Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-2745-7932
Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Arthrodesis of a Finger Proximal Interphalangeal Prepared Joint, a Cadaveric Feasibility Study
Authors
Abstract
Objective
Traditionally, the procedure for proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint fusion has been described with an open approach using a dorsalcurvilinear incision. Due to the inherent risk of soft tissue complications with this technique, we propose a percutaneous technique for resecting bone cartilage and achieving a stable fusion angle with two mini-incisions, one lateral and one dorsal. The goal of all arthrodesis techniques is to create a stable joint fusion at the most functional angle for activities of daily living.
Materials and Methods
A small, low speed high torque straight burr was introduced into the joint through a lateral joint line stab incision. The joint space was enlarged with manual traction, and chondral resection was performed under fluoroscopy. The PIP joint was then fused in adequate position with a headless compression screw through a dorsal stab incision. The joints were subsequently dissected to evaluate the degree of resection, the percentage of appropriately prepped joint surface, and any evidence of tissue damage. This study was conducted using 10 cadaver hands and included 39 joints.
Results
This study demonstrated that joint preparation and fusion angle can be reproducibly achieved while preserving a non-disrupted soft tissue envelope. Taken together, these findings suggest that the described percutaneous PIP arthrodesis technique has strong potential for achieving favorable clinical outcomes.
Conclusion
Minimally invasive percutaneous PIP joint arthrodesis appears to be a feasible alternative technique that offers the advantage of minimal soft tissue disruption while achieving a stable construct for joint fusion.
Ethical Approval
Institutional Review Board approval was not required for this cadaver study.
Note
This study was performed at the University of Tennessee Health Science Center–Campbell Clinic, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Biomedical Engineering.
Publication History
Received: 12 May 2025
Accepted: 12 November 2025
Article published online:
10 December 2025
© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
-
References
- 1 Jacobs BJ, Verbruggen G, Kaufmann RA. Proximal interphalangeal joint arthritis. J Hand Surg Am 2010; 35 (12) 2107-2116
- 2 Chen D, Shen J, Zhao W. et al. Osteoarthritis: toward a comprehensive understanding of pathological mechanism. Bone Res 2017; 5: 16044
- 3 Madden MO, Palmer JR, Ameri BJ, Vakharia RM, Landes J, Roche MW. Trends in primary proximal interphalangeal joint system and revisions for osteoarthritis of the hand in the Medicare database. Hand (N Y) 2020; 15 (06) 818-823
- 4 Millrose M, Gesslein M, Ittermann T, Kim S, Vonderlind HC, Ruettermann M. Arthrodesis of the proximal interphalangeal joint of the finger—a systematic review. EFORT Open Rev 2022; 7 (01) 49-58
- 5 Vitale MA, Fruth KM, Rizzo M, Moran SL, Kakar S. Prosthetic arthroplasty versus arthrodesis for osteoarthritis and posttraumatic arthritis of the index finger proximal interphalangeal joint. J Hand Surg Am 2015; 40 (10) 1937-1948
- 6 Herren D. The proximal interphalangeal joint: arthritis and deformity. EFORT Open Rev 2019; 4 (06) 254-262
- 7 Newman EA, Orbay MC, Nunez Jr FA, Nunez Sr F. Minimally invasive proximal interphalangeal joint arthrodesis using headless screw: surgical technique. Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg 2018; 22 (02) 39-42
- 8 Segalman KA. Lateral approach to proximal interphalangeal joint implant arthroplasty. J Hand Surg Am 2007; 32 (06) 905-908
- 9 Cheah AEJ, Yao J. Surgical approaches to the proximal interphalangeal joint. J Hand Surg Am 2016; 41 (02) 294-305
- 10 Kaufmann G. [Minimally invasive arthroscopic-assisted arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint]. Oper Orthop Traumatol 2021; 33 (06) 465-470
- 11 Hodel S, Viehöfer A, Wirth S. Minimally invasive arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint: a systematic literature review. Foot Ankle Surg 2020; 26 (06) 601-606
- 12 Folberg CR, Alves JAO, Pereira FMS. Minimally invasive interphalangeal arthrodesis. Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg 2022; 26 (03) 146-151
- 13 Hachisuka H, Okuhara A, Munemori M, Ishibashi S, Adachi N. Novel minimally invasive approach for arthrodesis in distal interphalangeal joint using microscope. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2025; 13 (02) e6553
- 14 Khatir B, Fréaud O, Petroni G, Pierrart J. Arthroscopic arthrodesis of the thumb metacarpophalangeal joint: an anatomical feasibility study. Hand Surg Rehabil 2022; 41 (06) 664-668
- 15 Arauz PG, Garcia J, Peralta M, Baldo M, Garcia G. Functional evaluation of optimal index finger proximal interphalangeal joint fusion angle using a simulated joint arthrodesis. J Biomech 2023; 147: 111442
- 16 Xu J, Yong FC, Lim CW, Wong KJH, Teoh LC. The impact of various simulated arthrodesis angles of the proximal interphalangeal joint of the ring and middle finger on grip strength. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2022; 142 (04) 701-705
- 17 Murray PM. Treatment of the osteoarthritic hand and thumb. In: Wolfe SW, Pederson WC, Hotchkiss RN, Kozin SH, Cohen MS. eds. Green's Operative Hand Surgery. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Inc.; 2017: 345-372