Informationen aus Orthodontie & Kieferorthopädie 2018; 50(01): 52-62
DOI: 10.1055/a-0577-4262
Übersichtsartikel
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Die dentolabiale Ästhetik

Dentolabial Esthetics
Sonia Mansour
,
Peter Pospiech
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
20 March 2018 (online)

Zusammenfassung

In einer Welt, in der Ästhetik und äußeres Aussehen immer bedeutender werden, spielt insbesondere die Schönheit der Zähne in den Vorstellungen der Patienten eine dominante Rolle, was sich als Leistungsangebot und auch wesentlicher Bestandteil der meisten Praxishomepages widerspiegelt. Gutes Aussehen steht in direktem Zusammenhang mit einem attraktiven Lächeln und schönen Zähnen und damit einer gesteigerten Lebensqualität.

Abstract

In a world where esthetics and outer appearances are becoming more and more important, especially beautiful teeth play a dominant role in the patients’ expectations, which is reflected on most practice homepages and an essential element within the range of services. Good looks are directly related to an attractive smile and nice teeth and consequently a better quality of life.

 
  • Literatur

  • 1 Institut der deutschen Zahnärzte. Fünfte deutsche Mundgesundheitsstudie (DMS V) – Kurzfassung. 1. Aufl Berlin/Köln: 2016
  • 2 Maio G. Die Zahnmedizin zwischen Heilkunde und Beautyindustrie. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 2009; 119: 47-51
  • 3 Cattoni F, Mastrangelo F, Gherlone EF. et al. A new total digital smile planning technique (3D-DSP) to fabricate CAD-CAM mockups for esthetic crowns and veneers. Int J Dent 2016; 2016: 6282587
  • 4 Coachman C, Calamita MA, Coachman FG. et al Facially generated and cephalometric guided 3D digital design for complete mouth implant rehabilitation: A clinical report. J Prostate Dent 2017; 117: 577-586
  • 5 Lin WS, Harris BT, Phasuk K et al. Integrating a facial scan, virtual smile design, and 3D virtual patient for treatment with CAD-CAM ceramic veneers: A clinical report. J Prostate Dent 2017 pii: S0022-3913(17)30208-1
  • 6 Coachman C, Calamita MA, Sesma N. Dynamic documentation of the smile and the 2D/3D digital smile design process. Int J Peridontics Restorative Dent 2017; 37: 183-193
  • 7 Patzelt SBM, Schaible LK, Stampf S. et al. Software-based evaluation of human attractiveness: A pilot study. J Prosthet Dent 2014; 112: 1176-1181
  • 8 Fradeani M. Ästhetische Sanierungen mit festsitzender Prothetik. Band 1: Ästhetische Analyse. Systematik von prothetischen Behandlungen. Berlin: Quintessenz; 2005
  • 9 Magne P, Belser U. Adhäsiv befestigte Keramikrestaurationen. 2. Aufl Berlin: Quintessenz; 2004: 57-96
  • 10 Tjan AH, Miller GD, The JG. Some esthetic factors in a smile. J Prosthet Dent 1984; 51: 24-28
  • 11 Matthews TG. The anatomy of a smile. J Prostate Dent 1978; 39: 128-134
  • 12 Chu SJ, Tan JH, Stappert CF. et al. Gingival zenith positions and levels of the maxillary anterior dentition. J Esther Rektor Dent 2009; 21: 113-120
  • 13 Tarnow DP, Magner AW, Fletcher P. The effect of the distance from the contact point to the crest of bone on the presence or absence of the interproximal dental papilla. J Periodontol 1992; 63: 995-996
  • 14 Fürhauser R, Florescu D, Benesch T. et al. Evaluation of soft tissue around single-tooth implant crowns: the pink esthetic score. Clin Oral Impl Res 2005; 16: 639-644
  • 15 Snow SR. Esthetic smile analysis of maxillary anterior tooth width: The golden percentage. J Esthet Dent 1999; 11: 177-184
  • 16 Sterrett JD, Oliver T, Robinson F. et al. Width/length ratios of normal clinical crowns of the maxillary anterior dentition in man. J Clin Periodontol 1999; 26: 153-157
  • 17 Magne P, Gallucci GO, Belser UC. Anatomic crown width/length ratios of unworn nd worn maxillary teeth in white subjects. J Prosthet Dent 2003; 89: 453-461
  • 18 Menezes EBC, Bittencourt MAV, Machado AW. Do different vertical positions of maxillary central incisors influence smile esthetics perceptions?. Dental Press J Orthod 2017; 22: 95-105
  • 19 Belser UC, Grütter L, Vailati F. et al. Outcome evaluation of early placed maxillary anterior single-tooth implants using objective esthetic criteria: A cross sectional, retrospective study in 45 patients with a 2- to 4-year follow-up using pink and white esthetic scores. J Periodontol 2009; 80: 140-151
  • 20 Lanza A, Di Francesco F, De Marco G. et al. Clinical application of the PES/WES Index on natural teeth: Case report and literature review. Case Rep Dent 2017; 2017: 9659062
  • 21 Jones AR, Martin W. Comparing pink and white esthetic scores to layperson perception in the single-tooth implant patient. Int J Oral Maxillofac Impf 2014; 29: 1348-1353
  • 22 Rodrigues Ade D, Magnani R, Machado MS. et al. The perception of smile attractiveness. Angle Orthod 2009; 79: 634-639
  • 23 Saffarpour A, Ghavam M, Saffarpour A. et al. Perception of laypeople and dental professionals of smile esthetics. J Dent (Teheran) 2016; 13: 85-91