. et al. Automatic surgical skill assessment using a task classification model in laparoscopic sigmoidectomy. Surg Endosc 2025; 39 (10) 6423-6429
- 87 Nakajima K, Kitaguchi D, Takenaka S. et al. Automated surgical skill assessment in colorectal surgery using a deep learning-based surgical phase recognition model. Surg Endosc 2024; 38 (11) 6347-6355
- 88 Nakajima K, Takenaka S, Kitaguchi D. et al. Artificial intelligence assessment of tissue-dissection efficiency in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2025; 410 (01) 80
- 89 Mascarenhas M, Mendes F, Fonseca F. et al. A novel deep learning model for predicting colorectal anastomotic leakage: A pioneer multicenter Transatlantic study. J Clin Med 2025; 14 (15) 5462
- 90 Hung AJ, Liu Y, Anandkumar A. Deep learning to automate technical skills assessment in robotic surgery. JAMA Surg 2021; 156 (11) 1059-1060
- 91 Koskinen J, Torkamani-Azar M, Hussein A, Huotarinen A, Bednarik R. Automated tool detection with deep learning for monitoring kinematics and eye-hand coordination in microsurgery. Comput Biol Med 2022; 141: 105121
- 92 Seenivasan L, Islam M, Kannan G, Ren H. SurgicalGPT: End-to-end language-vision GPT for visual question answering in surgery. In: Greenspan H, Madabhushi A, Mousavi P. et al., eds. Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2023. Springer Nature Switzerland; 2023: 281-290
- 93 Sharma S, Mutter D, Padoy N. fine-CLIP: Enhancing Zero-Shot Fine-Grained Surgical Action Recognition with Vision-Language Models. arXiv:2503.19670. 2025 (preprint)
- 94 Khanna A, Wolf T, Frank I. et al. Enhancing accuracy of operative reports with automated artificial intelligence analysis of surgical video. J Am Coll Surg 2025; 240 (05) 739-746
- 95 Stueker EH, Kolbinger FR, Saldanha OL. et al. Vision-language models for automated video analysis and documentation in laparoscopic surgery: A proof-of-concept study. Int J Surg 2025; 111 (11) 7777-7786
- 96 Yang S, Zhou F, Mayer L. et al. Large-scale self-supervised video foundation model for intelligent surgery. arXiv:2506.02692. 2025 (preprint)
- 97 Schmidgall S, Kim JW, Kuntz A, Ghazi AE, Krieger A. General-purpose foundation models for increased autonomy in robot-assisted surgery. Nat Mach Intell 2024; 6 (11) 1275-1283
- 98 Kassem H, Alapatt D, Mascagni P, Karargyris A, Padoy N. Federated Cycling (FedCy): Semi-supervised federated learning of surgical phases. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2023; 42 (07) 1920-1931
- 99 Venkatesh DK, Funke I, Pfeiffer M. et al. Mission balance: Generating under-represented class samples using video diffusion models. In: Gee JC, Alexander DC, Hong J. et al., eds. Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2025. Springer Nature Switzerland; 2025: 412-422
- 100 Venkatesh DK, Rivoir D, Pfeiffer M, Kolbinger F, Speidel S. Data Augmentation for Surgical Scene Segmentation with Anatomy-Aware Diffusion Models. Ppaer presented at: 2025 IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV); Tucson, AZ. 2025: 2280-2290
- 101 Giglio B, Albeloushi A, Alhaj AK. et al. Artificial intelligence-augmented human instruction and surgical simulation performance: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg 2025; 160 (09) 993-1003
- 102 Kim JWB, Chen JT, Hansen P. et al. SRT-H: A hierarchical framework for autonomous surgery via language-conditioned imitation learning. Sci Robot 2025; 10 (104) eadt5254
- 103 Saeidi H, Opfermann JD, Kam M. et al. Autonomous robotic laparoscopic surgery for intestinal anastomosis. Sci Robot 2022; 7 (62) eabj2908
