J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2024; 85(01): 057-066
DOI: 10.1055/a-1978-9487
Original Article

A Decade of Global Skull Base Researchers: Gender Data from over 2,700 Abstract Authors in the Journal of Neurological Surgery Part B: Skull Base

Rosemary T. Behmer Hansen
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Rutgers University, Newark, New Jersey, United States
,
2   Department of Psychiatry, Rutgers University, Newark, New Jersey, United States
,
Justin L. Gold
3   Department of Neurosurgery, Cooper Medical School of Rowan University, Camden, New Jersey, United States
,
William A. Blocher III
4   Department of Neurosurgery, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
,
Samantha D. Palma
4   Department of Neurosurgery, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
,
Stephen J. Susman
4   Department of Neurosurgery, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
,
Sai Batchu
5   Independent Researcher, Camden, New Jersey, United States
,
Nicole A. Silva
6   Department of Neurosurgery, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
,
Angela M. Richardson
4   Department of Neurosurgery, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Objective The North American Skull Base Society (NASBS) annual conference brings together skull base researchers from surgical and nonsurgical fields. Our objective was to quantify the contributions of the authors by gender, who presented their work at NASBS and were subsequently published in the Journal of Neurological Surgery Part B: Skull Base.

Methods Oral and poster abstracts presented at the NASBS annual meeting from January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2020 were extracted from the Journal of Neurological Surgery Part B: Skull Base. The genderize.io Web application programming interface was utilized to determine authorship gender. A minority of first and last authors had departmental affiliations listed; a subgroup analysis was performed of these authors.

Results Female gender was assigned to 498 (17.8%) of the 2,798 first authors and 269 (9.7%) of the 2,762 last authors. Female authorship has consistently increased over the last decade. Representation was higher in otolaryngology (23.3% of first authors, 12.1% of last authors; p = 0.018) than neurosurgery (13.5% of first authors, 4.3% of last authors; p = 0.004). Female researchers were not less likely than their male counterparts to receive prestigious oral presentations. Of the 52 total countries represented, 20 (38.5%) had at least one female first author. Representation varied dramatically between countries.

Conclusion The NASBS' efforts have undoubtedly contributed to these impressive strides toward gender parity. More work is needed to ensure that the best and the brightest, regardless of background, continue to contribute to skull base surgery research.



Publication History

Received: 28 September 2022

Accepted: 07 September 2022

Accepted Manuscript online:
15 November 2022

Article published online:
22 December 2022

© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References

  • 1 Bernardi K, Shah P, Lyons NB. et al. Perceptions on gender disparity in surgery and surgical leadership: A multicenter mixed methods study. Surgery 2020; 167 (04) 743-750
  • 2 Sangji NF, Fuentes E, Donelan K, Cropano C, King D. Gender disparity in trauma surgery: compensation, practice patterns, personal life, and wellness. J Surg Res 2020; 250: 179-187
  • 3 Yue T, Khosa F. Academic gender disparity in orthopedic surgery in Canadian universities. Cureus 2020; 12 (03) e7205
  • 4 Zambare WV, Sobin L, Messner A, Levi JR, Tracy JC, Tracy LF. Gender representation in otolaryngology-head and neck surgery recognition awards. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2021; 164 (06) 1200-1207
  • 5 Association of American Medical Colleges. 2017 Physician Specialty Data Report: Active Physicians by Sex and Specialty. Association of American Medical Colleges. Published 2017. Accessed January 31, 2020 at: https://www.aamc.org/data-reports/workforce/interactive-data/active-physicians-sex-and-specialty2017
  • 6 Renfrow JJ, Rodriguez A, Wilson TA, Germano IM, Abosch A, Wolfe SQ. Tracking career paths of women in neurosurgery. Neurosurgery 2018; 82 (04) 576-582
  • 7 Behmer Hansen RT, Silva NA, Cuevas R. et al. Fellowship, gender, and scholarly productivity: trends among academic neurosurgeons in the US. J Neurosurg 2020; •••: 1-9 DOI: 10.3171/2020.5.JNS20577.
  • 8 Lulla T, Behmer Hansen RT, Smith CA, Silva NA, Patel NV, Nanda A. Women neurosurgeons around the world: a systematic review. Neurosurg Focus 2021; 50 (03) E12
  • 9 Barinsky GL, Daoud D, Tan D. et al. Gender representation at conferences, executive boards, and program committees in otolaryngology. Laryngoscope 2021; 131 (02) E373-E379
  • 10 Silva N, Cerasiello S, Semonche A. et al. Gender representation at neurological surgery conferences. World Neurosurg 2019; 129: 453-459
  • 11 Johnson GW, Almgren-Bell A, Skidmore A. et al. Representation of female neurosurgeons as abstract authors at neurological surgery conferences. J Neurosurg 2022; 137 (04) 1180-1186
  • 12 NASBS North American Skull Base Society. NASBS. Published March 1, 2022. Accessed January 2, 2022 at: https://www.nasbs.org/
  • 13 Behmer Hansen RT, Palma SD, Blocher WA. et al. A decade of global skull base researchers: Authorship trends from 3295 abstracts in the Journal of Neurological Surgery Part B: Skull Base. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2024; 85 (01) 44-56
  • 14 Lerchenmüller C, Lerchenmueller MJ, Sorenson O. Long-term analysis of sex differences in prestigious authorships in cardiovascular research supported by the national institutes of health. Circulation 2018; 137 (08) 880-882
  • 15 Shahid I, Khan MS, Sohail A. et al. Evaluation of representation of women as authors in pivotal trials supporting US Food and Drug Administration approval of novel cardiovascular drugs. JAMA Netw Open 2022; 5 (02) e220035
  • 16 Hart KL, Perlis RH. Trends in proportion of women as authors of medical journal articles, 2008-2018. JAMA Intern Med 2019; 179 (09) 1285-1287
  • 17 IBM Corp. Released 2019. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 26.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp
  • 18 Wickham H. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. Published 2016. Accessed January 2, 2022 at: https://ggplot2.tidyverse.org
  • 19 Rahimy E, Jagsi R, Park HS. et al. Quality at the American Society for Radiation Oncology Annual Meeting: gender balance among invited speakers and associations with panel success. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2019; 104 (05) 987-996
  • 20 Flaten HK, Goodman L, Wong E, Hammes A, Brown MR. Analysis of speaking opportunities by gender at National Dermatologic Surgery Conferences. Dermatol Surg 2020; 46 (09) 1195-1201
  • 21 Elango M, Asaad M, Kotta PA. et al. Gender disparity in abstract presentation at plastic surgery meetings. J Surg Res 2021; 265: 204-211
  • 22 Zaza N, Ofshteyn A, Martinez-Quinones P, Sakran J, Stein SL. Gender equity at surgical conferences: quantity and quality. J Surg Res 2021; 258: 100-104
  • 23 Capella C, Schlegel L, Shenot P, Murphy A. Female representation at high-profile urology conferences, 2014-2019: a leadership metric. Urology 2021; 150: 72-76
  • 24 Gupta M, Reichl A, Diaz-Aguilar LD. et al. Pregnancy and parental leave among neurosurgeons and neurosurgical trainees. J Neurosurg 2020; 134 (03) 1325-1333
  • 25 Silva NA, Cerasiello SY, Behmer Hansen RT, Liu JK, Eloy JA. Letter to the Editor Regarding “Investigating the Gender Pay Gap in Industry Contributions to Academic Neurosurgeons”. World Neurosurg 2020; 138: 574-575
  • 26 Chandrasekhar SS. Strengthening our societies with diversity and inclusion. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2020; 53 (04) 701-707
  • 27 Odell T, Toor H, Takayanagi A. et al. Gender disparity in academic neurosurgery. Cureus 2019; 11 (05) e4628-e4628
  • 28 Kondziolka D, Liau LM. Editorial. Sexual harassment in neurosurgery: #UsToo. J Neurosurg 2020; 135 (02) 1-3
  • 29 Perez MG, Fassiotto M, Altamirano J. et al. Untapped resources: attaining equitable representation for women in IR. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2019; 30 (04) 579-583
  • 30 Kim EE, Klein AL, Lartigue JW, Hervey-Jumper SL, Rosseau G. Diversity in neurosurgery. World Neurosurg 2021; 145: 197-204
  • 31 Casadevall A. Achieving speaker gender equity at the American Society for Microbiology general meeting. MBio 2015; 6 (04) e01146
  • 32 Gerull KM, Kim DJ, Cogsil T, Rhea L, Cipriano C. Are women proportionately represented as speakers at orthopaedic surgery annual meetings? A cross-sectional analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2020; 478 (12) 2729-2740
  • 33 Silver JK, Cuccurullo SJ, Ambrose AF. et al. Association of Academic Physiatrists Women's Task Force Report. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2018; 97 (09) 680-690
  • 34 Davids JS, Lyu HG, Hoang CM. et al. Female representation and implicit gender bias at the 2017 American society of colon and rectal surgeons' annual scientific and tripartite meeting. Dis Colon Rectum 2019; 62 (03) 357-362
  • 35 Ruzycki SM, Fletcher S, Earp M, Bharwani A, Lithgow KC. Trends in the proportion of female speakers at medical conferences in the United States and in Canada, 2007 to 2017. JAMA Netw Open 2019; 2 (04) e192103
  • 36 Lin TR, Kocher NJ, Klausner AP, Raman JD. Longitudinal gender disparity in female urology resident primary authorship at an American Urological Association Sectional Meeting. Urology 2017; 110: 40-44
  • 37 Jones TM, Fanson KV, Lanfear R, Symonds MR, Higgie M. Gender differences in conference presentations: a consequence of self-selection?. PeerJ 2014; 2 (01) e627
  • 38 Partiali B, Oska S, Touriel RB, Delise A, Barbat A, Folbe A. Gender disparity in speakers at a major academic emergency medicine conference. Emerg Med J 2021; 38 (05) 379-380
  • 39 Ronne-Engström E. Women in German neurosurgery: status and representation at annual national meetings. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2020; 162 (02) 237-238