Endoscopy 2020; 52(10): 886-890
DOI: 10.1055/a-1176-0967
Innovations and brief communications

Effectiveness of combination endoscopic therapy for colonic anastomotic leaks

Nikhil R. Thiruvengadam
1   Division of Gastroenterology, UCSF Medical Center, San Francisco, California, United States
,
Christopher Hamerski
2   Interventional Endoscopy Services, California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, California, United States
,
Andrew Nett
2   Interventional Endoscopy Services, California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, California, United States
,
Yasser Bhat
3   Division of Gastroenterology, Palo Alto Medical Foundation, Palo Alto, California, United States
,
Janak Shah
4   Division of Gastroenterology, Ochsner Medical Center, Louisiana, United States.
,
Jona Bernabe
2   Interventional Endoscopy Services, California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, California, United States
,
Steven Kane
2   Interventional Endoscopy Services, California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, California, United States
,
Kenneth Binmoeller
2   Interventional Endoscopy Services, California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, California, United States
,
Rabindra R. Watson
2   Interventional Endoscopy Services, California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, California, United States
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Background Colonic anastomotic leaks are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Whereas small case series suggest that fully covered self-expandable metal stents (FCSEMS) are effective, no larger studies have examined the impact of combination endoscopic therapy on colonic anastomotic leaks.

Methods Our retrospective cohort study reviewed 51 patients undergoing endoscopic therapy for colonic anastomotic leaks between 2011 and 2018. Patients receiving combination therapy involving FCSEMS plus local closure (n = 24) were compared with patients receiving FCSEMS alone (n = 18) or endoscopic suturing alone (n = 9). The primary outcomes were technical and clinical success (resolution of leak, removal of percutaneous drains, avoidance of surgical reoperation, and reversal of temporary diversion).

Results Clinical success was achieved in 55 % of patients. Clinical success was achieved in 18/24 patients (75 %) with combination therapy compared with 6/18 patients receiving FCSEMS alone (33 %, adjusted risk ratio [RR] 2.16, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.10 – 4.24; P = 0.02) and 4 /9 patients undergoing endoscopic suturing alone (44 %, RR 1.91, 95 %CI 0.84 – 4.31; P = 0.10). Stent migration occurred in 40 % of patients.

Conclusions This large series demonstrates that combination therapy was associated with a higher rate of clinical success, and future prospective studies are warranted.

Supplementary material



Publication History

Received: 05 November 2019

Accepted: 03 April 2020

Article published online:
10 June 2020

© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References

  • 1 Khan AA, Wheeler JM, Cunningham C. et al. The management and outcome of anastomotic leaks in colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis 2008; 10: 587-592
  • 2 Kingham TP, Pachter HL. Colonic anastomotic leak: risk factors, diagnosis, and treatment. J Am Coll Surg 2009; 208: 269-278
  • 3 Blumetti J, Abcarian H. Management of low colorectal anastomotic leak: preserving the anastomosis. World J Gastrointest Surg 2015; 7: 378-383
  • 4 Vermeer TA, Orsini RG, Daams F. et al. Anastomotic leakage and presacral abscess formation after locally advanced rectal cancer surgery: incidence, risk factors and treatment. Eur J Surg Oncol 2014; 40: 1502-1509
  • 5 Damrauer SM, Bordeianou L, Berger D. Contained anastomotic leaks after colorectal surgery: are we too slow to act?. Arch Surg 2009; 144: 333-338
  • 6 Hallbook O, Sjodahl R. Anastomotic leakage and functional outcome after anterior resection of the rectum. Br J Surg 1996; 83: 60-62
  • 7 Caruso A, Manno M, Manta R. et al. Alternative management of anastomotic colorectal strictures: our experience with fully covered self-expanding metal stents. Surg Endosc 2013; 27: 4752-4753
  • 8 Cereatti F, Fiocca F, Dumont JL. et al. Fully covered self-expandable metal stent in the treatment of postsurgical colorectal diseases: outcome in 29 patients. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 2016; 9: 180-188
  • 9 Lamazza A, Sterpetti AV, De Cesare A. et al. Endoscopic placement of self-expanding stents in patients with symptomatic anastomotic leakage after colorectal resection for cancer: long-term results. Endoscopy 2015; 47: 270-272
  • 10 Arezzo A, Verra M, Reddavid R. et al. Efficacy of the over-the-scope clip (OTSC) for treatment of colorectal postsurgical leaks and fistulas. Surg Endosc 2012; 26: 3330-3333
  • 11 Weidenhagen R, Gruetzner KU, Wiecken T. et al. Endoscopic vacuum-assisted closure of anastomotic leakage following anterior resection of the rectum: a new method. Surg Endosc 2008; 22: 1818-1825
  • 12 Catalano MF, Sorser SA, Henderson JB. et al. 810 Successful closure of enteric fistulas using the Apollo Overstitch Suturing System. Gastroenterology 2014; 146: S-142-S-143
  • 13 Tsereteli Z, Sporn E, Geiger TM. et al. Placement of a covered polyester stent prevents complications from a colorectal anastomotic leak and supports healing: randomized controlled trial in a large animal model. Surgery 2008; 144: 786-792