Download PDF
Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol 2022; 226(03): 197-204
DOI: 10.1055/a-1756-5518
Hebammenfokus: Review

Global Research Trends in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus from 2000 to 2020: A Bibliometric Study

Hongyan Chen
1   School of Nursing, Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou, China
2   Central Laboratory, Longgang District Maternity & Child Healthcare Hospital, Shenzhen, China
,
Fengxiang Wei
1   School of Nursing, Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou, China
2   Central Laboratory, Longgang District Maternity & Child Healthcare Hospital, Shenzhen, China
,
Xiaohang Chen
2   Central Laboratory, Longgang District Maternity & Child Healthcare Hospital, Shenzhen, China
,
Ken Chen
1   School of Nursing, Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou, China
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Aims This study analyzed major trends and topics in the field of gestational diabetes mellitus research between 2000 and 2020.

Methods Studies that investigated gestational diabetes mellitus published between 2000 and 2020 were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection database. Data from the identified studies were analyzed using CiteSpace software.

Results A total of 22,713 publications were retrieved, among which 21,722 publications were included in this scientometric analysis. Clustering analysis revealed 13 themes across all fields. Physical activity is an emerging trend. Co-word analysis showed that subject high-frequency keywords were: risk factor, obesity, insulin resistance, prevalence, and association. Centrality indices identified the most influential keywords to be: body mass index, risk factors, gestational weight gain, and obesity. Burst keywords revealed that there were six research frontier subtopics: i) prediction of adverse neonatal outcomes in gestational diabetes mellitus; ii) postpartum period research – blood glucose levels and insulin resistance; iii) meta-analysis – understanding the best evidence in pregnancy gestational diabetes mellitus; iv) gene expression profiles and DNA methylation in gestational diabetes mellitus; v) biomarkers for predicting higher birth and children weights; and vi) discussion on diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes mellitus classification.

Conclusion The number of studies on gestational diabetes mellitus is increasing. For two decades, the United States has been the global leader in the number of published studies. Studies on gestational diabetes mellitus are mainly from developed countries, with a few of them being from developing countries. An emerging field of research aims at elucidating the association between physical activity and gestational diabetes mellitus.

Key words

Gestational diabetes mellitus - Bibliometric analysis - Research trends - Focus research


Publication History

Received: 05 December 2021

Accepted after revision: 19 January 2022

Article published online:
11 March 2022

© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • References

  • 1 World Health Organization. Diagnostic criteria and classification of hyperglycaemia first detected in pregnancy: a WHO Guideline. Diabet Res Clin Pract 2014; 103: 341-363
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Hod M, Kapur A, Sacks D. et al. The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) initiative on gestational diabetes mellitus: a pragmatic guide for diagnosis, management, and care. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2015; 131: S173-S211
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Yuen L, Saeedi P, Riaz M. et al. Projections of the prevalence of hyperglycaemia in pregnancy in 2019 and beyond: results from the International Diabetes Federation Diabetes Atlas, 9th edition. Diabet Res Clin Pract 2019; 157: 107-841
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Guariguata L, Linnenkamp U, Beagley J. et al. Global estimates of the prevalence of hyperglycaemia in pregnancy. Diabet Res Clin Pract 2014; 103: 176-185
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Sweileh WM, Al-Jabi SW, AbuTaha AS. et al. Bibliometric analysis of worldwide scientific literature in mobile-health: 2006–2016. BMC Medical Inform Decis Mak 2017; 17: 72
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Sung SF, Hsieh CY, Hu YH. Two decades of research using Taiwan’s national health insurance claims data: bibliometric and text mining analysis on PubMed. J Med Internet Res 2020; 22: e18457
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Chen LW, Soh SE, Tint MT. et al. Combined analysis of gestational diabetes and maternal weight status from pre-pregnancy through post-delivery in future development of type 2 diabetes. Sci Rep 2021; 11: 5021
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Goyal A, Gupta Y, Kalaivani M. et al. Long term (>1 year) postpartum glucose tolerance status among Indian women with history of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) diagnosed by IADPSG criteria. Diabet Res Clin Pract 2018; 142: 154-161
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Lowe WL, Scholtens DM, Lowe LP. et al. Association of gestational diabetes with maternal disorders of glucose metabolism and childhood adiposity. JAMA 2018; 320: 1005-1016
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Chen C, CiteSpace II. Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. J Am Soc Inf Sci Tec 2006; 57: 359-377
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Van Eck NJ, Waltman L. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics 2010; 84: 523-538
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Iftikhar PM, Ali F, Faisaluddin M. et al. A bibliometric analysis of the top 30 most-cited articles in gestational diabetes mellitus literature (1946–2019). Cureus 2019; 11: e4131
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 HAPO Study Cooperative Research Group. Hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcomes. N Engl J Med 2008; 358: 1991-2002
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Metzger BE, Gabbe SG, Persson B. et al. International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups recommendations on the diagnosis and classification of hyperglycemia in pregnancy. Diabet Care 2010; 33: 676-682
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Crowther CA, Hiller JE, Moss JR. et al. Effect of treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus on pregnancy outcomes. N Engl J Med 2005; 352: 2477-2486
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Bellamy L, Casas JP, Hingorani AD. et al. Type 2 diabetes mellitus after gestational diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 2009; 373: 1773-1779
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Kim C, Newton KM, Knopp RH. Gestational diabetes and the incidence of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review. Diabet Care 2002; 25: 1862-1868
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Devos P, Menard J. Trends in worldwide research in hypertension over the period 1999–2018. Hypertension 2020; 76: 1649-1655
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Guariguata L, Linnenkamp U, Beagley J. et al. Global estimates of the prevalence of hyperglycaemia in pregnancy. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2014; 103: 176-185
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 HAPO Study Cooperative Research Group. Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome (HAPO) Study: associations with neonatal anthropometrics. Diabetes 2009; 58: 453-459
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Lowe W, Scholtens DM, Kuang A. et al. Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome Follow-up Study (HAPO FUS): maternal gestational diabetes mellitus and childhood glucose metabolism. Diabet Care 2019; 42: 381-392
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Gao Y, Wang Y, Zhai X. et al. Publication trends of research on diabetes mellitus and T cells (1997–2016): a 20-year bibliometric study. PloS One 2017; 12: e184-e869
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Kramer CK, Campbell S, Retnakaran R. Gestational diabetes and the risk of cardiovascular disease in women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetologia 2019; 62: 905-914
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Tomic V, Bosnjak K, Petrov B. et al. Macrosomic births at Mostar clinical hospital: a 2 year review. Bosn J Basic Med Sci 2007; 7: 271-274
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Alves JM, Teles RHG, Gatto CVG. Mapping research in the obesity, adipose tissue, and microRNA field: a bibliometric analysis. Cells 2019; 8: 1581
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Jafari-Shobeiri M, Ghojazadeh M, Azami-Aghdash S. et al. Prevalence and risk factors of gestational diabetes in Iran: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Iran J Public Health 2015; 44: 1036-1044
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Onat T, Inandiklioglu N. Circulating myonectin and irisin levels in gestational diabetes mellitus – a case-control study. Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol 2021; 225: 320-326
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Litou H, Anastasiou E, Thalassinou L. et al. Increased prevalence of VNTR III of the insulin gene in women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Diabet Res Clin Pract 2007; 76: 223-228
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Simmons D, Jelsma JGM, Galjaard S. et al. Results from a European multicenter randomized trial of physical activity and/or healthy eating to reduce the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus: the DALI Lifestyle Pilot. Diabet Care 2015; 38: 1650-1656
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Vitale M, Masulli M, Rivellese AA. et al. Pasta consumption and connected dietary habits associations with glucose control, adiposity measures, and cardiovascular risk factors in people with type 2 diabetes – TOSCA.IT Study. Nutrients 2019; 12: 101
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Maslova ES, Hansen LG, Grunnet LG. et al. Maternal protein intake in pregnancy and offspring metabolic health at age 9–16 y: results from a Danish cohort of gestational diabetes mellitus pregnancies and controls. Am J Clini Nutr 2017; 106: 623-636
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Dasgupta K, Da Costa D, Pillay S. et al. Strategies to optimize participation in diabetes prevention programs following gestational diabetes: a focus group study. PLoS One 2013; 8: e67878
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Gupta Y, Kapoor D, Josyula LK. et al. A lifestyle intervention programme for the prevention of type 2 diabetes mellitus among South Asian women with gestational diabetes mellitus [LIVING study]: protocol for a randomized trial. Diabet Med 2019; 36: 243-251
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Gupta Y, Goyal A, Kalra S. et al. Variation in the classification of hyperglycaemia in pregnancy and its implication. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2020; 8: 264-266
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Goyal A, Gupta Y, Kalaivani M. et al. Concordance of glycaemic and cardiometabolic traits between Indian women with history of gestational diabetes mellitus and their spouses: an opportunity to target the household. Diabetologia 2019; 62: 1357-1365
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Vinter CA, Jensen DM, Ovesen P. et al. The LiP (Lifestyle in Pregnancy) Study: aA randomized controlled trial of lifestyle intervention in 360 obese pregnant women. Diabet Care 2011; 34: 2502-2507
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Dodd JM, Turnbull D, McPhee AJ. et al. Antenatal lifestyle advice for women who are overweight or obese: LIMIT randomised trial. BMJ 2014; 348: g1285
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Luoto R, Kinnunen TI, Aittasalo M. et al. Primary prevention of gestational diabetes mellitus and large-for-gestational-age newborns by lifestyle counseling: a cluster-randomized controlled trial. PloS Med 2011; 8: e1001036
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar