Übersetzung, Test-Retest-Reliabilität und Konstruktvalidität der deutschen Version der Exercise Self-Efficacy Scale für körperliche Aktivität bei Personen mit axialer Spondyloarthritis

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund Körperliche Aktivität kann die Symptomatik von Personen mit axialer Spondyloarthritis (axSpA) verbessern. Die Selbstwirksamkeit ist dabei ein wichtiger prädiktiver Faktor. Mit dem Fragebogen „Exercise Self-Efficacy Scale“ (ESES) kann die Selbstwirksamkeit für körperliche Aktivität erfasst werden. Bislang gab es noch keine deutsche, validierte Version des Fragebogens.

Ziel Untersuchung der transkulturell adaptierten deutschen Version der ESES (ESES-D) bezüglich Test-Retest-Reliabilität, interner Konsistenz sowie Konstruktvalidität bei Personen mit axSpA.

Methode Die ESES-D wurde anhand des TRAPD-Team-Translation-Models in die deutsche Sprache übersetzt und in einer Beobachtungsstudie evaluiert. Die interne Konsistenz wurde mittels Cronbachs Alpha und die Test-Retest-Reliabilität mittels Intraklassen-Koeffizienten (ICC, Two-way Mixed Effects Model) überprüft. Die Konstruktvalidität wurde aufgrund a priori definierter Hypothesen mittels Korrelationen zwischen der ESES-D, demografischer Merkmale und Messinstrumente zu krankheitsbedingten Symptomen, Funktionseinschränkungen, körperlicher Aktivität sowie Ergebniserwartung für das Training untersucht. Bei Erfüllung von 6 von 8 Hypothesen galt die Konstruktvalidität als bestätigt.

Ergebnisse Die ESES wurde in die deutsche Sprache übersetzt. Es wurden 52 Personen mit axSpA zwischen 31 und 80 Jahren in die Studie eingeschlossen. Die deutsche Version der ESES demonstrierte gute Werte bezüglich der Reliabilität mit einem ICC von 0,78 (95 % CI; 0,63–0,88) und einem Cronbachs Alpha von 0,85. 5 von 8 a priori definierte Hypothesen zur Überprüfung der Konstruktvalidität wurden bestätigt.

Schlussfolgerung Die ESES-D erfasst die Selbstwirksamkeit für körperliche Aktivität mit guter Test-Retest-Reliabilität und interner Konsistenz. Die Konstruktvalidität konnte nicht abschließend bestätigt werden. Weitere Forschung zur Konstruktvalidität und Responsivität wird empfohlen.

Abstract

Background Physical activity can improve disease-related symptoms in people with axSpA. In this context, self-efficacy for physical activity is an important predictive factor. The “Exercise Self-Efficacy Scale” (ESES) questionnaire can be used to assess self-efficacy for physical activity. However, a transculturally adapted German version of the questionnaire does currently not exist.

Objective To examine the transculturally adapted German version of the ESES (ESES-D) regarding its test-retest reliability, internal consistency, and construct validity in people with axSpA.

Method The TRAPD Team Translation Model was used to translate the questionnaire in German. The ESES-D was subsequently evaluated in an observational study. The internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach’s alpha and the test-retest reliability using the intraclass-coefficient (ICC, Two-way mixed effects model). Construct validity was examined based on a priori defined hypotheses using correlations between the ESES-D, demographic characteristics and measurement instruments on disease-related symptoms, functional limitations, physical activity, and outcome expectancy for training. The validity was considered valid if 6 out of 8 hypotheses were confirmed.

Results The questionnaire was translated into German. 52 subjects between 31 and 80 years were included. The German version of the ESES indicated good values of reliability with an ICC of 0.78 (95 % CI; 0.63–0.88), and an alpha-coefficient of 0.85. 5 out of 8 a priori defined hypotheses were confirmed, thus, validity was not confirmed.

Conclusion The ESES-D measures self-efficacy for physical activity with good test-retest reliability and internal consistency. Construct validity could not be terminatory confirmed. Further research on construct validity and responsiveness is recommended.

Schlüsselwörter

axiale Spondyloarthritis - Selbstwirksamkeit - körperliche Aktivität - Reliabilität - Validität

Key words

ankylosing spondylitis - self-efficacy - physical activity - reliability - validity

Publication History

Received: 16 July 2021

Accepted: 04 March 2022

Article published online:
15 June 2022

• Literatur

• 1 van der Heijde D, Ramiro S, Landewé R. et al. 2016 update of the ASAS-EULAR management recommendations for axial spondyloarthritis. An Rheuma Dis 2017; 76: 978-991 DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210770.
• 2 Rausch Osthoff A-K, Niedermann K, Braun J. et al. 2018 EULAR recommendations for physical activity in people with inflammatory arthritis and osteoarthritis. An Rheuma Dis 2018; 77: 1251-1260 DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018–213585.
• 3 Caspersen CJ, Powell KE, Christenson GM. Physical Activity, Exercise, and Physical Fitness: Definitions and Distinctions for Health-Related Research. Pub Health Reports 1985; 100: 126-131
• 4 Garber CE, Blissmer B, Deschenes MR. et al. Quantity and Quality of Exercise for Developing and Maintaining Cardiorespiratory, Musculoskeletal, and Neuromotor Fitness in Apparently Healthy Adults: Guidance for Prescribing Exercise. Med & Science Sports & Exerc 2011; 43: 1334-1359 DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e318213fefb.
• 5 Fongen C, Sveaas SH, Dagfinrud H. Barriers and Facilitators for Being Physically Active in Patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis: A Cross-sectional Comparative Study. Musculos Care 2015; 13: 76-83 DOI: 10.1002/msc.1088.
• 6 Niedermann K, Nast I, Ciurea A. et al. Barriers and Facilitators of Vigorous Cardiorespiratory Training in Axial Spondyloarthritis: Surveys Among Patients, Physiotherapists, and Rheumatologists. Arthritis Care Res 2019; 71: 839-851 DOI: 10.1002/acr.23705.
• 7 Reinseth L, Uhlig T, Kjeken I. et al. Performance in leisure-time physical activities and self-efficacy in females with rheumatoid arthritis. Scan J Occupa Ther 2011; 18: 210-218 DOI: 10.3109/11038128.2010.514941.
• 8 Lewis BA, Marcus BH, Pate RR. et al. Psychosocial mediators of physical activity behavior among adults and children. Am J Prev Med 2002; 23: 26-35 DOI: 10.1016/S0749-3797(02)00471-3.
• 9 Bandura A. Self-efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change. Psycho Review 1977; 87: 191-215 DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191.
• 10 Bandura A. Self-Efficacy. Encyclopedia of Human Behavior. New York: Academic Press; 1994: 71-81
• 11 van der Bijl JL, Shortridge-Baggett LM. The theory and measurement of the self-efficacy construct. Res Theory Nursing Pract 2001; 15: 189-207
• 12 Dzewaltowski DA. Toward a Model of Exercise Motivation. J Sport & Ex Psychol 1989; 11: 251-269 DOI: 10.1123/jsep.11.3.251.
• 13 Bauman AE, Sallis JF, Dzewaltowski DA. et al. Toward a better understanding of the influences on physical activity. Am J Prev Med 2002; 23: 5-14 DOI: 10.1016/S0749-3797(02)00469-5.
• 14 Yordy GA, Lent RW. Predicting Aerobic Exercise Participation: Social Cognitive, Reasoned Action, and Planned Behavior Models. J Sport Ex Psychol 1993; 15: 363-374 DOI: 10.1123/jsep.15.4.363.
• 15 Hammer C, Degerfeldt L, Denison E. Mechanical diagnosis and therapy in back pain: Compliance and social cognitive theory. Adv Physiother 2007; 9: 190-197 DOI: 10.1080/14038190701433241.
• 16 Nessen T, Demmelmaier I, Nordgren B. et al. The Swedish Exercise Self-Efficacy Scale (ESES-S): reliability and validity in a rheumatoid arthritis population. Disabil Reha 2015; 37: 2130-2134 DOI: 10.3109/09638288.2014.998780.
• 17 Mohler P, Dorer B, de Jong J. et al. Guidelines for best practice in cross-cultural surveys: full guidelines. Survey Research Center, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan; 2011: Ann Arbor, MI. 2016
• 18 Solomon P. The think aloud method: A practical guide to modelling cognitive processes. Information Processing & Management 1995; 31: 906-907 DOI: 10.1016/0306-4573(95)90031-4.
• 19 Brandt J, Westhoff G, Rudwaleit M. et al. Validierung einer deutschen Version des Fragebogens BASDAI zur Messung der Krankheitsaktivität bei ankylosierender Spondylitis. Zeitschr Rheumatol 2003; 62: 264-273 DOI: 10.1007/s00393-003-0522-y.
• 20 Kiltz U, Winter J, Schirmer M. et al. Deutsche Übersetzung und crosskulturelle Adaptation des ASAS-Gesundheitsindex: Ein ICF-basiertes Instrument zur Erfassung der Funktionsfähigkeit von Patienten mit ankylosierender Spondylitis. Zeitschr Rheumatol 2016; 75: 993-998 DOI: 10.1007/s00393-016-0218–8.
• 21 Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjöström M. et al. International Physical Activity Questionnaire: 12-Country Reliability and Validity. Med & Science Sports & Ex 2003; 35: 1381-1395 DOI: 10.1249/01.MSS.0000078924.61453.FB.
• 22 World Health Organization, Hrsg. Global recommendations on physical activity for health. Genève: WHO-press; 2010
• 23 Rausch Osthoff A-K, Vliet Vlieland TPM, Meichtry A. et al Lessons learned from pilot implementation of physical activity recommendations in axial Spondyloarthritis exercise group therapy – less may be more. BMC Rheumatology 2021; 6 DOI: 10.1186/s41927-021-00233-z.
• 24 de Vet HCW, Terwee CB, Mokkink LB. et al. Hrsg. Measurement in medicine: a practical guide. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press; 2011
• 25 Atkinson G, Nevill AM. Statistical Methods For Assessing Measurement Error (Reliability) in Variables Relevant to Sports Medicine. Sports Med 1998; 26: 217-238 DOI: 10.2165/00007256-199826040-00002.
• 26 Koo TK, Li MY. A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research. J Chiro Med 2016; 15: 155-163 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012.
• 27 Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass Correlations : Uses in Assessing Rater Reliability. Psycho Bulletin 1979; 86: 420-428 DOI: 10.1037//0033-2909.86.2.420.
• 28 Bernstein IH, Nunnally JC. Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1994
• 29 Leong FTL, Austin JT. The Psychology Research Handbook: A Guide for Graduate Students and Research Assistants. 2. Aufl.. USA California: Sage Publication; 2006
• 30 Cureton EE. Rank-biserial correlation. Psychometrika 1956; 21: 287-290 DOI: 10.1007/BF02289138.
• 31 Bland JM, Altman DG. Applying the right statistics: analyses of measurement studies: Measurement studies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003; 22: 85-93 DOI: 10.1002/uog.122.
• 32 Denison E, Åsenlöf P, Sandborgh M. et al. Musculoskeletal Pain in Primary Health Care: Subgroups Based on Pain Intensity, Disability, Self-Efficacy, and Fear-Avoidance Variables. J Pain 2007; 8: 67-74 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2006.06.007.
• 33 Pfingsten M, Kröner-Herwig B, Leibing E. et al. Validation of the German version of the Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ). Euro J Pain 2000; 4: 259-266 DOI: 10.1053/eujp.2000.0178.
• 34 MacCallum RC, Zhang S, Preacher KJ. et al. On the practice of dichotomization of quantitative variables. Psycho Methods 2002; 7: 19-40 DOI: 10.1037/1082-989X.7.1.19.
• 35 Epstein J, Santo RM, Guillemin F. A review of guidelines for cross-cultural adaptation of questionnaires could not bring out a consensus. J Clin Epidemiol 2015; 68: 435-441 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.11.021.
• 36 Epstein J, Osborne RH, Elsworth GR. et al. Cross-cultural adaptation of the Health Education Impact Questionnaire: experimental study showed expert committee, not back-translation, added value. J Clin Epidemiol 2015; 68: 360-369 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.07.013.
• 37 Donaldson SI, Grant-Vallone EJ. Understanding Self-Report Bias in Organizational Behavior Research. J Business Psycho 2002; 17: 245-262
• 38 Tourangeau R, Yan T. Sensitive questions in surveys. Psycho Bulletin 2007; 133: 859-883 DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.133.5.859.