Keywords:
Sleep Spindle - Asperger’s Syndrome - Neurodevelopmental Disorders
INTRODUCTION
Sleep is a highly complex phenomenon divided into different stages depending on changes
in electrical brain activity (EEG). The electroencephalographic graph-elements that
characterize each of the sleep stages make up the sleep microstructure, where the
sleep spindles are present[1].
Sleep spindles are integrated by waxing and waning rhythmic waves of 9 to 16Hz with
duration from 0.5 to 2.5 seconds observed in frontal, central and parietal EEG derivations;
these sleep microelements are observed across the N2 and N3 sleep phases. They originate
in the thalamic reticular nucleus when hyperpolarization occurs due to a decrease
in noradrenergic and serotonergic activity; reticular nuclei then generate electrical
bursts that are transmitted to the cerebral cortex through thalamic-cortical interactions,
producing inter-regional synchronization patterns[2]
,
[3].
Sleep spindles appear between six weeks and three months of age; as age increases,
both quantity and intrinsic frequency of sleep spindles increment, while their duration
tends to decrease. At around 12 months of age the first form of a mature spindle can
be seen, with the appearance of slow spindles on anterior regions of the brain[4]. During puberty, the spindles observed in frontal areas tend to become slower (<12Hz)
compared to those of central and parietal areas where spindles commonly have a faster
frequency (>12Hz). Amplitude begins to decrease and a greater decrement is observed
in posterior areas of the brain. At the end of adulthood, the number of spindles begins
to decrease gradually[5].
Sleep spindles have been considered as a sleep stabilizer. This graph-element has
a protective function by modulating the degree of sensory stimulation that reaches
the thalamus; this is supported by clinical observations where people with hypersomnia
have a higher density of spindles in relation to people with normal sleep patterns[6]. It is also observed that people with a higher density of sleep spindles have greater
tolerance to presence of noise and therefore tend to have fewer awakenings than people
with fewer spindles[7]. Recent studies in which sleep spindles are evoked artificially in mice show that
there is a positive correlation between the amount of sleep spindles and length of
NREM[8].
Sleep spindles are also related to memory consolidation. Different researches show
that there is an increase in density and power of sleep spindles in people who sleep
after performing verbal and visuospatial learning, and memorization tasks, as well
as motor tasks[9]. With the use of EEG and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fRMN), researchers
observed a reactivation of brain areas that were used during the learning process
in the subsequent sleep periods[10]. Likewise, this graph-element is associated with brain plasticity and IQ[11].
Different studies have determined that the quantity and morphology of sleep spindles
are affected in different neuropsychiatric diseases such as schizophrenia, Down syndrome
and Alzheimer’s disease[12]
-
[14]. Generalized developmental disorders, which include the autistic spectrum, are a
group of neurological disorders in which analysis of sleep microstructure has not
been fully studied. In this context, analyzing the characteristics of sleep spindles
in these patients can provide important information about sleep stability and the
level of impairment of cognitive abilities.
Asperger’s syndrome (AS) is a generalized developmental disorder characterized by
deficiencies in social interaction, presence of inadequate communication skills, restricted
interests and stereotypical and repetitive behaviors. Cognitive and linguistic development
are not delayed, as in other autism spectrum disorders[15]. Neuroanatomical studies have evidence that Asperger’s patients show a decrease
in the gray and white matter density in multiple regions such as amygdala, hippocampus,
prefrontal lobes, medial-frontal gyrus, right cerebellum, limbic system, parietal
lobe, left thalamus, and putamen. Functional abnormalities are also observed in cerebellar
connections, in the frontal and temporal cortex, as well as in the limbic system,
including the amygdala and hippocampus[16]
,
[17].
Regarding their cognitive characteristics, using different validated psychometric
tests, it is observed that patients with AS present difficulties in identification
of symbols and increased reaction time when performing tasks. On the contrary, a better
performance is observed in arithmetic, verbal and fluency of reasoning tasks. These
patients also present deficits on identification of prosody and rhythm of language.
Among other cognitive alterations found in AS are social skills, executive functions,
sustained attention, and coherence of thoughts[16].
AS patients also present deficits in tasks that involve autobiographical and episodic
information[18]. On the other hand, they perform well on semantic memory tasks related to remembering
pairs of words, while they have difficulties with tasks related to working memory[19].
Several studies show that patients with generalized developmental disorders, including
Asperger’s syndrome, have sleep disturbances. Using questionnaires and actigraphy,
we can observe difficulties in initiating and maintaining sleep, shorter total sleep
time, morning awakenings and parasomnias[20]
-
[23]. However, polysomnographic recordings show contrasting results; in some cases, a
decrease in total sleep time is observed and in other cases there are no differences
in sleep macrostructure[24]
-
[27].
Recent studies on sleep microstructure in patients within the autistic spectrum show
a decrease in sleep spindle’s density in central regions, lower density of sleep spindles
in the N2 phase in prefrontal regions and shorter duration spindles in frontal regions[28]
,
[29]. In other studies, no significant differences were observed in spindle’s density
and main characteristics[30]. These studies analyze the sleep spindles in patients along the entire autistic
spectrum, which includes different disorders like classic autism and AS, which may
explain the inconsistencies in the results. Therefore, the objective of this study
is to provide additional information about the sleep spindles characteristics exhibited
during sleep in children with AS.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Study design
Cross-sectional case-control study.
Sample description
The studied sample consisted of nine male children diagnosed with AS and nine healthy
participants (HP) with age and sex matched (between 6 and 12 years).
Participants
AS Group
Inclusion criteria: having a diagnosis of AS made by multidisciplinary specialists
in “Caritas de Amistad” association, based on the DSM-IV TR[31] and conducted through interviews with children and their parents.
Exclusion criteria: present evidence of sleep apnea or parasomnia during the first
night of study or previously identified; also any neurological disease or consumption
of hypnotics.
HP Group
Inclusion criteria: having age and sex mentioned previously.
Exclusion criteria: present evidence of sleep disorder during the first night of study
or previously identified, consumption of medication at the time of the study and diagnosis
of a chronic disease or health problem that affects sleep.
Sampling for AS group was carried out through the voluntary participation of members
of “Caritas de Amistad”, an association that specializes in diagnosing and treating
children and adolescents with Asperger’s syndrome. While for the HP group, convenience
sampling was carried out in which relatives of members of the university community
were identified and selected; the children’s parents were given a medical history
to assess the health status of the candidate.
Ethics consideration
Written informed consent was signed by each parent or guardian of all the participants.
This protocol has been approved by the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Psychology
at National Autonomous University of Mexico.
Procedure
Data collection was carried out through two polysomnographic (PSG) recordings on consecutive
nights, the first one was considered for habituation to recording conditions and the
second for analyzing and comparing the sleep characteristics displayed by the two
groups. The PSGs were carried out in the Neuroscience Laboratory of the Faculty of
Psychology at National Autonomous University of Mexico (Universidad Nacional Autónoma
de México UNAM). During eight-hour studies, electrical brain (EEG), ocular (EOG),
muscle (EMG), and cardiac (EKG) activities were obtained. In addition, respiratory
and pulse oximetry sensors were placed. Recordings were done by a 32-channel Easy
II equipment and software from Cadwell Laboratories from 2006.
During the first night, electrodes for EEG recordings were placed in C3, C4, O1 and
O2 derivations. During the second night of recording, EEG electrodes were placed in
F3, F4, C3, C4, T3, T4, P3, P4, O1, and O2 leads.
EEG data was obtained from monopolar leads using wave filters from 35Hz to 0.35Hz
and a sensitivity of 10µV/mm[34].
Data analysis
The sleep phases and sleep spindles were visually identified according to the Manual
of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine[32]. Sleep spindles index (number of spindles per hour of sleep), duration, amplitude
and intrinsic frequency (number of waves per second) were analyzed to determine differences
between both groups of participants. For the analysis of sleep spindle’s index, we
identify each spindle visually in at least one of the frontal and parietal derivations.
In order to calculate duration, amplitude and frequency, 200 sleep spindles of four
different EEG derivations (F3, F4, P3 and P4) were visually selected for each participant
and subsequently analyzed using the Brain Storm EEG software. This resulted in 50
sleep spindles per derivation[33]; for each EEG lead, sleep spindles not associated with K complexes or arousals were
visually identified independently; these spindles were selected in epochs scored as
N2. For the intrinsic frequency of each spindle was obtained using the Fourier transform
via the software and the results were averaged.
Statistical analysis
We performed Mann-Whitney U test for independent samples to compare sleep spindles
index (SSI). While to determine differences in duration, amplitude and intrinsic frequency;
we also used Mann-Whitney U (independent samples) for each variable and for each registered
brain region.
RESULTS
Sleep Spindle Index
Healthy participants presented a spindle index of 234 spindles per hour of NREM, while
AS group SSI value was 218 spindles per hour of NREM. However, this difference did
not reach statistically significant levels ([Figure 1]).
Figure 1 Number of spindles per hour of sleep in both groups. Note. Standard error marked
on each bar. No significant differences were observed between both groups (t test=-.559
and p=.5).
Sleep spindle duration
Comparative analysis of the sleep spindles duration in leads F3, F4, P3, and P4 showed
that values were always greater in the HP group. However, the observed differences
were not statistically significant (U=32, p=.453; U=35, p=.627; U=36, p=.691 and U=19, p=.058, respectively) in none of the analyzed regions ([Figure 2]).
Figure 2 Average duration in milliseconds of the spindles analyzed in F3, F4, P3, and P4.
Note: standard error marked on each bar.
Spindle amplitude
The maximum average amplitude reached by spindles in leads F3, F4, P3, and P4, did
not show statistically significant differences between both groups (U=31, p=.402; U=39, p=.895; U=39, p=.895 and U=33, p=.508, respectively) ([Figure 3]). However, it is important to highlight that in both groups the spindles amplitude
is significantly greater in frontal leads compared to parietal leads.
Figure 3 Average amplitude of sleep spindles in the different brain regions. Note: standard
error marked on each bar. No significant differences were found.
Sleep spindle intrinsic frequency
The sleep spindle intrinsic frequency recorded in leads F3, F4, C3, and C4 was significantly
lower in the AS group in all cases (U=10, p=.007; U=12, p=.012; U=18, p=.046 and U=15, p=.024) ([Figure 4]). All the results can be seen in [Table 1].
Figure 4 Sleep spindle intrinsic frequency registered in different electroencephalographic
derivations. Note: standard error marked on each bar. Significant differences are
observed: *p<.05, **p<.01.
Table 1.
Sleep spindle values for both groups .* Differences statistically significant considering
a level of significance of 0.05 ** Differences statistically significant considering
a level of significance of 0.01.
|
Group
|
Mean
|
SD
|
U
|
Sig
|
SSI
|
HP
|
234.23
|
69.78
|
39
|
.928
|
AS
|
218.95
|
46.04
|
Spindle Duration F3
|
HP
|
1504.67
|
218.59
|
32
|
.453
|
AS
|
1458.23
|
104.82
|
Spindle Duration F4
|
HP
|
1590.28
|
139.06
|
35
|
.627
|
AS
|
1553.13
|
133.63
|
Spindle Duration P3
|
HP
|
1474.26
|
168.21
|
36
|
.691
|
AS
|
1433.34
|
99.46
|
Spindle Duration P4
|
HP
|
1631.71
|
152.32
|
19
|
.058
|
AS
|
1505.17
|
123.72
|
Spindle Amplitude F3
|
HP
|
77.33
|
24.34
|
31
|
.402
|
AS
|
84.13
|
15.27
|
Spindle Amplitude F4
|
HP
|
86.75
|
31.17
|
39
|
.895
|
AS
|
83.24
|
16.41
|
Spindle Amplitude P3
|
HP
|
57.43
|
13.82
|
39
|
..895
|
AS
|
58.93
|
12.91
|
Spindle Amplitude P4
|
HP
|
63.11
|
16.74
|
33
|
.508
|
AS
|
61.42
|
15.05
|
Spindle Frequency F3
|
HP
|
12.26
|
.43
|
10
|
.007**
|
AS
|
11.67
|
.40
|
Spindle Frequency F4
|
HP
|
12.29
|
.29
|
12
|
.012**
|
AS
|
11.75
|
.40
|
Spindle Frequency P3
|
HP
|
12.83
|
.30
|
18
|
.046*
|
AS
|
12.20
|
.65
|
Spindle Frequency P4
|
HP
|
12.72
|
.52
|
15
|
.024*
|
AS
|
12.17
|
.31
|
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION
After analyzing the sleep spindles of both groups, we observed spindles in a range
of 9 to 14Hz, this frequency range is similar to that found by Clawson et al.[2] (9-16Hz), the difference between both ranges may be due to the age of the participants
in each study. However, unlike this study, we did not analyze alpha rhythm since our
objective was only to analyze sleep spindles found in phase N2.
We found that the participants in the HP group show significantly faster sleep spindles
in the frontal and parietal areas of the brain compared to the participants in the
AS group. The comparative analysis of spindle amplitude displayed by the two groups
did not show significant differences in any derivations; the values of spindle amplitude
we observed are similar to those reported by other authors in healthy children[4]
,
[5]
,
[27]
,
[34]. However, it is interesting to outstand that frontal derivations (F3 and F4) of
both groups of participants show spindle amplitude significantly higher than parietal
derivations (P3 and P4). Regarding the sleep spindle duration, no significant differences
were found either.
There are relatively few studies looking at the characteristics of sleep spindles
in children with AS specifically. Unfortunately, the results present in this study
are not consistent with those reported by Tessier et al.[29], who found a lower density of sleep spindles in lead Fp2 and shorter duration of
spindles in Fp1. These authors found lower intrinsic frequency in sleep spindles in
the central region, while in the present investigation we found that the frequency
of sleep spindles is lower in frontal areas, as well as in parietal areas. The observed
differences may be due to the age and size of the samples studied, as well as in the
EEG derivations analyzed[29].
Studies of the brain activity’s ontogeny have shown that the sleep spindles intrinsic
frequency increases gradually during the transition between childhood and adolescence
concomitantly with brain maturation. After reaching adulthood, sleep spindle frequency
remains unchanged[4]. The deficiencies in the development of gray and white matter present in patients
with AS may affect the development of neural circuits responsible for the sleep spindle
expression, which remain in stages prior to their age due to the immaturity of the
systems that integrate the signals coming from thalamic reticular nuclei.
Some studies find a negative correlation between slow frontal spindles (<12Hz) and
the IQ of children from 9 to 12 years of age, as well as a positive correlation between
parietal fast spindles (>12Hz) and IQ. Among the tasks studied in these investigations
are working memory, planning ability, and perceptual reasoning[2]. Other studies show that during the first hour of sleep a negative correlation is
observed between the retention of information related to memorizing word pairs and
the density of fast spindles[10]. The speed of information processing in children, defined as the time in which the
participant solves a certain mental task, also has a positive correlation in relation
to the density of slow spindles, while no correlation is observed with fast sleep
spindles, this could be indicative of the relationship between slow sleep spindles
and children’s cognitive development11. With this in mind, it is probable that the
differences of sleep spindle’s intrinsic frequency found in the present study are
related to the cognitive alterations observed in the neuropsychological development
of children with Asperger’s syndrome[16]
-
[19].
Slow and fast sleep spindles have topographical and functional differences. Slow spindles
observed in frontal lobes are associated with frontal gyrus increased activity, while
fast spindles observed in parietal lobes are associated with activity in areas involved
with sensory-motor information processing35. Changes in spindle’s intrinsic frequency
throughout the brain could alter function of the different areas of frontal and parietal
lobes.
However, additional studies are required in order to understand the functional significance
of sleep spindles on the cognitive processes of patients with AS.
As observed in schizophrenia, Down syndrome, and Alzheimer’s disease[12]
-
[14], changes in the sleep microstructure of children with Asperger’s syndrome can lead
to their use as an indicator of risk factors for the presence of neuropsychiatric
disorders.
Strengths and limitations of the study
The main strength of this study is the sample selection. In past research, participants
with different diagnoses within the autism spectrum and of a wide variety of ages
were used, while in this research a homogeneous sample was selected in terms of diagnosis
and age. In addition, having a previous night of study guaranteed a better adaptation
to the laboratory conditions, which helped to observe a more stabilized sleep.
As for the limitations of the study, the study had a small sample; future studies
should consider expanding the sample. Unfortunately, it was not possible to control
for the wake-sleep rhythm in the days preceding the PSG recordings. Also, since the
sleep spindle identification was only visual, it was not possible to differentiate
between fast and slow sleep spindles.