Reliability of a Submaximal Field Test in Wheelchair Rugby

Abstract

The aim was to investigate the test-retest reliability of performance and physiological variables of a submaximal wheelchair rugby field test. Eight trained wheelchair rugby athletes with a spinal cord injury (age: median 40, interquartile range 6.9 y; body mass: median 77.7, interquartile range 23.9 kg) performed a submaximal field test two times with a duration of 41 min, split up into four sets of eight min. Each set included eight laps with one eight-meter sprint (SP8) and one four-meter sprint (SP4). The absolute and relative reliability and the performance decrease (fatigue) across the sets were investigated. The examined variables were sprinting time, heart rate, and RPE. The measured parameters showed moderate (peak heart rate ICC3,1=0.663, peak rate of perceived exertion ICC3,1=0.718), good (SP4 ICC3,1=0.874), and excellent (mean heart rate ICC3,1=0.905, SP8 ICC3,1=0.985) test-retest reliability. Fatigue was observed for SP8 in test 2 between set 2/3 and set 2/4. For test 1 a significant decrease of performance for SP4 was found between set 2/3, set 2/4 and between set 3/4. In conclusion the submaximal field test showed moderate to excellent reliability for all measured parameters. The observed fatigue seems to be not clinically relevant. The test can be recommended to assess the effects of training or interventions.

Key words

paralympics - exercise testing - spinal cord injury

Publication History

Received: 15 October 2021

Accepted: 20 June 2022

Accepted Manuscript online:
20 June 2022

Article published online:
01 December 2022

• References

• 1 International Wheelchair Rugby Federation. (2021). Wheelchair Rugby Classifier Handbook. https://www.iwrf.com/resources/iwrf_docs/ IWRF_Classifier_Handbook_2021.pdf
• 2 Jacobs PL, Nash MS. Exercise recommendations for individuals with spinal cord injury. Sports Med 2004; 34: 727-751 DOI: 10.2165/00007256-200434110-00003.
• 3 Goosey-Tolfrey VL, Leicht CA. Field-based physiological testing of wheelchair athletes. Sports Med 2013; 43: 77-91 DOI: 10.1007/s40279-012-0009-6.
• 4 Flueck J, Lienert M, Schaufelberger F. et al. Reliability of a 3-min all-out arm crank ergometer exercise test. Int J Sports Med 2015; 36: 809-813 DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1548811.
• 5 Perret C, Labruyère R, Mueller G. et al. Correlation of heart rate at lactate minimum and maximal lactate steady state in wheelchair-racing athletes. Spinal Cord 2012; 50: 33-36 DOI: 10.1038/sc.2011.97.
• 6 Eerden S, Dekker R, Hettinga FJ. Maximal and submaximal aerobic tests for wheelchair-dependent persons with spinal cord injury: a systematic review to summarize and identify useful applications for clinical rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil 2018; 40: 497-521 DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2017.1287623.
• 7 Rasche W, Janssen TW, Van Oers CA. et al. Responses of subjects with spinal cord injuries to maximal wheelchair exercise: comparison of discontinuous and continuous protocols. Eur J Appl Physiol 1993; 66: 328-331
• 8 Stangier C, Abel T, Zeller S. et al. Comparison of different blood lactate threshold concepts for constant load performance prediction in spinal cord injured handcyclists. Front Physiol 2019; 10: 1054 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2019.01054.
• 9 Perret C, Abel T. Physiology. In: Vanlandewijck YC, Thompson WR, eds. Training and Coaching the Paralympic Athlete. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell; 2016: 53-74 DOI: 10.1002/9781119045144.ch3
• 10 Löllgen H, Leyk D. Exercise Testing in Sports Medicine. Deutsches Aerzteblatt Online 2018; DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2018.0409.
• 11 Noonan V, Dean E. Submaximal exercise testing: clinical application and interpretation. Phys Ther 2000; 80: 782-807 DOI: 10.1093/ptj/80.8.782.
• 12 Rhodes J, Mason BS, Perrat B. et al. Activity profiles of elite wheelchair rugby players during competition. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 2015; 10: 318-324 DOI: 10.1123/ijspp.2014-0203.
• 13 Gee CM, Lacroix MA, West CR. A 20×20 m repeated sprint field test replicates the demands of wheelchair rugby. J Sci Med Sport 2018; 21: 753-757 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2017.12.006.
• 14 West CR, Campbell IG, Shave RE. et al. Effects of abdominal binding on cardiorespiratory function in cervical spinal cord injury. Respir Physiol Neurobiol 2012; 180: 275-282 DOI: 10.1016/j.resp.2011.12.003.
• 15 [Anonymous] World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA 2013; 310: 2191-2194 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2013.281053.
• 16 Sporner ML, Grindle GG, Kelleher A. et al. Quantification of activity during wheelchair basketball and rugby at the national veterans wheelchair games: a pilot study. Prosthet Orthot Int 2009; 33: 210-217 DOI: 10.1080/03093640903051816.
• 17 Van Der Slikke RMA, Berger MAM, Bregman DJJ. et al. Wearable wheelchair mobility performance measurement in basketball, rugby, and tennis: lessons for classification and training. Sensors (Basel) 2020; 20: 3518 DOI: 10.3390/s20123518.
• 18 Sarro KJ, Misuta MS, Burkett B. et al. Tracking of wheelchair rugby players in the 2008 Demolition Derby final. J Sports Sci 2010; 28: 193-200 DOI: 10.1080/02640410903428541.
• 19 Borg GA. Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1982; 14: 377-381
• 20 Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 1979; 86: 420-428 DOI: 10.1037//0033-2909.86.2.420.
• 21 Koo TK, Li MY. A Guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med 2016; 15: 155-163 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012.
• 22 Beckerman H, Roebroeck ME, Lankhorst GJ. et al. Smallest real difference, a link between reproducibility and responsiveness. Qual Life Res 2001; 10: 571-578 DOI: 10.1023/a:1013138911638.
• 23 Bland MJ, Altman D. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 327: 307-310 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(86)90837-8.
• 24 Munzel U, Brunner E. Nonparametric methods in multivariate factorial designs. J Stat Plan Inference 2000; 88: 117-132 DOI: 10.1080/02664763.2021.1915256.
• 25 Atkinson G, Nevill AM. Statistical methods for assessing measurement error (reliability) in variables relevant to sports medicine. Sports Med 1998; 26: 217-238 DOI: 10.2165/00007256-199826040-00002.
• 26 Roberto Zamunér A, Silva E, Macher Teodori R. et al. Autonomic modulation of heart rate in paraplegic wheelchair basketball players: linear and nonlinear analysis. J Sports Sci 2013; 31: 396-404 DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2012.734917.
• 27 Bunten DC, Warner AL, Brunnemann SR. et al. Heart rate variability is altered following spinal cord injury. Clin Auton Res 1998; 8: 329-334 DOI: 10.1007/bf02309623.
• 28 Pfennings LEMA, Van Der Ploeg HM, Cohen L. et al. A comparison of responsiveness indices in multiple sclerosis patients. Qual Life Res 1999; 8: 481-489 DOI: 10.1023/a:1008971904852.
• 29 Currell K, Jeukendrup AE. Validity, Reliability and sensitivity of measures of sporting performance. Sports Med 2008; 38: 297-316 DOI: 10.2165/00007256-200838040-00003.
• 30 ASIA and ISCoS International Standards Committee. The 2019 revision of the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI) – What’s new?. Spinal Cord 2019; 57: 815-817 DOI: 10.1038/s41393-019-0350-9.