Download PDF
Facial Plast Surg 2023; 39(02): 118-124
DOI: 10.1055/a-1849-3233
Original Research

The Future of Visual Documentation? Assessing the Use of Videography in Facial Plastic Surgery

Danny Soares 
1   Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Central Florida, College of Medicine, Orlando, Florida
2   American Foundation for Aesthetic Medicine (AFFAM), Fruitland Park, Florida
,
Kyle Yamamoto
3   University of Nevada, Reno School of Medicine, Reno, Nevada
,
Daniel Liebertz
4   Private Practice, Kirkland, Washington
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Recent technological advancements in the field of portable electronics have facilitated the use of videography as a form of visual documentation in facial plastic surgery. Currently, the degree of video adoption and perceptions relating to its use in plastic surgery are not known. This study aimed to evaluate the current use, perceptions, and barriers regarding the adoption of video in the clinical practice of facial plastic surgery. A cross-sectional study of all American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery members was conducted through an e-mail-disseminated 24-item online survey. A total of 164 surgeons responded to the survey. Nearly all surgeons reported routinely employing photography for the documentation and marketing of surgical results. Fewer than 25% of respondents acknowledged using video to document surgical outcomes. Younger surgeons (<10 years in practice) and those in academic practices were significantly more likely to adopt videography (32 vs. 17%, p = 0.042 and 38 vs. 18%, p = 0.027, respectively). Most surgeons regarded video as the superior visual documentation format for dynamic facial expression and as being more difficult to deceptively manipulate. Most frequently cited barriers to adoption included time-consuming capture, file editing/storage requirements, and lack of clear standards. Videography holds favorable potential as the future format of visual documentation in facial plastic surgery due to its ability to capture the full range of dynamic facial expression. Establishing standards and setup guidelines for video capture will be essential in increasing its adoption.

Keywords

videography in plastic surgery - barriers to video adoption - visual documentation

Supplementary Material



Publication History

Accepted Manuscript online:
11 May 2022

Article published online:
07 August 2022

© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Weissler JM, Stern CS, Schreiber JE, Amirlak B, Tepper OM. The evolution of photography and three-dimensional imaging in plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 139 (03) 761-769
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Boehm KS, Rohrich RJ, Lalonde DH. Why videos matter so much in plastic surgery today: a complete index of videos in plastic and reconstructive surgery and plastic and reconstructive surgery global open. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018; 141 (04) 1051-1054
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Mazer L, Varban O, Montgomery JR, Awad MM, Schulman A. Video is better: why aren't we using it? A mixed-methods study of the barriers to routine procedural video recording and case review. Surg Endosc 2022; 36 (02) 1090-1097
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Vosburgh KG, Newbower RS. Moore's law, disruptive technologies, and the clinician. Stud Health Technol Inform 2002; 85: 8-13
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Sharma A, Minh Duc NT, Luu Lam Thang T. et al. A consensus-based Checklist for Reporting of Survey Studies (CROSS). J Gen Intern Med 2021; 36 (10) 3179-3187
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Pandis N, Fedorowicz Z. The international EQUATOR network: enhancing the quality and transparency of health care research. J Appl Oral Sci 2011;19(05)
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Nicogossian A, Kloiber A, Stabile B. The revised world medical association's declaration of Helsinki 2013: enhancing the protection of human research subjects and empowering ethics review committees. World Med Health Policy 2014; 6: 1-3
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Monks GH. Correction by operation of some nasal deformities and disfigurements. Boston Med Surg J 1898; 139: 262
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Williams JB. Electronics invades photography: digital cameras. In: The Electronics Revolution: Inventing the Future. Chicester, United Kingdom: Springer Praxis; 2017: 243-250
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Mullen JR, Srinivasan RC, Tuckman DV, Hammert WC. How to shoot and edit high-quality surgical videos for hand and upper extremity surgery. J Hand Surg Am 2022; 47 (05) 471-474
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 American Society of Plastic Surgeons. 2020 national plastic surgery statistics. Accessed March 19, 2022 at: https://www.plasticsurgery.org/documents/News/Statistics/2020/plastic-surgery-statistics-report-2020.pdf
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Michaud T, Gassia V, Belhaouari L. Facial dynamics and emotional expressions in facial aging treatments. J Cosmet Dermatol 2015; 14 (01) 9-21
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Crystal DT, Cuccolo NG, Ibrahim AMS, Furnas H, Lin SJ. Photographic and video deepfakes have arrived: how machine learning may influence plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2020; 145 (04) 1079-1086
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Cromey DW. Avoiding twisted pixels: ethical guidelines for the appropriate use and manipulation of scientific digital images. Sci Eng Ethics 2010; 16 (04) 639-667
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Hakimi AA, Prasad KR, Hong EM. et al. Video standards for rhinoplasty education: a review and recommended guidelines. Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med 2020; 22 (03) 219-224
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Augestad KM, Butt K, Ignjatovic D, Keller DS, Kiran R. Video-based coaching in surgical education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 2020; 34 (02) 521-535
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Esposito AC, Coppersmith NA, White EM, Yoo PS. Video coaching in surgical education: utility, opportunities, and barriers to implementation. J Surg Educ 2022; 79 (03) 717-724
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar