How Expensive is ENT Surgeons' Involvement in Retrosigmoid Craniotomies? A Time-Driven Activity-Based Cost Analysis

Abstract

Objective

This study aims to examine the impact of ear, nose, and throat (ENT) surgeons' involvement on intraoperative costs and operating room (OR) times for retrosigmoid craniotomies using time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC).

Design

A retrospective, single-center analysis was conducted. TDABC methodology was utilized to calculate total intraoperative costs. Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to assess the independent effect of ENT surgeons' involvement on surgical costs and OR time.

Setting

All procedures were performed at the Thomas Jefferson University Hospital and affiliated sites between 2017 and 2022.

Participants

About 255 patients underwent retrosigmoid craniotomy (166 neurosurgery only, 89 with ENT surgeons' involvement).

Main Outcome Measures

Main outcome measures include total intraoperative costs calculated using TDABC methodology, OR time, supply costs, and personnel costs.

Results

Inclusion of ENT surgeons was significantly associated with increased total costs (B = $4,082 ± $1,015, p < 0.001) and OR time (B = 135 ± 38 minutes, p < 0.001). The mean total cost of neurosurgery-only cases was $7,538 ± $3,977, compared with $14,217 ± $3,485 for multidisciplinary cases. Personnel costs were the primary driver of this increase, with no significant difference in supply costs between groups.

Conclusion

While ENT collaboration can enhance outcomes in select cases, such as those involving vestibular schwannomas, its routine inclusion may not be cost-effective. Our study demonstrates the marginal cost of ENT collaboration for retrosigmoid craniotomies. Future studies may build on our costing framework by integrating outcomes with costs to determine the true cost-effectiveness of cross-specialty collaboration.

Keywords

retrosigmoid craniotomy - ENT collaboration - time-driven activity-based costing - cost-effectiveness

Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 30. Januar 2025

Angenommen: 12. Mai 2025

Accepted Manuscript online:
13. Mai 2025

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
22. Mai 2025

• References

• 1 Basma J, Anagnostopoulos C, Tudose A. et al. History, variations, and extensions of the retrosigmoid approach: Anatomical and literature review. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2021; 83 (Suppl. 02) e324-e335
• 2 Baroncini M, Thines L, Reyns N, Schapira S, Vincent C, Lejeune JP. Retrosigmoid approach for meningiomas of the cerebellopontine angle: Results of surgery and place of additional treatments. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2011; 153 (10) 1931-1940 , discussion 1940
• 3 Chen LF, Yu XG, Bu B, Xu BN, Zhou DB. The retrosigmoid approach to petroclival meningioma surgery. J Clin Neurosci 2011; 18 (12) 1656-1661
• 4 Lucas JC, Fan CJ, Jacob JT, Babu SC. Retrosigmoid approach for sporadic vestibular schwannoma: Patient selection, technical pearls, and hearing results. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2023; 56 (03) 509-520
• 5 Zhang H, Wang J, Liu J. et al. Fully neuroendoscopic resection of cerebellopontine angle tumors through a retrosigmoid approach: A retrospective single-center study. Neurosurg Rev 2023; 47 (01) 14
• 6 Ohue S, Fukushima T, Friedman AH, Kumon Y, Ohnishi T. Retrosigmoid suprafloccular transhorizontal fissure approach for resection of brainstem cavernous malformation. Neurosurgery 2010; 66 (6, Suppl Operative): 306-312 , discussion 312–313
• 7 Tatagiba MS, Roser F, Hirt B, Ebner FH. The retrosigmoid endoscopic approach for cerebellopontine-angle tumors and microvascular decompression. World Neurosurg 2014; 82 (06) S171-S176
• 8 Darrouzet V, Martel J, Enée V, Bébéar JP, Guérin J. Vestibular schwannoma surgery outcomes: our multidisciplinary experience in 400 cases over 17 years. Laryngoscope 2004; 114 (04) 681-688
• 9 Tonn JC, Schlake HP, Goldbrunner R, Milewski C, Helms J, Roosen K. Acoustic neuroma surgery as an interdisciplinary approach: A neurosurgical series of 508 patients. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2000; 69 (02) 161-166
• 10 Hadjipanayis CG, Carlson ML, Link MJ. et al. Congress of Neurological Surgeons systematic review and evidence-based guidelines on surgical resection for the treatment of patients with vestibular schwannomas. Neurosurgery 2018; 82 (02) E40-E43
• 11 Shashikumar SA, Gulseren B, Berlin NL, Hollingsworth JM, Joynt Maddox KE, Ryan AM. Association of hospital participation in bundled payments for care improvement advanced with Medicare spending and hospital incentive payments. JAMA 2022; 328 (16) 1616-1623
• 12 Ali DM, Leibold A, Harrop J, Sharan A, Vaccaro AR, Sivaganesan A. A multi-disciplinary review of time-driven activity-based costing: practical considerations for spine surgery. Global Spine J 2023; 13 (03) 823-839
• 13 Kaplan RS, Anderson SR. Time-driven activity-based costing. Harv Bus Rev 2004; 82 (11) 131-138 , 150
• 14 Leibold A, Glener S, Sarikonda A. et al. What is the true cost of motion preservation? A time-driven activity-based cost analysis of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus disc replacement. World Neurosurg 2024; 192: e506-e512
• 15 Leibold A, Sarikonda A, Tecce E. et al. How do the true intraoperative costs of endoscopic diskectomy compare with microdiskectomy for lumbar disk herniations? A time-driven activity-based cost analysis. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 2024; 27: 690-697
• 16 Sarikonda A, Leibold A, Ali DM. et al. What is the marginal intraoperative cost of using an exoscope or operative microscope for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion? A time-driven activity-based cost analysis. World Neurosurg 2024; 181: e3-e10
• 17 Sarikonda A, Leibold A, Sami A. et al. Do busier surgeons have lower intraoperative costs? An analysis of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion using time-driven activity-based costing. Clin Spine Surg 2024; 37 (10) E455-E463
• 18 Sarikonda A, Sami A, Hines K. et al. What is the value proposition of evidence-based guidelines? An application of the Operative Value Index for lumbar fusions. World Neurosurg 2024; 189: e832-e840
• 19 Sarikonda A, Tecce E, Leibold A. et al. What is the marginal cost of using robot assistance or navigation for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion? A time-driven activity-based cost analysis. Neurosurgery 2024; 95 (03) 556-565
• 20 Tecce E, Sarikonda A, Leibold A. et al. Does body mass index influence intraoperative costs and operative times for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion? A time-driven activity-based costing analysis. World Neurosurg 2024; 185: e563-e571
• 21 Sivaganesan A, Asher AL, Bydon M. et al. A strategy for risk-adjusted ranking of surgeons and practices based on patient-reported outcomes after elective lumbar surgery. Spine 2019; 44 (09) 670-677
• 22 Kaplan RS, Porter ME. How to solve the cost crisis in health care. Harv Bus Rev 2011; 89 (09) 46-52 , 54, 56–61 passim
• 23 Semaan MT, Wick CC, Kinder KJ, Stuyt JG, Chota RL, Megerian CA. Retrosigmoid versus translabyrinthine approach to acoustic neuroma resection: A comparative cost-effectiveness analysis. Laryngoscope 2016; 126 (Suppl. 03) S5-S12
• 24 Dambrino IV RJ, Liles DC, Chen JW. et al. The cost of a plastic surgery team assisting with cranioplasty. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2023; 228: 107711
• 25 Jimenez AE, Azad TD, Mukherjee D. Decreasing reimbursement of pituitary tumor surgery: An analysis of medicare data from 2010 to 2020. Neurosurgery 2024; 94 (01) 140-146
• 26 Kaplan RS, Witkowski M, Abbott M. et al. Using time-driven activity-based costing to identify value improvement opportunities in healthcare. J Healthc Manag 2014; 59 (06) 399-412
• 27 Porter ME. What is value in health care?. N Engl J Med 2010; 363 (26) 2477-2481
• 28 Sarikonda A, Self DM, Quraishi D. et al. Should proximal fixation be at C2 or C3-C4? An application of the Operative Value Index for elective posterior cervical decompression and Fusion. World Neurosurg 2025; 197: 123898
• 29 Sarikonda A, Quraishi D, Mitchell Self D. et al. Introducing the operative value index for glioma surgery: an integration of quality-adjusted life years with time-driven activity-based costing. J Neurooncol Published online March 10, 2025;
• 30 Sarikonda A, Sami A, Self DM. et al. Are mildly disabled patients appropriate for spine bundles? An application of the Operative Value Index. World Neurosurg 2025; 196: 123797