Download PDF
ZWR - Das Deutsche Zahnärzteblatt 2018; 127(09): 414-420
DOI: 10.1055/a-0675-6531
Fortbildung | Periimplantitis
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Erhaltung periimplantärer Gewebe – Möglichkeiten und Grenzen

Astrid Klocke
,
Hans Ulrich Brauer
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
14 September 2018 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

In diesem Fachbeitrag werden basierend auf der neuen Klassifikation parodontaler und periimplantärer Erkrankungen die 3 Formen periimplantärer Gewebe beschrieben. Nach eingehender Beschreibung der periimplantären Mukositis und der Periimplantitis wird sowohl die nicht chirurgische als auch die chirurgische Therapie der Periimplantitis dargestellt. Hieran anschließend wird das Konzept der periimplantären Erhaltungstherapie vorgestellt.
Fazit

Aufgrund der hohen Zahl an Implantationen und der bisher nicht vorhersagbaren Ergebnisse der Behandlung einer bestehenden Periimplantitis, ist der periimplantären Erhaltung der Hart- und Weichgewebe eine besondere Aufmerksamkeit zu schenken. Dazu ist es erforderlich, den genauen Zustand der periimplantären Gewebe festzustellen, anhand dessen ein entsprechendes Nachsorgekonzept zur Vermeidung periimplantärer Erkrankungen erstellt wird. Dieses ist individuell für den Patienten abzustimmen.

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Albrektsson T, Donos N. Implant survival and complications. The Third EAO consensus conference 2012. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012; 23 (Suppl. 06) 63-65
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Pjetursson BE, Tan K, Lang NP. et al. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of fixed partial dentures (FPDs) after an observation period of at least 5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004; 15: 667-676
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Lang NP, Pjetursson BE, Tan K. et al. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of fixed partial dentures (FPDs) after an observation period of at least 5 years. II. Combined tooth–implant-supported FPDs. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004; 15: 643-653
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Roos-Jansaker AM, Lindahl C, Renvert H. et al. Nine- to fourteen-year follow-up of implant treatment. Part I: implant loss and associations to various factors. J Clin Periodontol 2006; 33: 283-289
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Hämmerle CHF, Tarnow D. The etiology of hard- and soft-tissue deficiencies at dental implants: A narrative review. J Clin Periodontol 2018; 45 (Suppl. 20) S267-S277
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Renvert S, Persson GR, Pirih FQ. et al. Peri-implant health, peri-implant mucositis, and peri-implantitis: Case definitions and diagnostic considerations. J Clin Periodontol 2018; 45 (Suppl. 20) S278-S285
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Meyer S, Giannopoulou C, Courvoisier D. et al. Experimental mucositis and experimental gingivitis in persons aged 70 or over. Clinical and biological responses. Clin Oral Implants Res 2017; 28: 1005-1012
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Salvi GE, Aglietta M, Eick S. et al. Reversibility of experimental peri-implant mucositis compared with experimental gingivitis in humans. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012; 23: 182-190
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Ferreira SD, Silva GL, Cortelli JR. et al. Prevalence and risk variables for peri-implant disease in Brazilian subjects. J Clin Periodontol 2006; 33: 929-935
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Roos-Jansaker AM, Lindahl C, Renvert H. et al. Nine- to fourteen-year follow-up of implant treatment. Part II: presence of peri-implant lesions. J Clin Periodontol 2006; 33: 290-295
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Roos-Jansaker AM, Renvert H, Lindahl C. et al. Nine- to fourteen-year follow-up of implant treatment. Part III: factors associated with peri-implant lesions. J Clin Periodontol 2006; 33: 296-301
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Rodrigo D, Martin C, Sanz M. Biological complications and peri-implant clinical and radiographic changes at immediately placed dental implants. A prospective 5-year cohort study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012; 23: 1224-1231
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Berglundh T, Lindhe J, Marinello C. et al. Soft tissue reaction to de novo plaque formation on implants and teeth. An experimental study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 1992; 3: 1-8
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Ericsson I, Berglundh T, Marinello C. et al. Long-standing plaque and gingivitis at implants and teeth in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 1992; 3: 99-103
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Costa FO, Takenaka-Martinez S, Cota LO. et al. Peri-implant disease in subjects with and without preventive maintenance: a 5-year follow-up. J Clin Periodontol 2012; 39: 173-181
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Schwarz F, Derks J, Monje A. et al. Peri-implantitis. J Clin Periodontol 2018; 45 (Suppl. 20) S246-S266
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Derks J, Schaller D, Hakansson J. et al. Peri-implantitis – onset and pattern of progression. J Clin Periodontol 2016; 43: 383-388
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Serino G, Turri A, Lang NP. Probing at implants with peri-implantitis and its relation to clinical peri-implant bone loss. Clin Oral Implants Res 2013; 24: 91-95
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Karoussis IK, Salvi GE, Heitz-Mayfield LJ. et al. Long-term implant prognosis in patients with and without a history of chronic periodontitis: a 10-year prospective cohort study of the ITI Dental Implant System. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003; 14: 329-339
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Roccuzzo M, Bonino F, Aglietta M. et al. Ten-year results of a three arms prospective cohort study on implants in periodontally compromised patients. Part 2: clinical results. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012; 23: 389-395
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Ong CT, Ivanovski S, Needleman IG. et al. Systematic review of implant outcomes in treated periodontitis subjects. J Clin Periodontol 2008; 35: 438-462
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Daubert DM, Weinstein BF, Bordin S. et al. Prevalence and predictive factors for peri-implant disease and implant failure: a cross-sectional analysis. J Periodontol 2015; 86: 337-347
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Heitz-Mayfield LJ. Peri-implant diseases: diagnosis and risk indicators. J Clin Periodontol 2008; 35: 292-304
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Rakic M, Grusovin MG, Canullo L. The Microbiologic Profile Associated with Peri-Implantitis in Humans: A Systematic Review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2016; 31: 359-368
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Monje A, Aranda L, Diaz KT. et al. Impact of Maintenance Therapy for the Prevention of Peri-implant Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Dent Res 2016; 95: 372-379
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Atieh MA, Alsabeeha NH, Faggion jr. CM. et al. The frequency of peri-implant diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Periodontol 2013; 84: 1586-1598
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Cho-Yan Lee J, Mattheos N, Nixon KC. et al. Residual periodontal pockets are a risk indicator for peri-implantitis in patients treated for periodontitis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012; 23: 325-333
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Karring ES, Stavropoulos A, Ellegaard B. et al. Treatment of peri-implantitis by the Vector system. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005; 16: 288-293
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Renvert S, Samuelsson E, Lindahl C. et al. Mechanical non-surgical treatment of peri-implantitis: a double-blind randomized longitudinal clinical study. I: clinical results. J Clin Periodontol 2009; 36: 604-609
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Sahm N, Becker J, Santel T. et al. Non-surgical treatment of peri-implantitis using an air-abrasive device or mechanical debridement and local application of chlorhexidine: a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical study. J Clin Periodontol 2011; 38: 872-878
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Natto ZS, Aladmawy M, Levi jr. PA. et al. Comparison of the efficacy of different types of lasers for the treatment of peri-implantitis: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2015; 30: 338-345
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Azizi B, Budimir A, Mehmeti B. et al. Antimicrobial Efficacy of Photodynamic Therapy and Light-Activated Disinfection Against Bacterial Species on Titanium Dental Implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2018; 33: 831-837
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Mombelli A, Feloutzis A, Bragger U. et al. Treatment of peri-implantitis by local delivery of tetracycline. Clinical, microbiological and radiological results. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001; 12: 287-294
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Persson GR, Salvi GE, Heitz-Mayfield LJ. et al. Antimicrobial therapy using a local drug delivery system (Arestin) in the treatment of peri-implantitis. I: Microbiological outcomes. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006; 17: 386-393
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Deppe H, Horch HH, Neff A. Conventional versus CO2 laser-assisted treatment of peri-implant defects with the concomitant use of pure-phase beta-tricalcium phosphate: a 5-year clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007; 22: 79-86
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Romeo E, Lops D, Chiapasco M. et al. Therapy of peri-implantitis with resective surgery. A 3-year clinical trial on rough screw-shaped oral implants. Part II: radiographic outcome. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007; 18: 179-187
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Claffey N, Clarke E, Polyzois I. et al. Surgical treatment of peri-implantitis. J Clin Periodontol 2008; 35 (Suppl. 08) 316-332
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Roos-Jansaker AM, Renvert H, Lindahl C et al. Submerged healing following surgical treatment of peri-implantitis: a case series. J Clin Periodontol 2007; 34: 723-727
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar