Effect of a biostimulatory homeopathic complex on venom production in captive rattlesnakes (Crotalus durissus)

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of two administration methods of a biostimulatory homeopathic complex (Convert H ^®) on the production of fresh and lyophilized venom of rattlesnakes (Crotalus durissus) under intensive captivity conditions. Sixty snakes were subjected to treatment following a randomized block design. The effects of sex and size were controlled for. Thirteen consecutive extractions were performed over 21 months. The first factor considered in the experiment was the origin of mice used as prey: a conventional colony (A1) or the Convert H colony (A2; mice receiving the homeopathic complex in water at 1%). The type of water given to snakes was the second factor: pure (B1) or amended with 5% of Convert H ^® (B2). The experiment was structured in a factorial 2 × 2 design combining mouse and water types (A1B1, A1B2, A2B1, and A2B2). No consistent treatment effects on fresh venom production (mL) were observed when the experimental groups were compared with controls (A1B1). However, production of lyophilized venom (mg) was significantly higher (p < 0.05) in A2B2 animals than in controls in eight of 13 extractions performed, and also in aggregate. The results revealed that production of lyophilized venom, measured over multiple extractions, can be increased by administering the homeopathic complex simultaneously to rattlesnakes and prey.

Keywords

Crotalus durissus - Convert H ^® - Fresh venom - Lyophilized venom

• References

• 1 Ashley B.D., Burchfield P.M. Maintenance of a snake colony for the purpose of venom extraction. Toxicon 1968; 5: 267-275.
• 2 Barravieira B. Venenos: aspectos clínicos e terapêuticos dos acidentes por animais peçonhentos. EPUB; Rio de Janeiro: 1999: 411.
• 3 Melgarejo-Giménez A.R. Criação e Manejo de Serpentes. Andrade A., Pinto S.C., Oliveira R.S. Animais de Laboratório Criação e Experimentação. Fiocruz; Rio de Janeiro: 2002: 175-199.
• 4 Costa A.C.O.R., Almeida-Santos S.M., Germano V.J., Oliveira L., Scartozzoni R.R., Salomão M.G. Manutenção de serpentes em cativeiro no instituto butantan: i- a longevidade dos gêneros Bothrops, Crotalus e Lachesis. Publ Avulsas do Inst Pau Brasil; 2005: 63-68. (8–9).
• 5 Daltry J.C., Wuster W., Thorpe R.S. The role of ecology in determining venom variation in the Malayan pitviper, Calloselasma rhodostoma . Symp Zool Soc Lond 1997; 70: 155-171.
• 6 Mirtschin P.J., Shine R., Nias T.J., Dunstan N.L., Houg B.J., Mirtschin M. Influences on venom yield in Australian tigersnakes (Notechis scutatus) and brownsnakes (Pseudonaja textilis: Elapidae, Serpentes). Toxicon 2002; 40: 1581-1892.
• 7 [FUNASA] Fundação Nacional de Saúde. Manual de Diagóstico e tratamento de acidentes por animais peçonhentos. 2th edn Fundação Nacional de Saúde; Brasília: 2001. 36p.
• 8 Varanda E.A., Giannini M.J.S.M. Bioquímica de venenos de serpentes. Barravieira B. Venenos: aspectos clínicos e terapêuticos dos acidentes por animais peçonhentos. 1th edn EPUB; Rio de Janeiro: 1999: 205-219.
• 9 Stolf H.O. Uso do adesivo tecidual de fibrina derivado do veneno de serpente e avaliação da técnica de auto-enxertia utilizando a pele do sulco nasogeniano. [Thesis] Universidade Federal de São Paulo; São Paulo: 1998.
• 10 Cardoso J.L.C., França F.O.S., Wen F.H., Málaque C.M.S., Haddad J.R.V. Biologia, clínica e terapêutica dos acidentes. Animais peçonhentos do Brasil. 1th edn FAPESP; São Paulo: 2003: 550.
• 11 Zug G.R., Vitt L.J., Caldwell J.P. Herpetology: An Introductory Biology of Amphibians and Reptiles. 2th edn Academic; San Diego: 2001. 630p.
• 12 Grisolia C.S., Stanchi N.O., Peluso F.O. Relación entre el período de ayuno y cantidad de veneno extraído de ofídios em cautiverio. Rev Arg Prod Anim 6 (07) 1986; 513-516.
• 13 Glenn J.L., Straight R., Snyder C.C. Yield of venom obtained from Crotalis atrox by electrical stimulation. Toxicon 1972; 10: 575-579.
• 14 Junior M.S. O Ofidismo no Brasil. Serviço Nacional de Educação Sanitária – Ministério da Saúde; Rio de Janeiro: 1956.
• 15 Benez S.M., Cairo N., Boericke W. Indicações clínicas e patológicas teoria e prática. Manual de Homeopatia Veterinária. 2th edn Tecmedd; São Paulo: 2004: 594.
• 16 Teixeira M.A., Carvalho T.B.S., Lucena G.A.R., Onselen V.J., Real M.R., Real C.M. Effetc of a biostimulatory homeopathic complex on mice subjected to feed stress. Proceedings of the 1 International Congress on the Future of Animal Research 2003; 56.
• 17 Zorzatto C., Teixeira M.A. Efeito do Convert H® - Complexo Homeopático – na 7a, 8a, 9a 10a e 11a Gerações de Camundongos (Mus musculus). Proceedings of the 1 Congresso de Medicina Veterinária e 2 Congresso do Centro-Oeste de Clínicos Veterinários de Pequenos Animais, Meio digital (CD-ROM) 2005.
• 18 Zorzatto C., Teixeira M.A., Carvalho T.B.S. Effect of Convert H^®, a biostimulatory homeopathic complex in the genaration of mice (Mus musculus). In:. EDUR; Seropédica, RJ: 2005: 7-8. suplemento.
• 19 Chabel J.C. Efeitos de um complexo homeopático em ovinos sob condições de restrição alimentar. [Dissertation] Universidade de Mato Grosso do Sul; Campo Grande: 2009.
• 20 National Research Council. Guide for the care and use of laboratory animals. 8th edn National Academy Press; Washington: 1996. 140p.
• 21 [ILAR] Institute for Laboratory Animal Resources – National Research Council. Guía para el cuidado y uso de los animales de laboratorio. Academia Nacional de Medicina; Mexico: 1996. 146p.
• 22 Bauab F.A., Brites V.L.C. Distúrbios eletrolíticos em Philodryas olfersii (Lichtenstein, 1823) Ophidia-Colubridae. Rev Centro Cienc Biomed Univ Fed Uberlandia 5 (01) 1989; 3-8.
• 23 Mader D.R. Reptile medicine and surgery. 1th edn W.B. Saunders; Philadelphia: 1996. 1264p.
• 24 Wolfinger R., Chang M. Comparing the SAS GLM and mixed procedures for repeated measures. Proceedings of the 20 Annual SAS Users Group International (SUGI) Conference 1995. http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/sas/library/mixedglm.pdf.
• 25 Littell R.C., Henry P.R., Ammerman C.B. Statistical analysis of repeated measures data using SAS procedures. J Anim Sci 1998; 76: 1216-1231.
• 26 Littell R.C., Milliken G.A., Stroup W.W., Wolfinger R.D., Schabenderg O. SAS system for mixed models. 2th edn SAS Institute; Cary, NC: 2006. 814p.
• 27 Kincaid C.D. Guidelines for selecting the covariance structure in mixed model analysis. Proceedings of the 30 Conference of the SAS Users Group International (SUGI) 2010: 1-8. http://www2.sas.com/proceedings/sugi30/198-30.pdf.
• 28 Belluomini H.E. Venom production of snakes in captivity. Mem Inst Butantan 1965; 32: 79-88.
• 29 Roodt A.R., Dolab J.A., Galarce P.P. et al. A study on the venom yield of venomous snake species from Argentina. Toxicon 1998; 36: 1949-1957.
• 30 Chippaux J.P., Williams V., White J. Snake venom variability: methods of study, results and interpretation. Toxicon 1991; 29: 1279-1303.
• 31 Williams V., White J. Variation in the composition of the venom from a single specimen of Pseudonaja textilis (common brown snake) over a year. Toxicon 1992; 30: 202-206.
• 32 Lopes H.C., Onselen V.J., Souza A.S. Homeopatia no comportamento de camundongos sob estresse agudo. Rev Bras Saúde Prod Anim 2009; 10: 840-851.
• 33 Kardong K.V. The evolution of snakes apparatus in snakes from colubrids to viperids & elapids. Mem Inst Butantan 1982; 46: 105-118.
• 34 Gopalakrishnakone P., Kochva E. Unusual aspects of the venom apparatus of the blue coral snake Maticora bivirgata . Arch Histol Cytol 1990; 53: 199-210.
• 35 Yamanouye N., Carneiro S.M., Scrivano C.N., Markus R.P. Characterization of β – adrenoceptors, responsible for venom production, in the venom gland of the snake Bothrops jararaca . Life Sci 2000; 67: 217-226.
• 36 Zablith M.B. Vias de sinalização desencadeadas pela estimulação do adrenoceptor β em células secretoras da glândula de veneno da serpente Bothrops jararaca . [Dissertation] Universiade de São Paulo; São Paulo: 2007.