B&G Bewegungstherapie und Gesundheitssport 2018; 34(02): 67-72
DOI: 10.1055/a-0573-5195
Wissenschaft
© Haug in Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Erfassung körperlicher Aktivität

Assessment of physical activity
Birte von Haaren-Mack
1   Deutsche Sporthochschule Köln, Abt. Gesundheit & Sozialpsychologie, Psychologisches Institut
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Eingegangen: 02 January 2018

Angenommen durch Review: 08 January 2018

Publication Date:
15 May 2018 (online)

Zusammenfassung

Vor dem Hintergrund zunehmenden Bewegungsmangels ist die adäquate Erfassung körperlicher Aktivität in der Bevölkerung für die Entwicklung geeigneter Interventionsmaßnahmen notwendig. Hierfür können generell entweder subjektive oder objektive Methoden verwendet werden. Während die Goldstandardmethoden objektiver Aktivitätserfassung für die Verwendung im Feld ungeeignet erscheinen, können einfache objektive Methoden wie die Akzelerometrie, Pedometrie und Herzfrequenzerfassung aufgrund des geringen Aufwands für Probanden gut verwendet werden. Die Auswahl der jeweils passenden Methode orientiert sich an der Fragestellung, der Aktivitätscharakteristik der Zielgruppe, den gewünschten Ausgabevariablen, den Kosten und der Praktikabilität im entsprechenden Setting. Durch die technische Entwicklung hat sich zunehmend auch die ambulante, technikgestützte Erfassung körperlicher Aktivität mithilfe von Multisensoren, Sensoren zur Kontexterfassung und die Interaktion mit Selbstangaben per Smartphone verbessert.

Summary

With decreasing levels of physical activity, adequate measures to assess physical activity at the population level in order to develop targeted intervention programmes are mandatory. In general, subjective and objective gold standard measures can be used to assess physical activity. While objective gold standard measures are inappropriate to assess physical activity in the field, accelerometry, pedometry or heart rate monitoring are appropriate easy methods to use due to their low participant burden. The choice of adequate measures depends on the research question, the characteristic of the physical activity behaviour of a target population, the outcome variables of interest, the budget and the practicability in the setting. Technological progress has led to a continuous improvement of ambulatory, technology-based approaches to assess physical activity using multi-sensors, context-sensitive sensors and interactive assessment in combination with self-report via smart phones.

 
  • Literatur

  • 1 WHO – World Health Organization. Global recommendations on physical activity for health. 2010
  • 2 Gabriel KP, Morrow JR, Woolsey A-LT. Framework for physical activity as a complex and multidimensional behavior. Journal of Physical Activity & Health 2012; 9: 11-18
  • 3 Caspersen CJ, Powell KE, Christenson GM. Physical activity, exercise, and physical fitness: Definitions and distinctions for health-related research. Public Health Reports 1985; 100: 126-31
  • 4 Fuchs R, Klaperski S, Gerber M, Seelig H. Messung der Bewegungs- und Sportaktivität mit dem BSA-Fragebogen: Eine methodische Zwischenbilanz. Zeitschrift für Gesundheitspsychologie 2015; 23: 60-76 . doi:10.1026/0943-8149/a000137
  • 5 Woll A. Diagnose körperlich-sportlicher Aktivität im Erwachsenenalter. Zeitschrift für Sportpsychologie 2004; 11: 54-70
  • 6 Prince SA, Adamo KB, Hamel ME, Hardt J, Connor Gorber S, Tremblay M. A comparison of direct versus self-report measures for assessing physical activity in adults: A systematic review. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity 2008; 5: 56
  • 7 Siegel N, von Haaren B. Apparative Verfahren. In: Bös K. editor. Handbuch motorische Tests: Sportmotorische Tests, Motorische Funktionstests, Fragebögen zur körperlich-sportlichen Aktivität und sportpsychologische Diagnoseverfahren. 3rd. ed. Göttingen: Hogrefe; 2017: 628-672
  • 8 Strath SJ, Kaminsky LA, Ainsworth BE, Ekelund U, Freedson PS, Gary RA. , et al. Guide to the assessment of physical activity: Clinical and research applications: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2013; 128: 2259-79 . doi:10.1161/01.cir.0000435708.67487.da
  • 9 Warren JM, Ekelund U, Besson H, Mezzani A, Geladas N, Vanhees L. Assessment of physical activity: a review of methodologies with reference to epidemiological research. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 2010; 17: 127-39 . doi:10.1097/HJR.0b013e32832ed875
  • 10 Chen KY, Janz KF, Zhu W, Brychta RJ. Redefining the roles of sensors in objective physical activity monitoring. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 2012; 44: 13-23
  • 11 Heil DP, Brage S, Rothney MP. Modeling physical activity outcomes from wearable monitors. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 2012; 44: 50-60 . doi:10.1249/MSS.0b013e3182399dcc
  • 12 Hey S, von Haaren B, . Anastasopoulou P. Erfassung körperlicher Aktivität mittels Akzelerometrie – Möglichkeiten und Grenzen aus technischer Sicht. B&G Bewegungstherapie und Gesundheitssport 2014; 30: 73-8 . doi:10.1055/s-0033-1361577
  • 13 Butte NF, Ekelund U, Westerterp KR. Assessing physical activity using wearable monitors: Measures of physical activity. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 2012; 44: 5-12
  • 14 Lyden K, Kozey SL, Staudenmeyer JW, Freedson PS. A comprehensive evaluation of commonly used accelerometer energy expenditure and MET prediction equations. Eur J Appl Physiol 2011; 111: 187-201 . doi:10.1007/s00421-010-1639-8
  • 15 Esliger DW, Tremblay MS. Technical reliability assessment of three accelerometer models in a mechanical setup. Medicine and Science in Sport and Exercise 2006; 38: 2173-81
  • 16 Tudor-Locke C, Bassett DR. How many steps/day are enough? Preliminary pedometer indices for public health. Sports Medicine 2004; 34: 1-8 . doi:10.2165/00007256-200434010-00001
  • 17 Tudor-Locke C, Craig CL, Brown WJ, Clemes SA, Cocker K de, Giles-Corti B. , et al. How many steps/day are enough? For adults. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. 2011; 8: 79
  • 18 Craig CL, Tudor-Locke C, Cragg S, Cameron C. Process and treatment of pedometer data collection for youth: The Canadian Physical Activity Levels among Youth study. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 2010; 42: 430-5
  • 19 Crouter SE, Schneider PL, Karabulut M, Bassett DR. Validity of 10 electronic pedometers for measuring steps, distance, and energy cost. Medicine and Science in Sport and Exercise 2003; 35: 1455-60
  • 20 Abernethy L, Bleakley C. Strategies to prevent injury in adolescent sport: a systematic review. British Journal of Sports Medicine 2007; 41: 627-38 . doi:10.1136/bjsm.2007.035691
  • 21 Leonard WR. Measuring human energy expenditure: What have we learned from the flex-heart rate method? American Journal of Human Biology 2003; 15: 479-89 . doi:10.1002/ajhb.10187
  • 22 Spurr GB, Prentice AM, Murgatroyd PR, Goldberg GR, Reina JC, Christman NT. Energy expenditure from minute-by-minute heart-rate recording: Comparison with indirect calorimetry. the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 1988; 48: 552-9
  • 23 Keytel LR, Goedecke JH, Noakes TD, Hiiloskorpi H, Laukkanen R, van der Merwe L, Lambert EV. Prediction of energy expenditure from heart rate monitoring during submaximal exercise. Journal of Sports Sciences 2005; 23: 289-97 . doi:10.1080/02640410470001730089
  • 24 Trost SG. Objective measurement of physical activity in youth: Current issues, future directions. Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews 2001; 29: 32-6
  • 25 Strath SJ, Bassett DR, Thompson DL, Swartz AM. Validity of the simultaneous heart rate-motion sensor technique for measuring energy expenditure. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 2002; 34: 888-94
  • 26 Schutz Y, Weinsier RL, Hunter GR. Assessment of free-living physical activity in humans: An overview of currently available and proposed new measures. Obes Res 2001; 9: 368-79 . doi:10.1038/oby.2001.48
  • 27 Hebestreit H, Bar-Or O. Influence of climate on heart rate in children: Comparison between intermittent and continuous exercise. European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology 1998; 78: 7-12 . doi:10.1007/s004210050380
  • 28 McCrory MA, Molé PA, Nommsen-Rivers LA, Dewey KG. Between-day and within-day variability in the relation between heart rate and oxygen consumption: Effect on the estimation of energy expenditure by heart-rate monitoring. the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 1997; 66: 18-25
  • 29 Montgomery PG, Green DJ, Etxebarria N, Pyne DB, Saunders PU, Minahan CL. Validation of heart rate monitor-based predictions of oxygen uptake and energy expenditure. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research , 2009; 23: 1489-95 . doi:10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181a39277
  • 30 Corder K, Brage S, Wareham NJ, Ekelund U. Comparison of PAEE from combined and separate heart rate and movement models in children. Medicine and Science in Sport and Exercise 2005; 37: 1761-7
  • 31 Clark CCT, Barnes CM, Stratton G, McNarry MA, Mackintosh KA, Summers HD. A review of emerging analytical techniques for objective physical activity measurement in humans. Sports Medicine 2017; 47: 439-47 . doi:10.1007/s40279-016-0585-y
  • 32 Trull TJ, Ebner-Priemer U. Ambulatory assessment. Annu Rev Clin Psychol 2013; 9: 151-76 . doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050212-185510
  • 33 Bussmann JB, Ebner-Priemer UW. Physical Activity Monitoring. In: Sweeny K, Robbins Megan L. , editors. The Encyclopedia of Health Psychology: Wiley; in press
  • 34 Intille SS, Lester J, Sallis JF, Duncan G. New horizons in sensor development. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 2012; 44: 24-31 . doi:10.1249/MSS.0b013e3182399c7d